Test Server Feedback

This is awesome. It works on all ships. I'm playing around with it and it's just awesome!! So much fun!

IMO it's pretty hard to see the thin vertical line. This screenshot is in front of an almost black background. Maybe adding a brighter spot on the horizontal pane can help.

BUG:

• You can activate the move cirlce ('M' Key) while docked in a citadel in outside view.
• The Tactical Overlay stays active when docking in a citadel. When undocking the ocerlay pane is still active but it doesn't function properly. Like not showing the arcs for things on grid or the direct line from my ship to the selected object.

so all new capital PvE content is capital NPC ships in Nullsec and capital spawns for WH, which where announced by CCP Fozzie on o7 Show episode 15???

Or more info will come???

CCP Fozzie said that NPC capitals will spawn only in nullsec

So, about the Rorqs 40% bonus to Captial Remote Shield Booster range per level...and the changes to cap reps...what do?

Right now if you stuff a carrier full of fighters it will cost around 480 mil. People just don't do it because they don't expect to lose many/any fighters. In a lot of situations the new fighters wouldn't get destroyed either, so people will probably go out without a full hangar.

thats quite true, the survivability of fighters against player ships is just bad, at least a resistance profile and way more buffer would be needed so you actually have a chance to call them back. they should be superior to any kind of drone, given their costs and volume requirements. however, even a Gecko launched from a droneboat is more tanky.

Also it feels generally totally wrong that fighters that should be superior to drones on most ways can neither guard my ship (auto-aggro when someone is attacking the carrier) nor aggress the next target once one has been shut down, nor auto-MWD for longer distances - all these things drones can do and in a highly advanced space-environment like eve-online there it feels hilarious that fighters can't do these same basic tasks.

I understand that you don't want to have auto-aggro because you want no afk-farming and such. Perfectly understandable, but there is a simple solution:
Give Fighters 1/3 of their total-DPS in a way like drones (auto-aggro) and 2/3 via the special-attack that needs to be triggered manually (increase the rounds to an amount any normal missile launcher could hold, else you will be more reloading than fighting). This way, "afk farming" would be pretty slow and ineffective, because the carrier has only 1/3 of its damage potential.

Also for the movement, give them automated afterburners for general movement (200% speed boost) and a manually triggered MWD for highspeed long distance travel. So a player still has great benefits when acting manually, but they are not worse than drones on their own.

Fighter Squads seem weak and npc's wreck them. That's going to take carriers out of the PVE part of the game. Dropping billions of ISK on fighters just to have NPCs chew halfway through your squads before they can return to bay. NPCs seem to prefer targeting the fighters over your carrier... I dunno seems worse to me. I like the Idea, just not the execution.

I did like 10 Drone Horde and Serpentis Heaven/Sanctum with Thanatos and didn't lose a single fighter. I recall them for rearm only and i did these anomalies faster than i can do on TQ.
And when skills like Drone interfacing and navigation will work it would be even better.

Well, based on the mass test it seems like anti-fighter fighters are super OP. I basically went into the fight with two incomplete squadrons of T1 Grams and came out with about 40 T2 heavy fighter squadron killmails. That's some supreme ISK efficiency right there.


I'm not sure when you tested that, but skills seem to be working now. At least the skills effecting speed; I'm not so sure about damage.

is it intended that the gal FAX does shield RR and the minm does Armor

currently the CPU/PG forces this set up

ofc none of the FAX seem to have enough cpu/pg so idk