These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Please reduce the number of SOV timers

First post
Author
Aiwha
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#461 - 2016-04-04 18:25:54 UTC
Neuntausend wrote:
Aiwha wrote:
We got paid to stop fighting each other and come **** on you. Which we gladly took because we both despise your leadership. After we roll you we'll probably get back to slapping each other silly. Again, this all comes down to you getting dogpiled because your coalitions diplomacy is absolute ****.


Our diplomacy isn't any more **** than some of your bigger "allies". The main difference is that they gave up their territories last year without even trying to defend it once in Aegis sov, because like us, they already knew the new system would be kind of terrible, and unlike us they don't have the perseverance to even try.



No, its because they don't need or want pve space. They subsist entirely on local moongoo where they live and their rather substantial warchest from the N3 days (oh god, there is SO much money still laying around from those glory days of slumlording) and AT winnings. And I assume members either incursion or have WH escalation alts or something.



They don't want to hold space. That's not how they want to play the game.

Sanity is fun leaving the body.

Neuntausend
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#462 - 2016-04-04 18:33:43 UTC
No, they just don't want to put in effort to hold space. They clearly wanted to hold space for years before, otherwise they wouldn't have.
Rain6637
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
#463 - 2016-04-04 18:37:19 UTC
Aiwha
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#464 - 2016-04-04 18:38:57 UTC
Neuntausend wrote:
No, they just don't want to put in effort to hold space. They clearly wanted to hold space for years before, otherwise they wouldn't have.




When renting was a thing. Then renting stopped being a thing.

Sanity is fun leaving the body.

Mario Putzo
#465 - 2016-04-04 19:49:08 UTC
Lucas Kell wrote:
Aiwha wrote:

[quote=Mario Putzo]Seems odd to hear a CFC member complain about overwhelming numbers. Why just over 6 months ago CFC was employing this exact same tactic in Providence to "prove" to CCP that an overwhelming force could just take what they wanted with impunity....then they proceeded to get roflstomped out by ProviBloc over 2 weeks. Difference of course being ProvidBloc actually actively defended their space against the CFC where as CFC is just abandoning regions en mass then whining about it later.
Hey, don;t get me wrong I've got nothing against overwhelming numbers, and I have no problem losing space to a bigger group rolling in, I just disagree with the notion that losing space is proof of being overextended, and I wish the game was entertaining when defending a region rather than being force to mine structures rather than just fight. Sov should be a byproduct of playing the game and fighting each other, not a fixed, timer based mechanic.


It absolutely is proof you are over extended though. CFC held at one point 8 regions as a 40K man group. This is ~5K dudes per region. Collectively that looks good on paper since there were no coalitions really capable of threatening the sov of CFC. But again if we look at ProviBloc, they had 15K dudes in one region, and still lost some timers over the brief war vs CFC.

The evidence that CFC was over extended is right there for you if you wish to look at it. Even the leadership of CFC has admitted they were probably holding more space then they could reliably hold, which is why they made no effort to hold Cloud Ring, or Tenal, or Tribute, because it their ability to defend that space was ineffective and their active pilot numbers inefficient for doing so.

By rights CFC should have been holding 3-4 regions, or about half of what they initially held before this conflict started. We know that defense in this situation is possible, ProviBloc has already shown us that 15K man coalition is capable of defending a single region against an overwhelming number of people arrayed against it. Had CFC consolidated into Dek/PB/Fade/Branch their ability to defense those regions would have been much much higher with 10K people per region.

CFC is losing this fight not because MBC has more dudes, not because FozzieSov generates timers, but because they did not have the capacity to defend what they laid claim to, and now it is too late for them to redeploy to save anything, had they consolidated months ago, they would likely have already bled out numbers from MBC because grinding into a defended sov provides much less of a morale boost then steam rolling through 5 regions in two weeks because the occupants would rather run than fight.

TLDR
ProviBloc 15K dudes 1 Region, successful defense vs 40K man coalition
CFC 40K dudes 8 Regions, abysmal failure vs 50K man coalition

Math isn't hard, 3-4 regions, leaning to the lesser side depending on the quality of you PVP core. Provi has proven with adequate numbers you can defend your space against a much larger foe.
Rain6637
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
#466 - 2016-04-04 19:51:14 UTC
Neuntausend
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#467 - 2016-04-04 20:10:31 UTC
Mario Putzo wrote:
TLDR
ProviBloc 15K dudes 1 Region, successful defense vs 40K man coalition
CFC 40K dudes 8 Regions, abysmal failure vs 50K man coalition


I'd go out on a limb and say ProviBloc wouldn't have been able to defend had we seriously wanted to invest more than a couple of days and actually claim it, which we didn't (why would we want to take a region at the other end of the cluster after Phoebe).

Also, the Imperium has in no way abysmally failed yet, so I'd recommend waiting with that statement until it has actually happened.

Compared to the Providence campaign, this war is already going much more slowly after having gone on for much longer, and it will slow down even more the more space we lose.

That aside, though, I do agree to a certain level. ADMs in some parts have not exactly been stellar when the storm hit. Deklein has a lot of sixes, and very few systems lower than 4, simply because it's being used by a 17k strong alliance.

So yes, having a 3k Alliance sitting on a regions worth of systems is simply too little people to properly occupy and defend it.
Zappity
New Eden Tank Testing Services
#468 - 2016-04-04 20:25:49 UTC
This thread has become confused because the situation has changed considerably since it started. The main premise at the beginning was that a powerful entity should not be subject to harassment by a weaker entity through sov mechanics (Horde persecuting SMA). The current situation is that the Imperium is now being attacked by a stronger entity (pretty much the rest of EVE).

Consolidating to a smaller footprint in order to more rapidly respond to light incursions would have worked well a few weeks ago. This would not work now because enough people are attacking that they would simply be overwhelmed regardless of the footprint.

I don't see any logical way past a mechanic whereby a group with superior strength can dominate a weaker one. This is pretty much the whole point of sov warfare - weaker groups can be expelled from their space.

Anything else would be an artificial block to the sandbox. It would be the equivalent of a mechanic which protected Providence from the Imperium incursion last year. The Imperium was stronger and could therefore do it. Now, the Imperium is weaker and cannot defend against the same being done to them.

Zappity's Adventures for a taste of lowsec and nullsec.

Neuntausend
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#469 - 2016-04-04 20:28:29 UTC
I agree, the situation has changed. But cut the crap about the imperium getting expelled for when you've actually managed to do it, will you? This war is far from over.
Zappity
New Eden Tank Testing Services
#470 - 2016-04-04 20:28:40 UTC
Mario Putzo wrote:
TLDR
ProviBloc 15K dudes 1 Region, successful defense vs 40K man coalition
CFC 40K dudes 8 Regions, abysmal failure vs 50K man coalition

Math isn't hard, 3-4 regions, leaning to the lesser side depending on the quality of you PVP core. Provi has proven with adequate numbers you can defend your space against a much larger foe.

This is somewhat revisionist. The Imperium could certainly have razed Provi to the ground had they chosen to. They were quite successful with the IHubs. They just chose not to.

Zappity's Adventures for a taste of lowsec and nullsec.

Zappity
New Eden Tank Testing Services
#471 - 2016-04-04 20:31:30 UTC
Neuntausend wrote:
I agree, the situation has changed. But cut the crap about the imperium getting expelled for when you've actually managed to do it, will you? This war is far from over.

By this logic, the Imperium equals goonswarm. Because whilst you are still holding Deklein you are certainly not still holding Vale, Tribute, Fade etc. But I guess those weren't held by GSF so they don't count.

Zappity's Adventures for a taste of lowsec and nullsec.

Andski
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#472 - 2016-04-04 20:35:33 UTC
Aiwha wrote:
We got paid to stop fighting each other and come **** on you. Which we gladly took because we both despise your leadership. After we roll you we'll probably get back to slapping each other silly. Again, this all comes down to you getting dogpiled because your coalitions diplomacy is absolute ****.


"this isn't about you, it's about your leadership" is a tired cliche and you should feel bad for using it

I'm 99% confident you couldn't name anyone in Imperium leadership beyond The Mittani and Sion

Twitter: @EVEAndski

"It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths."    - Abrazzar

Rain6637
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
#473 - 2016-04-04 20:36:59 UTC
Andski wrote:
Aiwha wrote:
We got paid to stop fighting each other and come **** on you. Which we gladly took because we both despise your leadership. After we roll you we'll probably get back to slapping each other silly. Again, this all comes down to you getting dogpiled because your coalitions diplomacy is absolute ****.


"this isn't about you, it's about your leadership" is a tired cliche and you should feel bad for using it

I'm 99% confident you couldn't name anyone in Imperium leadership beyond The Mittani and Sion

Ha trick question it's ALL mittens and Sion.
Rain6637
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
#474 - 2016-04-04 20:37:54 UTC
Neuntausend
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#475 - 2016-04-04 21:46:51 UTC  |  Edited by: Neuntausend
Zappity wrote:
Neuntausend wrote:
I agree, the situation has changed. But cut the crap about the imperium getting expelled for when you've actually managed to do it, will you? This war is far from over.

By this logic, the Imperium equals goonswarm. Because whilst you are still holding Deklein you are certainly not still holding Vale, Tribute, Fade etc. But I guess those weren't held by GSF so they don't count.


The Imperium has lost quite a lot of space, this is true. I just don't consider that an abysmal failure in the face of a force superior in numbers and grr. In a war like this, space will be lost. It would be an abysmal failure for the attacking side were it not so. Don't think in individual alliances, because that's not what we are - the Imperium is a coalition and should be seen as one. As long as at least one Imperium alliance still holds space, all members of the Imperium will have a place to stay.

edit: We also still hold most of the regions you listed. They certainly are on fire, but you have not taken them just yet.
Lucas Kell
Solitude Trading
S.N.O.T.
#476 - 2016-04-04 21:55:55 UTC
Aiwha wrote:
Grr gons hat gons.
I see what you are saying bro.

The Indecisive Noob - EVE fan blog.

Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list.

Mr Mieyli
Doomheim
#477 - 2016-04-04 22:00:16 UTC
Lucas Kell wrote:
Aiwha wrote:
Grr gons hat gons.
Boo boo hoo


You guys are funny, I'm having a great time watching the replies in this thread

This post brought to you by CCP's alpha forum alt initiative. Playing the eve forums has never come cheaper.

Neuntausend
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#478 - 2016-04-04 22:04:58 UTC
Rain6637 wrote:
Andski wrote:
I'm 99% confident you couldn't name anyone in Imperium leadership beyond The Mittani and Sion

Ha trick question it's ALL mittens and Sion.


I find this guy with the hat disturbing. He's a leader, right?
Lucas Kell
Solitude Trading
S.N.O.T.
#479 - 2016-04-04 22:07:40 UTC
Akballah Kassan wrote:
Waded through this thread and I'd had my own thoughts.
*Looks at alliance tag*
I seriously doubt that.

Akballah Kassan wrote:
Our Alliance entosis things to provoke fights. Before everybody dog piled into fighting The Imperium/CFC we rarely got a decent fight because Goons would just drop Super caps on us, to which we have no counter. They never looked for fun fights and to be fair if that's how they roll and their line members are happy with that then I can't complain.
If that were true you'd fight. As your overlord Gevlon has stated, since you've started entosising your stats have drastically reduced. Let's face it, you entosis some stuff to try to feel relevant then bomb yourselves at a gate. This is pretty much the entertainment you add (and you are very good at that so don't stop).

Akballah Kassan wrote:
Imperium was vastly over extended and even Mitten's acknowledges this. Whilst I can understand his call to fall back (a bit like the USSR did in WW II) it must be disheartening to other alliances knowing 'their' space is probably gone forever.
Not overextended so much as needing to focus our defenses because of the sheer number of players that are coming in. We certainly haven't lost any of our space forever since there's absolutely no way you guys are going to be able to either stay blue or continue this war for the years it would take to win it.

Akballah Kassan wrote:
As for SMA, the same O.P is crying on another thread about the threat from a lone entosising Condor, explaining how they all have to dock up, wait for an FC to form a fleet to go and kill the menace! If one entosising Condor is such a threat no wonder your empire is crumbling!
He may be, but that doesn't mean that right here he doesn't have a point. Entosis is boring.

Akballah Kassan wrote:
As for the actual sov mechanics - sov-wanding isn't the best game play but it's better then the old super blob wins sov we had before. Also, nothing will stop boredom and burn out being a tactic used in sov warfare no matter what system you use. Nobody is going to suicide fleets against an enemy they know they can't beat and attackers who don't get a fight will have to put up with the boredom that entails.
But it's the same. You realise the only reason you are making a dent is because you are now in a blob lol.

"Finally, Lucas's complaints about nobody being able to go on deployment any more because they have to constantly defend their own space - surely that's a good thing? Why should you be able to go on vacation to kick over somebody else's sand castle, safe in the knowledge your own sand castle is safe while you do it?"
Why should sov holders be able to attack each other? I pretty much think that's the idea of the game mate. Holding sov shouldn't just mean you are trapped having to stand guard day in day out because any randoms with a sovwand can come and screw up the ADMs. If they are supposed to just defend then there should definitely be better defensive bonuses, as at the moment it seems like holding sov is more like a noose than anything else.

The Indecisive Noob - EVE fan blog.

Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list.

Aiwha
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#480 - 2016-04-04 22:17:28 UTC  |  Edited by: Aiwha
Andski wrote:
Aiwha wrote:
We got paid to stop fighting each other and come **** on you. Which we gladly took because we both despise your leadership. After we roll you we'll probably get back to slapping each other silly. Again, this all comes down to you getting dogpiled because your coalitions diplomacy is absolute ****.


"this isn't about you, it's about your leadership" is a tired cliche and you should feel bad for using it

I'm 99% confident you couldn't name anyone in Imperium leadership beyond The Mittani and Sion



DBRB whelping ceptor fleets and Digi hiding in the bushes across your street. Winet biomassed so we can't really mock him anymore since he's gonna go to ground.

Sanity is fun leaving the body.