These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Please reduce the number of SOV timers

First post
Author
Lucas Kell
Solitude Trading
S.N.O.T.
#301 - 2016-03-29 23:46:08 UTC
Seven Koskanaiken wrote:
Oh so calling them kadeshit was actually a display of wit and not "attempting to attack by acting like a child".

Well, thanks for that clarification.
Mate, if you can't see the distinction between making a play on a groups name - which literally everyone in EVE does - and utterly refusing to move on from the past out of some sense of butthurt over whatever triggered you in the past then that's really no helping you understand. Either way, it continues to amuse me every time some dweeb starts rattling on about the CFC.

The Indecisive Noob - EVE fan blog.

Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list.

Rain6637
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
#302 - 2016-03-30 00:39:42 UTC
It's worth mentioning though, the defectors as of late are from the CFC era and share the CFC is Real mindset. Blawrf in particular openly disagreed with the Imperium changeover and is pretty much a hanger-on to the idea that the CFC still exists.
Rain6637
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
#303 - 2016-03-30 00:40:31 UTC
The rest of them are so old I literally don't know who they are.
Rain6637
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
#304 - 2016-03-30 01:03:15 UTC
I can think of something worse than wishing you could have your old enemy back, which is wishing you could have EVE as it was two expansions ago.
Rain6637
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
#305 - 2016-03-30 01:04:10 UTC
Zappity
New Eden Tank Testing Services
#306 - 2016-03-30 03:19:46 UTC
Rain6637 wrote:
Zappity please lay off the ph koolaid.

Ooh, there's koolaid? Maybe it is on their forum. But I have avoided that so far because I am exposed to enough carcinogens at work.

I'm finding this whole thing fascinating regardless of the outcome. I think it is pretty unlikely that goons will be turfed out of Deklein but the lesser alliances are another matter.

Zappity's Adventures for a taste of lowsec and nullsec.

Seven Koskanaiken
Shadow Legions.
Insidious.
#307 - 2016-03-30 03:33:22 UTC  |  Edited by: Seven Koskanaiken
Lucas Kell wrote:
utterly refusing to move on.


Wait a minute, when did we change the subject to your eve-o posting?
Arsine Mayhem
Doomheim
#308 - 2016-03-30 05:10:13 UTC
Lucas Kell wrote:
Neadayan Drakhon wrote:
or go back to Sov always being vulnerable... never made sense to me to only have windows of vulnerability
And go back to actually needing to commit something of value to actually attack it too?


Are those TEARS? Why yes they are.
Arsine Mayhem
Doomheim
#309 - 2016-03-30 05:12:03 UTC
Lucas Kell wrote:
Seven Koskanaiken wrote:
Oh so calling them kadeshit was actually a display of wit and not "attempting to attack by acting like a child".

Well, thanks for that clarification.
Mate, if you can't see the distinction between making a play on a groups name - which literally everyone in EVE does - and utterly refusing to move on from the past out of some sense of butthurt over whatever triggered you in the past then that's really no helping you understand. Either way, it continues to amuse me every time some dweeb starts rattling on about the CFC.


You're just tearing up all through the thread aren't you.

We LOVE goon tears, and tears from their meat shields also. Stupid meat shields.
Xeno Szenn
Pandemic Horde Inc.
Pandemic Horde
#310 - 2016-03-30 06:24:12 UTC
Rain6637 wrote:
I can think of something worse than wishing you could have your old enemy back, which is wishing you could have EVE as it was two expansions ago.



I actual don;t want the old expansions back. every expansion brings something new and it's all about adaptation. At the end of the day an eve war is about making a player not have fun with the group there flying with anymore. I personally love tidi and entosis mechanics. I love the idea of a good old fashioned trench warfare in a space game. The cap and citdel changes have me excited to see what new meta's will spring up and what everyone will have to adapt to.
Lucas Kell
Solitude Trading
S.N.O.T.
#311 - 2016-03-30 06:44:34 UTC
Arsine Mayhem wrote:
Lucas Kell wrote:
Neadayan Drakhon wrote:
or go back to Sov always being vulnerable... never made sense to me to only have windows of vulnerability
And go back to actually needing to commit something of value to actually attack it too?
Are those TEARS? Why yes they are.
Only if you have literally no idea what tears are. P Got anything constructive to add to the conversation?

The Indecisive Noob - EVE fan blog.

Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list.

Rain6637
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
#312 - 2016-03-30 07:47:35 UTC
Xeno I don't want to say anything disheartening but yeah.

As for anyone else with a hateboner problem that can never be fixed, *yawn.*
Sister MaryElephant
Stellar Conundrum
#313 - 2016-03-30 07:55:19 UTC
Zappity wrote:
Lucas Kell wrote:
Why does it not surprise me that you need a sippy cup?

You are being very nasty in this thread. Were I of similar ilk I would point out that CO2 just figured out how to reduce sov timers. :)


What have you got against sippy cups?

And having followed Zappity's adventures for quite some time I am THRILLED to be in the same thread Pirate

In the meantime....lets return to "Irony Unlimited" featuring the voice of Goon begging CCP to change the rules to compensate for 40k alliance having 300 in fleet Lol

Or bring Darius back.
Goon may go down in flames but Darius would make it amusing in an eloquent poop-n-fartz joke sort of way!
Rain6637
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
#314 - 2016-03-30 07:56:52 UTC
Xeno Szenn
Pandemic Horde Inc.
Pandemic Horde
#315 - 2016-03-30 10:03:30 UTC
Rain6637 wrote:
Xeno I don't want to say anything disheartening but yeah.

As for anyone else with a hateboner problem that can never be fixed, *yawn.*



It's not dishertining for me If i'm in that means the bad guys are in and lets face it everyone ont he otherside is the bad guy even if you don;t dislike them. its the nature of war. And i smile as i relise that everything i'm in there in and vice versa. As for entosis mechanics shooting an I hub is the same as entosising to me so no real diffrance. Just a diffrant way of pervoking the fight.,
Blawrf McTaggart
Imperial Academy
Amarr Empire
#316 - 2016-03-30 10:32:58 UTC
Rain6637 wrote:
It's worth mentioning though, the defectors as of late are from the CFC era and share the CFC is Real mindset. Blawrf in particular openly disagreed with the Imperium changeover and is pretty much a hanger-on to the idea that the CFC still exists.


Hey, just correcting you a tad here: I didn't openly disagree with the Imperium changeover until my big Reddit thing. I kept any concerns quiet and private - I also don't believe the CFC exists, I just use the term to differentiate between the coalition I served and what it turned into (Imperium).
Rain6637
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
#317 - 2016-03-30 12:13:29 UTC
Unless you're saying you didn't disagree with things until your Reddit AMA, the timing doesn't change anything.

Now that I have both of you PLebes here,

made you post.
Rain6637
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
#318 - 2016-03-30 12:14:15 UTC
Eli Apol
Definitely a nullsec alt
#319 - 2016-03-30 12:15:31 UTC
I'm glad the eve player base has stepped in to help Goons with their request for fewer timers. Great community we have here.

but what would I know, I'm just a salvager

Rain6637
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
#320 - 2016-03-30 12:16:03 UTC
Xeno Szenn wrote:
Rain6637 wrote:
Xeno I don't want to say anything disheartening but yeah.

As for anyone else with a hateboner problem that can never be fixed, *yawn.*



It's not dishertining for me If i'm in that means the bad guys are in and lets face it everyone ont he otherside is the bad guy even if you don;t dislike them. its the nature of war. And i smile as i relise that everything i'm in there in and vice versa. As for entosis mechanics shooting an I hub is the same as entosising to me so no real diffrance. Just a diffrant way of pervoking the fight.,

What I had on my mind was the messy / bloody changes coming to capital gameplay.

I've been told that within GSF, if you lose a capital on official business, it gets replaced.

As for you guys, from what I can tell the conensus regarding capital losses is "we don't take losses."