These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
Previous page123
 

Would F2P EVE with a cap of 3 mil SP be a bad thing for the game?

First post
Author
Indahmawar Fazmarai
#41 - 2016-03-23 14:31:47 UTC
Killwitch wrote:
Indahmawar Fazmarai wrote:


Long answer: Hell no, I don't want to discuss that


You post in a forum because you DONT want to discuss something? Big smile


See, I was the first to bring to the forums the risk of CCP considering or even making EVE ready for F2P. I was also the first to hint at how could be implemented as a "extended trial", with trial restrictions in place (or some more), no skilling past the first 30 days and ability to use skill injectors.

So it's not about EVE stop being a subscription game, but adding F2P as a way to play it, and adapt EVE to a model based on monetizing acitvity versus the current model of monetizing access.

Adding F2P would call in the people filtered out by the subscription model. How many people is that, and who are they, is the key of the move.

If they're the usual F2P crowd, their numbers would overwhelm and destroy the new player resources provided by players.
If they are too few people, F2P will not sustain itself.

And no matter who comes to EVE with F2P, veterans will be alienated.
Jenn aSide
Worthless Carebears
The Initiative.
#42 - 2016-03-23 14:56:36 UTC  |  Edited by: Jenn aSide
There is simply nothing good about 'free to play' to me. Companies who make f2p games love it because it makes them money. But it's the how of it all that sucks.

In a F2P game most people are free riders (or mostly free except for the odd impulse purchase) who do little or nothing for the game's community other than make any kind of local/global chat a cess pit. The money is made from abusing the few "whales" willing and capable (or sick enough) to pump outrageous amounts of real money into the game. It's borderline abusive, it's taking advantage of weak willed gamers the same way that intentionally planting a liquor store next to an AA meeting house would be.

"Pay for access only" games are much less immoral with regards to their relationship with their players. It's one of the things I loved about CCP all these years, with the exceptions of the greed is good fiasco (and more recently, skill trading), they seemed to be the more 'fair trade/ you get a good game, we get to make a decent living but we won't gouge you' type in character, as opposed to the 'squeeze every bit of money out of you that we can before we discard you and shut down all the servers of the game you like' character of other game companies I've had the displeasure of experiencing in my 23 years of this form of gaming.

Players that advocate EVE going more f2p to 'keep up with the times' are imo just responding to a kind of anxiety (better known as 'EVE is dying"). Anxiety caused by the idea that EVE (with it's outdated payment model) will die, thus taking with it all the time and money they 'invested' into it. That fear/desperation leads them to think that something that could (in theory at least) bring more players to the game and more money to CCP would prevent the dying, without considering that the same thing could be responsible for and even accelerate the actual death of the game (by pushing away the loyal customers who play the game because it's not f2p, while at the same time failing to attract enough f2p 'whales' to compensate).
Pandora Carrollon
Provi Rapid Response
#43 - 2016-03-23 15:31:39 UTC
You could do F2P with 1 character (no alts), no skill training at all just basic skills, and make everything ala Carte pay for improvement. You want that Level 5 skill, it will cost you $X amount of money. Pure money based account. It could be done, but would it be worth it? Likely not.
Agondray
Avenger Mercenaries
VOID Intergalactic Forces
#44 - 2016-03-23 17:00:40 UTC
they could introduce a account limit since there are people basicly paying for free with 60+ accounts all because others want quick cash and don't want to grind for it

"Sarcasm is the Recourse of a weak mind." -Dr. Smith

DaReaper
Net 7
Cannon.Fodder
#45 - 2016-03-23 18:20:39 UTC
F2P eve would be bad for it. It should never go F2P. If they needed to do that, i would rather they kill eve and start over in an EVE 2 that is better. But i believe we are about to be in a period of stablitly followed by rebound in subscription numbers. So eve will be fine and doens;t nee dot be F2P ever

OMG Comet Mining idea!!! Comet Mining!

Eve For life.

DaReaper
Net 7
Cannon.Fodder
#46 - 2016-03-23 22:43:21 UTC
i will say this, a limited SP char that had perma death, or eve on hard mode, might be fun.but no to f2p

OMG Comet Mining idea!!! Comet Mining!

Eve For life.

Epic Name
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#47 - 2016-03-24 01:09:09 UTC
This would make some people will cry
ISD Buldath
#48 - 2016-03-24 06:52:59 UTC
Quote:
5. Trolling is prohibited.

Trolling is a defined as a post that is deliberately designed for the purpose of angering and insulting other players in an attempt to incite retaliation or an emotional response. Posts of this nature are disruptive, often abusive, and do not contribute to the sense of community that CCP promote.


I have removed the offending content, and those Quoting it.

~ISD Buldath

Instructor King of the Forums! Knight of the General Discussion

Support, Training and Resources Division

Interstellar Services Department

I do not respond to EVE-Mails regarding forum moderation.

Gully Alex Foyle
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#49 - 2016-03-24 08:02:24 UTC
With skill extractors, EVE is already F2P if you forfait character SP progression.


You just have to first accumulate 5M SP on an account.

That's roughly 3 months of training, which with the buddy system and the usual new player promotions can cost you close to nothing in RL cash.


Then, you just extract all your SP over 5M, sell it, buy PLEX, fund your account. You may have to add 1-2 hundred mil ISK per month but that's very easy to make.


The only real difference with the OP's proposal is that currently CCP continues to make money (PLEX sales), which is better for everybody imho.

Make space glamorous! Is EVE dying or not? Ask the EVE-O Death-o-meter!

Indahmawar Fazmarai
#50 - 2016-03-24 14:51:23 UTC  |  Edited by: Indahmawar Fazmarai
ISD Buldath wrote:
Quote:
5. Trolling is prohibited.

Trolling is a defined as a post that is deliberately designed for the purpose of angering and insulting other players in an attempt to incite retaliation or an emotional response. Posts of this nature are disruptive, often abusive, and do not contribute to the sense of community that CCP promote.


I have removed the offending content, and those Quoting it.


You deleted a bit too much, since my post suggesting to use time vouchers for players who play EVE in a discontinuous way (as an alternative to F2P) was not trolling.

Just for the record, I suggested to sell 30 days time vouchers for 24 USD/EUR. A day from the voucher would be spent when login in and would allow to log in for free (not spending more days from the voucher) for 24 hours, after which any further login (or staying logged in) would spend another day from the voucher. This way a player could pay for the time as he uses it, rather than pay 30 days in advance and be stuck with spending them, playing or not playing.
DaReaper
Net 7
Cannon.Fodder
#51 - 2016-03-24 15:54:03 UTC
Gully Alex Foyle wrote:
With skill extractors, EVE is already F2P if you forfait character SP progression.


You just have to first accumulate 5M SP on an account.

That's roughly 3 months of training, which with the buddy system and the usual new player promotions can cost you close to nothing in RL cash.


Then, you just extract all your SP over 5M, sell it, buy PLEX, fund your account. You may have to add 1-2 hundred mil ISK per month but that's very easy to make.


The only real difference with the OP's proposal is that currently CCP continues to make money (PLEX sales), which is better for everybody imho.



No, not really. The skill injectors don;t make eve free to play, that gives you an option to get things done a we bit faster. But as skill points in essence don;t mean jack **** anyway, its not a huge deal. And the Fact that eve allowed legal charictor training form nearly day one means its not free to play, or play to win, or whatever bull crap you want to label it as. The skill injectors could be seen as the start of the path towards F2P, or just as a means to supplement eve income.

The ops propsole is not the same as what you are suggesting by a long shot. but think what you will, you are just incorrect

OMG Comet Mining idea!!! Comet Mining!

Eve For life.

Iain Cariaba
#52 - 2016-03-24 16:09:54 UTC
Mr Epeen wrote:
F2P until 3M SP?

I'm sure any number of CODE people will be along shortly to voice their support for this gankers wet dream.

Mr Epeen Cool

I certainly wouldn't use this to train 10 catalyst alts and go on a ganking spree. Honestly, I wouldn't. Twisted
sci0gon
Kaira Innovations
#53 - 2016-03-24 17:02:41 UTC
Killwitch wrote:
I assume that would create problems with botters etc, guess you could limit that by restricting the amount of ISK the character can send to other players?


I just want to point out that it would invite more isk sellers to the game and even if the amount of isk for those characters had limits set on how much they could transfer they could still bypass that with other means.
Dani Gallar
Doomheim
#54 - 2016-03-24 18:52:46 UTC
Killwitch wrote:
I assume that would create problems with botters etc, guess you could limit that by restricting the amount of ISK the character can send to other players?


One huge problem with trying to create artificial barriers in EVE is that the player base have shown to be quite 'creative' before and it's to be expected in a game where activities/behaviour that would never be tolerated in other games are not only tolerated but seen as central to the game's atmosphere.

If one where to allow F2P under certain 'arbitrary conditions' I can almost guarantee that we would see a destructive form of cat & mouse game between the Dev's and the players that could be interesting but is not in the interest of either.

EVE:s main 'thing' compared to other MMO:s is that almost anything goes and that the economy is completely player driven and none of these factors would be possible in a F2P game ... out of all reasons to not go F2P I would say these factors are the most important.
Ivanpaneriai
Doomheim
#55 - 2016-03-24 19:29:28 UTC
Stupid idea. Just close it. Big smile
Ralph King-Griffin
New Eden Tech Support
#56 - 2016-03-24 19:31:32 UTC
ISD Buldath wrote:
Quote:
5. Trolling is prohibited.

Trolling is a defined as a post that is deliberately designed for the purpose of angering and insulting other players in an attempt to incite retaliation or an emotional response. Posts of this nature are disruptive, often abusive, and do not contribute to the sense of community that CCP promote.


I have removed the offending content, and those Quoting it.

ehh the op's still there.
Divine Entervention
Doomheim
#57 - 2016-03-24 19:34:57 UTC  |  Edited by: Divine Entervention
Yes is no fun.

Absolutely not OP. It would provide a much needed injection of people into this obviously dwindling playerbase we have here, saving EvE.

There would needto be strict guidelines though. Can't just let a bunch of poories (people who are inferior because they have no money) get to play EvE and think they're as equal as the rest of us. Maybe build a small section of space that they can fly around in and be separate from the rest of us.
Gully Alex Foyle
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#58 - 2016-03-25 10:00:30 UTC
DaReaper wrote:
Gully Alex Foyle wrote:
With skill extractors, EVE is already F2P if you forfait character SP progression.


You just have to first accumulate 5M SP on an account.

That's roughly 3 months of training, which with the buddy system and the usual new player promotions can cost you close to nothing in RL cash.


Then, you just extract all your SP over 5M, sell it, buy PLEX, fund your account. You may have to add 1-2 hundred mil ISK per month but that's very easy to make.


The only real difference with the OP's proposal is that currently CCP continues to make money (PLEX sales), which is better for everybody imho.



No, not really. The skill injectors don;t make eve free to play, that gives you an option to get things done a we bit faster. But as skill points in essence don;t mean jack **** anyway, its not a huge deal. And the Fact that eve allowed legal charictor training form nearly day one means its not free to play, or play to win, or whatever bull crap you want to label it as. The skill injectors could be seen as the start of the path towards F2P, or just as a means to supplement eve income.

The ops propsole is not the same as what you are suggesting by a long shot. but think what you will, you are just incorrect
Ehm, I think you're confusing F2P with P2W.

I was simply pointing out that if you extract and sell all of your monthly SP, you can basically afford a PLEX a month thus playing for free, without even having to grind ISK (except for maybe a 100 mil or so).

Make space glamorous! Is EVE dying or not? Ask the EVE-O Death-o-meter!

sci0gon
Kaira Innovations
#59 - 2016-03-25 11:12:17 UTC
Dani Gallar wrote:
[quote=Killwitch]EVE:s main 'thing' compared to other MMO:s is that almost anything goes and that the economy is completely player driven and none of these factors would be possible in a F2P game ... out of all reasons to not go F2P I would say these factors are the most important.



After seeing this post I must point out that I have played a few other mmo's over time and every single one of them has had an economy which was driven by the players while they were F2P, they were also P2W games too. I do agree with your other statement about this game though, this one does allow almost anything to happen and have yet to find another mmo that follows that same path.
Soldarius
Dreddit
Test Alliance Please Ignore
#60 - 2016-03-25 13:41:41 UTC
Quick answer to OP: Yes. Infinite free alts for ganks, cynos, etc is bad, m'kay?

http://youtu.be/YVkUvmDQ3HY

Previous page123