Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center

I've read eveythings thats been posted and all of the slides from all of the presentations at the meet ups. Changing your resist profile really doesn't do much unless you go from fighting a hybrid turret fleet to a laser fleet, or are fighting something with drones like say Ishtars w/ sentrys. Most fleet doctrines, at least that i fight, right now are multi damage type. While yes, they would be handy, they won't be as strong as a regular t2 specific hardener. These aren't going to be as useful as you think. When people mean refitting in triage they typically mean fitting from tank fit to capacitor/remote rep fit, which a scripted hardener can't do.

With the reduction in HP, and the introduction of plates etc. will implants that previously said "has no effect on capital sized modules..." etc. be reviewed?

Actually this could provide very interesting gameplay , but need to balanced somehow.

If i remember correctly.
Amarr/Caldari FAX will have resist bonus and will be more suited for fleets
Galente/Minmatar will have rep bonus making them more viable for small engagements (that will never happen)

Introducing implants to affect capital modules could mess things in a very interesting way, as galente/ minmatar Fax could be more valuated on field more often.

This need to be balanced somehow.
Slave offer boost to armor EHP, but not provide bonus to local reps or passive shield regen.
Crystals don't provide boost to passive regen of shields, but if you combine passive shield regen, crystal effect , local rep bonus, capital ancillary shield boosters and fact that shield boosters rep at first cycle - you can get very broken ship.

Maybe instead of T2 sets we can include only hardwirings that will affect capital local reps?
Only slot 6 and 9
https://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/Skill_Hardwiring

Like that last idea you've got there, capital only skill hardwirings.

As we start to approach the major spring release of Citadels, we still have very little information to go on.

We have no idea as to the transition for carrier pilots to force aux, we have very little info on the new mechanics for carrier/super combat, and we are fast approaching the final days pilots can train into needed skills to use many of the new features on release.

On top of this, many players are falling fast behind in the economic areas, while leaks in the CSM and focus groups are giving a small handful of players significant advantages. If you think this isn't true, then explain the price changes and sales of stront a month prior to the official release of that change.

There is a lot that pilots need to prepare for in the coming months, and we are even more in the dark than before. I say this, as we have been given information, which was changed do to feedback, only to be told we would get more information later in the week. Well that was weeks ago and still nothing. So now we are not just uninformed, but also worried if the next bit of info will also be as carefully not planned out.

While having a focus group for the first few stages of mechanics and features is fine, remember that there are a lot more pilots out here who care about these topics. We have vested interests in day to day usefulness, combat and non-combat applications. Let us give feedback and see if there are any holes that have been missed.

We want a game that we enjoy playing, and currently, there are a lot of fears that we not only won't enjoy the next era of eve, but that it will become even more stagnate then it already is.

Please, help us, help you. Drop some info our way. See what the players think. Look at how we react and if it is changes that will boost our desire to stay and keep enjoying the game. Don't make the same mistake of jump changes and entosis. Let the players give feedback, so that we can continue to build an exciting universe rather than watch it slowly fade into stagnate territories, that has more worth in saying you own it than it does actually having it.

On mid-fight refitting:
Why not make it so a ship can't use its own refitting service? This would mean keeping two or more refit-capable ships close to each other, and the possibility of bumping them apart in the middle of a fight so they can't refit.

Suggestion for the Fighter UI interface when launching or recalling fighters.

Can you make it so that the large fighter icons stay where they are and the small module icons move upwards instead?

Has it been said what the skill requirement will be for T2 XL turrets/launchers? Level 5 of the skill or is there a new spec skill

I feel dreads should be able to fit both the standard AND the high angle turrets... or at lease have enough cargo to enable it to refit to the other weapon type.

... Also, they should get a drone bay with a max 125 bandwidth.

Is the prerequisite for those new skills Racial Capital Turret V?