These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Player Features and Ideas Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

IHUB - Upgrades PVE sites for Togetherness!
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
PartyPrincess
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#1 - 2016-03-15 08:41:51 UTC  |  Edited by: PartyPrincess
Hello,

Since some topic's by ccp are not going to happen or they wont give update to theses ideas. Back in the summer CCP posted a topic which they would give group sites to IHUB as upgrades. Here are my ideas to help along of what we could run as sites. I for one would like to see three different level of sites of which you can run togetherness on...

Level one sites are built like Missions...
2-3 ships to run them... many rooms to run...
Level two sites are built like Wormholes...
6-9 ships to run them... fast you kill stuff the more you can tiger .. bring capitals in you can tiger the capital spawn....
Level three sites are built like Incursions....
13-15 ships to run them... one room...
Wimzy Chent-Shi
Garoun Investment Bank
Gallente Federation
#2 - 2016-03-17 13:56:57 UTC
Null not OP enough? But yes indeed, everyone soloing their own is boring, togetherness is fun, lvl 5 missions is a way - their spawn rate is limitless and you can make it as efficient as possible but incursions still pay better for togetherness.
Depending on how fast can you go I suppose you could do the sites in as many ships as you can field but then the spawn rate is a problem.
So the possibility is there already, just not as enriching.

Please advocate why people should make more ISK in null.

Come get some cancer @ my blog !

"This clash of opinions is like cutting onions. We are creating something here, that's productive, ...and then there is also salt." -Wimzy 2016
Rowells
Pator Tech School
Minmatar Republic
#3 - 2016-03-17 17:07:36 UTC
Wimzy Chent-Shi wrote:
Null not OP enough? But yes indeed, everyone soloing their own is boring, togetherness is fun, lvl 5 missions is a way - their spawn rate is limitless and you can make it as efficient as possible but incursions still pay better for togetherness.
Depending on how fast can you go I suppose you could do the sites in as many ships as you can field but then the spawn rate is a problem.
So the possibility is there already, just not as enriching.

Please advocate why people should make more ISK in null.

I didn't hear anything about more isk in that idea.
Frostys Virpio
State War Academy
Caldari State
#4 - 2016-03-17 18:07:42 UTC
Rowells wrote:
Wimzy Chent-Shi wrote:
Null not OP enough? But yes indeed, everyone soloing their own is boring, togetherness is fun, lvl 5 missions is a way - their spawn rate is limitless and you can make it as efficient as possible but incursions still pay better for togetherness.
Depending on how fast can you go I suppose you could do the sites in as many ships as you can field but then the spawn rate is a problem.
So the possibility is there already, just not as enriching.

Please advocate why people should make more ISK in null.

I didn't hear anything about more isk in that idea.


If there isn't more ISK into it, people will keep doing what the are doing now. It's the EVE reality.
Rowells
Pator Tech School
Minmatar Republic
#5 - 2016-03-17 18:54:55 UTC  |  Edited by: Rowells
Frostys Virpio wrote:
Rowells wrote:
Wimzy Chent-Shi wrote:
Null not OP enough? But yes indeed, everyone soloing their own is boring, togetherness is fun, lvl 5 missions is a way - their spawn rate is limitless and you can make it as efficient as possible but incursions still pay better for togetherness.
Depending on how fast can you go I suppose you could do the sites in as many ships as you can field but then the spawn rate is a problem.
So the possibility is there already, just not as enriching.

Please advocate why people should make more ISK in null.

I didn't hear anything about more isk in that idea.


If there isn't more ISK into it, people will keep doing what the are doing now. It's the EVE reality.

That depends. If it's roughly the same payout per person, the added security of buddies and engagement might entice players who prefer that. Group PVE activities tend to lend themselves to fleet comps that are better at dealing with pvp than solo PVE fits.

Currently, if you try to shove more people in typical anoms, the reduced time doesn't match the reduction in the payout (with some rare cases like smartbomb havens).

Of course not everyone would do it, but that wouldn't be surprising.
Wimzy Chent-Shi
Garoun Investment Bank
Gallente Federation
#6 - 2016-03-18 09:50:38 UTC  |  Edited by: Wimzy Chent-Shi
Rowells wrote:
Frostys Virpio wrote:
Rowells wrote:
Wimzy Chent-Shi wrote:
Null not OP enough? But yes indeed, everyone soloing their own is boring, togetherness is fun, lvl 5 missions is a way - their spawn rate is limitless and you can make it as efficient as possible but incursions still pay better for togetherness.
Depending on how fast can you go I suppose you could do the sites in as many ships as you can field but then the spawn rate is a problem.
So the possibility is there already, just not as enriching.

Please advocate why people should make more ISK in null.

I didn't hear anything about more isk in that idea.


If there isn't more ISK into it, people will keep doing what the are doing now. It's the EVE reality.

That depends. If it's roughly the same payout per person, the added security of buddies and engagement might entice players who prefer that. Group PVE activities tend to lend themselves to fleet comps that are better at dealing with pvp than solo PVE fits.

Currently, if you try to shove more people in typical anoms, the reduced time doesn't match the reduction in the payout (with some rare cases like smartbomb havens).

Of course not everyone would do it, but that wouldn't be surprising.


I would turn this into an overal concept encouraging T1 logi and other kinds of support.
However as far as the team bonuses go, not even 80 man incursion fleet uses much besides dps/sniper/logi.
I think I have heard of the mission stacking idea - escalation being considered/introduced at Vegas

Come get some cancer @ my blog !

"This clash of opinions is like cutting onions. We are creating something here, that's productive, ...and then there is also salt." -Wimzy 2016