Test Server Feedback

The correct answer here is nucleoplasm (and vesicles which you got).

We use over 20 cell types and in some the nucleoli are more visible than others in the blue channel. Basically if the green is throughout the nucleus but got big holes in then it's nucleoplasm. The granular cases are harder where you can't make out the holes quite as easily.

After spending to much time with pd here another feedback:
Right now PD feels like trying to learn something while somebody gives you a sweet or a hit in the face at random intervals. Not ot good for learning, because the negative feedback from making a error and the positive reinforcment from doing my job good is disconected from my actions. I would suggest adding a
"I want feedback button" under tha abnormal sampel box.
It woul pop up that sampel as soon as a consens is reached again and I would have to doo it again (without isk and AK and exp of course) .. so I would have the chance to learn from hard sampels because I could see what the most people think out of that hard chase.
Also could HPA see were people are unsure and maek a turorila based on the hard chases.
Greetings Lasse

Agree we should make a better tutorial, will talk to the others.

Just by playing myself I would say golgi/mitochondria is difficult for you to distinguish between, and also MTOC/aggresome. Maybe we should just have a look at some images where there's no consensus at all, as well. (My colleague made a quick walkthrough, might help some? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TrqCWg0cZSk&feature=youtu.be).

Because the DDOs stuff again the post:
The problem is that the training effect is 0 if your feedback is disconected with the action. You could replace the accuracy with a random number generator and it would be the same feeling.

Edit 2: Also your "calibration" sampels are annoying : http://imgur.com/EhMH5Xa Ok one answer of me is wron .. I get it .. but I see that not every cell has the same look .. for me this is a variation ... but I'm now punished for that "added value information"

Exaclty like it was, Abnormal and then Unidentifable. No reason in trying to classify a broken image.

Seems to be an issue that AK are lost when PD crashes just when reaching a new lvl (some ppl in the chat mentioned loosing 10-20k AK). Possible to calculate theoretical AK for a player based on lvl and restore?

Oh also this :

Would you consider talking to CCP about the potential for a bonus on the Nestor (A Sisters of Eve "Science" themed battleship) which increases Project Discovery rewards? +5% XP and ISK, or 10% or whatever CCP feels is appropriate.

These vessels lack a strong role - they are good at several different things, but they really lack a role as a "science" vessel. Having this bonus would be very lore-relevant, and allow those of us who want to really aid Project Discovery to be able to spend out for the ships to earn extra for the risks we take in flying them. A "flagship" for Project Discovery.

Alternatively, rather than a bonus just for being in a nestor (in space) CCP could consider a remote assistance module (Spatial Research Assistance Module? SRAM?), which can be activated only by a nestor, which provides research bonuses for the ship recieving the effect, allowing the Nestor piloted by a philanthropic "Citizen scientist" to improve the Project Discovery rewards for a group of other players.

This would mean "science fleet" would become a thing - these pilots could travel around together doing any number of activities, enjoying the bonuses provided by the Nestor science flagship.

Further to this (depending on what people think of this idea), Project Discovery/The Nestor could be coded to provide a selection of bonuses for different things at different times.

For example, log into Eve, boot Project Discovery and there is a tab which you can click which drops down a box which reads:

"Enhance your scientific endeavours by having a Nestor activate a SRAM on your vessel while using Project Discovery, +5% ISK and XP rewards."

"Obtain further bonuses by being in the presence of certain spatial anomalies to enhance research activities"

Be with proximity of X type of star. (Changes periodically) +5% Orbit a x-type planet. (Changes periodically) +5% Be in wormhole space. (+10%) Be in the locality of an Ice Belt (+5%)

And have it so these change periodically so there are only a few active at any time, meaning this research fleet would move around to obtain slightly better results at Project Discovery.

This would give "scientists" a real role within the game, not just as "Docked and clicking Project Discovery every minute" but allow those of us equipped with Nestors and the skills to use them the ability to organise and travel with fleets of citizen scientists - a dynamic, engaging, activity which also induces RISK (have to be undocked, have to move around, have to find certain things in space) which CCP loves.

I hope you like the idea! :)

I agree, but why not add an activity which can be pursued by those who are interested? If it isn't required, doesn't give bonuses that obsolete standard play, all it adds is a positive element to it for those who want to RP or engage with it in a more meaningful ingame way.

In my opinion it integrates it into Eve better. Currently we have a window that can be opened anywhere, and doesn't interact with the game in any way at all except ISK rewards. Having the option of some interaction with "spaceships online" can't harm the interest factor of PD.

Ouch, nothing like getting the original test sample for determining a classification wrong, lol.

1. Interesting proposal, but it could affect submissions a lot more and act more like a default for people wanting to avoid a penalty hit if they were not sure what to select.

2. This would be nice. The hover annoys me frequently when trying to select something else.

3. They are aware of this and working on a fix.

4. Agreed.

5. This would seriously help out the system a lot and likely remove over half of the incorrect submissions.