These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

[Citadels] Changing NPC taxes

First post
Author
Beta Maoye
#321 - 2016-03-04 21:55:27 UTC
If you are a space trader, will you consign your valuable assets for sale in a space building that is constantly at risk of being blocked from access, being expelled, being reinforced, being destructed and subject to change of pricing at the mercy of owner? Are you serious? Merging market hub into Citadel is a bad idea.

The downside of market hub in Citadel is too much to be compensated by a few percentage of fees. The possible risk and hassle against the small gain is not worth the effort to use it. A space full of empty Citadel is not what we want. So, instead of creating arbitrary "competitive advantage" for Citadel, market hub should be removed from it. Market hub should remain in NPC station and no need to raise sales tax and broker fee to give a buff to Citadel. Citadel can be a death star, an industrial port, an invention laboratory, a mining base, an intelligence centre or a propaganda monument, but not a market hub.
Anhenka
Native Freshfood
Minmatar Republic
#322 - 2016-03-04 22:08:03 UTC  |  Edited by: Anhenka
Beta Maoye wrote:
If you are a space trader, will you consign your valuable assets for sale in a space building that is constantly at risk of being blocked from access, being expelled, being reinforced, being destructed and subject to change of pricing at the mercy of owner? Are you serious? Merging market hub into Citadel is a bad idea.

The downside of market hub in Citadel is too much to be compensated by a few percentage of fees. The possible risk and hassle against the small gain is not worth the effort to use it. A space full of empty Citadel is not what we want. So, instead of creating arbitrary "competitive advantage" for Citadel, market hub should be removed from it. Market hub should remain in NPC station and no need to raise sales tax and broker fee to give a buff to Citadel. Citadel can be a death star, an industrial port, an invention laboratory, a mining base, an intelligence centre or a propaganda monument, but not a market hub.


I would use someone elses citadel to shave 4% off each transaction from broker fee's, absolutely.

I am a firm believer in the power of human greed, and human greed says than 1% of 1 million transaction is way more than 100% of zero transactions.

I believe that asset recovery in the same system is free, yeah? So there's no risk if the citadel explodes, other than presumably a loss of broker fee's on current orders.

As for the station owner closing down the station from general access? Not concerned. They probably put it up precisely to make money through market transactions. Closing it down would be nonsensical.

And even if it does, I'll just remote sell everything to other poor suckers who don't look before they buy. Or red frog it out, if they are still ok with the Frogs docking.

Concern level: 2/10

Edit: Remember, if I have 4% lower broker fee's at a Citadel as opposed to Jita 4-4, and 10 bil in market movement a day, that's 400 million a day in fee's I'm not paying compared to NPC
Kaivar Lancer
Doomheim
#323 - 2016-03-04 22:13:38 UTC
I'm just wondering why CCP is so damn eager to force traders into citadels.

An EVE trader is faced with two choices:

- train Broker Relations to V and grind NPC faction and corporation standings to the max. It'll be the new Material Efficiency V.
- face the uncertainty of trading in a citadel that can be ganked, dismantled, taxes hiked and docking rights arbitrarily revoked.
- play another game where inconvenience ISN'T a "game feature"
Indahmawar Fazmarai
#324 - 2016-03-04 22:13:52 UTC
Lugh Crow-Slave wrote:
Indahmawar Fazmarai wrote:
Making undesirable to play the game without your (CCP's) new toys is just an invitation to not play the game any longer.

It's like wardecs. The optimal solution is to not play.

Want to avoid paying taxes for what used to be free? Don't play EVE.

It's not about people ragequitting over this change. It's about people playing the game in the same way they like to play it, but now being inconvenienced day after day after day.

Day after day after day, you pay a fee for using a JC.

Day after day after day, you lose money setting up orders.

It will not matter for one week. Or one month. Or one year. But sooner or later, it will wear off.

And then the optimal solution will be to stop being inconvenienced every single day. Stop playing EVE.

I can hear you asking: Why not play EVE in a different way? Come on. What kind of fool would pay for playing what he doesn't wants to play?


but these things never used to be free just cheaper


Jumping clones is free, or so I recall. Now they plan charging 5 million ISK for each clone jump so players can earn money by owning a clone facility at their Citadel.

That's a negative incentive against NPC stations, but also against playing the game. Rather than make Citadels better, they just make the game worse unless you own a Citadel.

This way of incentivization haves "backfire" written over it. It will not cause players to use more Citadels, but certainly will cause more players to leave the game.

The funniest thing is that knowing this should be CCP's job, not mine.

As has already being pointed out, tinkering with cooldown length (for a fee) would be a positive incentive to use Citadels over NPC stations. Surely this was suggested, thoroughly debated and evaluated... and rejected.

Thus CCP decided to punish players for not using Citadels rather than reward them for using Citadels. Straight
Lugh Crow-Slave
#325 - 2016-03-04 22:21:41 UTC
Kaivar Lancer wrote:
I'm just wondering why CCP is so damn eager to force traders into citadels.

An EVE trader is faced with two choices:

- train Broker Relations to V and grind NPC faction and corporation standings to the max. It'll be the new Material Efficiency V.
- face the uncertainty of trading in a citadel that can be ganked, dismantled, taxes hiked and docking rights arbitrarily revoked.
- play another game where inconvenience ISN'T a "game feature"


i thought standings were no longer going to effect it


also the point is there is now an option other than npc so npc needs to be rebalanced
Rowells
Blackwater USA Inc.
Pandemic Horde
#326 - 2016-03-04 22:25:17 UTC
Deck Cadelanne wrote:
Lugh Crow-Slave wrote:


the problem is npc stations are to plentiful and to strong they did need to be nerffed


Actually the opposite is true.

Vast areas of nullsec are effectively "owned" by the big blocs mostly because there are no NPC stations from which any opposition can base any sort of sustained activity.

[EDIT: Meant to add - we need *more* NPC stations in null and low, including more NPC "pockets" breaking up sov null. Unless stagnation and stasis is the actual endgame here]

There is plenty of NPC space up in the north with active alliances in them. Geuss that bloc should break up any minute now.
Kaivar Lancer
Doomheim
#327 - 2016-03-04 22:26:06 UTC
Anhenka wrote:
[
Edit: Remember, if I have 4% lower broker fee's at a Citadel as opposed to Jita 4-4, and 10 bil in market movement a day, that's 400 million a day in fee's I'm not paying compared to NPC


You're presuming that a citadel owner will publicly tax 0%, which won't be the case, just like there aren't any POCOs that publicly tax 0%. It's not gonna happen. IF a trader can reduce their NPC broker tax to say 2%, a citadel owner will try to get away with charging 1.99% tax. The only way to get 0% tax is if you're friendly with the citadel owner. Since the null sec blocs are best positioned to deploy citadels, a trader or industrialist has no choice but to grovel to one of these blocs. Basically, to enjoy the same game as it was pre-citadel, you'll need to obtain another person's permission AND keep it for the rest of your Eve life. F that.
Lugh Crow-Slave
#328 - 2016-03-04 22:29:20 UTC
Rowells wrote:
Deck Cadelanne wrote:
Lugh Crow-Slave wrote:


the problem is npc stations are to plentiful and to strong they did need to be nerffed


Actually the opposite is true.

Vast areas of nullsec are effectively "owned" by the big blocs mostly because there are no NPC stations from which any opposition can base any sort of sustained activity.

[EDIT: Meant to add - we need *more* NPC stations in null and low, including more NPC "pockets" breaking up sov null. Unless stagnation and stasis is the actual endgame here]

There is plenty of NPC space up in the north with active alliances in them. Geuss that bloc should break up any minute now.


i meant to say in HS anyway that was my bad

currently you are never more than three jumps from a station and those are very uncommon
Rowells
Blackwater USA Inc.
Pandemic Horde
#329 - 2016-03-04 22:30:46 UTC
Beta Maoye wrote:
If you are a space trader, will you consign your valuable assets for sale in a space building that is constantly at risk of being blocked from access, being expelled, being reinforced, being destructed and subject to change of pricing at the mercy of owner? Are you serious? Merging market hub into Citadel is a bad idea.

It's not like current nullsec station owners don't already do half of that.
Marcus Alenko
State War Academy
Caldari State
#330 - 2016-03-04 22:32:05 UTC
[quote=Kaivar Lancer
- play another game where inconvenience ISN'T a "game feature"[/quote]


Honestly, this must be their reason for most of these changes.
Indahmawar Fazmarai
#331 - 2016-03-04 22:34:28 UTC
Anhenka wrote:
Beta Maoye wrote:
If you are a space trader, will you consign your valuable assets for sale in a space building that is constantly at risk of being blocked from access, being expelled, being reinforced, being destructed and subject to change of pricing at the mercy of owner? Are you serious? Merging market hub into Citadel is a bad idea.

The downside of market hub in Citadel is too much to be compensated by a few percentage of fees. The possible risk and hassle against the small gain is not worth the effort to use it. A space full of empty Citadel is not what we want. So, instead of creating arbitrary "competitive advantage" for Citadel, market hub should be removed from it. Market hub should remain in NPC station and no need to raise sales tax and broker fee to give a buff to Citadel. Citadel can be a death star, an industrial port, an invention laboratory, a mining base, an intelligence centre or a propaganda monument, but not a market hub.


I would use someone elses citadel to shave 4% off each transaction from broker fee's, absolutely.

I am a firm believer in the power of human greed, and human greed says than 1% of 1 million transaction is way more than 100% of zero transactions.

I believe that asset recovery in the same system is free, yeah? So there's no risk if the citadel explodes, other than presumably a loss of broker fee's on current orders.

As for the station owner closing down the station from general access? Not concerned. They probably put it up precisely to make money through market transactions. Closing it down would be nonsensical.

And even if it does, I'll just remote sell everything to other poor suckers who don't look before they buy. Or red frog it out, if they are still ok with the Frogs docking.

Concern level: 2/10

Edit: Remember, if I have 4% lower broker fee's at a Citadel as opposed to Jita 4-4, and 10 bil in market movement a day, that's 400 million a day in fee's I'm not paying compared to NPC


The last time a trade hub was born in EVE, the alternate marketplace was in the depth of nullsec space and as much as 60+ jumps away from some regions of space. Thus one player looked for an alternate place... conveniently near the borders of the Empires, and near enoguh of the center of the (newly established) second layout of the gates network.

The place chosen was a system with heavy Caldari Navy presence. One of the stations had a easy name -the station on the fourth moon on the fourth planet of system Jita.

That player seeded that station and others began doing the same; soon it was the largest marketplace in the game and thus the best chance to find what a buyer was looking for and the best chance to find a buyer for what a seller was selling.

10 years later, Jita 4-4 still is the best place to meet sellers and buyers. Inconvenience them enough and they will quit the game for lack of a viable marketplace. Do anything your own and the more you succeed the sooner someone is going to burn your little stall...
Rowells
Blackwater USA Inc.
Pandemic Horde
#332 - 2016-03-04 22:35:52 UTC
I'm sure if taxes had originally been set at suggested levels, then citadels were added, the feelings would be almost completely opposite.

I geuss it depends on the order of the carrot/stick.
Anhenka
Native Freshfood
Minmatar Republic
#333 - 2016-03-04 22:39:29 UTC  |  Edited by: Anhenka
Kaivar Lancer wrote:
Anhenka wrote:
[
Edit: Remember, if I have 4% lower broker fee's at a Citadel as opposed to Jita 4-4, and 10 bil in market movement a day, that's 400 million a day in fee's I'm not paying compared to NPC


You're presuming that a citadel owner will publicly tax 0%, which won't be the case, just like there aren't any POCOs that publicly tax 0%. It's not gonna happen. IF a trader can reduce their NPC broker tax to say 2%, a citadel owner will try to get away with charging 1.99% tax. The only way to get 0% tax is if you're friendly with the citadel owner. Since the null sec blocs are best positioned to deploy citadels, a trader or industrialist has no choice but to grovel to one of these blocs. Basically, to enjoy the same game as it was pre-citadel, you'll need to obtain another person's permission AND keep it for the rest of your Eve life. F that.


If you can't do it on your own, and your friends won't do it with you, and won't join a group that will, and then you sit around and whine about it, you are the only one who looks silly.

And I was basing my numbers off CCP 5-6% broker fee number, *.75 for max Broker Relations skill = 3.75-4.5%. I can very easily see a player Citadel running with either 1 or .5% broker fee's, and that is not modified by the Broker skill.

So that would be 2.75% - 4% decrease compared NPC station, assuming a .5%-1% broker fee on the player Citadel and a 5%-6% broker fee on NPC stations, modified by skill.

So my bad, I should have said "Remember, if I have 2.75%-4% lower broker fee's at a Citadel as opposed to Jita 4-4, and 10 bil in market movement a day, that's 275 mil to 400 mil a day in fee's I'm not paying compared to NPC"

That's still a lot of money.
beakerax
Pator Tech School
#334 - 2016-03-04 22:40:25 UTC
Kaivar Lancer wrote:
I have to wait 5 days AND spend hours relisting 600+ orders every time a citadel gets ganked. To add insult to injury, I'll also have to pay a new set of fees for the new orders.

Yeah, it would be very nice if citadels could be destroyed/replaced or otherwise change hands without significantly interrupting trade.
Kaivar Lancer
Doomheim
#335 - 2016-03-04 22:46:02 UTC
Anhenka wrote:

If you can't do it on your own, and your friends won't do it with you, and won't join a group that will, and then you sit around and whine about it, you are the only one who looks sill.


Um, how about me enjoying a game feature that's existed since Eve's inception? This is like buffing NPC rats by 500% to encourage mission runners to do PVP. Those people would quit rather than be forced to do something they don't enjoy.
Lugh Crow-Slave
#336 - 2016-03-04 22:49:21 UTC
Kaivar Lancer wrote:
Anhenka wrote:

If you can't do it on your own, and your friends won't do it with you, and won't join a group that will, and then you sit around and whine about it, you are the only one who looks sill.


Um, how about me enjoying a game feature that's existed since Eve's inception? This is like buffing NPC rats by 500% to encourage mission runners to do PVP. Those people would quit rather than be forced to do something they don't enjoy.


then you can still do it, it will just cost you more
beakerax
Pator Tech School
#337 - 2016-03-04 22:51:58 UTC
Kaivar Lancer + Anhenka wrote:
words

Citadels will also be in direct competition which each other in a way that POCOs really aren't. If your broker fees aren't a bargain compared to NPC stations, people will move elsewhere.
Anhenka
Native Freshfood
Minmatar Republic
#338 - 2016-03-04 22:54:28 UTC
Kaivar Lancer wrote:
Anhenka wrote:

If you can't do it on your own, and your friends won't do it with you, and won't join a group that will, and then you sit around and whine about it, you are the only one who looks sill.


Um, how about me enjoying a game feature that's existed since Eve's inception? This is like buffing NPC rats by 500% to encourage mission runners to do PVP. Those people would quit rather than be forced to do something they don't enjoy.


And yet things must change, and no change will ever have everyone happy with it. We can't not do anything on the off chance someone thinks that they don't like it and has a right to veto it.

And just because people think that a change will effect their playstyle in a negative way and reduce their enjoyment of the game doesn't mean that it's a bad change for the game.

Removing the tens of billions of ISK Technetium moon fountains negatively effected the playstyle of people who enjoyed that isk. Removing afk ratting from carriers in the upcoming patch will be a huge hit to AFK goon ratters. Jump changes that prevented PL from dropping on top of everyone within 6 regions definitely effected their playstyle negatively.

All of them had to happen though. They were all due to mechanics that were cancerous to the game.

And now you get to deal with Citadels, and the idea that people who use them have an advantage over those that don't.

Get over it, it's going to happen.
Deck Cadelanne
CAStabouts
#339 - 2016-03-04 22:57:24 UTC
Rowells wrote:

There is plenty of NPC space up in the north with active alliances in them. Geuss that bloc should break up any minute now.


Do smaller groups use those NPC stations as bases to raid out of?

More of them might even mean more raiding, which means more conflict, less stasis and stagnation...more content.



"When the going gets weird, the weird turn professional."

- Hunter S. Thompson

Seraphim Risen
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
#340 - 2016-03-04 22:59:07 UTC
Wait. Am I understanding this right?! 5 million ISK to use my jump clones?!

Never not badpost.