These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Player Features and Ideas Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Job output

Author
Kruenix Gearsworth
Yuki Hama Space Jumpers
#1 - 2016-02-27 16:54:15 UTC
is there a way to change the output location of the job once it has been submitted. If not, that would be a very useful update. thanks and fly safe o/
Bumblefck
Kerensky Initiatives
#2 - 2016-02-27 16:57:22 UTC
What, do you mean the output hangar? How would that change benefit the average player?

Perfection is a dish best served like wasabi .

Bumble's Space Log

Iain Cariaba
#3 - 2016-02-27 17:15:08 UTC
Likely he shunted the output to the corp hangar, but now wants to keep it for himself.
Lugh Crow-Slave
#4 - 2016-02-27 18:59:14 UTC
Bumblefck wrote:
What, do you mean the output hangar? How would that change benefit the average player?



Alot if you are mass building capitals
Bumblefck
Kerensky Initiatives
#5 - 2016-02-27 19:32:29 UTC  |  Edited by: Bumblefck
Lugh Crow-Slave wrote:
Bumblefck wrote:
What, do you mean the output hangar? How would that change benefit the average player?



Alot if you are mass building capitals



As the average player is wont to do...ffs

Perfection is a dish best served like wasabi .

Bumble's Space Log

Lugh Crow-Slave
#6 - 2016-02-27 20:30:39 UTC
Bumblefck wrote:
Lugh Crow-Slave wrote:
Bumblefck wrote:
What, do you mean the output hangar? How would that change benefit the average player?



Alot if you are mass building capitals



As the average player is wont to do...ffs


What do you mean capital production is mid tier for an industrial


Generally goes t1 > capital > T3 >T2

Yes is unintuitive but that's how the soil progression works along with resource gathering

Not all Industrials progress this way but it is the path of least resistance so yes your average player is probably producing capitals or capital components
Rivr Luzade
Coreli Corporation
Pandemic Legion
#7 - 2016-02-27 21:08:11 UTC  |  Edited by: Rivr Luzade
Bumblefck wrote:
Lugh Crow-Slave wrote:
Bumblefck wrote:
What, do you mean the output hangar? How would that change benefit the average player?

Alot if you are mass building capitals

As the average player is wont to do...ffs

Even without capital building would it be nice if the Industry UI knew that building 10 Sins into a Small Freight Container can impossibly work out when the assembly belts want to deliver them. This kind of stuff has happened a couple of times to me in the past and I then had to repackage the container in order for the industry window to output the things into the item hangar. It's a lot better now since the Industry window remembers input and output locations, but it would be nice to have a dialog after the job telling you to output it somewhere else if the destination has not enough room or a dialog before the job starts telling you that the output location is too small.

With regards to changing hangars if you do not like the corp hangar anymore ... vOv I don't really have an opinion on that.

UI Improvement Collective

My ridicule, heavy criticism and general pale outlook about your or CCP's ideas is nothing but an encouragement to prove me wrong. Give it a try.

Kruenix Gearsworth
Yuki Hama Space Jumpers
#8 - 2016-02-28 01:15:08 UTC
Actually, there have been times where I've had deliveries too large for containers they were scheduled for. Also, there have been times were I've selected the wrong container and had to move the goods after delivery...an annoyance really.
Iain Cariaba
#9 - 2016-02-28 02:21:55 UTC
Kruenix Gearsworth wrote:
Actually, there have been times where I've had deliveries too large for containers they were scheduled for. Also, there have been times were I've selected the wrong container and had to move the goods after delivery...an annoyance really.

I'd support a check to determine if there's enough room in a container to put the finished product. That is quite reasonable, as there's decent probability that you're not the only one using that container for output.

As far as your mistake of clicking the wrong container, sorry, that's not one I'd support. That falls under double checking the settings before you hit Start.
Lugh Crow-Slave
#10 - 2016-02-28 02:25:41 UTC
Iain Cariaba wrote:
Kruenix Gearsworth wrote:
Actually, there have been times where I've had deliveries too large for containers they were scheduled for. Also, there have been times were I've selected the wrong container and had to move the goods after delivery...an annoyance really.

I'd support a check to determine if there's enough room in a container to put the finished product. That is quite reasonable, as there's decent probability that you're not the only one using that container for output.

As far as your mistake of clicking the wrong container, sorry, that's not one I'd support. That falls under double checking the settings before you hit Start.

And making sure three is doh room doesn't fall under that?