Assembly Hall

Well i wont go in detail trough all of ideas. For now i ll post general thoughts.

EVE sports. In the link bellow its explained a bit better.
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=11176

Strategical targets.
Why not make that every region has its own strategical targets. Let them be 3 and let em be something like radars, monuments, destroyed ships etc. So when one fleet controls all 3 strategic point they get some kind of bonuses (Bigger targeting range, better tracking, moral which gives some % of dmg etc). A Fleet will control a strategic point only by having a recon keeping it active (some kind of channeling). When the recon moves and stop channeling the fleet will lose the bonus.
This will give an opportunity for smaller fleets to be viable and decisive in large battles that are happening for sov control in a region.

Exploration missions
In other words it would be "Treasure hunting". Npcs give u missions "riddles" so u can decode em and find some artifacts. Some of those artifacts could be useful or just collectible. Some of the missions (riddles) could be found in scanned anomalies in some containers.
Example u get a mission to decode a riddle. After doing it u realize u need to go somewhere in western Tenal to scan an anomaly, kill the rats in it and extract a content from container. U do all that and all u get is another riddle for next target. Eventually u solve the final mission and u get a collectible artifact which can be sold to collectors, or an item that can be really useful and expansive.

Capital balance:
I will take some roles for capitals and rate each capital ship for each role.
Rolles would be:
a) Transportation,
b) Ratting,
c) Logistic,
d) v Structures,
e) v Subcapitals,
f) v Capitals.

Rates would be from 1 to 5 (5 for the highest).

Dreads:
a) 0,
b) 3,
c) 0,
d) 5 (While sieged),
e) 5 (Best against subcapitals while non sieged) and 0 (while sieged)
f) 2 While not sieged and 4 while sieged.

Carriers:
a) 4
b) 4
c) 5 Make them more viable repairing other capitals against Dreads, Supers and Titans
d) 5 repairing and 3 dmg the structures
e) 3
f) 1

Supers:
a) 5
b) 5
c) 0
d) 4
e) 1 The worst against subcaptials
f) 5 the ultimate capital killing machine

Titans:
a) Unique (They got bridges)
b) 5
c) 0
d) 5
e) 4 pretty good against subcaptials
f) 3 avarage against capitals and Unique (Doomsday)

Tnx for your patient!

Did you just suggest...achievements?

Get out.


edit: riddles that you have to solve? They'd all be solved and searchable on Google within a day of release. You underestimate the tenacity of Eve players and the speed with which we spread information.

I'm completely against achievements. I think they've wrecked gaming. Look at Batman Arkham Asylum. You spend maybe 10 hours actually playing out the storyline, and another 40-50 trying to complete the achievements. They're an easy way out of good game design.

This is especially bad in multiplayer games where people you are depending on suddenly drop what they're doing because they have a shot at some hard-to-get achievement.

You want achievements in Eve? Certifications. Level 5 skills. Wallet balance goals. Flying any paritcular ship you couldn't fly last week. Winning PVP against the odds. You shouldn't need some arbitrary reward system to tell you how you're progressing or give you new goals. Not in Eve.

Oke good, good finally some discussion. Well my point was exactly to bring up a discussion about these ideas, because i think those are some nice proposals that can add smth good to this game. I didnt go trough em in details so i wanted to see what other ppl think, so we could shape them up together.

Sport and Tactical objective is actually what is my main focus and think that can be introduced quite easily and would give some more depth to this game.

About achievements, i never ment smth like in other hello kitty games when u do it u get some shinny pop ups. Hell no, its more like a personal satisfaction of solving riddles or being stubborn goin trough google and doing em as much as u can. The real achievement would be the items (Relic) u get. It would add more content for ppl that get bored looking at the spin counter. Why not in future those Relics not be viable to show off in establishments.
And yes some will get trough google looking up the solutions, but some believe me will actually try do em by emselves. It just adds some more content for everyone, doesnt need much skilllz. U d need to scan em and kill some **** inside. Some of those actually d be difficult and u d need a minor fleet to defeat it. Solo collector could pay mercenarries for help.
And would add even more depth to the market, collectors would bargain for em and some would even kill for certain relics.
Relics wldnt be the only thing u get from those kind of missions, ppl would get some useful items too, so it would be another and let say quite interesting way to earn isk.

About capital balance. Well it is just an issue that bothers me as most of EVE population i think. So just wanted to know what people think of what i proposed and maybe tweak it a bit.

Well it has nothing to do like the achievements u mentioned. So i deleted the word achievement from the main post, because i see people dont get it. I already mentioned u dont get any popus or any kind of certificates that shows that u did it on a certain date so u can link it around. What i ment about achievement its more of a personal satisfaction and about the item (Relic) u got which u can collect or sell. Those relics i could compare it like a drop of a rare officer module. That module u can also show off or sell. These exploration missions appart from relics would yield some useful module too, why not drop also officer modules. Would be lot longer farm but let say some officer modules d be guaranteed.
In other words its Exploration missions or "Treasure hunting"

So i ll just delte the word achievement, but its the same thing i am speaking about. From now on let just call it "Exploration mission".

And about capital balance i do understand few things here and there, dont u worry :DDD

Another thing i noticed is that there is no slaping for my first 2 proposals Sports and Strategical targets. I want to see what are people thinking about it,

3 words...

What...

The...

****...