These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Test Server Feedback

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
Previous page12
 

New mirror for Singularity - 2016-02-17

First post
Author
Chitsa Jason
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#21 - 2016-02-17 16:38:58 UTC
So how long downtime is going to be?

Burn the land and boil the sea You can't take the sky from me

Amak Boma
Dragon Factory
xX SERENITY Xx
#22 - 2016-02-17 17:01:58 UTC
big ode to sisi in vip mode, can we know when will be back? so we can build erebus stacks xD
Destiny Dain2
Your Destiny Corporation
#23 - 2016-02-17 17:56:11 UTC  |  Edited by: Destiny Dain2
Amak Boma wrote:
big ode to sisi in vip mode, can we know when will be back? so we can build erebus stacks xD



Just saw a posting...

"So, we will be keeping the server in VIP for at least tonight, and resuming normal service as early as possible tomorrow. Sorry for the inconvenience. " as of 2016-02-17 17:30:25 UTC

CCP Goliath | QA Director | EVE Illuminati | @CCP_Goliath


Oh, I just noticed you responded already on that thread, cool. This is for everyone else then.
Artemis Dalvik
Arxersize Industries
#24 - 2016-02-17 18:30:22 UTC
CCP Goliath wrote:
Some words on /copyskills - we (Habakuk, DeNormalized and I) are currently investigating ways to re-enable this command. We have a few notions, such as placing the command on a 30 day cooldown when used, but are also investigating if we can tie it in to extractor use (e.g. if you have used extractors you can't use copyskills for X days/weeks/whatever). It will still be disabled when the server comes back up, however.


What about disabling seeding of extractors on sisi? Its already live on TQ and is certainly being tested, is it necessary or desired to have these on Singularity?
Amak Boma
Dragon Factory
xX SERENITY Xx
#25 - 2016-02-17 18:55:43 UTC
exacly dont seed the extractors on sisi. there is few reasons why not

1. buy extractors in tranqulity , buy bestower , fill the bestower with extractors and keep that
2. when mirror on singularity occurs you can evryday use /copyships to clone your extractors

Lee Maulerant
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#26 - 2016-02-17 19:08:00 UTC
Amak Boma wrote:
exacly dont seed the extractors on sisi. there is few reasons why not

1. buy extractors in tranqulity , buy bestower , fill the bestower with extractors and keep that
2. when mirror on singularity occurs you can evryday use /copyships to clone your extractors



Yeah sure, spend a ridiculous amount of ISK on TQ to buy extractors for about 300m to 400m each, throw how ever many of them into a Bestower (Frankly any ship since they're 0.1m3) and use /copyships which has a 24 hour cooldown.

Although it sounds plausible, it's inefficient.
Leia Sophia Stormfall
New Eden Rookery
#27 - 2016-02-17 19:28:14 UTC
Honestly just take injectors/exractors out of the game for sisi if they aren't specifically needed for testing. If that comes up, then roll a 48 hour window on sisi where they are seeded, monitor whatever test, then remirror, removing them from the game again.

Lee Maulerant
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#28 - 2016-02-17 19:37:21 UTC
Leia Sophia Stormfall wrote:
Honestly just take injectors/exractors out of the game for sisi if they aren't specifically needed for testing. If that comes up, then roll a 48 hour window on sisi where they are seeded, monitor whatever test, then remirror, removing them from the game again.



This. Now since I don't want to seem like a spammer I'll add my own insight as to why I think this is a good or bad idea.

First and foremost, the injectors aren't seeded because you'll have that one guy that'll buy all 99,999,999 of them and use them all on his character then buy the rest so he can be king of EVE. Boys being boys.

Secondly, if you want to test this efficiently, give everyone 1,000 or so skill injectors so they get that set of SP, no more, extractors can be used but injectors can't be sold on the market or traded to prevent abuse but can be used by the pilot that owns them, this would balance it out

Thirdly a 48 hour window is good, it's a nice round number, gives people plenty of time to "test" (Quoted because no testing will take place at all) the new changes and explore other additional content they haven't seen before, the re-mirroring would clear all the mess of abandoned ships, drones, bookmarks and any other junk that isn't needed. A clean slate if you will.

So in short. "This".
Amak Boma
Dragon Factory
xX SERENITY Xx
#29 - 2016-02-17 19:43:02 UTC
or do simply 20 or even 30 skill injectors per masstest as reward. that is much easier. than giving 2mill sp.
Commandant John
4S Corporation
The Initiative.
#30 - 2016-02-17 19:57:11 UTC
The 14 day cooldown on copyskills if you used an extractor on a character is a perfectly reasonable compromise. Nothing needs to be changed with regards to extractors or injectors in their current form on the test server. Any extra restrictions added to them could compromise their use on TQ should a bug with them appear.

Extractors are as easy as getting a stack of PLEX for 100 ISK and converting to AUR. Injectors you'll just have to sort on your own. As far as MTs are concerned the 2m SP is a perfectly acceptable reward for those who don't want to use or can't use injectors. Giving of injectors to people for attending mass tests will just lead to people bringing large numbers of accounts, feeding all injectors to one character and the issue CCP wants to avoid just returns.
Akimos
Alpha Bar
#31 - 2016-02-17 23:31:05 UTC
I find it impossible to understand the rationale behind awarding SP for test participation. Especially now.

In my mind CCP would have an equal amount of support if they chose to give out alliance tournament ships instead. Probably even more support!

It seems to me that this approach would not hinder any testing that needs to be done by CCP. It would solve the Extractor/Injector debate - seed them both and let people go wild. As it stands, is it not the case that the problem with /copyskills + injecting is that it makes SP giveaways pointless? So solve the problem guys. Give out AT ships.
Tosawa Komarui
State War Academy
Caldari State
#32 - 2016-02-18 00:16:42 UTC
CCP Goliath wrote:
Some words on /copyskills - we (Habakuk, DeNormalized and I) are currently investigating ways to re-enable this command. We have a few notions, such as placing the command on a 30 day cooldown when used, but are also investigating if we can tie it in to extractor use (e.g. if you have used extractors you can't use copyskills for X days/weeks/whatever). It will still be disabled when the server comes back up, however.



why does this even bother you? its a test server, does it really matter if people do this to try different things?
pajedas
Doomheim
#33 - 2016-02-18 00:48:06 UTC
Tosawa Komarui wrote:
why does this even bother you? its a test server, does it really matter if people do this to try different things?

↑ THIS ↑

They say none of it matters and then they worry about something completely arbitrary.

🐇

Barrett Fruitcake
Doomheim
#34 - 2016-02-18 01:31:04 UTC
Tosawa Komarui wrote:
CCP Goliath wrote:
Some words on /copyskills - we (Habakuk, DeNormalized and I) are currently investigating ways to re-enable this command. We have a few notions, such as placing the command on a 30 day cooldown when used, but are also investigating if we can tie it in to extractor use (e.g. if you have used extractors you can't use copyskills for X days/weeks/whatever). It will still be disabled when the server comes back up, however.



why does this even bother you? its a test server, does it really matter if people do this to try different things?


There has always been a group of Sisi regulars that would abuse this so bad that it would become common knowledge that you also need to follow this process to get a good result on your testing.

They want realistic testing off all skill levels and capabilities.

If they seed, all tourney ships, all supers, all officer mods, and skill injectors, the only testing that will be done is; Tourney ships, supers and nearly maxed skills.

This is known because of various occurrences in the past such as Dominion testing and Armageddon Days.

That should not be the norm for the test server, and saying that good testing results in such cases is either completely naïve or out of self-interest.

basically, been there done that, it doesn't work.
pajedas
Doomheim
#35 - 2016-02-18 02:03:05 UTC
Barrett Fruitcake wrote:
basically, been there done that, it doesn't work.

You obviously have no clue...and you can stop brown nosing.

🐇

Era'kanath
Zebra Corp
Goonswarm Federation
#36 - 2016-02-18 02:51:36 UTC
pajedas wrote:
Barrett Fruitcake wrote:
basically, been there done that, it doesn't work.

You obviously have no clue...and you can stop brown nosing.


He does have a clue, and that's from experience.. not pulling **** out of no where like you are.

He's right; If supers and max skills were seeded, all that would be 'tested' are supers.
Why? Because It's new. People weren't able to do it before, they'll flood to it to try it out; but then they'll see the power in it, they won't let go until a remirror where it doesn't occur again.

This has happened a couple of times in the past 5 years.



However, from personal opinion- I think beacons should be strategically placed with names of the main Server rules, and advertisement that PV is the sub-cap only system.

And seed max skills only.

"The more we sweat in peacetime, the less we bleed in war."

Shova'k
The Bank Of Jita
#37 - 2016-02-18 03:19:00 UTC
Barrett Fruitcake wrote:
Tosawa Komarui wrote:
CCP Goliath wrote:
Some words on /copyskills - we (Habakuk, DeNormalized and I) are currently investigating ways to re-enable this command. We have a few notions, such as placing the command on a 30 day cooldown when used, but are also investigating if we can tie it in to extractor use (e.g. if you have used extractors you can't use copyskills for X days/weeks/whatever). It will still be disabled when the server comes back up, however.



why does this even bother you? its a test server, does it really matter if people do this to try different things?


There has always been a group of Sisi regulars that would abuse this so bad that it would become common knowledge that you also need to follow this process to get a good result on your testing.

They want realistic testing off all skill levels and capabilities.

If they seed, all tourney ships, all supers, all officer mods, and skill injectors, the only testing that will be done is; Tourney ships, supers and nearly maxed skills.

This is known because of various occurrences in the past such as Dominion testing and Armageddon Days.

That should not be the norm for the test server, and saying that good testing results in such cases is either completely naïve or out of self-interest.

basically, been there done that, it doesn't work.


because most people will never be able to afford to do any of that on TQ lol so those of us who can and would like to test something before actually investing the isk just to find out it was a waste are SOL tis a shame but thats life lol
pajedas
Doomheim
#38 - 2016-02-18 03:35:06 UTC
Era'kanath wrote:
This has happened a couple of times in the past 5 years.

Wow...a whole 5 years?

CCP doesn't give two $hit$ about what we think, get used to it.

🐇

Barrett Fruitcake
Doomheim
#39 - 2016-02-18 04:18:36 UTC
pajedas wrote:
Barrett Fruitcake wrote:
basically, been there done that, it doesn't work.

You obviously have no clue...and you can stop brown nosing.


You would think a character from 2005 would have more understanding of why things are the way they are on Sisi.

When did you buy this character.

Era'kanath
Zebra Corp
Goonswarm Federation
#40 - 2016-02-18 06:22:12 UTC
pajedas wrote:
Era'kanath wrote:
This has happened a couple of times in the past 5 years.

Wow...a whole 5 years?

CCP doesn't give two $hit$ about what we think, get used to it.


If they didn't give two craps about what we thought, every Super, AT ships and Officer/Faction module would be seeded.

"The more we sweat in peacetime, the less we bleed in war."

Previous page12