These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Test Server Feedback

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Balancing Feedback: Assault Ships

First post First post
Author
placeholder Zateki
Freehold Fleet
#481 - 2012-01-11 00:47:25 UTC
You appear to have missed the sarcasm in that post completely. BTW, don't take quotes out of context, in the line after where you stopped I said "Do you see how that argument is flawed"
Prometheus Exenthal
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#482 - 2012-01-11 00:50:29 UTC
Do you see how you're not looking at the whole argument?
It's not solely large 00 fleets, and it's not specifically people who solo or do small scale.

AFs are fundamentally flawed in that they have poor performance operating offensively (4th bonus/slots), and exceedingly poor performance operating evasively and defensively. The former being for things like running back to gates or through camps, and the latter being in regard to actual combat mobility.

And yes, it's all hearsay until someone can prove otherwise.
It's like me looking at the trailer for the Hobbit and calling it trash solely because I don't like Peter Jackson (just an example folks), then the movie comes out and it's fantastic and wins a ton of awards.

The difference between myself and the rest being stubborn, is that I've got the hard evidence and you (as a group) do not.

https://www.youtube.com/user/promsrage

DO YOUR JOBS, CCP DEVS. FIX THE GAME INSTEAD OF FKING IT

Alex Medvedov
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#483 - 2012-01-11 01:07:36 UTC
Prometheus Exenthal wrote:

The difference between myself and the rest being stubborn, is that I've got the hard evidence and you (as a group) do not.


For the ****sake Prom tell me one thing which you have and other AF pilots dont have.
Thats your most stupid comment so far.
All you have are results from testing on Sisi which i did myself as well and came up with entirely different results.... So whos evidence is actually harder?Big smile
And with my experience of flying nothing but the Jaguar over last 5 years I belive my opinion might be worth at least a consideration when I opose your statement about AFs having poor performance!
Axel Greye
Unlikely Suspects
#484 - 2012-01-11 01:28:58 UTC
I LOVE All of the individual changes made to the assault frigates, please please PLEASE leave those modifications.

However, I feel the MWD bonus is rather wasted. by all means keep it, but for 90% of AF roles it wont be needed. MWD's are the realm of interceptors, AFs are followup tacklers that use ABs to keep their sigs as low as possible whilst maintaining speed, usually complimented by scram range tackling.

Individual Analysis:

Retribution: Now serves as a very viable heavy tackler, can maintain propulsion whilst tackling due to second mid, serves as a very good DPS boat.

Vengeance: Now has Relatively better DPS to compliment its Amarrian Brick Tank. Serves as a Viable Solo Option as well as gang support.


Ishkur: Drone Hit Point bonus is definitely beneficial, and the additional low slot can be used to suit a variety of fits, overall seems like a good balance.

Enyo: Finally has that third midslot needed to truly close down range and apply its role of Damage Boat, Perfect Buff.


Harpy: Now serves dual roles, one as a very viable long range railgun kiter, another as an up close blaster boat to which the shield resistance bonus is greatly needed.

Hawk: Active Tank is awesome, Please don't remove it, the fifth midslot adds room for a cap booster to supplement a cap heavy tank, and its DPS is amazing, truly an assault frigate if ever there was one.


Wolf: Tracking Bonus is an amazing way to compliment this ship, with its lack of web the tracking bonus ensures the ability to apply DPS within scram range, and the new lowslot can be used in a variety of ways, A very nice way to balance this ship.

Jaguar: again, Tracking bonus is a very nice addition to an already generally recognized good assault ship. Low slot adds more versatility fitting wise without making it too powerful.




Overall Impression: CCP hit the nail on the head, the MWD bonus sent it slightly askew, but I think the individual ship alterations are Perfect. PLEASE dont change them. ♥
Prometheus Exenthal
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#485 - 2012-01-11 01:32:33 UTC  |  Edited by: Prometheus Exenthal
@Alex
That's all well and good, but nobody has yet shown how exactly said ships would be overpowered.
Comparing them to other frigates is an awful argument because the other frigates already fall to AFs.

Some Pirate frigs will need a boost, fine. That's not enough to discredit the boost.

The lesser T1 cruisers need a boost, fine. This has been known for years, and needs to be done if AFs get boosted or not. Once again, not enough to discredit the boost.

As it's been repeatedly stated, AFs do NOT compare to the other T2. No T2 frigates are not comparable to each other.
You can't take an Helios up against a Taranis and expect to win. So why shouldn't you expect the same from any other class.

I'm not trying to be egotistical or anything, so if that's how it appears to be, I apologize.

https://www.youtube.com/user/promsrage

DO YOUR JOBS, CCP DEVS. FIX THE GAME INSTEAD OF FKING IT

Plutonian
Intransigent
#486 - 2012-01-11 01:34:53 UTC
Prometheus Exenthal wrote:
AFs are fundamentally flawed in that they have poor performance operating offensively (4th bonus/slots), and exceedingly poor performance operating evasively and defensively.


Prove it.
Michael Harari
Genos Occidere
HYDRA RELOADED
#487 - 2012-01-11 01:42:52 UTC  |  Edited by: Michael Harari
Prometheus Exenthal wrote:
[

You can't take an Helios up against a Taranis and expect to win. So why shouldn't you expect the same from any other class.

http://eve-kill.net/?a=kill_detail&kll_id=11933652

http://eve-kill.net/?a=kill_detail&kll_id=11933864

http://eve-kill.net/?a=kill_detail&kll_id=11933521

http://eve-kill.net/?a=kill_detail&kll_id=11924292

(there are more, as we both know, and I ignored all kills vs t1 frigates)




I dislike the idea that after afs, cruisers will be buffed. After that, cruisers will be shitting all over bcs, bcs will get buffed, and so on and we just have incredible power creep.
Axel Greye
Unlikely Suspects
#488 - 2012-01-11 01:50:48 UTC
Im totally gonna hop onboard with this discussion if thats alright. Being a pretty well known frigate pilot (atleast in highsec) I have alot of good input. :3

These are my PVP related insights as to frigate classes.

T1 Frigates: Serve as a training platform for most pilots. cheap, disposable however that does not mean poor. T1 Frigates like all other ship classes can be mastered and used with enough skill to perform well and above their cost. 95% of Eve pilots skip learning how to fly frigates properly and move into bigger ships like cruisers, something that CCP should try to address in the starter tutorials.
They serve as fleet tacklers, Solo Vessels and Basic EWAR support, a Great way to get to grips of the combat mechanics of EvE, and which to learn a combat style which best suits the user.

Destroyers: Serve as the Natural Step up from frigates. You have learned how to pilot and kill with a t1 frigate, now learn how to hunt them and defend your fleet from them with a destroyer.
Destroyers are not invincible to a skilled frigate pilot, but have enough base stat bonuses to shred the vast majority of careless frigates.

Assault Frigs: Now that you have experienced T1 frigs and Destroyers, you will have found a style of PVP that you are comfortable with. Assault frigates have a big variation of combat styles to choose from, which is a good thing. they are basically amplified versions of their T1 counterparts. Become comfortable with a fighting style on a t1 Hull, then Begin to truly apply it with the relevant assault frigate.
Hunt Solo, or Use them as heavy tacklers for your fleet. If an Interceptor gets a point on something, you are the second line of Attack to get your target locked down.

Interceptor: Interceptors are split into two categories, the fleet support tackler, which is designed to hold point on a target from range, and be a nuisance to get rid of while your heavy tacklers get it locked down.
The Combat Interceptor, designed to engage targets of opportunity using speed to your advantage. Both are a fun and interesting way to fly a Frigate Hull.

EAF: Designed to Provide Advanced EWAR support for a fleet, but are generally not flown solo. A good frigate class for those pilots who love to provide advantage and support.

Stealth Bomber: Covops Gang and Large Fleet DPS support, designed for taking down battleships and above, can be flown solo with the right kind of setup, but is primarily a fleet ship.

Faction and Pirate Frigate : Frigates for the Richer Pilot, Serve multiple roles like assault frigs, but come with a heftier price tag. They are powerful, and dangerous, but should only be flown if you have the ISK to fund them. Basically you are trading ISK for Combat Performance.



All frigate classes have purpose, to compare them is pointless, one must address them individually if one wants to balance.
Zircon Dasher
#489 - 2012-01-11 01:55:54 UTC
Prometheus Exenthal wrote:
Do you see how you're not looking at the whole argument?
It's not solely large 00 fleets, and it's not specifically people who solo or do small scale.

AFs are fundamentally flawed in that they have poor performance operating offensively (4th bonus/slots), and exceedingly poor performance operating evasively and defensively. The former being for things like running back to gates or through camps, and the latter being in regard to actual combat mobility.

And yes, it's all hearsay until someone can prove otherwise.
It's like me looking at the trailer for the Hobbit and calling it trash solely because I don't like Peter Jackson (just an example folks), then the movie comes out and it's fantastic and wins a ton of awards.

The difference between myself and the rest being stubborn, is that I've got the hard evidence and you (as a group) do not.



Problems in this thread so far:

Argument (via agreement with Merin): MWD is mandatory to fight in null
Conflict: Prom uses AB enyo because he has a scout alt/warp-in (who doesnt have a scout except inties and Drams?)

Argument: AF's are flawed because they lack offensive, evasive, and defensive, power.
Conflict: Good AF pilots already kill cruisers and under that are not total no0bs.

Argument: This is about making AF more competative with larger ships (cruisers)
Conflict: New AF are easily killed by destroyer+ hulls.

Argument: AF will not supplant inties or faction frigs (nor should they) because they are too fat and slow
Conflict: AF are designed to be used in fast mobile gangs (which does not include HAC, recons, dics, interceptors...so he must mean faction frigs since that is all that is left that is highly mobile)


"Evidence" is pretty vague

-Just sayin Lol

Nerfing High-sec is never the answer. It is the question. The answer is 'YES'.

Plutonian
Intransigent
#490 - 2012-01-11 01:56:09 UTC  |  Edited by: Plutonian
Michael Harari wrote:
Prometheus Exenthal wrote:
[

You can't take an Helios up against a Taranis and expect to win. So why shouldn't you expect the same from any other class.

http://eve-kill.net/?a=kill_detail&kll_id=11933652

http://eve-kill.net/?a=kill_detail&kll_id=11933864

http://eve-kill.net/?a=kill_detail&kll_id=11933521

http://eve-kill.net/?a=kill_detail&kll_id=11924292

(there are more, as we both know, and I ignored all kills vs t1 frigates)




I dislike the idea that after afs, cruisers will be buffed. After that, cruisers will be shitting all over bcs, bcs will get buffed, and so on and we just have incredible power creep.



Battle Helios best helios. Lol

EDIT: And to add some content, Prom has agreed that the T1 frigs, pirate frigs, Assault frigs, and cruisers need a buff. I think those should come first before we start buffing battle cruisers, battle ships, and caps. Blink
Michael Harari
Genos Occidere
HYDRA RELOADED
#491 - 2012-01-11 01:59:01 UTC
Axel Greye wrote:


EAF: Designed to Provide Advanced EWAR support for a fleet, but are generally not flown solo. A good frigate class for those pilots who love to provide advantage and support.


This is very much not true, EAFs are terrible. Its like flying a blackbird, but you get alphaed by a thrasher.

Quote:


Faction and Pirate Frigate : Frigates for the Richer Pilot, Serve multiple roles like assault frigs, but come with a heftier price tag. They are powerful, and dangerous, but should only be flown if you have the ISK to fund them. Basically you are trading ISK for Combat Performance.

Also not true. These af changes mean there is literally no reason to fly a hookbill over a hawk. Firetails are already not great, and after these changes, why would you ever fly one over a jaguar?

Zircon Dasher
#492 - 2012-01-11 02:02:42 UTC  |  Edited by: Zircon Dasher
Axel Greye wrote:
All frigate classes have purpose, to compare them is pointless, one must address them individually if one wants to balance.


:Frystare:

Srs?

Nerfing High-sec is never the answer. It is the question. The answer is 'YES'.

Axel Greye
Unlikely Suspects
#493 - 2012-01-11 02:05:25 UTC
Michael Harari wrote:
Axel Greye wrote:


EAF: Designed to Provide Advanced EWAR support for a fleet, but are generally not flown solo. A good frigate class for those pilots who love to provide advantage and support.


This is very much not true, EAFs are terrible. Its like flying a blackbird, but you get alphaed by a thrasher.

Quote:


Faction and Pirate Frigate : Frigates for the Richer Pilot, Serve multiple roles like assault frigs, but come with a heftier price tag. They are powerful, and dangerous, but should only be flown if you have the ISK to fund them. Basically you are trading ISK for Combat Performance.

Also not true. These af changes mean there is literally no reason to fly a hookbill over a hawk. Firetails are already not great, and after these changes, why would you ever fly one over a jaguar?



Assuming piloted properly:

Kitsune can keep an arty thrasher permajammed from 70km away.

Keres can keep an arty thrasher from ever locking it.

Hyena is vulnerable to artillery thashers, but can keep an autocannon thrasher from ever getting close to it.

Sentinel can keep a Thrasher neuted (not that it matters) but more importantly tracking disrupted to the point at which it can no longer track with arties or apply DPS with autocannons.



You raise a good point about the navy faction frigates, but navy faction are basically just Slightly better combat platforms than their T1 counterparts.
Pay more ISK, get more output.

Pirate Faction could stand to be buffed, but even as they are they can go toe to toe with an AF and stand a decent chance of success. Plus, they are stylish. 8)
Zircon Dasher
#494 - 2012-01-11 02:06:06 UTC
Plutonian wrote:
Prom has agreed that the T1 frigs, pirate frigs, Assault frigs, and cruisers need a buff. I think those should come first before we start buffing battle cruisers, battle ships, and caps. Blink



Should we start demanding a second round of boosts to frigs and cruisers, because we will be back to where we are now, so that we get in the que now?

Nerfing High-sec is never the answer. It is the question. The answer is 'YES'.

Axel Greye
Unlikely Suspects
#495 - 2012-01-11 02:08:02 UTC
Zircon Dasher wrote:
Axel Greye wrote:
All frigate classes have purpose, to compare them is pointless, one must address them individually if one wants to balance.


:Frystare:

Srs?

If you wont raise a serious argument I hope you don't expect to receive a serious answer.
Mirei Jun
Garoun Investment Bank
Gallente Federation
#496 - 2012-01-11 02:11:00 UTC  |  Edited by: ISD Grossvogel
(moved from a separate thread — ISD Grossvogel)

There is yet more testing to do, but...:

THE GOOD:

- Yes! Another slot!
- Yes! A 4th bonus! (And a damn good one!)

THE BAD:

- Role Bonus is redundant with interceptors. AFs are not suppose to be beefy interceptors. Reconsider a varied version of the original AB bonus or something else to make them "slipperier".

- The Ishkur's 4th bonus is worthless. Please consider giving it the full drone boat package: 10% bonus to drone DAMAGE and hit points. Under the current setup it is totally underpowered and no longer a viable choice.

- The Retribution is now viable with 2 mids.. However lasers and MWDs do not mix well.

MJ
Plutonian
Intransigent
#497 - 2012-01-11 02:16:59 UTC
I have to say the thing that scares me the most is the impression that everyone flying T1 frigs in lowsec are:

1.) poor
2.) learning to PvP
3.) training for 'better' ships

I have billions, have been fighting for years, and I can fly every sub-cap (90% with near perfect skills). I can only assume the same when I see Miura Bull or Wensley or other well known Rifter pilots in game (not that I'm comparing my PvP prowess to them... they're really damn good).

Axel Greye
Unlikely Suspects
#498 - 2012-01-11 02:23:51 UTC  |  Edited by: Axel Greye
Plutonian wrote:
I have to say the thing that scares me the most is the impression that everyone flying T1 frigs in lowsec are:

1.) poor
2.) learning to PvP
3.) training for 'better' ships

I have billions, have been fighting for years, and I can fly every sub-cap (90% with near perfect skills). I can only assume the same when I see Miura Bull or Wensley or other well known Rifter pilots in game (not that I'm comparing my PvP prowess to them... they're really damn good).



as I said, T1 frigates can be mastered just like all other ship classes, and an expert T1 frigate pilot can achieve incredible things.
Fights that many would say are not possible, become obtainable goals.

Example:

http://eve.battleclinic.com/killboard/killmail.php?id=14007423
Alex Medvedov
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#499 - 2012-01-11 02:24:07 UTC  |  Edited by: Alex Medvedov
Prometheus Exenthal wrote:
@Alex
That's all well and good, but nobody has yet shown how exactly said ships would be overpowered.
Comparing them to other frigates is an awful argument because the other frigates already fall to AFs.


Well I have spent quite a some time trying to point to you which AFs seems to be overpowered and why, what more do you want? Pictures? And I was bacically worried only about AF vs AF ballance.
So lets try something opposite - could you please show me how exactly are current AFs on TQ underpowered? (Retribution aside) Thank you!

Prometheus Exenthal wrote:

Some Pirate frigs will need a boost, fine. That's not enough to discredit the boost.

The lesser T1 cruisers need a boost, fine. This has been known for years, and needs to be done if AFs get boosted or not. Once again, not enough to discredit the boost.


As some have pointed out already you are going down the boosting spiral and with basically nothing to support such decision. Isnt common sense telling you than better option might be to boost AFs sighificantly less, than boosting them as was suggested and than be forced to boost Destroyers, Cruisers, pirate frigs and who knows what else to get everything balanced?
Axel Greye
Unlikely Suspects
#500 - 2012-01-11 02:29:16 UTC
Alex Medvedov wrote:
Prometheus Exenthal wrote:
@Alex
That's all well and good, but nobody has yet shown how exactly said ships would be overpowered.
Comparing them to other frigates is an awful argument because the other frigates already fall to AFs.


Well I have spent quite a some time trying to point to you which AFs seems to be overpowered and why, what more do you want? Pictures? And I was bacically worried only about AF vs AF ballance.
So could you please show me how exactly are current AFs on TQ underpowered? (Retribution aside) Thank you!

Prometheus Exenthal wrote:

Some Pirate frigs will need a boost, fine. That's not enough to discredit the boost.

The lesser T1 cruisers need a boost, fine. This has been known for years, and needs to be done if AFs get boosted or not. Once again, not enough to discredit the boost.


As some have pointed out already you are going down the boosting spiral and with basically nothing to support such decision. Isnt common sense telling you than better option might be to boost AFs sighificantly less, than boosting them as was suggested and than be forced to boost Destroyers, Cruisers, pirate frigs and who knows what else to get everything balanced?

dont nerf the class, nerf the individual ships.
Some pirate frigates definitely do not need buffing, Drams, DD's, Worm. but then again, the Cruor or Succubus could use (to avoid the word buff) reinvisioning.

People seem to be under the impression that you cannot buff one ship in a class, without boosting all the others. Caracal needing a buff? FIne buff it, Dont buff all the other T1 Cruisers that are fine as they are out of principle.