These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

[February] Wreck Hitpoint Rebalance

First post First post
Author
Lucas Kell
Solitude Trading
S.N.O.T.
#261 - 2016-02-09 14:00:10 UTC
Dom Arkaral wrote:
Hey guy, is this a post about CODE. and aanti-ganking?
No it's a post about wreck hp buff... and that concerns everyone ingame.
The ONLY people I saw hating on this buff is AG.
That's because it's a direct nerf to one of the few things AGs could do to negatively affect gankers. If this were balanced out with improvements in other areas to make active anti-ganking more viable, it wouldn't be so bad a change. Without that though it's a kick in the nuts to a group that's already laying on the floor.

The Indecisive Noob - EVE fan blog.

Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list.

Anthar Thebess
#262 - 2016-02-09 14:00:17 UTC
Antiganking and ganking is role playing in eve.
To do both you need to dedicate lot of time.
I also gank, mostly tornado or vexor.
If i sit for 8 hours on the gate waiting and scanning for target i don't expect for antiganking to be less time consuming.

Want to be good antiganker?
Patrol gank areas 8 hours a day with friends.
Battlecruisers are used for ganking freighters, pilots have kill rights or less than -5 sec status.
Why you don't insta point them in a svipul or loki and then kill them?
5 guys can easily disrupt most of the ganks this way - just by fitting 2 points on each ship you remove 10 battlecruisers from the gank fleet.
Don't want to pay isk to activate kill right? Even when this is sole purpose of this mechanic.
Form alliance, and ask all freighter pilots to put kill rights to this alliance for 0 isk.

How many times i had 10mil kill right on my tornado, and for 2 days no one cared to claim it?

Effort, this is what you are missing in antiganking.
Dom Arkaral
Bannheim
Cuttlefish Collective
#263 - 2016-02-09 14:04:28 UTC
Anthar Thebess wrote:
Antiganking and ganking is role playing in eve.
To do both you need to dedicate lot of time.
I also gank, mostly tornado or vexor.
If i sit for 8 hours on the gate waiting and scanning for target i don't expect for antiganking to be less time consuming.

Want to be good antiganker?
Patrol gank areas 8 hours a day with friends.
Battlecruisers are used for ganking freighters, pilots have kill rights or less than -5 sec status.
Why you don't insta point them in a svipul or loki and then kill them?
5 guys can easily disrupt most of the ganks this way - just by fitting 2 points on each ship you remove 10 battlecruisers from the gank fleet.
Don't want to pay isk to activate kill right? Even when this is sole purpose of this mechanic.
Form alliance, and ask all freighter pilots to put kill rights to this alliance for 0 isk.

How many times i had 10mil kill right on my tornado, and for 2 days no one cared to claim it?

Effort, this is what you are missing in antiganking.

+1

Tear Gatherer. Quebecker. Has no Honer. Salt Harvester.

Broadcast 4 Reps -- YOU ARE NOT ALONE, EVER

Instigator of the First ISD Thunderdome

CCL Loyalist

Dom Arkaral
Bannheim
Cuttlefish Collective
#264 - 2016-02-09 14:05:42 UTC
Lucas Kell wrote:
Dom Arkaral wrote:
Hey guy, is this a post about CODE. and aanti-ganking?
No it's a post about wreck hp buff... and that concerns everyone ingame.
The ONLY people I saw hating on this buff is AG.
That's because it's a direct nerf to one of the few things AGs could do to negatively affect gankers. If this were balanced out with improvements in other areas to make active anti-ganking more viable, it wouldn't be so bad a change. Without that though it's a kick in the nuts to a group that's already laying on the floor.


This buff is bigger than you, Anti-Ganking and CODE.
Get over it

And like Tora would say, Adapt or Die

Tear Gatherer. Quebecker. Has no Honer. Salt Harvester.

Broadcast 4 Reps -- YOU ARE NOT ALONE, EVER

Instigator of the First ISD Thunderdome

CCL Loyalist

Lucas Kell
Solitude Trading
S.N.O.T.
#265 - 2016-02-09 14:15:13 UTC
Anthar Thebess wrote:
Antiganking and ganking is role playing in eve.
To do both you need to dedicate lot of time.
I also gank, mostly tornado or vexor.
If i sit for 8 hours on the gate waiting and scanning for target i don't expect for antiganking to be less time consuming.

Want to be good antiganker?
Patrol gank areas 8 hours a day with friends.
Battlecruisers are used for ganking freighters, pilots have kill rights or less than -5 sec status.
Why you don't insta point them in a svipul or loki and then kill them?
5 guys can easily disrupt most of the ganks this way - just by fitting 2 points on each ship you remove 10 battlecruisers from the gank fleet.
Don't want to pay isk to activate kill right? Even when this is sole purpose of this mechanic.
Form alliance, and ask all freighter pilots to put kill rights to this alliance for 0 isk.

How many times i had 10mil kill right on my tornado, and for 2 days no one cared to claim it?

Effort, this is what you are missing in antiganking.
OK, so prove it. Because the way it looks at the moment, even though this is obvious advice, not a single anti-ganker has managed to pull this off. I fail to believe that lack of effort is the issue here (since that would suggest that noone that chooses to anti-gank is able to put in any effort, and anyone that can put in effort chooses not to anti-gank), and in my opinion it's that the mechanics to defend a target from gankers are incredibly weak and easily countered.

I think you are underestimating the complexity of the situation overstating the effects that would have on the gankers. During Burn Amarr we had a huge number of anti-gankers trying to point on the undock and on the gates to the target, and swarms of them around the target, and we didn't even make any special effort to defeat them, just added more disposable F1 monkeys to the fleet. Other than giving us something to do in local while we were waiting out our timers, they were laughable incapable of slowing us down regardless of the effort they put in.

The Indecisive Noob - EVE fan blog.

Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list.

Lucas Kell
Solitude Trading
S.N.O.T.
#266 - 2016-02-09 14:17:06 UTC
Dom Arkaral wrote:
This buff is bigger than you, Anti-Ganking and CODE.
Get over it

And like Tora would say, Adapt or Die
Tora would generally be pro-content too I imagine though, whereas you seem to be against the idea of having a viable opposing team to fight. Stop being such a carebear.

The Indecisive Noob - EVE fan blog.

Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list.

baltec1
Bat Country
Pandemic Horde
#267 - 2016-02-09 14:23:37 UTC
Lucas Kell wrote:

I think you are underestimating the complexity of the situation overstating the effects that would have on the gankers. During Burn Amarr we had a huge number of anti-gankers trying to point on the undock and on the gates to the target, and swarms of them around the target, and we didn't even make any special effort to defeat them, just added more disposable F1 monkeys to the fleet. Other than giving us something to do in local while we were waiting out our timers, they were laughable incapable of slowing us down regardless of the effort they put in.


Because they were unorganized, running poorly fitted ships, zero probers, not using any good tactics or even communicating with each other. We lost more to the police than anti gankers because of those reasons. They didn't even try to find the undock ping we were using.

AG doesn't win because its full of bad pilots who cant work together. Meanwhile you have RFF doing their own protection and raking in an utter fortune while being so safe they might as well be immune to attack.
Dom Arkaral
Bannheim
Cuttlefish Collective
#268 - 2016-02-09 14:23:52 UTC  |  Edited by: Dom Arkaral
Lucas Kell wrote:
Dom Arkaral wrote:
This buff is bigger than you, Anti-Ganking and CODE.
Get over it

And like Tora would say, Adapt or Die
Tora would generally be pro-content too I imagine though, whereas you seem to be against the idea of having a viable opposing team to fight. Stop being such a carebear.


Lol says the Internet tearrorist (lol tearrorist.. get it?)

I know plenty of SMA that gank, I have ganked on my scout. Maybe it's time you tried it instead of making a fool of yourself on the forums...
Htfu or gtfo

Seriously

Ty

Tear Gatherer. Quebecker. Has no Honer. Salt Harvester.

Broadcast 4 Reps -- YOU ARE NOT ALONE, EVER

Instigator of the First ISD Thunderdome

CCL Loyalist

Anthar Thebess
#269 - 2016-02-09 14:29:19 UTC  |  Edited by: Anthar Thebess
Lucas Kell wrote:
OK, so prove it. Because the way it looks at the moment, even though this is obvious advice, not a single anti-ganker has managed to pull this off.


This is a problem, you need more than 1 person to do it.
Try armor HIC that have insta lock, they scram at 32km range can mount 5 hic scrams.
3 people sitting at gate can capture up to 15 gank ships.
Dom Arkaral
Bannheim
Cuttlefish Collective
#270 - 2016-02-09 14:33:25 UTC
Anthar Thebess wrote:
Lucas Kell wrote:
OK, so prove it. Because the way it looks at the moment, even though this is obvious advice, not a single anti-ganker has managed to pull this off.


This is a problem, you need more than 1 person to do it.
Try armor HIC that have insta lock, they scram at 32km range can mount 5 hic scrams.
3 people sitting at gate can capture up to 15 gank ships.

HICs can only mount one bubble mod... (those that have infinite point with the script)
Sorry Twisted

Tear Gatherer. Quebecker. Has no Honer. Salt Harvester.

Broadcast 4 Reps -- YOU ARE NOT ALONE, EVER

Instigator of the First ISD Thunderdome

CCL Loyalist

Lucas Kell
Solitude Trading
S.N.O.T.
#271 - 2016-02-09 14:40:33 UTC
baltec1 wrote:
Because they were unorganized, running poorly fitted ships, zero probers, not using any good tactics or even communicating with each other. We lost more to the police than anti gankers because of those reasons. They didn't even try to find the undock ping we were using.

AG doesn't win because its full of bad pilots who cant work together. Meanwhile you have RFF doing their own protection and raking in an utter fortune while being so safe they might as well be immune to attack.
So prove it. Demonstrate how easily you can be an anti-ganker if you put the effort in and I will gladly admit defeat.

Also RFF are haulers, not anti-gankers. Unless you are suggesting anti-gankers are given the ability to remotely control how other people's freighters are fit, loaded cargo and fly, it's still irrelevant. Plus if you wanted to drop an RFF freighter, you could. There's no such thing as immunity to ganking.

Dom Arkaral wrote:
I know plenty of SMA that gank, I have ganked on my scout. Maybe it's time you tried it instead of making a fool of yourself on the forums...
I do. Stop being terrible.

Anthar Thebess wrote:
This is a problem, you need more than 1 person to do it.
Try armor HIC that have insta lock, they scram at 32km range can mount 5 hic scrams.
3 people sitting at gate can capture up to 15 gank ships.
I'm sure you do, yet I've seen fleets of anti-gankers still unable to do a damn thing to even slow down a gank. I think the phrase "easier said than done" comes into play here. But by all means demonstrate how you can consistently stop ganks with your instalocking hics.

The Indecisive Noob - EVE fan blog.

Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list.

Masao Kurata
Perkone
Caldari State
#272 - 2016-02-09 14:40:44 UTC
Lucas Kell wrote:
OK, so save me the effort of doing it myself.


FTFY.
Dom Arkaral
Bannheim
Cuttlefish Collective
#273 - 2016-02-09 14:44:55 UTC
Lucas Kell wrote:
Dom Arkaral wrote:
I know plenty of SMA that gank, I have ganked on my scout. Maybe it's time you tried it instead of making a fool of yourself on the forums...
I do. Stop being terrible.

Prove it

Lol bring it son, I'll be waiting for ya :)

Tear Gatherer. Quebecker. Has no Honer. Salt Harvester.

Broadcast 4 Reps -- YOU ARE NOT ALONE, EVER

Instigator of the First ISD Thunderdome

CCL Loyalist

Lucas Kell
Solitude Trading
S.N.O.T.
#274 - 2016-02-09 14:52:23 UTC
Masao Kurata wrote:
Lucas Kell wrote:
OK, so save me the effort of doing it myself.
FTFY.
He's the one making the wild claim that anti-ganking is easy. I've given it a try and seen that it's not as easy as it seems, and all the player failing at anti-ganking daily would seem to be further proof. If he wants me to take this claim seriously he needs to provide evidence of anti-gankers succeeding somewhat consistently under the current mechanics. He won't though because he can't.

Dom Arkaral wrote:
Prove it

Lol bring it son, I'll be waiting for ya :)
I'm sure there's some on this characters killboard somewhere. If not try my alt Argus Kell, he's definitely got some from Burn Jita. Can't remember which alts I used during Burn Amarr, none on my remaining active accounts I'm pretty sure.

Well that was easy.


The Indecisive Noob - EVE fan blog.

Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list.

Dom Arkaral
Bannheim
Cuttlefish Collective
#275 - 2016-02-09 14:55:50 UTC
Lucas Kell wrote:
Masao Kurata wrote:
Lucas Kell wrote:
OK, so save me the effort of doing it myself.
FTFY.
He's the one making the wild claim that anti-ganking is easy. I've given it a try and seen that it's not as easy as it seems, and all the player failing at anti-ganking daily would seem to be further proof. If he wants me to take this claim seriously he needs to provide evidence of anti-gankers succeeding somewhat consistently under the current mechanics. He won't though because he can't.

Dom Arkaral wrote:
Prove it

Lol bring it son, I'll be waiting for ya :)
I'm sure there's some on this characters killboard somewhere. If not try my alt Argus Kell, he's definitely got some from Burn Jita. Can't remember which alts I used during Burn Amarr, none on my remaining active accounts I'm pretty sure.

Well that was easy.



Lol are those the only time you actually ganked?
Did you ever solo gank anything or do a small freighter fleet?

If those are the only ganking events you did, you clearly have no clue about ganking lol

Tear Gatherer. Quebecker. Has no Honer. Salt Harvester.

Broadcast 4 Reps -- YOU ARE NOT ALONE, EVER

Instigator of the First ISD Thunderdome

CCL Loyalist

Anthar Thebess
#276 - 2016-02-09 15:01:09 UTC  |  Edited by: Anthar Thebess
Dom Arkaral wrote:
Anthar Thebess wrote:
Lucas Kell wrote:
OK, so prove it. Because the way it looks at the moment, even though this is obvious advice, not a single anti-ganker has managed to pull this off.


This is a problem, you need more than 1 person to do it.
Try armor HIC that have insta lock, they scram at 32km range can mount 5 hic scrams.
3 people sitting at gate can capture up to 15 gank ships.

HICs can only mount one bubble mod... (those that have infinite point with the script)
Sorry Twisted

?????
My broadsword have 5 scrams.
Gully Alex Foyle
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#277 - 2016-02-09 15:02:48 UTC
Just had a look at zkill, most recent freighter kills, first page.

18 out of 22 were either not tanked or 'anti-tanked' (cargo expanders).


82% of freighter pilots don't even try to avoid getting ganked! Roll


This discussion is just silly, it's like saying that mechanics should change because some fool dies repeatedly trying to 1v1 a svipul in a noobship.

Make space glamorous! Is EVE dying or not? Ask the EVE-O Death-o-meter!

Dom Arkaral
Bannheim
Cuttlefish Collective
#278 - 2016-02-09 15:07:00 UTC
Anthar Thebess wrote:
Dom Arkaral wrote:
Anthar Thebess wrote:
Lucas Kell wrote:
OK, so prove it. Because the way it looks at the moment, even though this is obvious advice, not a single anti-ganker has managed to pull this off.


This is a problem, you need more than 1 person to do it.
Try armor HIC that have insta lock, they scram at 32km range can mount 5 hic scrams.
3 people sitting at gate can capture up to 15 gank ships.

HICs can only mount one bubble mod... (those that have infinite point with the script)
Sorry Twisted

?????
My broadsword have 5 scrams.

Not the warp disruption field generators

And if you do, how do you shoot stuff? Lol

Tear Gatherer. Quebecker. Has no Honer. Salt Harvester.

Broadcast 4 Reps -- YOU ARE NOT ALONE, EVER

Instigator of the First ISD Thunderdome

CCL Loyalist

Anthar Thebess
#279 - 2016-02-09 15:09:33 UTC
Dom Arkaral wrote:
Anthar Thebess wrote:
Dom Arkaral wrote:
Anthar Thebess wrote:
Lucas Kell wrote:
OK, so prove it. Because the way it looks at the moment, even though this is obvious advice, not a single anti-ganker has managed to pull this off.


This is a problem, you need more than 1 person to do it.
Try armor HIC that have insta lock, they scram at 32km range can mount 5 hic scrams.
3 people sitting at gate can capture up to 15 gank ships.

HICs can only mount one bubble mod... (those that have infinite point with the script)
Sorry Twisted

?????
My broadsword have 5 scrams.

Not the warp disruption field generators

And if you do, how do you shoot stuff? Lol

I don't shoot stuff, people do it for me, and in case of antigankers faction police.
My job is to capture target, and keep him pin down.
Lucas Kell
Solitude Trading
S.N.O.T.
#280 - 2016-02-09 15:10:58 UTC
Dom Arkaral wrote:
Lol are those the only time you actually ganked?
Did you ever solo gank anything or do a small freighter fleet?

If those are the only ganking events you did, you clearly have no clue about ganking lol
I've done loads of different type, I just have 20 accounts, so trying to keep track of which character did what and when isn't the easiest of tasks. I've done most types though, solo a dualbox miner ganking, solo alpha ganking autopiloters, large and small group freighter ganking, I FCed a few back during one of the interdictions too.

That said, you're attempting to attack my knowledge of ganking for what reason exactly? Even if I'd never ganked a single ship, the incredible lack of successful anti-gankers speaks of itself.

Out of curiosity, would you really be against them making anti-ganking more viable? Like under all circumstances? What if they made ganking in general easier but gave people more tools to actively defend ships so that there was a much more active and dynamic fight?

The Indecisive Noob - EVE fan blog.

Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list.