These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Ganking alleged AFK miners in Hi-Sec 0.5 - 1.0

First post
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Chopper Rollins
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#101 - 2016-02-08 05:26:52 UTC
Tippia wrote:

How did it take more effort and risk to gank at a time when ships were more fragile and when the punishments were minimal to non-existent? I know you're just lying about this because that what you always do, but you could you at least explain the insane and twisted logic behind your lie?


This thread will lose any chance of yielding insight of any kind if intelligent people are baited into wrestling with the oiled squid of Infinity Ziona's opinions trying to pose as facts. Followed by wild claims and outright lies devolving into RL threats and whacky nonsense. We've had that thread, it was incredible, let it rest.
One thing's for sure, threads like these make me want to go shoot some poor schmuck's Venture in lowsec. Thanks for the inspiration i guess.



Goggles. Making me look good. Making you look good.
Ilithyia Borgia
The Conference Elite
The Conference
#102 - 2016-02-08 05:42:50 UTC
Michel Petit wrote:
I've been playing EVE for several years and the one thing I can't wrap my head around is why it's ok and even encouraged to gank Hi-Sec solo miners.


EVE is a game and ganking is fun. Reason enough.
Nitshe Razvedka
#103 - 2016-02-08 05:55:21 UTC
Jacques d'Orleans wrote:
Nitshe Razvedka wrote:
If you break down the average gankers KB, they are individuals lacking basic pvp skills. Hoping to maintain their poor self esteem by attacking the most defenceless targets. Like street junkies attacking the elderly. Knowing if they fleeted up in null they would have their buts handed to them..


Well, when someone is talking about the KB's of others he should be prepared to show his own. Ah, i forgot you don't have one, because your just a forum alt, which means that you don't even have the self esteem to post with your main and then you have the chuzpa to talk about others assumed "low self esteem". Seriously?
Also it would be fine, when you're talking about the PvP skills of others, to show us yours in form of a KB, ah sorry, i forgot you're just a forum warrioring blatherer.



You must have been the one in corp who gets the joke last, let you in on a secret; Your hapless James315 licence isn't going to save from being ganked. Can link you a internal CODE email having a laugh at all the "dumb asses" who bought licences and have them dutifully in their bio.

Pay me 25 isk and I will post the link. Keep the licence in the bio an keep looking like a............!

Thieving pirates discuss INTEGRITY; Anarchist gankers give us LAWS; and Whoring merc's cry then blow off clients with INSULTS.

Up is down and down is up in the C&P Forum.
Teckos Pech
Hogyoku
Goonswarm Federation
#104 - 2016-02-08 06:13:35 UTC
Infinity Ziona wrote:

the original EvE subscribers such as myself are the reason EvE exists. We signed to an EvE that was harsh abd relatively balanced. we populated EvE and played it the way it was designed to be played. one of the defining things about us originals is we prefered EvE harsh. any changes that make it easy or risk free we dislike. getting a real non-consentual kill in EvE should always take effort and risk. ganking in that sense is anti-EvE and ill forever oppose it.

the reason pcu is low is because we have wow stained devs directing devepment instead of eve devs.


Oh **** off you whine bear. Just go. We'll be better off with out you, Bella, and Admiral Foxbolt. Just leave.

"The curious task of economics is to demonstrate to men how little they really know about what they imagine they can design."--Friedrich August von Hayek

8 Golden Rules for EVE Online
Nitshe Razvedka
#105 - 2016-02-08 06:16:22 UTC
Jacques d'Orleans wrote:
Nitshe Razvedka wrote:
If you break down the average gankers KB, they are individuals lacking basic pvp skills. Hoping to maintain their poor self esteem by attacking the most defenceless targets. Like street junkies attacking the elderly. Knowing if they fleeted up in null they would have their buts handed to them..


Well, when someone is talking about the KB's of others he should be prepared to show his own. Ah, i forgot you don't have one, because your just a forum alt, which means that you don't even have the self esteem to post with your main and then you have the chuzpa to talk about others assumed "low self esteem". Seriously?
Also it would be fine, when you're talking about the PvP skills of others, to show us yours in form of a KB, ah sorry, i forgot you're just a forum warrioring blatherer.



My main is used to troll griefers.Evil To effectively troll my main is secret.

Tora Bushido knows my RL background and main toon. Tora acts as a cut out. So I can say to window-lickers who buy licences from tard gankers how crap they are, an if push comes to shove he can confirm my unicum stats to tard gankers as well.

Feel owned??!! Burn your licence to start with.CoolBig smile

Thieving pirates discuss INTEGRITY; Anarchist gankers give us LAWS; and Whoring merc's cry then blow off clients with INSULTS.

Up is down and down is up in the C&P Forum.
Infinity Ziona
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#106 - 2016-02-08 06:17:42 UTC
Chopper Rollins wrote:
Tippia wrote:

How did it take more effort and risk to gank at a time when ships were more fragile and when the punishments were minimal to non-existent? I know you're just lying about this because that what you always do, but you could you at least explain the insane and twisted logic behind your lie?


This thread will lose any chance of yielding insight of any kind if intelligent people are baited into wrestling with the oiled squid of Infinity Ziona's opinions trying to pose as facts. Followed by wild claims and outright lies devolving into RL threats and whacky nonsense. We've had that thread, it was incredible, let it rest.
One thing's for sure, threads like these make me want to go shoot some poor schmuck's Venture in lowsec. Thanks for the inspiration i guess.




feeling threatened by my reasoned analysis? we did have that other thread and the proofs in the sig. i exposed the null hypocrisy and null didnt like it. all my predictions came to pass and my claims proved correct.

CCP Fozzie “We can see how much money people are making in nullsec and it is, a gigantic amount, a shit-ton… in null sec anomalies. “*

Kaalrus pwned..... :)
Chopper Rollins
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#107 - 2016-02-08 06:26:52 UTC
Infinity Ziona wrote:
Chopper Rollins wrote:
Tippia wrote:

How did it take more effort and risk to gank at a time when ships were more fragile and when the punishments were minimal to non-existent? I know you're just lying about this because that what you always do, but you could you at least explain the insane and twisted logic behind your lie?


This thread will lose any chance of yielding insight of any kind if intelligent people are baited into wrestling with the oiled squid of Infinity Ziona's opinions trying to pose as facts. Followed by wild claims and outright lies devolving into RL threats and whacky nonsense. We've had that thread, it was incredible, let it rest.
One thing's for sure, threads like these make me want to go shoot some poor schmuck's Venture in lowsec. Thanks for the inspiration i guess.




feeling threatened by my reasoned analysis? we did have that other thread and the proofs in the sig. i exposed the null hypocrisy and null didnt like it. all my predictions came to pass and my claims proved correct.


Actually you lost me when you claimed to have forced null sov holders to give you docking rights at one of their stations while killing their line members. I was really interested in that. You posted pictures of you docked at a station AFTER it had changed hands.
Then there was the crazy thread where you threatened to step to people in RL over some manufactured nonsense. So a person with no integrity lost all credibility too.
Interestingly, the only pilot i could find on zkill with the name Nitshe is in a corp called Carebear Abortion Clinic.
I wonder, is this thread a gigantic ruse?


Goggles. Making me look good. Making you look good.
Teckos Pech
Hogyoku
Goonswarm Federation
#108 - 2016-02-08 06:28:30 UTC
Infinity Ziona wrote:
Chopper Rollins wrote:
Tippia wrote:

How did it take more effort and risk to gank at a time when ships were more fragile and when the punishments were minimal to non-existent? I know you're just lying about this because that what you always do, but you could you at least explain the insane and twisted logic behind your lie?


This thread will lose any chance of yielding insight of any kind if intelligent people are baited into wrestling with the oiled squid of Infinity Ziona's opinions trying to pose as facts. Followed by wild claims and outright lies devolving into RL threats and whacky nonsense. We've had that thread, it was incredible, let it rest.
One thing's for sure, threads like these make me want to go shoot some poor schmuck's Venture in lowsec. Thanks for the inspiration i guess.




feeling threatened by my reasoned analysis? we did have that other thread and the proofs in the sig. i exposed the null hypocrisy and null didnt like it. all my predictions came to pass and my claims proved correct.


What reasoned analysis? Last I knew you were quiting, but here you are whining once again for CCP to buff a play style that has not sustained player growth ever.

Why don't you just follow through on your "threats"...oh yeah, because you come crawling back and demanding that CCP make changes that have not been shown to support player growth.

"The curious task of economics is to demonstrate to men how little they really know about what they imagine they can design."--Friedrich August von Hayek

8 Golden Rules for EVE Online
Infinity Ziona
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#109 - 2016-02-08 06:37:48 UTC
Teckos Pech wrote:
Infinity Ziona wrote:

the original EvE subscribers such as myself are the reason EvE exists. We signed to an EvE that was harsh abd relatively balanced. we populated EvE and played it the way it was designed to be played. one of the defining things about us originals is we prefered EvE harsh. any changes that make it easy or risk free we dislike. getting a real non-consentual kill in EvE should always take effort and risk. ganking in that sense is anti-EvE and ill forever oppose it.

the reason pcu is low is because we have wow stained devs directing devepment instead of eve devs.


Oh **** off you whine bear. Just go. We'll be better off with out you, Bella, and Admiral Foxbolt. Just leave.

be respectful when posting

CCP Fozzie “We can see how much money people are making in nullsec and it is, a gigantic amount, a shit-ton… in null sec anomalies. “*

Kaalrus pwned..... :)
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#110 - 2016-02-08 06:46:53 UTC
Infinity Ziona wrote:
feeling threatened by my reasoned analysis?
What reasoned analysis?
Your entire argument is a tangle of contradictions and history revisionism and you have offered no logic to tie your conclusions together with your incorrect rendition of history.

Quote:
all my predictions came to pass and my claims proved correct.
What predictions?
The only ones I can see are that you think a harsher environment will bring back the crowd, but then you go on to suggest that the game be made less harsh. You keep claiming that things were better back when highsec was pretty much a free-for-all, but then you turn right around and suggest that the devs should move away from that. How does any of what you lie about make any sense whatsoever?!
Nitshe Razvedka
#111 - 2016-02-08 07:12:14 UTC
Infinity Ziona wrote:
Teckos Pech wrote:
Infinity Ziona wrote:

the original EvE subscribers such as myself are the reason EvE exists. We signed to an EvE that was harsh abd relatively balanced. we populated EvE and played it the way it was designed to be played. one of the defining things about us originals is we prefered EvE harsh. any changes that make it easy or risk free we dislike. getting a real non-consentual kill in EvE should always take effort and risk. ganking in that sense is anti-EvE and ill forever oppose it.

the reason pcu is low is because we have wow stained devs directing devepment instead of eve devs.


Oh **** off you whine bear. Just go. We'll be better off with out you, Bella, and Admiral Foxbolt. Just leave.

be respectful when posting



Pick just one window-licking idiot Infinity and I will pay a couple of alliances to wardec them for a month.

Choose one to grief and collectively punish.

Forums are my fun time.EvilBig smile



It's only Eve......

Thieving pirates discuss INTEGRITY; Anarchist gankers give us LAWS; and Whoring merc's cry then blow off clients with INSULTS.

Up is down and down is up in the C&P Forum.
Ozzie Udan
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#112 - 2016-02-08 07:17:31 UTC
Interesting read, I say get in your damn space Ships and fight them, wouldn't that be fun to,

Take it from me Code tears are the best,

As a side line I'm collecting code dead corpe, only rule i Imake I must be on the whore mail that killed them

A soft answer turneth away wrath. Once wrath is looking the other way, shoot it in the head A painting of me

Morgan Agrivar
Doomheim
#113 - 2016-02-08 08:00:20 UTC
This thread has just left the building...thank you and good night. We love you, Cleveland! *\o/*
Top Guac
Doomheim
#114 - 2016-02-08 08:41:34 UTC  |  Edited by: Top Guac
Nitshe Razvedka wrote:
Infinity Ziona wrote:
Teckos Pech wrote:
Infinity Ziona wrote:

the original EvE subscribers such as myself are the reason EvE exists. We signed to an EvE that was harsh abd relatively balanced. we populated EvE and played it the way it was designed to be played. one of the defining things about us originals is we prefered EvE harsh. any changes that make it easy or risk free we dislike. getting a real non-consentual kill in EvE should always take effort and risk. ganking in that sense is anti-EvE and ill forever oppose it.

the reason pcu is low is because we have wow stained devs directing devepment instead of eve devs.


Oh **** off you whine bear. Just go. We'll be better off with out you, Bella, and Admiral Foxbolt. Just leave.

be respectful when posting



Pick just one window-licking idiot Infinity and I will pay a couple of alliances to wardec them for a month.

Choose one to grief and collectively punish.

Forums are my fun time.EvilBig smile



It's only Eve......

Oh boy your a ******.

You and infinity are the window lickers, so if you are going to choose a wardec target, it's either you or him.

He rides a Harley though and will send his dog after you, so you better pay mercs to wardec yourself, just in case.
Infinity Ziona
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#115 - 2016-02-08 11:45:39 UTC
Top Guac wrote:
Nitshe Razvedka wrote:
Infinity Ziona wrote:
Teckos Pech wrote:
Infinity Ziona wrote:

the original EvE subscribers such as myself are the reason EvE exists. We signed to an EvE that was harsh abd relatively balanced. we populated EvE and played it the way it was designed to be played. one of the defining things about us originals is we prefered EvE harsh. any changes that make it easy or risk free we dislike. getting a real non-consentual kill in EvE should always take effort and risk. ganking in that sense is anti-EvE and ill forever oppose it.

the reason pcu is low is because we have wow stained devs directing devepment instead of eve devs.


Oh **** off you whine bear. Just go. We'll be better off with out you, Bella, and Admiral Foxbolt. Just leave.

be respectful when posting



Pick just one window-licking idiot Infinity and I will pay a couple of alliances to wardec them for a month.

Choose one to grief and collectively punish.

Forums are my fun time.EvilBig smile



It's only Eve......

Oh boy your a ******.

You and infinity are the window lickers, so if you are going to choose a wardec target, it's either you or him.

He rides a Harley though and will send his dog after you, so you better pay mercs to wardec yourself, just in case.

My dog died. Harley got repossessed. Also haved licked a window or two in my life. Off Topic though.

CCP Fozzie “We can see how much money people are making in nullsec and it is, a gigantic amount, a shit-ton… in null sec anomalies. “*

Kaalrus pwned..... :)
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#116 - 2016-02-08 11:49:18 UTC
Infinity Ziona wrote:
My dog died. Harley got repossessed. Also haved licked a window or two in my life.

…and you still haven't quit in spite of promising to do so many times over.
Nitshe Razvedka
#117 - 2016-02-08 11:49:22 UTC  |  Edited by: Nitshe Razvedka
Top Guac wrote:
[quote=Nitshe Razvedka][quote=Infinity Ziona][quote=Teckos Pech][quote=Infinity Ziona]


You and infinity are the window lickers, so if you are going to choose a wardec target, it's either you or him.

He rides a Harley though and will send his dog after you, so you better pay mercs to wardec yourself, just in case.



An avocado scammer who has never undocked plays devils advocate for the window-licker ganking tards, choice pick to be your champion tards. Roll

Thieving pirates discuss INTEGRITY; Anarchist gankers give us LAWS; and Whoring merc's cry then blow off clients with INSULTS.

Up is down and down is up in the C&P Forum.
Infinity Ziona
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#118 - 2016-02-08 11:58:01 UTC
Tippia wrote:
Infinity Ziona wrote:
My dog died. Harley got repossessed. Also haved licked a window or two in my life.

…and you still haven't quit in spite of promising to do so many times over.

I did quit. now im back. quiting is an awesome thing so I quit quiting. When I decide to leave ill be quiting quiting quiting.

CCP Fozzie “We can see how much money people are making in nullsec and it is, a gigantic amount, a shit-ton… in null sec anomalies. “*

Kaalrus pwned..... :)
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#119 - 2016-02-08 12:00:01 UTC
Infinity Ziona wrote:
I did quit. now im back.
So you didn't actually quit.
Yet another lie on your part.
Infinity Ziona
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#120 - 2016-02-08 12:12:08 UTC
Tippia wrote:
Infinity Ziona wrote:
I did quit. now im back.
So you didn't actually quit.
Yet another lie on your part.

no i quit quitting. its a requirement of quitting quitting to have first quit.

CCP Fozzie “We can see how much money people are making in nullsec and it is, a gigantic amount, a shit-ton… in null sec anomalies. “*

Kaalrus pwned..... :)