These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Market Discussions

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
123Next page
 

XL Citadel close to Jita - 0% tax?

First post
Author
Jay Plorer
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#1 - 2016-01-26 22:57:50 UTC  |  Edited by: Jay Plorer
Hello all,

I hope you are all as excited I am for the next meta: Citadels. http://community.eveonline.com/news/dev-blogs/building-your-citadel-one-block-at-a-time/

As you know, Citadels will be somewhat of a hybrid between player made stations, and what we currently call POS'. One of the great things about Citadels is that people will be able to trade items at zero (edit: low) percent tax (provided that the owner chooses so).

Recently, someone calculated that there was 350 billion in profit made in Jita daily. I think his or her numbers were found to be off, but 350 billion is just the margin. Imagine how much isk is actually changing hands! Likely trillions a day...

Jita currently charges a tax for every isk spent. Even if this tax were as low as 1%, same would amount to 10 billion in taxes per trillion. With citadels, we could possibly forego this tax.

Do you think that, with enough publicity, people could be persuaded to change the current market from Jita 4-4 to possibly an XL-Citadel located somewhere in an adjacent system?

If so, I propose getting together and building an XL Citadel in Jita (and maybe later one in Amarr). I have quite a few billion saved up, which I would be willing to invest, but obviously I cannot do it alone.

Let me know what you think. If there is interest, there would need to be a way to remunerate those that contribute. Maybe a lottery based on the amount of isk that you donate? If you win the lottery you get your name name as part of the citadel name for a certain amount of time?

Obviously all the isk would go to a third party, such as Chribba. We could even agree to make Chribba the owner of the citadels to make sure that there is no abuse and that taxes aren’t raised.

Note: this assumes that an XL Citadel would be very hard to destroy in High Security - possibly a reasonable assumption given that no capital ships are available. Although any items within the citadel would be transferred to another station if ever it does get destroyed.

Edit: This could also be used for free repairs.

Edit 2: From the looks of it, this may actually become a thing. CCP just announced that it is planning on raising tax in NPC stations from 2.5% to 7.5 or 8%. Whoa. https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=471995&find=unread
Jay Plorer
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#2 - 2016-01-26 23:06:12 UTC  |  Edited by: Jay Plorer
Reserved.
Tau Cabalander
Retirement Retreat
Working Stiffs
#3 - 2016-01-26 23:18:56 UTC
Needs a catchy name like TITANS4U CITADELS4U
Jerry T Pepridge
Meta Game Analysis and Investment INC.
#4 - 2016-01-26 23:32:19 UTC
2-3-4 years away.

better plan now guys

@JerryTPepridge

ExookiZ
The Dark Space Initiative
Scary Wormhole People
#5 - 2016-01-26 23:33:09 UTC
i have a feeling that like POSes, citadels will not be allowed in Jita.

Also paints a target, someones gonna war dec it and roll over it with a dread fleet unless it has a very dedicated defense initiative.

Finally, isk sinks are good, i suspect that SCC taxes will apply to any market, regardless of where it is, They still apply to null stations.

Event Organizer of EVE North East

Lord Haur
Star Frontiers
Brotherhood of Spacers
#6 - 2016-01-26 23:37:40 UTC
ExookiZ wrote:
Finally, isk sinks are good, i suspect that SCC taxes will apply to any market, regardless of where it is, They still apply to null stations.


Certainly.

Although it looks as though CCP wants to make citadels have lower taxes: (quoting from the initial structure blog from after Fanfest last year)

"We are also considering giving those a tax advantage next to NPC stations (either by increasing NPC taxes or having tax reductions on the player-made variations)."
Railroad Cop
Carebears -With- Guns
Goonswarm Federation
#7 - 2016-01-27 00:32:37 UTC
No.

Current stations can not be destroyed - there is no risk in having trillions of assets sitting in a station.

The second you go to move a trade hub out of a station into a citadel - everyone's assets are at risk. A citadel can be destroyed.

The only way this will happen is if CCP makes it so existing stations can be destroyed after citadel's have been released - then yes - most definitely. What you want will happen - and i can foresee Chribba being the one to lead and make this happen.

If Chribba owned the Citadel - everyone would be at ease that they are not going to be screwed over. God help anyone that decides to try and take on Chribba - as people would make this their main trade hub and you can guarantee an army will stand up to defend it considering how much in assets would be sitting in the thing.

Speaking of which - Chribba??? Have you had any thoughts on this? :)
0000000000ZERO0000000000
Zero Zentharis
#8 - 2016-01-27 01:08:45 UTC
Making a tiny outpost in .5 heavily trafficked system for gankers to chill in is a plausible idea.
Market hub with no taxes is fairly stupid idea.

"People will stand up to defend their assets" is rather adorable. Every single null war is won whenever the other side decides to stop logging in. And that is in null, where people are accustomed to defending their own space. Why should a random high-sec pubbie do anything whenever their beloved taxless citadel burns?

If anything it would be an interesting social experiment, on whether there are more people who like to press F1 in Oneiros or in Oracle.

Jay Plorer
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#9 - 2016-01-27 01:39:38 UTC
Railroad Cop wrote:
No.

Current stations can not be destroyed - there is no risk in having trillions of assets sitting in a station.

The second you go to move a trade hub out of a station into a citadel - everyone's assets are at risk. A citadel can be destroyed.

The only way this will happen is if CCP makes it so existing stations can be destroyed after citadel's have been released - then yes - most definitely. What you want will happen - and i can foresee Chribba being the one to lead and make this happen.

If Chribba owned the Citadel - everyone would be at ease that they are not going to be screwed over. God help anyone that decides to try and take on Chribba - as people would make this their main trade hub and you can guarantee an army will stand up to defend it considering how much in assets would be sitting in the thing.

Speaking of which - Chribba??? Have you had any thoughts on this? :)


I aqm pretty sure they said that items within citadels would not be destroyed - merely placed in a close NPC station...
The Slayer
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
#10 - 2016-01-27 01:58:57 UTC
Jay Plorer wrote:

I aqm pretty sure they said that items within citadels would not be destroyed - merely placed in a close NPC station...



You also have to pay a fee to get them back when this happens
Alexi Stokov
State War Academy
Caldari State
#11 - 2016-01-27 02:25:14 UTC
Why would anyone put in the time and effort to build a citadel and set a 0% tax rate?
Sabriz Adoudel
Move along there is nothing here
#12 - 2016-01-27 03:30:14 UTC
The Slayer wrote:
Jay Plorer wrote:

I aqm pretty sure they said that items within citadels would not be destroyed - merely placed in a close NPC station...



You also have to pay a fee to get them back when this happens



IIRC the fee applies only if the item is teleported from one system to another. Within the same system no fee.


On the original post - removing the SCC sales tax would be an unmitigated disaster for the game. It's already below optimal in terms of functioning as an ISK sink.

CCP seem quite aware of this (they did increase taxes and broker fees several expansions ago).

I support the New Order and CODE. alliance. www.minerbumping.com

Edwin Rothbard
Interstellar Arbitrage
#13 - 2016-01-27 05:31:42 UTC
I hate to burst your bubble but citadels will most likely have the same system deployment restrictions as POSes: namely they cannot be built in a number of special systems. IE trade hubs such as Jita, Amarr, et al.
Tau Cabalander
Retirement Retreat
Working Stiffs
#14 - 2016-01-29 00:43:18 UTC
Alexi Stokov wrote:
Why would anyone put in the time and effort to build a citadel and set a 0% tax rate?

I would.

A medium citadel (POS replacement) is pretty cheap to install and maintain.
Mephiztopheleze
Laphroaig Inc.
#15 - 2016-01-29 00:54:29 UTC
ExookiZ wrote:
Also paints a target, someones gonna war dec it and roll over it with a dread fleet unless it has a very dedicated defense initiative.


And just how many Dreads are there in HiSec?

I know of one.

Quick, to the Attack Battlecruisers and Sentry Drone VNIs!

Occasional Resident Newbie Correspondent for TMC: http://themittani.com/search/site/mephiztopheleze

This is my Forum Main. My Combat Alt is sambo Inkura

Elizabeth Norn
Nornir Research
Nornir Empire
#16 - 2016-01-29 01:21:11 UTC  |  Edited by: Elizabeth Norn
Mephiztopheleze wrote:
ExookiZ wrote:
Also paints a target, someones gonna war dec it and roll over it with a dread fleet unless it has a very dedicated defense initiative.


And just how many Dreads are there in HiSec?

I know of one.

Quick, to the Attack Battlecruisers and Sentry Drone VNIs!


Currently you're not allowed to use high sec capitals for combat. Hopefully you'll need something a bit tougher than Attack BCs and VNIs, you definitely will for XL Citadels if their testing is any indication of their final power (https://twitter.com/CCP_Fozzie/status/690205264843313152).
Edwin Rothbard
Interstellar Arbitrage
#17 - 2016-01-29 08:22:20 UTC
Mephiztopheleze wrote:
[quote=ExookiZ]And just how many Dreads are there in HiSec?

I know of one.


I suspect there are lots of high sec capitals still. As liz pointed out you aren't allowed to use them in pvp and you aren't allowed to sell them. Mine is getting very dusty sitting in station.
Luna Bowman
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#18 - 2016-01-29 16:03:02 UTC
ExookiZ wrote:
i have a feeling that like POSes, citadels will not be allowed in Jita.

Also paints a target, someones gonna war dec it and roll over it with a dread fleet unless it has a very dedicated defense initiative.

Finally, isk sinks are good, i suspect that SCC taxes will apply to any market, regardless of where it is, They still apply to null stations.


I wonder if dropping one next door to jita would be profitable enough for traders to move one system over.
Luna Bowman
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#19 - 2016-01-29 16:05:26 UTC
Tau Cabalander wrote:
Alexi Stokov wrote:
Why would anyone put in the time and effort to build a citadel and set a 0% tax rate?

I would.

A medium citadel (POS replacement) is pretty cheap to install and maintain.


As far as devs confirmed, only L and XL citadels will support market modules
Nitshe Razvedka
#20 - 2016-01-29 17:51:36 UTC
I would invest for a .5% tax, would give a good ROI.

Could build it half-way between dodixie and jita.

Will need to pay ongoing security to protect investment.

Thieving pirates discuss INTEGRITY; Anarchist gankers give us LAWS; and Whoring merc's cry then blow off clients with INSULTS.

Up is down and down is up in the C&P Forum.

123Next page