These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE Technology Lab

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
Previous page123
 

Hey CCP! Can we have an IGB update?

First post
Author
Bienator II
madmen of the skies
#41 - 2016-01-12 00:44:30 UTC
CCP FoxFour wrote:
Amely Miles wrote:
Removing the IGB in my opinion is a BAD MOVE on CCPs part since majority of people use it in Eve.


Feel free to voice your opinion but saying things like this only hurts your case. When you say this it completely invalidates your case since the majority of users DON'T use the IGB. We have metrics on it, I know how many users open the IGB, how many pages are requested with the IGB, how many times the custom JavaScript hooks are used, etc. The single biggest use of the IGB is leaving it open and letting it refresh for sites like SIggy and Tripwire to track your location in wormholes. Even with that the majority of users do NOT use the IGB. Taking the less than majority and subtracting a substantial portion of that leaves the user base of the IGB at... well not that large at all.

The rest of your points however are far more valid and being kept in mind.


i use it exclusively as picture viewer. for anything else the security risk is too high.

how to fix eve: 1) remove ECM 2) rename dampeners to ECM 3) add new anti-drone ewar for caldari 4) give offgrid boosters ongrid combat value

Jack Tronic
borkedLabs
#42 - 2016-01-12 06:09:06 UTC
CCP FoxFour wrote:
If I get my way the IGB will get nuked next year. I hope to have a location service in CREST early next year so we can start the major transition away from it.


*looks at siggy's codebase needing major rewrite*

*looks at need to also switch to crest for the location tracking*

*looks at real life job to create a system handling 1 million cellular modem devices reporting data remotely in next few months*

*cries*
Aaril
Pandemic Horde Inc.
Pandemic Horde
#43 - 2016-01-12 06:51:54 UTC  |  Edited by: Aaril
My suggestion is to keep the browser...

BUT...add an option to disable it (or vice versa, disable and give a warning when people enable it in their options about security holes).

Also, while we're at it, let us disable links...or if we do click on a link, have it put in our clipboard.
BigSako
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#44 - 2016-01-12 09:49:32 UTC
Removing the IGB will sure have a benefit for CCP in the sense that they do not need to worry about people "hacking" the game or other eve players with a website. It will free resources, for sure. Considering MANY players have a tablet or a smartphone with a rather large screen, it is the right way to go.

However, I personally expect CCP to not just replace the IGB with CREST functionality, but to provide features that make me WANT to switch. Some features will obviously require you to run the EvE client (e.g., location, "showinfo", market stuff, ...), but others may not (read and ANSWERE eve mail, modify the skill queue, etc...).

Communication with the community about those features is key! Make a focus group, hold a chat, gather some developers together on slack, etc.... Because if you lose your 3rd-party developers (which are the main reasons that large groups of people can enjoy the game together, and not just solo), then you will eventually lose your players.

TL;DR: If they (CCP) kill the IGB, they need to provide KILLER FEATURES for CREST to make the change worth it. Communication is key.
CCP FoxFour
C C P
C C P Alliance
#45 - 2016-01-12 10:34:30 UTC
BigSako wrote:
Removing the IGB will sure have a benefit for CCP in the sense that they do not need to worry about people "hacking" the game or other eve players with a website. It will free resources, for sure. Considering MANY players have a tablet or a smartphone with a rather large screen, it is the right way to go.

However, I personally expect CCP to not just replace the IGB with CREST functionality, but to provide features that make me WANT to switch. Some features will obviously require you to run the EvE client (e.g., location, "showinfo", market stuff, ...), but others may not (read and ANSWERE eve mail, modify the skill queue, etc...).

Communication with the community about those features is key! Make a focus group, hold a chat, gather some developers together on slack, etc.... Because if you lose your 3rd-party developers (which are the main reasons that large groups of people can enjoy the game together, and not just solo), then you will eventually lose your players.

TL;DR: If they (CCP) kill the IGB, they need to provide KILLER FEATURES for CREST to make the change worth it. Communication is key.


So basically the existing plan? As is being proven with todays release of things like location and editing waypoints from CREST. Our pain point is going to be not with people that use the custom features of the IGB but with the people who only have 1 monitor and don't want to alt tab. Even as we add features to CREST that are not in the IGB they are going to want those features in the IGB in some way because they don't want to alt tab.

@CCP_FoxFour // Technical Designer // Team Tech Co

Third-party developer? Check out the official developers site for dev blogs, resources, and more.

Fonac
Imperial Academy
Amarr Empire
#46 - 2016-01-12 11:22:24 UTC  |  Edited by: Fonac
CCP FoxFour wrote:
BigSako wrote:
Removing the IGB will sure have a benefit for CCP in the sense that they do not need to worry about people "hacking" the game or other eve players with a website. It will free resources, for sure. Considering MANY players have a tablet or a smartphone with a rather large screen, it is the right way to go.

However, I personally expect CCP to not just replace the IGB with CREST functionality, but to provide features that make me WANT to switch. Some features will obviously require you to run the EvE client (e.g., location, "showinfo", market stuff, ...), but others may not (read and ANSWERE eve mail, modify the skill queue, etc...).

Communication with the community about those features is key! Make a focus group, hold a chat, gather some developers together on slack, etc.... Because if you lose your 3rd-party developers (which are the main reasons that large groups of people can enjoy the game together, and not just solo), then you will eventually lose your players.

TL;DR: If they (CCP) kill the IGB, they need to provide KILLER FEATURES for CREST to make the change worth it. Communication is key.


So basically the existing plan? As is being proven with todays release of things like location and editing waypoints from CREST. Our pain point is going to be not with people that use the custom features of the IGB but with the people who only have 1 monitor and don't want to alt tab. Even as we add features to CREST that are not in the IGB they are going to want those features in the IGB in some way because they don't want to alt tab.



I'll be honest, i do not have the overview to understand what exactly CREST does, and what the possiblities are in the future.
However....

People that can't/won't alt-tab must be a minority... I mean really, alt-tabbing is one of the most beneficial thing you can do while using a computer. I could not imagine a world where alt-tabbing was something i never used, it's only going to limit your abilities, if you abstain from using such an usefull feature of the windows eco system.
Please don't limit your features, because of such people :)

... Oh and also keep up the good work Cool

Edit: So i just read up on CREST... My point still stands.. Who are those people
BigSako
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#47 - 2016-01-12 12:55:15 UTC
Thanks for the reply! Yes, the current endpoints are looking good, let's see what the community makes out of them. However, an excellent example of people that only have on monitor are laptop users. Forcing them to alt-tab might be.... bad? I don't know.

But again, if CREST (or rather the apps that use CREST) offer the ability to use external devices (read: smartphones/tablets), then alt-tabbing this is no longer an issue. I believe the number of people that really "browse the web" in their IGB is rather limited, and alt-tab is a viable option for those people.
Bruce Warhead
Incursion Citadel Network
#48 - 2016-01-12 19:15:15 UTC
If CCP replace used functionality of the IGB with crest data that is available in reasonable usable time intervals, I do not have a problem with removing the IGB.
It is better to be able to use proper website in modern day browsers out of game and have the same functionality then have your website need to function on the ingame browser.

And CCP is already showing that they are going to provide functionality that is going to be lost with the IGB on other resources.
The recent CharacterLocation resource shows that.
So yeah if they are going to keep up the functionality I am all for replacing the ingame browser actually!

But please keep the IGB until the needed data is available over other methods :)

What would be harder to replace are probably functionalities like opening mail windows, sending fleet invites and such by pressing a button in a browser.
It would be nice if the client would just get an interface that you could connect to from an application on the same computer to execute those actions.

Might be a good idea to even make them http post/get calls to actually enable browser websites to call those with simple cross domain ajax requests to localhost.
(Pretty sure that would require the client to set that Access-Control-Allow-Origin header
and you could like specifiy in the local clients settings it self a list of allowed websites, or pop up a message when a website that is not in the list connects for the first time.
Ofc answer that first call without the calling website in the header, just if the user clicks yes, have the website added to the header the next time.


Sure website will need to update the way they access data, but that should not be that hard.


Well that would be my ideas to that matter :)
From some one who just prepared to actually create a website for the ingame browser and on his research hit this forum entry.
CCP FoxFour
C C P
C C P Alliance
#49 - 2016-01-13 09:12:01 UTC
Jack Tronic wrote:
CCP FoxFour wrote:
If I get my way the IGB will get nuked next year. I hope to have a location service in CREST early next year so we can start the major transition away from it.


*looks at siggy's codebase needing major rewrite*

*looks at need to also switch to crest for the location tracking*

*looks at real life job to create a system handling 1 million cellular modem devices reporting data remotely in next few months*

*cries*


I know the feels. :( If there is anything I can do to help please let me know!

@CCP_FoxFour // Technical Designer // Team Tech Co

Third-party developer? Check out the official developers site for dev blogs, resources, and more.

lost packet
Alpha Flight
#50 - 2016-02-13 01:54:26 UTC  |  Edited by: lost packet
CCP FoxFour wrote:
What do you use the IGB for?

Couple of things regularly used:-

  • Being able to visit a site, such as one containing alliance fits, click on a fit, click buy all. (lazy?)
  • Being able to use [custom] sites for finding [alliance] contracts and setting up logistics contracts
  • dScan tools which allow you to quickly click on the ship-type to pull up the description
  • KOS checkers used in Provi, which allow you to click on a pilot/corp/alliance to quickly set standings, especially the ones that check multiple pilots in local. P
Sugilite
Perkone
Caldari State
#51 - 2016-02-15 05:38:27 UTC
CCP FoxFour wrote:
Max Kolonko wrote:
Also i have only one monitor so its kind of touchy subject for me and all overlay browsers ive tried are s#?!t compared to igb. And no, im not going to rearrange my apartament to fit second monitor unless i see two monitors on eve online minimal system requirements page.


What do you use the IGB for?


http://i.imgur.com/r9i0SvV.png
That's what I use most.

I can't believe lost packet was the only other person to mention dscan. Oh god need the ability to share that information easily.

Being able to show info on things/set destination/other stuff in the IGB is so good. Need. In my SS you can see you can click on that little info button to show info on any of those.
Captain Panther
Development institute
C A M E L O T
#52 - 2016-02-15 16:59:30 UTC
And i just want to be able to easily open those cute GIFs in a game window during the gang roam >.<

SATRO - канал рекрутинга ФВ ПвП корпы Space Traffic Control альянса Heiian Conglomerate. Ведем набор пилотов соответствующего направления для роумов по лоусеку в составе флота Альянса и форматного просева рядов галлов! :)

Laranell
Garoun Investment Bank
Gallente Federation
#53 - 2016-02-23 21:31:06 UTC
CCP FoxFour wrote:
Amely Miles wrote:
Removing the IGB in my opinion is a BAD MOVE on CCPs part since majority of people use it in Eve.


Feel free to voice your opinion but saying things like this only hurts your case. When you say this it completely invalidates your case since the majority of users DON'T use the IGB. We have metrics on it, I know how many users open the IGB, how many pages are requested with the IGB, how many times the custom JavaScript hooks are used, etc. The single biggest use of the IGB is leaving it open and letting it refresh for sites like SIggy and Tripwire to track your location in wormholes. Even with that the majority of users do NOT use the IGB. Taking the less than majority and subtracting a substantial portion of that leaves the user base of the IGB at... well not that large at all.

The rest of your points however are far more valid and being kept in mind.


How do your metrics from when it was up to date compare to now?

I would use it more when actually playing if I could watch videos and ****, but I guess that was never the intended use anyway. For a while I could just use a stay on top Chrome window, but the addon I was using died. I play triplemon with the client actually using all three. It was nice leaving browser open in an empty space on one side looking up fittings and other noob stuff. To be frank I more often used that stay on top for various EVE things because the IGB was garbage.

I don't understand all the hate for the IGB. It's really a unique feature that has the chance to actually keep people in-game (even while being side-tracked) but seems to get poopood all day long. Is it really that much of a pain in the ass to just update it?

I feel like a properly supported browser in-game means more content in-game. If you're not tabbed out of the game you're more likely to be a part of something going on. Is my thinking incorrect?
Dilagant
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#54 - 2016-04-21 23:25:56 UTC
CCP, If you need some money to update the IGB, start a "Go Fund Me" and I'll give you some cash. If you want to know how much we love it, give us a survey. I don't get to chat with CSM members much, but I will do a survey.
Previous page123