These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Player Features and Ideas Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Regulate Plex Trade!

Author
SurrenderMonkey
State Protectorate
Caldari State
#21 - 2016-01-11 16:10:46 UTC  |  Edited by: SurrenderMonkey
Hairpins Blueprint wrote:
Daichi Yamato wrote:
people are buying more plex than ever before, BECAUSE they get so much isk for it.


No, they buy less, because they get much more isk for it now.

they by few insted of dozen to get same results.



So you're saying people buy more of something when they're getting a poor value for their money, and buy less of something when they're getting a good value for their money?

Do you have any idea how ridiculous you sound?Roll

"Help, I'm bored with missions!"

http://swiftandbitter.com/eve/wtd/

Vincent Athena
Photosynth
#22 - 2016-01-11 16:17:56 UTC
Barrogh Habalu wrote:
Hairpins Blueprint wrote:
People buy less plex because they get more isk for it...

I'm not sure how to interpret OP's thought...

The idea is:
You want to buy a super. You don't have the ISK. So: You purchase PLEX, sell for ISK, get the super. But higher the ISK value of the PLEX, fewer you need to purchase to get your super. Ive talked to people involved with supers, and they say this is happening. It is a mechanism that causes supply to drop despite the price increase.
On the other side, more people decide to get supers. But that is ultimately limited by the number of player who can fly a super.
Result: It's unclear what ISK value of the PLEX results in the greatest sale volume of PLEX for CCP.

Know a Frozen fan? Check this out

Frozen fanfiction

Vimsy Vortis
Shoulda Checked Local
Break-A-Wish Foundation
#23 - 2016-01-11 16:20:48 UTC
Regulating the sale of PLEX would be incredibly anti-sanbox. Diminishing the sandbox diminishes the game. No player should want that, even if it means they have to actually have a job to play EVE.
Hairpins Blueprint
The Northerners
Pandemic Horde
#24 - 2016-01-11 16:59:29 UTC
Vimsy Vortis wrote:
Regulating the sale of PLEX would be incredibly anti-sanbox. Diminishing the sandbox diminishes the game. No player should want that, even if it means they have to actually have a job to play EVE.


OFC you are right, but Plex is the item outside of the sand box. What if Jita trades were able to manipulaet the price of Game time on CCP's site? would it be cool that few trilinares could scam the whole community? you have everything to play with; plex is just item like no other, so other rules should apply to it.

Hairpins Blueprint
The Northerners
Pandemic Horde
#25 - 2016-01-11 17:01:27 UTC
SurrenderMonkey wrote:
Hairpins Blueprint wrote:
Daichi Yamato wrote:
people are buying more plex than ever before, BECAUSE they get so much isk for it.


No, they buy less, because they get much more isk for it now.

they by few insted of dozen to get same results.



So you're saying people buy more of something when they're getting a poor value for their money, and buy less of something when they're getting a good value for their money?

Do you have any idea how ridiculous you sound?Roll



no it does not, when plex was for 300m people had to buy 3x plex now just one. what is ridiculous here?
Hairpins Blueprint
The Northerners
Pandemic Horde
#26 - 2016-01-11 17:04:29 UTC
Mag's wrote:
Yeah no. Plex prices need to reach at least 2 billion tbh. They are way too cheap atm.


So you can buy eaven less to get more? way is that so?


The price of plex should be controled by supply and demnad, not Jita traders.


And plex beeing traded on market only once seems to be the best way to deal with the problem.

Because you can still trade / contract or donate it.
Danika Princip
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
#27 - 2016-01-11 17:32:19 UTC
Hairpins Blueprint wrote:


no it does not, when plex was for 300m people had to buy 3x plex now just one. what is ridiculous here?



What's ridiculous is that you think people will still want to buy PLEX when they need £50 for a billion, not £17.

Meaning a super bought with nothing but PLEX would cost £1000, not £340.


Can you explain how Jita traders are somehow not a part of supply and demand?

If every PLEX that went to a buy order was gone from the market for good, do you not think this would see a lot less of them on sell orders?
SurrenderMonkey
State Protectorate
Caldari State
#28 - 2016-01-11 17:42:06 UTC
Quote:
And plex beeing traded on market only once seems to be the best way to deal with the problem.


You haven't made a substantive argument that a problem even exists, let alone one that needs to be dealt with.

"Help, I'm bored with missions!"

http://swiftandbitter.com/eve/wtd/

Mag's
Azn Empire
#29 - 2016-01-11 17:50:00 UTC
Hairpins Blueprint wrote:
Mag's wrote:
Yeah no. Plex prices need to reach at least 2 billion tbh. They are way too cheap atm.


So you can buy eaven less to get more? way is that so?


The price of plex should be controled by supply and demnad, not Jita traders.


And plex beeing traded on market only once seems to be the best way to deal with the problem.

Because you can still trade / contract or donate it.
Just a little heads up my dear. Jita traders are a part of supply and demand. Blink

Just because you don't like how they deal with it, doesn't mean it should be restricted and/or nerfed.

Destination SkillQueue:- It's like assuming the Lions will ignore you in the Savannah, if you're small, fat and look helpless.

Teckos Pech
Hogyoku
Goonswarm Federation
#30 - 2016-01-11 18:13:06 UTC
Hairpins Blueprint wrote:


hurf-n-blurf about PLEX prices and market manipulation



sigh


This thread again I see.

I'd like to see an explanation of how this market manipulation works. If you spend trillions driving up the price of PLEX and are sitting on alot of PLEX with a high price, yes you have made substantial gains, but those gains are only on "paper" until you sell the PLEX and realize those gains. But by selling PLEX you are going to start driving the price down. So explain how this mechanism works. If a player or even a group of players have tried to buy up PLEX to drive up the price how exactly are they going to unwind from that position?

Further, what is to stop others from cashing in their PLEX stash? I am willing to bet some people who are ISK rich and don't know where to park all that ISK in game park it in PLEX figuring it will, over time trend up as PLEX prices have. So if you jack up the price artificially, what is to stop people from selling more PLEX?

Or here is a thought...why is the current price wrong? CCP has been tying PLEX to more and more things in game. Not just game time, but other things as well.

And this statement,

Quote:
People buy less plex because they get more isk for it,....


Let me see, I'll get more ISK if I hold for...how long? For the last 3 months. Further, if I've bought a PLEX for RL money and want to sell it in game that implies I want ISK now. Holding onto that PLEX is going to cost me in that I don't get the ISK I want/need now. If anything the higher the ISK price of PLEX in game means more will be sold, all other things considered.

I find these claims of manipulation to be completely unfounded. Nobody can put forward a convincing strategy. They just say, "Of course there is manipulation....because, and you're an idiot if you disagree." That is some compelling argument right there.

Roll

"The curious task of economics is to demonstrate to men how little they really know about what they imagine they can design."--Friedrich August von Hayek

8 Golden Rules for EVE Online

Isaac Armer
The Soup Kitchen
#31 - 2016-01-11 19:34:46 UTC
Hairpins Blueprint wrote:
no it does not, when plex was for 300m people had to buy 3x plex now just one. what is ridiculous here?


It is ridiculous. I am fairly new by EVE standards (not a year in yet), and recently wanted to explore a new area of the game. Without giving details of my new project, I needed 600-700 million ISK more than I had. Given plex prices are so high, and I can earn $20 IRL so quickly, I just bought a plex and got my billion or so ISK.

If plex was only 300 mil I wouldn't have spent my real life money on it. I would have just done the level 4 grind to get my needed ISK.
Bumblefck
Kerensky Initiatives
#32 - 2016-01-11 20:38:52 UTC
Hairpins Blueprint wrote:
I You can still tarde...it.







Never has a truer word be more inadvertently spoken.

Perfection is a dish best served like wasabi .

Bumble's Space Log

Alexis Nightwish
#33 - 2016-01-11 20:56:00 UTC
I'm not an expert on economics but I certainly know enough to see that the OP knows nothing about it.

Also, I'm a proponent of market PvP. Being a trader isn't something that interests me personally, but I have a lot of respect for those who can do it well.

-1

CCP approaches problems in one of two ways: nudge or cludge

EVE Online's "I win!" Button

Fixing bombs, not the bombers

Teckos Pech
Hogyoku
Goonswarm Federation
#34 - 2016-01-11 21:15:27 UTC
Mag's wrote:
Hairpins Blueprint wrote:
Mag's wrote:
Yeah no. Plex prices need to reach at least 2 billion tbh. They are way too cheap atm.


So you can buy eaven less to get more? way is that so?


The price of plex should be controled by supply and demnad, not Jita traders.


And plex beeing traded on market only once seems to be the best way to deal with the problem.

Because you can still trade / contract or donate it.
Just a little heads up my dear. Jita traders are a part of supply and demand. Blink

Just because you don't like how they deal with it, doesn't mean it should be restricted and/or nerfed.



Exactly, there can be no supply and thus no demand without people trading in PLEX. Where exactly do people think supply comes from? Unicorns?

Holy crap.

"The curious task of economics is to demonstrate to men how little they really know about what they imagine they can design."--Friedrich August von Hayek

8 Golden Rules for EVE Online

Teckos Pech
Hogyoku
Goonswarm Federation
#35 - 2016-01-11 21:24:58 UTC
Danika Princip wrote:
Hairpins Blueprint wrote:


no it does not, when plex was for 300m people had to buy 3x plex now just one. what is ridiculous here?



What's ridiculous is that you think people will still want to buy PLEX when they need £50 for a billion, not £17.

Meaning a super bought with nothing but PLEX would cost £1000, not £340.


Can you explain how Jita traders are somehow not a part of supply and demand?

If every PLEX that went to a buy order was gone from the market for good, do you not think this would see a lot less of them on sell orders?


Exactly right. If once a person buys a PLEX then it cannot go back on the market ever. As a result you could very well have less supply, at all price levels. In economics this is called a negative supply shock--i.e. the supply curve shifts in and the price goes....up.

Further, the OP is under the impression that speculation is a bad thing. This is fundamentally flawed thinking. Market speculators ensure the most recent information is incorporated into the price of whatever commodity they are speculating on. Further, speculators bring liquidity to the market. Right now if you must have a PLEX you can log in, go to Jita and buy one of the 4-500 sell orders. It is a very liquid market meaning demand can be satisfied quickly. There are also many buyers as well ensuring that a player who needs a quick infusion of ISK can do the same thing, log into game, go to Jita have the PLEX delivered to his hangar and sell it very quickly.

Speculators and speculation is a good thing. Without you might not be able to buy what you want.

"The curious task of economics is to demonstrate to men how little they really know about what they imagine they can design."--Friedrich August von Hayek

8 Golden Rules for EVE Online

Teckos Pech
Hogyoku
Goonswarm Federation
#36 - 2016-01-11 21:33:45 UTC
Hairpins Blueprint wrote:
SurrenderMonkey wrote:
Hairpins Blueprint wrote:
Daichi Yamato wrote:
people are buying more plex than ever before, BECAUSE they get so much isk for it.


No, they buy less, because they get much more isk for it now.

they by few insted of dozen to get same results.



So you're saying people buy more of something when they're getting a poor value for their money, and buy less of something when they're getting a good value for their money?

Do you have any idea how ridiculous you sound?Roll



no it does not, when plex was for 300m people had to buy 3x plex now just one. what is ridiculous here?


OMG....

Look, the thing you are missing is that people have budget constraints in real life. That is, suppose a player needs 1.2 billion ISK, back when PLEX were 300 million a player would have to drop $80. Now, he drops $20. In which situation would people be more willing to buy 1.2 billion worth of ISK? Many people would consider $80 too much, but $20...okay.

In other words, the higher price in game translates into increased demand in the out of game market. Roll

"The curious task of economics is to demonstrate to men how little they really know about what they imagine they can design."--Friedrich August von Hayek

8 Golden Rules for EVE Online

Isaac Armer
The Soup Kitchen
#37 - 2016-01-11 21:49:08 UTC
Teckos Pech wrote:
OMG....

Look, the thing you are missing is that people have budget constraints in real life. That is, suppose a player needs 1.2 billion ISK, back when PLEX were 300 million a player would have to drop $80. Now, he drops $20. In which situation would people be more willing to buy 1.2 billion worth of ISK? Many people would consider $80 too much, but $20...okay.

In other words, the higher price in game translates into increased demand in the out of game market. Roll


This...I am that person. My new project needs a few hundred million isk more than I have. Given I can easily make $20 in an hour IRL, I literally just bought a plex for cash and sold it to get the ISK. If I had to spend $80 to get it though, I would have resigned myself to a few days of grinding missions and saved my money IRL
SurrenderMonkey
State Protectorate
Caldari State
#38 - 2016-01-11 22:05:58 UTC
Teckos Pech wrote:
Hairpins Blueprint wrote:
SurrenderMonkey wrote:
Hairpins Blueprint wrote:
Daichi Yamato wrote:
people are buying more plex than ever before, BECAUSE they get so much isk for it.


No, they buy less, because they get much more isk for it now.

they by few insted of dozen to get same results.



So you're saying people buy more of something when they're getting a poor value for their money, and buy less of something when they're getting a good value for their money?

Do you have any idea how ridiculous you sound?Roll



no it does not, when plex was for 300m people had to buy 3x plex now just one. what is ridiculous here?


OMG....

Look, the thing you are missing is that people have budget constraints in real life. That is, suppose a player needs 1.2 billion ISK, back when PLEX were 300 million a player would have to drop $80. Now, he drops $20. In which situation would people be more willing to buy 1.2 billion worth of ISK? Many people would consider $80 too much, but $20...okay.

In other words, the higher price in game translates into increased demand in the out of game market. Roll


Yep. It's called "price elasticity of demand", though in this case, it's slightly removed from the standard description as the price itself for the plex item is a fixed feature, but the translated price for ISK is not.

"Help, I'm bored with missions!"

http://swiftandbitter.com/eve/wtd/

Rek Seven
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#39 - 2016-01-11 22:46:14 UTC
PLEXing your account used to be a goal attainable by anyone. It kept the player count up and increased active in space... Now it is just for the super rich, incursion runners or the pay to win crowd to enjoy Sad
Danika Princip
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
#40 - 2016-01-11 22:49:50 UTC
Rek Seven wrote:
PLEXing your account used to be a goal attainable by anyone. It kept the player count up and increased active in space... Now it is just for the super rich, incursion runners or the pay to win crowd to enjoy Sad


I do it with PI.

I run three accounts and PLEX two of them with just the PI money.