These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Market Discussions

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

★ Illegal Investments ★ Banking ★ 10% Interest!

Author
Blueprint Buyer
Doomheim
#201 - 2016-01-03 19:39:59 UTC
virm pasuul wrote:
The guy practically ticked the "this is a scam" boxes off for you.


Greed it seems is more powerful than sense.
Jerry T Pepridge
Meta Game Analysis and Investment INC.
#202 - 2016-01-04 01:55:27 UTC
Blueprint Buyer wrote:
virm pasuul wrote:
The guy practically ticked the "this is a scam" boxes off for you.


Greed it seems is more powerful than sense.


do you allow your character to buy anything else other than blueprints?

This wasn't a scam coz only 1 dude lost isk, the rest was this OP's alts / shills.

its not even story thread worthy.

@JerryTPepridge

Blueprint Buyer
Doomheim
#203 - 2016-01-04 13:58:51 UTC
Jerry T Pepridge wrote:
Blueprint Buyer wrote:
virm pasuul wrote:
The guy practically ticked the "this is a scam" boxes off for you.


Greed it seems is more powerful than sense.


do you allow your character to buy anything else other than blueprints?

This wasn't a scam coz only 1 dude lost isk, the rest was this OP's alts / shills.

its not even story thread worthy.



Only when they've been good.


17 People had investments held with Illegal Investments on 3/12. As far as I know none of them were Alts.

The total isk held when the channel closed is not known exactly, having to take into account that people were "earning interest" on their deposits. It was said though that he had over 100b in deposits, IIRC that was said a day or two before the channel closed, so although unlikely it's possible it could be higher.

Could be that someone deposited a large amount and it was too good to resist?
Elizabeth Norn
Nornir Research
Nornir Empire
#204 - 2016-01-04 16:11:00 UTC  |  Edited by: Elizabeth Norn
Blueprint Buyer wrote:

17 People had investments held with Illegal Investments on 3/12. As far as I know none of them were Alts.

The total isk held when the channel closed is not known exactly, having to take into account that people were "earning interest" on their deposits. It was said though that he had over 100b in deposits, IIRC that was said a day or two before the channel closed, so although unlikely it's possible it could be higher.

Could be that someone deposited a large amount and it was too good to resist?


You're quite the spokeswoman!
Blueprint Buyer
Doomheim
#205 - 2016-01-04 18:33:55 UTC
Elizabeth Norn wrote:
Blueprint Buyer wrote:

17 People had investments held with Illegal Investments on 3/12. As far as I know none of them were Alts.

The total isk held when the channel closed is not known exactly, having to take into account that people were "earning interest" on their deposits. It was said though that he had over 100b in deposits, IIRC that was said a day or two before the channel closed, so although unlikely it's possible it could be higher.

Could be that someone deposited a large amount and it was too good to resist?


You're quite the spokeswoman!



I see what you did there, hohoho, but no. I just hung out in the public channel and made notes of things.

It wasn't like he was keeping that information private there were public sheets for everyone to see.
Jerry T Pepridge
Meta Game Analysis and Investment INC.
#206 - 2016-01-05 03:33:40 UTC
Blueprint Buyer wrote:

Only when they've been good.


17 People had investments held with Illegal Investments on 3/12. As far as I know none of them were Alts.

The total isk held when the channel closed is not known exactly, having to take into account that people were "earning interest" on their deposits. It was said though that he had over 100b in deposits, IIRC that was said a day or two before the channel closed, so although unlikely it's possible it could be higher.

Could be that someone deposited a large amount and it was too good to resist?


its pretty obvious by this thread its 1 guy & his alts & it was a failed scam. there is no butthurt responses here, only 1 guy who claims others lost more.

numbers and figures are great but when given by someone such as yourself, they are obvious fanboy lies, why would someone other than OP be explaining the "figures".

@JerryTPepridge

Blueprint Buyer
Doomheim
#207 - 2016-01-05 15:50:32 UTC
Jerry T Pepridge wrote:
Blueprint Buyer wrote:

Only when they've been good.


17 People had investments held with Illegal Investments on 3/12. As far as I know none of them were Alts.

The total isk held when the channel closed is not known exactly, having to take into account that people were "earning interest" on their deposits. It was said though that he had over 100b in deposits, IIRC that was said a day or two before the channel closed, so although unlikely it's possible it could be higher.

Could be that someone deposited a large amount and it was too good to resist?


its pretty obvious by this thread its 1 guy & his alts & it was a failed scam. there is no butthurt responses here, only 1 guy who claims others lost more.

numbers and figures are great but when given by someone such as yourself, they are obvious fanboy lies, why would someone other than OP be explaining the "figures".



They were in his public sheets!

I'm not a fanboy I just observed what was going on. I'm just saying what the sheets said.

I understand you like to troll an everything but at least take a few minutes to check what your trolling about.

There was a public sheet posted on the first post which showed the overall illegal investments accounts and dates of deposits. After the reopening there was 18 deposits followed by 1 withdrawal to the value of a previous deposit and then, well we don't know.

17 presumed account holders. Over 100b on the public sheet.

Not a fanboy just not blind, and yeah I did calculate each deposit to see if the numbers added up for the withdrawal huhuhuh.
Elizabeth Norn
Nornir Research
Nornir Empire
#208 - 2016-01-05 16:14:55 UTC  |  Edited by: Elizabeth Norn
Blueprint Buyer wrote:
I understand you like to troll an everything but at least take a few minutes to check what your trolling about.

There was a public sheet posted on the first post which showed the overall illegal investments accounts and dates of deposits. After the reopening there was 18 deposits followed by 1 withdrawal to the value of a previous deposit and then, well we don't know.

17 presumed account holders. Over 100b on the public sheet.

Not a fanboy just not blind, and yeah I did calculate each deposit to see if the numbers added up for the withdrawal huhuhuh.


Check what? Everything was purged, there isn't a shred of evidence. Here's how it looks to me, with OP's highly likely false claims of large amounts of ISK invested in the market and themselves, their low daily profit that would have barely covered interest payments, daily bumps reeking of desperation prior to silently closing shop and only a single investor claiming they lost money; everything points to this being a failed venture.
Blueprint Buyer
Doomheim
#209 - 2016-01-05 16:55:58 UTC  |  Edited by: Blueprint Buyer
Elizabeth Norn wrote:
Blueprint Buyer wrote:
I understand you like to troll an everything but at least take a few minutes to check what your trolling about.

There was a public sheet posted on the first post which showed the overall illegal investments accounts and dates of deposits. After the reopening there was 18 deposits followed by 1 withdrawal to the value of a previous deposit and then, well we don't know.

17 presumed account holders. Over 100b on the public sheet.

Not a fanboy just not blind, and yeah I did calculate each deposit to see if the numbers added up for the withdrawal huhuhuh.


Check what? Everything was purged, there isn't a shred of evidence. Here's how it looks to me, with OP's highly likely false claims of large amounts of ISK invested in the market and themselves, their low daily profit that would have barely covered interest payments, daily bumps reeking of desperation prior to silently closing shop and only a single investor claiming they lost money; everything points to this being a completely failed venture.


Well they were public when I last looked at them... They do infact appear to have been "purged".

Granted it does appear to be a singular investors loss but we know from the forum post that AT LEAST 2 were invested.
If you go back through the posts.

I just thought it was an interesting "venture" too observe and make notes, even if you think it failed I saw from the public channel and sheets there were peopled involved.

I don't care enough to keep responding to you two though.

Well done II well played, regardless of your haul was interesting to follow.


edit: side note for the luls. I actually only found your bpo selling service though this thread haha
Jerry T Pepridge
Meta Game Analysis and Investment INC.
#210 - 2016-01-06 10:13:08 UTC
Blueprint Buyer wrote:

They were in his public sheets!

I'm not a fanboy I just observed what was going on. I'm just saying what the sheets said.

There was a public sheet posted on the first post which showed the overall illegal investments accounts and dates of deposits. After the reopening there was 18 deposits followed by 1 withdrawal to the value of a previous deposit and then, well we don't know.

17 presumed account holders. Over 100b on the public sheet.


you were not an investor, but recall the amount of accounts, amount of withdrawals, 18 deposits hey? mmmm,

/me Lifts your thinly veiled disguise, of hello illegal investor 006.

Blueprint Buyer wrote:

I understand you like to troll an everything but at least take a few minutes to check what your trolling about.


not sure what you mean by that, Trolling is prohibited, these are moderated forums. i know you only liked to view this particular thread as mentioned earlier Blink

@JerryTPepridge

Blueprint Buyer
Doomheim
#211 - 2016-01-06 15:54:15 UTC
Jerry T Pepridge wrote:
Blueprint Buyer wrote:

They were in his public sheets!

I'm not a fanboy I just observed what was going on. I'm just saying what the sheets said.

There was a public sheet posted on the first post which showed the overall illegal investments accounts and dates of deposits. After the reopening there was 18 deposits followed by 1 withdrawal to the value of a previous deposit and then, well we don't know.

17 presumed account holders. Over 100b on the public sheet.


you were not an investor, but recall the amount of accounts, amount of withdrawals, 18 deposits hey? mmmm,

/me Lifts your thinly veiled disguise, of hello illegal investor 006.

Blueprint Buyer wrote:

I understand you like to troll an everything but at least take a few minutes to check what your trolling about.


not sure what you mean by that, Trolling is prohibited, these are moderated forums. i know you only liked to view this particular thread as mentioned earlier Blink



Only recently. Replying to you and the other. I don't usually post at all and now I remember why. *Frown Face*


No I wasn't an investor. I wouldn't invest into something with no collateral. This is partly why I was interested to see what happened.


I cant remember the exact numbers but from my notes it was on about 18 individual deposits and 1 withdrawal similar to that of a deposit from one before. I cant be exact and it was an assumption that there were 17 investors roughly.

Literally the only point I was making is I don't believe it was all set-up and loads of alts were used just to get 25b. I just don't believe that. There was deferentially at least two and I'm thinking unto 17.

That's all I wanted to say, I'm not going to respond here any more because you're draining my soul. 10/10 for you and a magic star o7

Hangdog Crux
Doomheim
#212 - 2016-01-06 20:46:32 UTC
I was actually an investor in the first round. I received my funds back with the appropriate interest. It looks like this happened to a number of people when he first closed the bank.

Then he restarted after a bit. At this point I was not a re-investor. The interest offered was less and with no collateral it was starting to sound even more questionable. So I was fortunate and did not lose when he folded.

My guess is that there were several actual people with isk invested with him. I'm not sure if the original closure and repayment was part of the scam; get people thinking you are trustworthy and then come back asking for more. I wouldn't be surprised if this is what he did.
Dextrome Thorphan
#213 - 2016-01-09 09:35:05 UTC  |  Edited by: Dextrome Thorphan
Jerry T Pepridge wrote:
Blueprint Buyer wrote:

Only when they've been good.


17 People had investments held with Illegal Investments on 3/12. As far as I know none of them were Alts.

The total isk held when the channel closed is not known exactly, having to take into account that people were "earning interest" on their deposits. It was said though that he had over 100b in deposits, IIRC that was said a day or two before the channel closed, so although unlikely it's possible it could be higher.

Could be that someone deposited a large amount and it was too good to resist?


its pretty obvious by this thread its 1 guy & his alts & it was a failed scam. there is no butthurt responses here, only 1 guy who claims others lost more.

numbers and figures are great but when given by someone such as yourself, they are obvious fanboy lies, why would someone other than OP be explaining the "figures".



Maybe not everybody wants to post butthurt responses when they've made a bad investment.


PS. I lost 500mill, if you must know... I just wanted it to be legit, knowing it probably wasn't. So I put a little bit of ISK in it to see what would happen. *shrugs*
Licio Caleb
KarmaFleet
Goonswarm Federation
#214 - 2016-01-12 18:35:37 UTC
so this isn't going anymore?
Jerry T Pepridge
Meta Game Analysis and Investment INC.
#215 - 2016-01-13 01:31:47 UTC
Licio Caleb wrote:
so this isn't going anymore?


no

@JerryTPepridge

Elisaran Dagma
Imperial Shipment
Amarr Empire
#216 - 2016-04-08 00:14:04 UTC
For anyone wondering, I had lost 10b thanks to this guy and my stupid trust ;)
Sabriz Adoudel
Move along there is nothing here
#217 - 2016-04-08 06:47:18 UTC
Well done, OP.

I support the New Order and CODE. alliance. www.minerbumping.com