These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Player Features and Ideas Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
12Next page
 

A bar / social hangout for our avatars in stations

Author
Tristan Agion
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
#1 - 2015-12-29 12:20:56 UTC
Short version

Create a bar / social hangout in stations, where we can walk our avatar, consume some drinks (ISK sink) and chat socially to people (setting up casual gangs, easing people into joining corps, etc.). To protect against scam spam, make it only possible to hear people within say 5 meters radius of your avatar. To protect against over-filling, limit the number of places (and create a queue system for entry).

Long version

  1. According to CCP Rise, nothing predicts better that a new player will stick with the game than that they engage socially (are in a player corp).

  2. Yet there is no place where one can build up social contacts. Local chat is either deadly silent or filled with the chatter of scammers. The newbie help channel is gone after a month and the number of people reading the forums is limited. Basically, one has to jump into the deep end of joining a corp, generally without really knowing anybody there. A place where people can go and chat socially would really help here to create contacts that lead to further engagement. Beyond finding a good corp, this might make it easier to ask for help with a mission, setting up casual gangs for some transient purpose, etc.

  3. EVE has the most amazing character creation system, allowing one to create highly realistic avatars.

  4. These avatars then for the most part stand around in the captain's quarter staring pointlessly at a flickering screen, or wherever else you park yours. Creating these fancy avatars seems like an exercise in futility. Furthermore, given that CCP actually wants us to buy apparel for these characters, it seems silly to make them appear to others mostly in the form of stamp-like portraits. Clearly, if we met each other with those avatars, people would be way more interested in dressing up nicely or interestingly. So the current situation is a waste of time for the player, and a waste of income opportunity for CCP.

Here's a simple idea that addresses both problems: create a bar / social hangout where we can walk out avatars in station. The only interaction required, at least at the beginning, is to be able to see other characters in their avatar and to be able to chat with them. To solve the scam spam problem, make it so that the chat in the bar only allows you to listen / talk to people within a set radius, say 5 meters. That way, a scammer can only really annoy a few people close by, and we can walk away from him. I would also suggest that the bar sells drinks and bar food (ISK sink). Eventually, it would be helpful to add gestures to give the avatars an active body language, but that can come later. In order to not overload the server and/or client with complexity, the number of places in the bar can be restricted. There could be a simple waiting queue for people to get in (and perhaps you should get thrown out after a couple of hours, to stop people from hogging the spots).

I think most of the technology for this is already available. We already have avatars walking in rooms with 3D collision detection, and obviously we already have chat. There is nothing fancy going on here, like say fighting between characters. All the avatars need to do is to move around in a different (and bigger) bar room, and sit down (perhaps a new animation for bar chairs required). The animation work for taking a drink should be relatively mild as well. On the software side, I imagine one has to handle collision between players in addition, as well as restricting chat based on a player to player distance.

Clearly this requires some dev work, but I think it would be a lot less work than other things one might want to do with the avatars. I think it could really make a big difference for the social life in EVE. And I think it would seriously boost sales of apparel, thus paying for itself.
Kagura Nikon
Native Freshfood
Minmatar Republic
#2 - 2015-12-29 12:47:49 UTC
That was what was called walk in stations, whose first step was incarna and was the largest failure on eve history and almost detroyed the game. I would not bet a penny they will ressurrect that so soon.

"If brute force does not solve your problem....  then you are  surely not using enough!"

Celthric Kanerian
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#3 - 2015-12-29 12:50:18 UTC
Tristan Agion wrote:
Short version

Create a bar / social hangout in stations, where we can walk our avatar, consume some drinks (ISK sink) and chat socially to people (setting up casual gangs, easing people into joining corps, etc.). To protect against scam spam, make it only possible to hear people within say 5 meters radius of your avatar. To protect against over-filling, limit the number of places (and create a queue system for entry).


This is all you had to write, the rest was waste.

Basicly this is what WiS was supposed to be, but CCP slacked with the general idea.
This is what we expect it to become one day, but most definately not now.
Tristan Agion
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
#4 - 2015-12-29 13:43:55 UTC
Celthric Kanerian wrote:
This is all you had to write, the rest was waste.
Basicly this is what WiS was supposed to be, but CCP slacked with the general idea.
This is what we expect it to become one day, but most definately not now.

Well, I wasn't around when all that happened. Still, what I suggested seems like really low-hanging fruit to me...

Perhaps CCP aimed too high in the past? But leaving things as they are seems worse to me than taking small steps forward.
Riot Girl
You'll Cowards Don't Even Smoke Crack
#5 - 2015-12-29 13:55:50 UTC
I always wanted low-sec booster bars, wonder if I'll ever get them.
NekoKitten
Neko Industry 'n' PvE
#6 - 2015-12-29 15:42:00 UTC
Yes I'm still waiting for Walking in Stations as well. It will be Walking in Citadels soon tho. Star Citizen can do it, Eve should be able to do it as well .. optional ofcourse, just like the Captains Quarters. Everyone can stay ship spinning if they want to. Lets go to bars and casinos, gamble, get drunk and get a holo hooker.
Solecist Project
#7 - 2015-12-29 16:38:39 UTC
I am saying it here again.

If WiS ever sees the light of day ...
... you will see me everywhere with an army of short skirted alts ...
... raking in billions from happily paying victims.


Bring it ...

That ringing in your ears you're experiencing right now is the last gasping breathe of a dying inner ear as it got thoroughly PULVERISED by the point roaring over your head at supersonic speeds. - Tippia

Ares Desideratus
UNSAFE SPACE
#8 - 2015-12-29 17:03:33 UTC  |  Edited by: Ares Desideratus
go play sims

but more seriously, no, because the avatars themselves are still garbage, if they ever get around to make decent avatars with decent customization i would support this, but my guy walks like he just got cornholed (even though he didn't)

no offense
Sephiroth CloneIIV
Brothers of Tyr
Goonswarm Federation
#9 - 2015-12-29 22:44:04 UTC  |  Edited by: Sephiroth Clone VII
I do want this.

It does seem really odd they don't, every other game has this ingrained. They big thing was execution with some insanely graphically intensive engine. They really just need to have it with decent but not amazing graphics and work up.

And of course, multiplayer, any incarnation of avatars in this game should be with players, this is a mmo.

Just because ccp bungled it doesn't make it impossible.
Nevyn Auscent
Broke Sauce
#10 - 2015-12-29 23:37:28 UTC
What you propose would not create meaningful social interaction in any way. Because there still wouldn't be any 'place to go' to talk to good people. Nor is trying to sell it as an 'isk sink' meaningful since the quantity of isk sunk would be negligible.
So no.

I'm not against WiS in general, and the incarna debacle was not anti WiS but anti greed is good for the most part.
But this is not a meaningful way forward with it.
Valkin Mordirc
#11 - 2015-12-30 03:17:33 UTC
I personally do not think that EVE needs WiS, even though a lot of people do.


However, WiS will always bring back the idea of the Greed is Good, and because of that, I really doubt that CCP will ever bring it to fruition, as most players will look at it as a cash grab.
#DeleteTheWeak
Kagura Nikon
Native Freshfood
Minmatar Republic
#12 - 2015-12-30 08:43:30 UTC
Sephiroth CloneIIV wrote:
I do want this.

It does seem really odd they don't, every other game has this ingrained. They big thing was execution with some insanely graphically intensive engine. They really just need to have it with decent but not amazing graphics and work up.

And of course, multiplayer, any incarnation of avatars in this game should be with players, this is a mmo.

Just because ccp bungled it doesn't make it impossible.



It means that their investor and other members of their chair board are likely very relutant to approve any project on that direction because it threatens their money.


That is completely normal, when a company burn itself in a move it takes a while before the investors accept anything again on same direction.

"If brute force does not solve your problem....  then you are  surely not using enough!"

Bad Messenger
Rehabilitation Clinic
#13 - 2015-12-30 09:13:17 UTC
Kagura Nikon wrote:
That was what was called walk in stations, whose first step was incarna and was the largest failure on eve history and almost detroyed the game. I would not bet a penny they will ressurrect that so soon.


yea, not implementing incarna fully was biggest failure which killed eve.
Lugh Crow-Slave
#14 - 2015-12-30 09:32:30 UTC
Sadly WIS was released poorly at a poor time along with other poor choices

Odds are it will never come back regardless of weather or not our would af to the game
Kagura Nikon
Native Freshfood
Minmatar Republic
#15 - 2015-12-30 09:45:45 UTC
Bad Messenger wrote:
Kagura Nikon wrote:
That was what was called walk in stations, whose first step was incarna and was the largest failure on eve history and almost detroyed the game. I would not bet a penny they will ressurrect that so soon.


yea, not implementing incarna fully was biggest failure which killed eve.



Well did not kill But when you advertise an expansion as incarna, and all you have is a room with bad lighting, that burns lots of video cards aroudn the world, and that present you with a a clothes store with 70$ items as the ONLY feature in the exapnsion.. well you cannot get surprised to receive a lot of flak and a LOT of cancelled subscriptions. I Myself cancelled my subscription for 1 year because of Incarna fiasco and disrespect to the players.

If they try it again they need to do it VERY carefully and with MUCh more dedication and completely separate from any money grab scheme (not that money grab is intrinsically bad, but they burned themselves there and need to be careful)

"If brute force does not solve your problem....  then you are  surely not using enough!"

Lugh Crow-Slave
#16 - 2015-12-30 10:16:37 UTC
Kagura Nikon wrote:
Bad Messenger wrote:
Kagura Nikon wrote:
That was what was called walk in stations, whose first step was incarna and was the largest failure on eve history and almost detroyed the game. I would not bet a penny they will ressurrect that so soon.


yea, not implementing incarna fully was biggest failure which killed eve.



Well did not kill But when you advertise an expansion as incarna, and all you have is a room with bad lighting, that burns lots of video cards aroudn the world, and that present you with a a clothes store with 70$ items as the ONLY feature in the exapnsion.. well you cannot get surprised to receive a lot of flak and a LOT of cancelled subscriptions. I Myself cancelled my subscription for 1 year because of Incarna fiasco and disrespect to the players.

If they try it again they need to do it VERY carefully and with MUCh more dedication and completely separate from any money grab scheme (not that money grab is intrinsically bad, but they burned themselves there and need to be careful)


Not to mention the leaked memo
Bad Messenger
Rehabilitation Clinic
#17 - 2015-12-30 13:22:38 UTC
Kagura Nikon wrote:
Bad Messenger wrote:
Kagura Nikon wrote:
That was what was called walk in stations, whose first step was incarna and was the largest failure on eve history and almost detroyed the game. I would not bet a penny they will ressurrect that so soon.


yea, not implementing incarna fully was biggest failure which killed eve.



Well did not kill But when you advertise an expansion as incarna, and all you have is a room with bad lighting, that burns lots of video cards aroudn the world, and that present you with a a clothes store with 70$ items as the ONLY feature in the exapnsion.. well you cannot get surprised to receive a lot of flak and a LOT of cancelled subscriptions. I Myself cancelled my subscription for 1 year because of Incarna fiasco and disrespect to the players.

If they try it again they need to do it VERY carefully and with MUCh more dedication and completely separate from any money grab scheme (not that money grab is intrinsically bad, but they burned themselves there and need to be careful)


there was nothing wrong on incarna, if your display card melts it is not fault of program, it is hardware failure.

If you have no money to buy items, then do not buy those, all was just items that does not affect gameplay.

Sadly now is too late, other games are filling needs now and EVE lost great opportunity because of peasants crying.
Kagura Nikon
Native Freshfood
Minmatar Republic
#18 - 2015-12-30 13:44:06 UTC  |  Edited by: Kagura Nikon
Bad Messenger wrote:
Kagura Nikon wrote:
Bad Messenger wrote:
Kagura Nikon wrote:
That was what was called walk in stations, whose first step was incarna and was the largest failure on eve history and almost detroyed the game. I would not bet a penny they will ressurrect that so soon.


yea, not implementing incarna fully was biggest failure which killed eve.



Well did not kill But when you advertise an expansion as incarna, and all you have is a room with bad lighting, that burns lots of video cards aroudn the world, and that present you with a a clothes store with 70$ items as the ONLY feature in the exapnsion.. well you cannot get surprised to receive a lot of flak and a LOT of cancelled subscriptions. I Myself cancelled my subscription for 1 year because of Incarna fiasco and disrespect to the players.

If they try it again they need to do it VERY carefully and with MUCh more dedication and completely separate from any money grab scheme (not that money grab is intrinsically bad, but they burned themselves there and need to be careful)


there was nothing wrong on incarna, if your display card melts it is not fault of program, it is hardware failure.

If you have no money to buy items, then do not buy those, all was just items that does not affect gameplay.

Sadly now is too late, other games are filling needs now and EVE lost great opportunity because of peasants crying.



It was .. simple. The design of a screen that is supposed to be left running should not keep a GPU running for 100%. It is a screen where people leave it there and go do something else for hours. A screen where performance did not matter so a forced max FPS lock should have been implemented. My GPU did not burn, because after a few hours i started seeing texture corruption artifacts, the same type you usually see on overheating GPUs, so I turned off the game, unsubscribed and only returned when they got us ship hangar back.


Go re read the history, specially the internal leaked memos that I should not quote here. There is no way people would not get angry about the store. The store would not have made people angry if the whole expansion was not a sad excuse to push people into using the store (even the concept of being FORCED into incarna view so you would feel the need to buy clothes).

But CCP learned, and that is great. Someday they might try it again and probably they will be wiser....

"If brute force does not solve your problem....  then you are  surely not using enough!"

Serendipity Lost
Repo Industries
#19 - 2015-12-30 18:52:09 UTC
Are we discussing Polka Bar, Stripper Joint, Juice Bar???

OP - google walking in stations or eve riot - this is not what folks want out of a space combat game.
Tristan Agion
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
#20 - 2015-12-30 19:14:17 UTC
I will leave the entire "history of WiS in EVE" aside. I wasn't playing this game back then. I've been playing this game for a few months, and my suggestion simply came from wondering why nothing meaningful can be done with my avatar.

Nevyn Auscent wrote:
What you propose would not create meaningful social interaction in any way. Because there still wouldn't be any 'place to go' to talk to good people. Nor is trying to sell it as an 'isk sink' meaningful since the quantity of isk sunk would be negligible. So no.

You make unsupported assertions there.

First, yes there would be a place to go, that's precisely the point. It would literally be a physical place (well, a virtual physical place) where our avatars would meet. Whether one would meet "good" people is of course not guaranteed, just like in a real bar. But by heading to the bar you would indicate your interest in socialising. Also, unlike local chat only people in the bar (and according to my idea, furthermore within physical proximity of your avatar in the bar) will hear you talking. This means you do not announce yourself to everybody in the system just by chatting.

Second, how much of an ISK sink this would be simply depends on the prices that would be set. Given that clothing can costs tens to hundreds of million ISK, I can easily imagine a glass of whiskey costing a million ISK or more. (Yes, the price system is broken if pants can cost more than spacecraft. But that EVE's economy is out of proportion for vanity items is not something this idea is trying to fix.) So binge drinking in the bar could indeed burn through a lot of ISK. We may even see the super-rich buying rounds for all present etc.
12Next page