These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Player Features and Ideas Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
123Next page
 

The Avg Battleship pilot. "Love PLZ" We would like to Be Known

First post
Author
Madlightning
State War Academy
Caldari State
#1 - 2015-12-21 08:21:41 UTC  |  Edited by: Madlightning
The Most of us that have been playing Eve For Years. have watched the Game Change like we have Never would of expected,


Cruisers, Frigs, Destroyers, recently battlecruisers, and Soon Capitals and Super capitals. but for some reason Battleship Have Barly worth mentioning, soon Dreads will have the Option to put the Beatdown. on Battleship and battlecruisers(To an Extent)


(Cause:1)As Long Lived avg battleship pilot myself, i kinda Fee Left out,Ugh recently CCP spoke about the changes to carriers, and it makes me think. When you See a Battleship what is its Role. it all depends on the Battleship. Me personaly I see battleships in some cases Gun Platforms Prime and Ready. to Put the Beatdown on people, other battleships i See as Gridholders ships that Have The Hardwere to hit anything Nearby by anymeans Loaded with guns Able to Target, Hit,Track, Ships of any Type, without the "NEED" for Ewar but not easly Held down by 3-4 Frigs And pounded on unable to Fight back, Due to the Natural Fitting of the ship. mainly the Shild fit Ships. Certain armor ships

Ships that Can in fact Hold Their own. Mainly pirate ships

some battleships should have Exceptionaly high Tracking(DPS low) and or Weapons mods that can cover a 20-30km Bubble alot of people think oh Toss on a Smart bomb. well that comes at a risk 1 if you have droness and person i orbiting you at less then 5k your going to pop your own drones and 1 Large smart bomb not going to Do a whole alot most of the time.


Most battleships Due to Reload pack around 300-600 DPS depending on fit. There needs to be a Battleship exclusive mod. that puts out 250 DPS Capped with lvl 5 (requires Testing/balence) that can Track and hit Small class ships inside that Range. for Turreted battleships only(i fly caldari mainly) the struggle is not there to "hit" small ships but for ships like the Rohk, Abaddon, Megathron, Apoc, Tempest, Maelstrom, Scorpion(we have to talk about that one #oddball #bestshipingame), Dominix, wait domi?( nvm GTFO you have drones you micro mini carrier),


Possable Issues you might have
ex:people "Hey madlightning you Srub people are just going to stick a bunch of those mods on a battlleship and Tank the ship to hell and Swarm them", to most Vet players when you look at 250 DPS that is a decent number on small ships. ut when you look at Cruisers and Larger ships+ resists. and movment 250 DPS looks more like 175-200DPS if not less and Battleship should onyl be able to place 1 of these mods in a high slot Lowering its Main Source a DPS to a Degree, and would also take up a decent ammount of PowerGrid/CPU and Can be Dsirupted with Ewar tracking E-War would have a 100-200% effect on this mod rendering it Useless, soo the 175-200 dps. Looks more like 5 dps. and 5-10% Sig increase protection comes at a cost. When your on Grid with a battleship 1 Lone frig non stealth bomber should not be able to perma lock down a battle and kill it with death by 1 mill paper cuts. i have seen it befor. Assault Frigs also They are Much more Beefy and should easly handle the mod without causing Major trouble. the MAX range for this would be 15KM. unless Marauder bastion becomes a "thing"


Null sec people: "whats stopping Huge Fleets of battleships from Cleaning Field in null sec with this anti-craft weapon" 1 well another battleship fleet. 2. a Fleet of capitals 3. bombs. 4. don't titans have the new Doomsday device comming soon(Can't Warp while the Device is active"micro warp?" NOPE,) When your in a small ship and you land on grid with a Battleship it should be like Let me be Smart. or die.


lets call it a D-Fence system this does not have a High Damage ticks But Very Rapid Ticks(Animation of the system is not related) and Can Load Scipts 30-60 sec loading time to Missle/Bomb Targeting because Bear WE ALL KNOW HOW GREAT DEFENDER MISSLES are.Bear it will be auto/toggle mod. can can destroy 10-30% of missles flying through its Field of View unless its 1-2 missles, depending on size of missles S/M/L/C group Capital size missles would Lucky To Destroy 1 meanwhile Rockets will be 80% of the rockets should be intercepted

Please Feel Free to Add/Comment if you Disagree Please DO so in a constructive way all of these IDEA flexable. some may just not be good ideas, but Battleships do need some Love and a Solid place in High/Low/Null sec and WH space to make them stand out.

My :Comment i Seen a 15 person cruiser fleet fight a 6-7 battle ship fleet Was a while ago but the Cruiser fleet got away with 13 People battleship fleet Wiped by Drones. if most battleship can't battle what are they? just ships? They Need to be like battllefield Utility ships there should be a Reason you want FEW on field.
Scipio Artelius
Weaponised Vegemite
Flying Dangerous
#2 - 2015-12-21 08:41:47 UTC
CCP buff Machariel.
















J/k. Aside from the Mach, I agree OP. BS could use some love.
Kuronaga
The Dead Parrot Shoppe Inc.
The Chicken Coop
#3 - 2015-12-21 09:29:15 UTC  |  Edited by: Kuronaga
Wanna melt a target? Caps do it faster.

Wanna tank the world? Caps do it better.

Wanna blame your loss on the people around you? Caps do it better.

Battleships got replaced by caps.
baltec1
Bat Country
Pandemic Horde
#4 - 2015-12-21 09:30:54 UTC
I can get my battleships to do all of the above.

The biggest problem battleships have is the fact that t3 cruisers get the same EHP while sporting a sig a fraction of the size, Greater speed and cap stability.
Krevnos
Back Door Burglars
#5 - 2015-12-21 10:26:30 UTC
I wouldn't hold my breath for any useful roles for battleships coming up soon: we told CCP they were useless over a year ago and they accused us of lying.
Madlightning
State War Academy
Caldari State
#6 - 2015-12-21 10:31:55 UTC  |  Edited by: Madlightning
Kuronaga wrote:
Wanna melt a target? Caps do it faster.

Wanna tank the world? Caps do it better.

Wanna blame your loss on the people around you? Caps do it better.

Battleships got replaced by caps.



i agree that pricetag though how many times have you been like lets spend the day risking caps. i only got about 800-900 mill to spare.




lol you lose that 1 cap your done. battleships you can get 2-3 ships out of that same cost.


but if you use a battleship like a Raven,Typoon, Domi, armagaddon, mega to fight smaller Stuff you can do it because those ships are Made almost Perfectly, what about all the other battleships
Madlightning
State War Academy
Caldari State
#7 - 2015-12-21 10:40:28 UTC  |  Edited by: Madlightning
baltec1 wrote:
I can get my battleships to do all of the above.

The biggest problem battleships have is the fact that t3 cruisers get the same EHP while sporting a sig a fraction of the size, Greater speed and cap stability.


i hear you there.
T3 Ships come at a Risk though. T3 ship without a doubt are Better in most way then battle ships but Not everyone can Freely Risk/Lose a T3 ship when ever.

what battle ship with turrets can Fend of frigs out to 15 KM without it being a missle ship or Cramming E-war webs and scrams? Most peopel can Grab a Vendicator double webs micro warp and a scramm and Punch Most people face in without trying. thats it If you are in a Ship that does not get any DPS Perks to it. or tracking your like at a loss, Ugh





Edit: Most of what i said is also Far fetched but when i Think battle ship i see a ship as far as sub cap goes, "i am a Battleship I can fight you Frigs and Destroyers bewere you solo can not fight me." but thats not the case Frigs can in alot of case 2-3 frigs can in fact Fight battleships again depending what that battle ships. but yes Alittle Love to some of the battleships
baltec1
Bat Country
Pandemic Horde
#8 - 2015-12-21 11:09:02 UTC
Madlightning wrote:


what battle ship with turrets can Fend of frigs out to 15 KM without it being a missle ship or Cramming E-war webs and scrams?
mega, navy mega, vindi, kronos, pest, fleet pest, vargur, hyperion, domi, sin, barghast, navy domi.





Lan Wang
Princess Aiko Hold My Hand
Safety. Net
#9 - 2015-12-21 11:13:49 UTC  |  Edited by: Lan Wang
baltec1 wrote:
Madlightning wrote:


what battle ship with turrets can Fend of frigs out to 15 KM without it being a missle ship or Cramming E-war webs and scrams?
mega, navy mega, vindi, kronos, pest, fleet pest, vargur, hyperion, domi, sin, barghast, navy domi.







missed the panther and typhoon, id rather undock my mach, rattler or vindi than a t3 tbh

Domination Nephilim - Angel Cartel

Calm down miner. As you pointed out, people think they can get away with stuff they would not in rl... Like for example illegal mining... - Ima Wreckyou*

Gregor Parud
Imperial Academy
#10 - 2015-12-21 11:13:54 UTC
Baltec got it right. The problem isn't BS, it's T3. Those are silly in the extreme and really need to be rebalanced hard, knocked down a few pegs turning them into "versatile but not dominant" ships. Once that happens BS will work fine.
baltec1
Bat Country
Pandemic Horde
#11 - 2015-12-21 11:28:23 UTC
Lan Wang wrote:
baltec1 wrote:
Madlightning wrote:


what battle ship with turrets can Fend of frigs out to 15 KM without it being a missle ship or Cramming E-war webs and scrams?
mega, navy mega, vindi, kronos, pest, fleet pest, vargur, hyperion, domi, sin, barghast, navy domi.







missed the panther and typhoon, id rather undock my mach, rattler or vindi than a t3 tbh


Ah forgot the panther and mach.
Remiel Pollard
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#12 - 2015-12-21 12:50:44 UTC
Came on here to say what Baltec said. Realised any contribution I might have made is entirely redundant. Decided instead to comment on the randomly capitalised words in the OP's post. Seriously, capital letters are reserved for starting sentences, and proper nouns, like Brisbane or Earth, unless you're talking about dirt, then it's just earth.

“Some capsuleers claim that ECM is 'dishonorable' and 'unfair'. Jam those ones first, and kill them last.” - Jirai 'Fatal' Laitanen, Pithum Nullifier Training Manual c. YC104

Gregor Parud
Imperial Academy
#13 - 2015-12-21 12:52:42 UTC
Remiel Pollard wrote:
Came on here to say what Baltec said. Realised any contribution I might have made is entirely redundant. Decided instead to comment on the randomly capitalised words in the OP's post. Seriously, capital letters are reserved for starting sentences, and proper nouns, like Brisbane or Earth, unless you're talking about dirt, then it's just earth.


He's SMA, they're on a different level. You're expecting too much.
Remiel Pollard
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#14 - 2015-12-21 12:54:25 UTC  |  Edited by: Remiel Pollard
Madlightning wrote:
baltec1 wrote:
I can get my battleships to do all of the above.

The biggest problem battleships have is the fact that t3 cruisers get the same EHP while sporting a sig a fraction of the size, Greater speed and cap stability.


i hear you there.
T3 Ships come at a Risk though. T3 ship without a doubt are Better in most way then battle ships but Not everyone can Freely Risk/Lose a T3 ship when ever.

what battle ship with turrets can Fend of frigs out to 15 KM without it being a missle ship or Cramming E-war webs and scrams? Most peopel can Grab a Vendicator double webs micro warp and a scramm and Punch Most people face in without trying. thats it If you are in a Ship that does not get any DPS Perks to it. or tracking your like at a loss, Ugh





Edit: Most of what i said is also Far fetched but when i Think battle ship i see a ship as far as sub cap goes, "i am a Battleship I can fight you Frigs and Destroyers bewere you solo can not fight me." but thats not the case Frigs can in alot of case 2-3 frigs can in fact Fight battleships again depending what that battle ships. but yes Alittle Love to some of the battleships


Man, I've blapped frigs with battleships, and vice versa, enough times to know it can be done. But at the end of the day, battleships aren't designed to blap frigs (generally speaking). Despite the fact that a good pilot with a smart fit CAN blap frigates, each size class of ship in the game is designed for fighting the same size. One frigate vs one battleship, more often than not the battleship won't have the tracking to hit the frig, and the frig won't have the tracking to hit the battleship. That's where support comes in, and the bigger the ship, the more support you're meant to have.

“Some capsuleers claim that ECM is 'dishonorable' and 'unfair'. Jam those ones first, and kill them last.” - Jirai 'Fatal' Laitanen, Pithum Nullifier Training Manual c. YC104

Bumblefck
Kerensky Initiatives
#15 - 2015-12-21 13:17:15 UTC
I LOVE CAPS, ALL CAPS ALL THE TIME

Perfection is a dish best served like wasabi .

Bumble's Space Log

Jenn aSide
Worthless Carebears
The Initiative.
#16 - 2015-12-21 13:48:02 UTC
I've seen this discussion before (battleships are hands down my favorite ship class) and I disagree with the conclusions the OP makes. Battleships are tricky to balance IMO because with as much EHP and other factors (like Range and DPS) you can get with them and the large weapons they carry, a slight buff ends up bringing some serious unintended consequences.

In another discussion about the issue I related an experience i had in another game with a similar issue. To summarize: There is video after video after video on sites like youtube of people who actually know how to use battleships slaughtering whole fleets of smaller ships. If you buff battleships to something the 'average' battleship pilot would find acceptable, you end up creating these super unbalanced monsters for people who are already good at using battleships. The game would quickly become battleships online, and as much as i love my Typhoons and Hyperions, that would be a bad thing for the game.

Another thing people don't consider when talking about battleships are their history. The ONLY reason we have these overly complicated turret and missile mechanics is because of battleship weapons. You really really didn't want to see a battleship come on grid when there was no such thing as tracking or fall off and your BC or smaller sized ship was going to be insta'd. I'd prefer 7 old school AOE Titan DDs to the face rather than see BSs be too strong again lol.
Lucas Kell
Solitude Trading
S.N.O.T.
#17 - 2015-12-21 14:39:04 UTC
Jenn aSide wrote:
I've seen this discussion before (battleships are hands down my favorite ship class) and I disagree with the conclusions the OP makes. Battleships are tricky to balance IMO because with as much EHP and other factors (like Range and DPS) you can get with them and the large weapons they carry, a slight buff ends up bringing some serious unintended consequences.
Back then you missed the same thing as you are here though. That what you are basing that on is the assumption that there is a super elite player always able to take that ship and destroy everything if it were buffed. With that as an assumption, nothing should ever be buffed.

Additionally, that super elite player will always exist. If they aren't in a battleship killing everything they are in whatever other ship is already powerful enough to kill everything. Hiding from the idea of buffing other ships because of them leave the exact same situation but with stagnant mechanics. Continuously shifting balance helps keep elite players on their toes as well as creating variety of play for everyone else.

The truth is that short of large scale battles, battleships see less use because ships that have been buffed or brought in at a greater level of power are used in their place. Strategic cruisers, T3 destroyers, HACS and AFs are heavily used because they are generally better and more flexible. Balancing battleships is a challenge to make sure they don't get too crazy when in massive blobs, but it certainly shouldn't be avoided because of fear of an elite player using it to do what they do anwyway.

The Indecisive Noob - EVE fan blog.

Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list.

Kuronaga
The Dead Parrot Shoppe Inc.
The Chicken Coop
#18 - 2015-12-21 14:49:37 UTC
Lan Wang wrote:
baltec1 wrote:
Madlightning wrote:


what battle ship with turrets can Fend of frigs out to 15 KM without it being a missle ship or Cramming E-war webs and scrams?
mega, navy mega, vindi, kronos, pest, fleet pest, vargur, hyperion, domi, sin, barghast, navy domi.







missed the panther and typhoon, id rather undock my mach, rattler or vindi than a t3 tbh



Yea me too but that's due to pride, not common sense.
Lan Wang
Princess Aiko Hold My Hand
Safety. Net
#19 - 2015-12-21 14:51:43 UTC
Kuronaga wrote:
Lan Wang wrote:
baltec1 wrote:
Madlightning wrote:


what battle ship with turrets can Fend of frigs out to 15 KM without it being a missle ship or Cramming E-war webs and scrams?
mega, navy mega, vindi, kronos, pest, fleet pest, vargur, hyperion, domi, sin, barghast, navy domi.







missed the panther and typhoon, id rather undock my mach, rattler or vindi than a t3 tbh



Yea me too but that's due to pride, not common sense.


i like the excitment when a fleet goes up saying "need blops" or "battleships needed", you just dont get that excitement from t3's or hacs anymore

Domination Nephilim - Angel Cartel

Calm down miner. As you pointed out, people think they can get away with stuff they would not in rl... Like for example illegal mining... - Ima Wreckyou*

Jenn aSide
Worthless Carebears
The Initiative.
#20 - 2015-12-21 15:10:37 UTC
Lucas Kell wrote:
Jenn aSide wrote:
I've seen this discussion before (battleships are hands down my favorite ship class) and I disagree with the conclusions the OP makes. Battleships are tricky to balance IMO because with as much EHP and other factors (like Range and DPS) you can get with them and the large weapons they carry, a slight buff ends up bringing some serious unintended consequences.
Back then you missed the same thing as you are here though. That what you are basing that on is the assumption that there is a super elite player always able to take that ship and destroy everything if it were buffed. With that as an assumption, nothing should ever be buffed.

Additionally, that super elite player will always exist. If they aren't in a battleship killing everything they are in whatever other ship is already powerful enough to kill everything. Hiding from the idea of buffing other ships because of them leave the exact same situation but with stagnant mechanics. Continuously shifting balance helps keep elite players on their toes as well as creating variety of play for everyone else.

The truth is that short of large scale battles, battleships see less use because ships that have been buffed or brought in at a greater level of power are used in their place. Strategic cruisers, T3 destroyers, HACS and AFs are heavily used because they are generally better and more flexible. Balancing battleships is a challenge to make sure they don't get too crazy when in massive blobs, but it certainly shouldn't be avoided because of fear of an elite player using it to do what they do anwyway.


The elite player isn't the only concern, just an example of what happens when you buff something 'because it's not good enough'. The much more numerous "above average" battleship pilots will take any ship balanced for "average" pilots and wreck shop with them too. That's why ships like the Gila, Worm and Orthrus just got nerfed, average players (like me) couldn't kill small gangs with them, but people only slightly better could terrorize folks with them.

That kind of thinking from CCP (ie, the idea that you can take something that is pretty much ok and 'buff it a little to make it more attractive') has led to all manner of nonsense like skynet ('hey, lets let capital drone boats get bonuses form drone mods without considering the fact that they have extra features like remote fighter assign').

Battleships are pretty much fine right now don't see much use outside of certain things not because they aren't good enough (They are), but because they fall below the "I can use this to reek havoc even though I'm not very good" threshold most players need to consider a thing worthwhile. Lack of common use does not equal lack of balance or quality, it mostly means that video players suck and are risk averse.

A better idea is to balance the things people use as "battleship alternatives' that make Battleships look worse than they are, namely T3 cruisers and maybe ABCs.
123Next page