These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Skill Discussions

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

[eb] - eveboard.com

Author
Morgan Agrivar
Doomheim
#401 - 2015-09-30 07:13:53 UTC
I have a question about the Compare Pilots feature. When you compare two or more pilots, it comes up with a Total Points at the bottom. How does eveboard calculate this score?

The reason I am asking is that I occasionally compare myself to other pilots close to my sp that is being sold on the character bazaar. I usually do + or - 5m sp to compare and I always seem to have the highest score. I have even compared myself to those 10 to 20m higher and I am confused why I still have a higher score than they do. I have 36m sp and I had a higher score than a 61m sp toon, so can you please explain how that is scored?

Thank you, I greatly appreciate it.
Tau Cabalander
Retirement Retreat
Working Stiffs
#402 - 2015-11-03 20:59:04 UTC
In case it hasn't already been mentioned....

CCP changes to the support website have broken the "new-style" predefined API key links, but the "old-style" still works.

https://community.eveonline.com/support/api-key/CreatePredefined?accessMask=59645960
RavenPaine
RaVeN Alliance
#403 - 2015-11-04 01:22:41 UTC  |  Edited by: RavenPaine
I added a skill to my queue, when there was an hour left till completion of the previous skill. When the new skill started, my Evemon did NOT show it as 100% completed.


Edit:
Today, 9 days later, I realize I have posted an evemon post in an eveboard thread.
Pretty sure it's part of being a blind old man, but dementia is also a possibility...

Don't let 'em trick you! The 'Golden years' is a lie!
LordOdysseus
HIgh Sec Care Bears
Brothers of Tangra
#404 - 2015-11-13 02:27:43 UTC
Chribba, I have a suggestion(if this has not been discussed before). There is this Global Rankings on EVEBoard,right? It shows many statistics on who has the most of what(skillwise mostly). How about adding the statistic about who has the most unallocated skillpoints in a descending order? I think it is as similar as the idea of having "who has the most ISK" statistic. What do you think about this?
Chribba
Otherworld Enterprises
Otherworld Empire
#405 - 2015-11-13 07:03:42 UTC  |  Edited by: Chribba
LordOdysseus wrote:
Chribba, I have a suggestion(if this has not been discussed before). There is this Global Rankings on EVEBoard,right? It shows many statistics on who has the most of what(skillwise mostly). How about adding the statistic about who has the most unallocated skillpoints in a descending order? I think it is as similar as the idea of having "who has the most ISK" statistic. What do you think about this?

I have the data and will try add the toplist asap

http://eveboard.com/fullranks/59-most-unallocated-sp

/c

★★★ Secure 3rd party service ★★★

Visit my in-game channel 'Holy Veldspar'

Twitter @ChribbaVeldspar

Towaoc
Applied Technologies Inc
Agents of Fortune
#406 - 2015-12-14 15:30:11 UTC  |  Edited by: Towaoc
Greetings all,

Chribba, since the introduction of the new skills "Command Destroyers" and "Logistics Frigates" last week, my board ranks page has shown that I have 1 level 2 skill and 1 level 3 skill, with the rest trained to level 4 or 5. I have added the two new skills but have trained each just to level 2, with the intent of holding them there (and collecting other new skills at L2) until I can figure out how to bring a batch of new level 2 skills through level 3 with as little impact on my overall rank as possible.

The lone level 3 in the data is, of course, currently crushing my overall rank - is it possible to correct this?

Also, and I know this has come up in the past but I don't think it has been talked about lately, has there been any further thought on changing the L4 and L3 rank categories to be cumulative rather than mutually exclusive, i.e., the Level 3 rank would become number of skills that are L3 or higher and L4 rank number of skills that are L4 or higher?

Thanks, as always, for your efforts in maintaining this outstanding resource!
Chribba
Otherworld Enterprises
Otherworld Empire
#407 - 2015-12-15 06:23:29 UTC
I have yet to update the database for the new skills so that is most likely why your rank got kicked a bit. I've not yet thought about that type of "grouping".

What's the benefit of grouping them by level and rank together? There would be a lot of grouping then I think, especially if you are going to do 5 groups per rank.

Lv1-5 @ Rank1
Lv1-5 @ Rank2
and so on?

/c

★★★ Secure 3rd party service ★★★

Visit my in-game channel 'Holy Veldspar'

Twitter @ChribbaVeldspar

RavenPaine
RaVeN Alliance
#408 - 2015-12-15 07:12:17 UTC
I could be totally wrong about what he is asking, but:
I don't think he means the skill rank, I think he means the EB ranking of "number of skills at level 3"

For instance, I currently have 44 skills at level 3. My ranking is in the 10,000 range for that stat.
If I train a couple skills to level 4, my ranking will go backwards for that stat, but it may also go backwards on EB overall.
So a better trained character may have a worse ranking.

Again, I could be interpreting his question wrong, but I observed my own character going backwards in ranking.
Since all I was doing was pumping up level 3's to level 4, I deduced that was the issue. At one point, I think I had a years worth of skills that I pushed to level 4.

Khanid Voltar
#409 - 2015-12-15 12:31:08 UTC  |  Edited by: Khanid Voltar
imo the eveboard global ranking sucks (altho endless love ofc for the /c man)

It has created perverse disincentives to partially complete skills in order to increase global ranking.

I get that it was done this way so that a newcomer could have as high a chance of increasing global ranking as a vet but as time has gone on and you see people skilling specifically to increase global ranking rather than to actually complete more skills you have to wonder what the point of it is at all.

@ Raven I believe the optimal level to have your skills at (in terms of global ranking) is half way between 4 & 5, there is a discussion somewhere in this thread where someone gives the formula and explains how it is done.

[edit] prior to level 3 skills do not count towards skill ranking. So when you took all your 3's to 4's you should have increased your global ranking true. but in that time people training skills to level 3 can do so a lot quicker than you can train them to 4 so that could be where your rank decreased instead of increasing. Also a new skill trained to l3 does more for your global ranking than an old skill trained from 3 to 4.

Personally I try to think about the global rank as little as possible!
Khanid Voltar
#410 - 2015-12-15 12:49:29 UTC  |  Edited by: Khanid Voltar
Chribba I have been meaning to ask if there is a way now to show number of ships with Mastery Level 5 on eveboard (or even for each level eg # @ l1, # @ l2, # @ l3 etc) ?

I know Evemon now has Masteries (I know that is nothing to do with you) but does that mean that they are on the API now, or have the Evemon team possibly done something internally in order to be able to include such metrics (in which case don't worry about it) ?
Amateratsu
The Pegasus Project
#411 - 2015-12-15 19:57:40 UTC
What Towaoc is asking for is to change 2 ranks.

Change the "number skills at level 3" to "number of skill at level 3 and higher. and the same for "number of skills at level 4" to "number of skill at level 4 and higher.

The reasoning for this is so you don't get penalised in the global ranking for having a low number of skills at level 3 or 4 or none at all at which point you get a penalty score for having a no data rank.

However doing the above will basically duplicate the total number of skills rank.
My self for example:- number of skills at level 3+ = 410 , number of skills at level 4+ = 410 same as total number of skills.
Towaoc
Applied Technologies Inc
Agents of Fortune
#412 - 2015-12-16 04:27:32 UTC
Raven and Amateratsu are on to what I'm saying.

It's a complex issue, hard to approach in this venue, but put simply, the current methodology penalizes characters who have advanced most or all skills to Level 4 and Level 5.

The error in my character's data illustrates the adverse impact of the current methodology of assigning mutually exclusive Level 3, 4 and 5 ranks in arriving at overall rank:

Level 5 skills: 224, rank: 200
Level 4 skills: 185, rank: 53
Level 3 skills: 1, rank: 70,344
(other stuff)
Overall rank: 57

Current methodology with corrected data:

Level 5 skills: 224, rank: 200
Level 4 skills: 185, rank: 53
Level 3 skills: 0, rank: approximately 1,750 (eveboard imputed value for a null category)
(other stuff)
Overall rank: 1 (sorry, somebody has to be here...)

Revised methodology with cumulative L3 and L4 ranks:

Level 5 skllls: 224, rank: 200
Level 4 or higher: 409, rank: probably top 20
Level 3 or higher: 409, rank: probably top 20
(other stuff)
Overall rank: 1

Overlook, for a moment, my shameless plug to remain #1, and focus on the adverse impact that a low Level 3 skill total has on overall rank. With many characters reaching the "all skills trained to Level 4 or higher" level (see separate thread on the subject), now may be the time to revise the ranking methodology to better recognize those achievements.



Towaoc
Applied Technologies Inc
Agents of Fortune
#413 - 2015-12-16 04:52:42 UTC
Khanid Voltar wrote:

......It has created perverse disincentives to partially complete skills in order to increase global ranking.

Guilty as charged. I implemented this tactic several years ago as part of a strategy to ascend to #1 in global ranking. It worked. I imagine others have done the same. But hey, having all of the skills i needed for what I do in the game already, why not? How about a +1 for being clever??

More seriously, the proposal above would negate this tactic, helping to restore the true spirit of the eveboard rank - that being to showcase characters that have achieved an advanced level of training in a broad and balanced set of skills.


Morgan Agrivar
Doomheim
#414 - 2015-12-16 07:38:39 UTC
I wonder if that is close to the question I had about the skill ranking when you compare two pilots? I always seem to have a higher score than others, even those up to 10-15m sp more than me...not intentional of course. I was just wondering how that score came to be...
RavenPaine
RaVeN Alliance
#415 - 2015-12-16 17:39:37 UTC  |  Edited by: RavenPaine
Morgan Agrivar wrote:
I wonder if that is close to the question I had about the skill ranking when you compare two pilots? I always seem to have a higher score than others, even those up to 10-15m sp more than me...not intentional of course. I was just wondering how that score came to be...


Your ranking score is based on a cumulative average of the 36 skill ranks at the top of your rank page.
You may have a more rounded character than some of those that you compare to.
For instance, someone that is hard focused in PvP only may have great stats in those areas, but they might have 2 skills in Science trained to level 1. That would make the Science category stat pretty bad, and affect their over all average.

^ As mentioned above, 1 or 2 skills in a particular category can take that stat to a ranking of 70, 80, 90,000 over all.

It's very much possible to have a better rank than a player who is much older than you are.

Obviously, skills that help you play the actual game are most important.
Playing with the EB ranks is something I think the older players have done when they had everything they wanted in game.
voetius
Grundrisse
#416 - 2015-12-16 21:36:08 UTC
RavenPaine wrote:
Morgan Agrivar wrote:
I wonder if that is close to the question I had about the skill ranking when you compare two pilots? I always seem to have a higher score than others, even those up to 10-15m sp more than me...not intentional of course. I was just wondering how that score came to be...


Your ranking score is based on a cumulative average of the 36 skill ranks at the top of your rank page.
You may have a more rounded character than some of those that you compare to.
For instance, someone that is hard focused in PvP only may have great stats in those areas, but they might have 2 skills in Science trained to level 1. That would make the Science category stat pretty bad, and affect their over all average.

^ As mentioned above, 1 or 2 skills in a particular category can take that stat to a ranking of 70, 80, 90,000 over all.

It's very much possible to have a better rank than a player who is much older than you are.

Obviously, skills that help you play the actual game are most important.
Playing with the EB ranks is something I think the older players have done when they had everything the wanted in game.


That does go a long way to explaining something that I had noticed. That there were players with 10 - 20 mill SP less than me that were ranked higher than me and I couldn't see any obvious reason why that was the case. I wasn't bothered enough to post and ask about it but it's good to know. Cheers :)
Morgan Agrivar
Doomheim
#417 - 2015-12-17 06:42:25 UTC
RavenPaine wrote:
Morgan Agrivar wrote:
I wonder if that is close to the question I had about the skill ranking when you compare two pilots? I always seem to have a higher score than others, even those up to 10-15m sp more than me...not intentional of course. I was just wondering how that score came to be...


Your ranking score is based on a cumulative average of the 36 skill ranks at the top of your rank page.
You may have a more rounded character than some of those that you compare to.
For instance, someone that is hard focused in PvP only may have great stats in those areas, but they might have 2 skills in Science trained to level 1. That would make the Science category stat pretty bad, and affect their over all average.

^ As mentioned above, 1 or 2 skills in a particular category can take that stat to a ranking of 70, 80, 90,000 over all.

It's very much possible to have a better rank than a player who is much older than you are.

Obviously, skills that help you play the actual game are most important.
Playing with the EB ranks is something I think the older players have done when they had everything they wanted in game.

Thank you for explaining that. As I was comparing myself to those within my sp range (just passed 41m sp) that were for sale on the character bazaar, I was floored on how much was being paid for them but I had a 'higher score' overall. Now that makes complete sense since I have spent the last 15 months filling in all the holes I had when I went pure tank/cap and had no offense.
Chribba
Otherworld Enterprises
Otherworld Empire
#418 - 2015-12-17 09:11:03 UTC
Khanid Voltar wrote:
Chribba I have been meaning to ask if there is a way now to show number of ships with Mastery Level 5 on eveboard (or even for each level eg # @ l1, # @ l2, # @ l3 etc) ?

I know Evemon now has Masteries (I know that is nothing to do with you) but does that mean that they are on the API now, or have the Evemon team possibly done something internally in order to be able to include such metrics (in which case don't worry about it) ?

I will look into seeing if I can show that somehow.

/c

★★★ Secure 3rd party service ★★★

Visit my in-game channel 'Holy Veldspar'

Twitter @ChribbaVeldspar

Chribba
Otherworld Enterprises
Otherworld Empire
#419 - 2015-12-17 09:15:35 UTC
I think I understand what you're all saying about the ranks now yeah. And I agree with you guys that the overall and such is pretty sucky, as well as me being a bit lost on a really good way to get an overall rank.

Perhaps I should try and make the ranks more of % of the max you can have in a group and use those values. As that also would be more dynamic I think than pure number of skills at a level.

The default "null" value is always problematic as it can have a big impact on things, and to the clever people gaming the eb ranks... I feel honored actually haha that you're playing the eb-game!

But in the end yes I need to look over the rankings.

/c

★★★ Secure 3rd party service ★★★

Visit my in-game channel 'Holy Veldspar'

Twitter @ChribbaVeldspar

RavenPaine
RaVeN Alliance
#420 - 2015-12-18 05:48:37 UTC
"Sucky" is not a word that has ever crossed my mind.

It is what it is, and I game it, accept my place in it, appreciate it.

Cool
Fun
Helpful
Free
Entertainment

Those are the words that come to mind

Thank you C for all your work.