These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Missions & Complexes

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
123Next pageLast page
 

Nerf and Redistribute Incursions

Author
Deen Wispa
Sheriff.
Caldari Tactical Operations Command
#1 - 2012-01-05 18:24:13 UTC
Read Jester's entry on Incursions;
http://jestertrek.blogspot.com/2012/01/caravan-of-heavens.html

Nerf the hisec incursions and redistribute appropriately amongst lowsec and nullsec. He makes alot of sense.

inb4 epic rage

High Five. Yeah! C'est La Eve .

Spineker
#2 - 2012-01-05 18:38:55 UTC
I think they should be nerfed but the only thing they need is no respawn just like missions. Don't need to move them any where. The farming is the worst part not that they are in highsec. Too hell with Null and Low they already have most of the cool things.
Spineker
#3 - 2012-01-05 18:40:50 UTC
Oh and no amount of force is going to make people go low or null forget it. Has never worked ever look at L5 and all the other garbage they have tried to force on the customers. It is not rage it is just laughable to even consider taking incursions out of highsec.
Deen Wispa
Sheriff.
Caldari Tactical Operations Command
#4 - 2012-01-05 18:48:39 UTC
Please read the entire post correctly. There is no mention of taking incursions out of hisec. Just better distribution :)

PS. Even the rage comments on Ripard's blog has alot of quick trigger comments that interpreted his analysis as taking incursions out of hisec. I guess this is a topic that will elicit a very visceral response from the community.

High Five. Yeah! C'est La Eve .

Spineker
#5 - 2012-01-05 18:58:45 UTC
I didn't read any of it don't like blogs or the word "redistrubution" because generally that means bend over because you are about to get redistrubuted prison love.

Stop the respawn in Low Null and Highsec period.
Substantia Nigra
Polaris Rising
Goonswarm Federation
#6 - 2012-01-05 19:36:31 UTC
It seems to me that CCP introduced incursions with a number of stated intentions. Incursions appear to have lived up to those intentions.

- Some ppl try incursions, some don't.
- Some ppl run lots and lots of incursions, some a few, and some none at all.
- Some ppl work hard at incursions and develop very efficient methods to make substantial incomes. Some ppl work at griefing incursions and incursion-runners, with occasional success.
- Some ppl enjoy, some not fussed, some dislike.
- Some ppl moan and bleat that incursions, incursion income, incursion distribution, incursion role-playing, incursion runners (etc etc etc) are bad things. Their reasons are many and may include isk faucets (whatever a faucet is), inconsistency with game story, encourage Russian bot-miners in nullsec (or whatever apocryphal evil is in mode atm), inflates the price of T3s, keeps ppl out of nullsec / lowsec / theirsec (etc etc etc). For various reasons they decide incursions, as implemented, do not fit their model of how eve should run to best suit them ... and so they try to shift the onus to CCP to 'fix' eve so it better fits their gameplay desires.

Me? I think incursions are fine, and I run them occasionally when I am in hisec. I don't have an incursions alt, it'd not be great use of my resources since w-space income is ok in its own right.

Eve is a sandbox, if you don't like something then go do something else. But please stop moaning and whining about what other ppl choose to do, or want to do. It's their sandbox as much as it is yours or mine.

If you want other ppl to do something else then employ your leadership and charisma, engage with them, and get them to do that something else ... don't comfy-chair whine for CCP to 'fix this' or 'fix that' just because it doesn't suit you today.

I guess I am almost a 'vet' by now. Hopefully not too bitter and managing to help more than I hinder. I build and sell many things, including large collections of bookmarks.

Akrasjel Lanate
Immemorial Coalescence Administration
Immemorial Coalescence
#7 - 2012-01-05 19:40:48 UTC
Nerf high sec Incursions rewards

CEO of Lanate Industries

Citizen of Solitude

Aestivalis Saidrian
Revenent Defence Corperation
Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive
#8 - 2012-01-05 20:06:34 UTC
No.

If you're in lowsec or nullsec and you do the same thing that Incursion runners do in high sec, you can make 180m or more per hour.
Brewlar Kuvakei
Adeptio Gloriae
#9 - 2012-01-05 20:11:04 UTC
I wish they'd just drop the sec status of the system the incursion was in to simulate concord being overwhelmed. This would be great and if the incursion fleet is not dispatched that system would remain a low sec system encouraging high secr's to retake it.
Deen Wispa
Sheriff.
Caldari Tactical Operations Command
#10 - 2012-01-05 20:34:52 UTC  |  Edited by: Deen Wispa
All good comments Substantia. However;

Substantia Nigra wrote:

Eve is a sandbox, if you don't like something then go do something else. But please stop moaning and whining about what other ppl choose to do, or want to do. It's their sandbox as much as it is yours or mine.

.


Eve is a sandbox . And within that sandbox people are allowed to counter their opinions with those of others. One is no more right than the other. But I'm simply stating that this is part of the sandbox that you so stated.

Having read enough of Ripard's entries, it's reasonably safe to assume that his feedback isn't to serve his own agenda. But to help and grow the EVE community in general. Resorting to the moaning and whining meme doesn't hold true in this case.

High Five. Yeah! C'est La Eve .

Muammar al-Amarr
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
#11 - 2012-01-05 20:58:06 UTC  |  Edited by: Muammar al-Amarr
Brewlar Kuvakei wrote:
I wish they'd just drop the sec status of the system the incursion was in to simulate concord being overwhelmed. This would be great and if the incursion fleet is not dispatched that system would remain a low sec system encouraging high secr's to retake it.

Brilliant idea actually. Make the system 0.0 until the incursion is over. Makes sense and fixes several issues at once.
wallenbergaren
Garoun Investment Bank
Gallente Federation
#12 - 2012-01-05 21:06:52 UTC  |  Edited by: wallenbergaren
As someone who does lowsec Incursions, the answer is not to try to get highsec Incursion runners into lowsec. You can't have all those people there, they will be killed until the population is thinned out enough. If you think highsec Incursions pay too well, then whatever, nerf them, but in lowsec it's a dog eat dog world. If we see someone else running sites nearby then we go after them. Lowsec Incursions work great but they couldn't support more people. If more people show up either we kill them or they kill us, but we won't both be there.
Deen Wispa
Sheriff.
Caldari Tactical Operations Command
#13 - 2012-01-05 21:10:31 UTC
wallenbergaren wrote:
As someone who does lowsec Incursions, the answer is not to try to get highsec Incursion runners into lowsec. You can't have all those people there, they will be killed until the population is thinned out enough. If you think highsec Incursions pay too well, then whatever, nerf them, but in lowsec it's a dog eat dog world. If we see someone else running sites nearby then we go after them. Lowsec Incursions work great but they couldn't support more people. If more people show up either we kill them or they kill us, but we won't both be there.


Right. But as the entry suggested, would having more incursions in lowsec at the same time result in less of stranglehold?

High Five. Yeah! C'est La Eve .

Kara Books
Deal with IT.
#14 - 2012-01-05 21:21:22 UTC
Deen Wispa wrote:
Read Jester's entry on Incursions;
http://jestertrek.blogspot.com/2012/01/caravan-of-heavens.html

Nerf the hisec incursions and redistribute appropriately amongst lowsec and nullsec. He makes alot of sense.

inb4 epic rage


I dont run incursions any more, I might for old times sakes, like.. later but there are more profitable things out there then incursions.

after 6 months and allot of hard work, my endeavors are now more profit then I had running incursions.

In the end, Incursions give every one a chance at a super shiny ship/carrier early in their eve life, this makes the game more interesting and will make people plex accounts for longer.

I might be wrong, but i think there's something to it.


Missions running is now rebounding, ratting is rebounding, and Im personally very happy to see more and more merchants actually interested in playing the market games. CCP has done some great things in the last few months.

Now for the growing delema of huge SOV alliances disappearing from the game, one by one and new ones are near impossible to create, Just my 5 cents on giving more and more people the incentive to plex their accounts for longer and longer.
Substantia Nigra
Polaris Rising
Goonswarm Federation
#15 - 2012-01-05 21:44:51 UTC
Deen Wispa wrote:
... it's reasonably safe to assume that his feedback isn't to serve his own agenda. But to help and grow the EVE community in general.


Irrespective of how you may interpret the author's motivations it's just another example of the "CCP changed something => That change doesn't fit with my model of how eve should be => CCP should change it to better fit my model" complex of reasoning.

I know it's not gonna change. Whatever things are available in eve, and whatever tweaks and changes CCP makes, there will be ppl who disagree or dislike it and some of them will air their views under the banner of "It's broken, so fix it CCP". Whatever their particular view is, they will garner a variable following of like-minded "yeah bro" people and they will also gather some disagreers.

It's all too easy to moan, however rationally argued or presented, that something is broken and thereby argue that someone else should fix it ... according to whatever fix-model you have in your mind. But when there are a helluvalot of ppl out there enjoying that 'broken' something, then those moans are clearly not aimed at helping those people ... they're just the author trying to impose / argue his view of how the eve universe should be.

Arguing views is fine by me, but 'fixing' the unbroken doesn't seem to be a terribly good idea.


btw. I do kinda like the idea, mentioned above, of variable sec status systems ... whether the changes happen thru incursions of thru some other mechanisms. It'd have some RW face credibility if some of those hinterland 0.4 / 0.5 systems gradually shifted in their degree of CONCORD control .... it'd certainly have me looking twice as I jumped my freighter into Hek / Uedama on the way to Jita.

I guess I am almost a 'vet' by now. Hopefully not too bitter and managing to help more than I hinder. I build and sell many things, including large collections of bookmarks.

Jyla Olanaki
Doomheim
#16 - 2012-01-05 22:06:00 UTC
Deen Wispa wrote:
All good comments Substantia. However;

Substantia Nigra wrote:

Eve is a sandbox, if you don't like something then go do something else. But please stop moaning and whining about what other ppl choose to do, or want to do. It's their sandbox as much as it is yours or mine.

.


Eve is a sandbox . And within that sandbox people are allowed to counter their opinions with those of others. One is no more right than the other. But I'm simply stating that this is part of the sandbox that you so stated.

Having read enough of Ripard's entries, it's reasonably safe to assume that his feedback isn't to serve his own agenda. But to help and grow the EVE community in general. Resorting to the moaning and whining meme doesn't hold true in this case.


Have to agree with Niga, but acknowledge that I usually concur with Rip's blogging to some degree.

The problem is that incursions, especially in highsec, offer semi-cooperative (fleets brought together on the fly with minimal pilot coordinating and trust required) pve that is palletable to both hardcore/well-connected players and casual/solo-ish players. I use the word "problem," because I see this as the catalyst for this debate, not because I personally view it as an issue harming gameplay.

The main thing to understand is that many players never make the leap to getting into an organized corp. Most of the dedicated soloists never bother with incursions, so we aren't talking about mr. anti-social mission man. We're talking about the average wife and kids weekend incursion pilot who isn't dedicated enough to EVE to warrent joining a well organized incursion team, the likes of which would be required to regularly hit incursions sites outside of highsec.

The worries about the "caravan," style incursion hopping seem valid on their face, but the reality is incursions delivered many semi-casual players from a life of mission running to pay the pvp bills (if they have any). Sending them back to their L4 agents so that the "game can be more healthy," doesn't seem like a good idea. Let the incursion casuals have their highsec incursions in numbers. The rest of us are free to operate superior fleets, beat them at/to sites, and run the more profitable incursions elsewhere.

The sandbox as it stands is essentially fine. Doctor the incrusion rewards a little if they're producing too much isk, but don't take away the pick-up incursion fleets that many rely on. And that is essentially what reducing highsec incursions would do.
Emperor Salazar
Remote Soviet Industries
Insidious Empire
#17 - 2012-01-05 22:29:47 UTC  |  Edited by: Emperor Salazar
They won't be.

But they should be.

As a sidenote, gates in high sec plexes should not allow T3. Awwww yeah
CeneUJiti
Doomheim
#18 - 2012-01-05 22:46:54 UTC
There is a "nerf hisec incursions" thread 4 topics down.

Remove Incursions from hisec completely; and you won't make people in multibilion isk faction BS go to lowsec or 00. It will remain RNK and Goons fighting each-other and everyone else over lowsec and 00 incursions.

I'd do the pointless thing and remind you all that highsec incursions are nerfed by default with their earnings capped to 60% of what lowsec and 00 ones pay out.

Let me repeat that; by default lowsec and 00 incursions pay out 66% more than highsec ones. What more of nerf do you want?
Endeavour Starfleet
#19 - 2012-01-06 00:15:36 UTC
Absolutely not. Incursions do NOT need to be touched.

I was once in the same mindset that incursions are a risk free way to make untold amounts of money. But in reality holding even 100M an hour with a shiny fleet is difficult.

You want to know why they pay out so much? Spend some time in the various incursion channels and you are soon to find tales about people losing their 2B isk ship because the logi DCed and messed up the chain or fell asleep. Logis perishing all the time.. And of course that you simply wont be able to hold anything but a highly disciplined fleet together long enough to hold it.

I warped to a planet cloaked and watched the incursion fleets move in an out. Most of the time I noticed they were there atleast 10 minutes with people warping in and out. On a shiny fleet that is nearly 2 sites.

With an alt you can easily make about as much in LVL4s with incursions you are completely dependant on who is in the fleet.

Also people lie all the time about their skills and fits. So you will sometimes go into what is supposed to be a shiny fleet with Logi 5 claimers actually at 4 with low emissions skills, Faction ships without claimed pimping and other issues. Then you've got people not hitting their webs. Mistiming their firings that prevents an alpha. And other things that can easilly knock it down to below lvl4 income.

Instead of bashing what you know nothing about. Try actually spending a few weeks in an incursion running mode (Tho you were likely like me and mad that they would not take your crapfit Raven) And learn how hard it is to actually make isk.

Incursions are a grouping incentive that does not involve big corp or alliance politics. If anything they need to be buffed.
Leelarja
The Omega Directive.
#20 - 2012-01-06 00:17:25 UTC
And what good would these changes do?
123Next pageLast page