EVE General Discussion

IB4L

Caps so people know who is important.

Actually, it's because the 3rd one has only a fraction of the participants of the 1st and 2nd ones. Surely you can understand what that means right? The income/person rate of incursions is incredibly high compared to any other PvE activity. You think it's "OK as is" because you are gaining from it, that doesn't mean it's right. Personally, I think if you want to make incursion level income you should have to be out of concord protection. The amount of income can stay, but you should have to be in lowsec or nullsec.

Troll-posting will only get you reported, so please stop it.

@Lucas Kell - I understand and i agree. However, moon-goo in 0.0 pays extremely well too and people are asking CCP to nerf it for years, claiming that the blue donut and current PVP stagnation is related to that, more specifically that alliances are cashing in the huge profits from the moons, but instead of using the ISK for SRP Programs, they chose to go blue with each other, thus no need for blowing ships. Shouldn't that be removed or nerfed too, based on the same principle ? The profitable moons are being help by a very small fraction of people and they generate huge profits...

What i keep seeing is: 0.0 players protecting their 0.0 content and income. You want to impose, by crying at ccp, your OWN playstile even in the space where you don't have sov, that's hilarious.

On the other hand, I'd have no problems at all if incursions would get nerfed. What I'm saying is they should nerf other income sources too, to balance the isk faucet/sink even better !
For example:
- remove or nerf moon-goo , based on your idea that huge profits should not be gained by a very small fraction of the game
- nerf 0.0 bounties so botters won't be inclined to rent space and bot 24/7 with semi-afk ishtars, carriers or supers
- nerf mining, so high-sec miners won't be inclined to bot either ( it's been a mining bot for years out there )
- and soooo on.

Basically, we can find a reson to nerf everything, if we really search for one. The only VALID concern would be to reduce the isk faucets and/or increase isk sinks to keep a healthy economy. Everything else, like nerfing only a specific activity just because you're jealous or it doesn't match your playstile is pure hypocrisy

There will always be double standards, because most people tend to put their own personal agendas/interests first.



But this thread is likely to go nowhere.

Thread Closed


This response is better located here.