These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Player Features and Ideas Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
Previous page12
 

T3 Battleship ?

Author
Stitch Kaneland
The Tuskers
The Tuskers Co.
#21 - 2015-11-24 20:09:32 UTC
You can get 307k EHP with only an armor tank. But you need purple EANM and mag stabs. You are at like 1800 heated dps though. But you actually have usable mids.

Vindicator (phone format)
x8 neutron blasters + void

Fed navy web
republic fleet 100mn MWD
Republic fleet warp disruptor
Large MJD
medium cap booster (could go to large, drop MJD)

x2 shaqil's ENAM
x2 t2 1600 plates
IFFA DCU
x2 brynns modified mag stabs

x3 t2 large trimarks

HG slave set + omega
Ellendras Silver
CrashCat Corporation
#22 - 2015-11-24 22:40:00 UTC
lets not make more ships we are getting new command dessies with a new prop mod and new EWAR frigs as a mining frig this is enough for now (maybe too much) as it will make a lot possible that isnt possible right now.

so no new ships till we seen impact of already new ships arriving in December.
the rest of the ships and modules are re-balanced specially the T3 cruisers, dessies and capital ships

even then i don't think T3 battleships are needed / wanted

[u]Carpe noctem[/u]

Tiddle Jr
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#23 - 2015-11-25 04:36:38 UTC
lol please no no

"The message is that there are known knowns. There are things we know that we know. There are known unknowns. That is to say there are things that we now know we don't know. But there are also unknown unknowns. There are things we don't know" - CCP

Rek Seven
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#24 - 2015-11-25 09:46:07 UTC  |  Edited by: Rek Seven
Vimsy Vortis
Shoulda Checked Local
Break-A-Wish Foundation
#25 - 2015-11-25 10:05:08 UTC
That's just regular spaceships with a coherent fleet doctrine.
Rek Seven
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#26 - 2015-11-25 11:02:31 UTC
Maybe, maybe not. It would depend on the functions/abilities/mechanics of the combined ships.
Serendipity Lost
Repo Industries
#27 - 2015-11-25 13:30:51 UTC
Rek Seven wrote:
Maybe, maybe not. It would depend on the functions/abilities/mechanics of the combined ships.



Does just 1 person then control the monster ship you just created? That would be pay to win with alts online in its simplest and purest form.
Rek Seven
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#28 - 2015-11-25 15:01:45 UTC  |  Edited by: Rek Seven
If you want it to be that way, sure... That is the beauty of imagination Roll

PS. i don't think pay to win means what you think it means
Serendipity Lost
Repo Industries
#29 - 2015-11-25 15:09:28 UTC
I think 20 dudes linking their ships together and being controlled by just one guy wouldn't be as fun as you think it would.

Pay to win: Paying more money than the other guy to achieve an advantage. This can manifest itself as hard currency purchases of 'better gear' than is not availble through game play. It can also manifest itself in the ability to purchase more accounts with hard currency and then link them together to be controlled by one individual.

Replace 'linking' with 'botting' and the idea isn't really changed in substance or function. That is NOT GOOD
Rek Seven
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#30 - 2015-11-25 17:43:51 UTC  |  Edited by: Rek Seven
Serendipity Lost wrote:
I think 20 dudes linking their ships together and being controlled by just one guy wouldn't be as fun as you think it would.


Then why are you basing an idea on something that you thing wouldn't be fun? You are the one that suggested linking 20 accounts that are controlled by one guy, not me.

Pay to win means you can pay money for something that is not acquirable by in-game means in a reasonable time-frame. By your definition, eve is and always has been a pay to win game but we digress.
Previous page12