Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center

One jump isn't going to get out of gate gun range, and if the complaint is about multiple command destroyers........it's possible to tank gate guns in an AF. Gate guns are trivial.

If they're using multiple ships to pull a ship off a gate in order to avoid gate guns........you can do that with 2 cheaper ships right now. T3D + logi cruiser.

Will the MJFG blink NPC ships (Sleepers, Drifters, Incursion rats, faction navy, etc.)? If yes, all or just some? If just some, which ones?

Will activation of the MJFG force your ship to accelerate to its top speed like the current MJDs do?

Will activation of the MJFG lock your ship's vector like the current MJDs do?

Will the MJFG give signature bloom to the CD? If not, it needs to or large ships (BC, BS) will have no way to counter this. :(

From what I've read, ANY ship that is scrammed, will NOT be pulled along by a CD? Is that correct? I just want to be 100% clear on this.

Will the MJFG affect Marauders in Bastion, or ships lighting a cyno?

Do you have any concerns regarding the ease with which these could break entosis links, or do you feel there is enough counterplay available?

The NPC ones are pretty trivial, true, but when we can build our own those may not be. Also if you bite off more than you can chew with your blink, the gate guns may seal your fate when added to the DPS of the ships you snagged.

How does a T3D and logi forcibly move another ship away from a gate? Are T3Ds really good bumpers or am I missing something?

I thought of two different usages of MJFG. They are possible?

1. station camping break
Instalocking Loki has 100k~EHP and nearly invulnerable to ganking unless ganker has bridging Titan.
I want kick it out of docking range with MJFG. However surviving seconds in front of the camper is a bit difficult for small ships.
Then I thought of the way to evade risk. Can I use a trick below?

Step1: Prepare 2 Command Destroyers with MJFG.
Step2: Warp at 100km from the Loki and align to it.
Step3: One Command Destroyer activate MJFG , and another one activate MJFG one tick later.
Step4: First MJFG ignites. Now 2 Command Destroyers are on the Loki.
Step5: Second MJFG ignites. 2 Command Destroyers and Loki are 100km away from station.

Ofcourse, Loki pilot can avoid this trick using "scramming" alt.

2. LP theif
LP theif isn't known well by non-FW people. It's one of the most risk averse farming in low sec.
A theif enters the plex run by same faction millitia men at end of timer and steal half of LP reward.
It's very annoying because shooting theif will ruin faction standing.
Can I use MJFG to kick out theif from beacon without standing loss?

That's 1,495,980 jumps for 1 AU.

Sorry but there are several very effective counters to this.

:- Man up and stop flying in keep at range 500 blobs.
:- Use the blob your hiding in to kill the Tactical Destroyers in the opposing fleet. (If your blob is unable to kill a destroyer before it gets close enough to you to separate your logi from the fleet, your doing something wrong)
:- Chances are, your blob will have some of these in fleet, use your 1st.

Regardless of gain, having the ability to completely troll a entire organized community with a cheapish single ship is a bit abusive. It's like giving a person the ability to enter a dungeon run of another group, teleport their healer to the entrance of the dungeon just so you can to watch the entire group die.

I see the issues here.

(Begins building incursion fu ooc jump drive alt).

Maybe one idea for the pot. If you could have activating the micro jump field generator either create a suspect timer or hostile timer when used in highsec - when it is initiated on neutral ships - not when the spool is completed.

As to the whole Incursion debate going on here:

I regulary fly as a Logi in incursion fleets. At first i was glad that this module would be banned from highsec, exactly for the reason of not wanting to be jumped 100km, or more, away and having to see the fleet die while i try to burn in range.

But the argument for the pro highsec side convinced me that it is better for the game and my fun to allow them.
The main reason is that for ASS and HQ fleets we have most of the time an designatet Logi anchor, most of the time also the sniper anchor.
This guy could easily fit a scram. A nice true sansha one + the information link = plenty of range.

Only things that i would change that the whole thing is not OP:
MJFG can´t jumps anchored ships, marauder in bastion as an example
MJFG spool up anchors the ship, no 1sec daisy chain
and of course the suspect timer on activation

this way a pre lock is easy, as soon as the MJFG spools up the ship is dead
cloak is counterable with containers from all ships during anchor point approach + larger logi orbit if one is spotted
if 1 or 2 logi get jumped, this is manageabel for a short duration

Jumping the sansha around? Good luck with that, they tend to shoot ships. Annoying? Maybe, but also a good laugh on coms.
Jumping the CQC? Same as logi anchor. Civi picker or other stuff, maybe a different positioning is in order.
Vanguards? They are boring as hell anyway.

Probably the best combination of ideas for a ship in the last decade or so to be honest. t2 command destroyers have been on my wish list for a long time now, thank you for delivering. These are definitely a step toward what on grid links should look like.