These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Too much EWAR in the game?

Author
Gregor Parud
Imperial Academy
#41 - 2015-11-17 18:04:18 UTC
Jenn aSide wrote:
Gregor Parud wrote:
It's not about being against the EULA or bad (but was a good try to change the subject a bit :P), it's about distancing yourself, in words anyway, from what the group you choose to be with is all about.


I didn't distance myself from anything. I made a statement of fact ("I am not an Alliance") against a nonsense allegation (something to do with blobs that has nothing to do with EWAR).

So, what are you on about, or are you just trolling right now, because you aren't making any sense. What is TEST doing wrong that I should distance myself from it?


Nothing, as stated I'm not talking about this or any specific situation. I'm merely commenting on the statement that you distance yourself from what the alliance you choose to be with does. Not saying Doc's remark made any sense.
AtramLolipop
Space Wolves ind.
Solyaris Chtonium
#42 - 2015-11-17 18:15:59 UTC
Daerrol wrote:
ll Kuray ll wrote:
Too much EWAR specifically Jams.

Too easy for a 500k ship to sit jamming a 500m boat, to make it worse 500k x 25 jams just makes it pointless.

Ewar should be stacked the same way rigs have.

EWAR should be small, medium, large. Neuts and Nos are but none of the other EWAR is.

I like the idea of making EWAR modules restricted to the specific ship class. Small EWAR modules can not be used on larger ship sizes, of course there are the specific role bonused ships that would be exempt from this. It just means more thought goes into fleet setups instead of making every man and his dog wear a web, disruptor, jam, nos etc.


Set drones to defensve. Watch the griffon die in a fire or warp out. Why does your 500m ship not have drones? Also who flies 500m ships? That's like a Bhaalgorn or something, and my bhaal has over 100 sensor strength...

Edit: This post angers me. more incoming. U mad bro? Oh yeah i'm mad.

Ok so a Griffon kitted out with Jams (1 of each racial) and 2 Signal Amps II, all level 5
Radar Jam Strength: 18.84 (total)

Phantasm Sensor Strength: 24 (total)
This is assuming all skills at 5. RADAR compensation is like a x2 skill, if it bothers you so much train it. Even at compensation 4 the phantasm is not jammed 100% of the time.

As you can see though, with NO defensive modules. So beyond the fact the griffon can't fight your drones if its life depended on it, as it has zero tank and only 2 unbonused guns + 1 drone to fight back, it still won't 100% jam you.

I assumed the griffon had a propulsion module. If it doesn't have your 500k frigate go and shoot it. Pro Tip: Fly the same racial sensor strength to negate 3/4s the griffons ecm power.

Edit 2: A phantasm still isn't a 500m Ship even with some bling on there.


When you wake up to the fact that not everyone wants to play the game in a group because there is something more satisfying about playing the game and achieving things on your own you might understand what you have written is ridiculous.

There are ships that cost way more than 500m and don't carry drones, Your argument about sensor strength is also stupid when the hole mechanic is based on chance. Hell you could fly a Falcon right at me and not land a single jam.

A huge piece of the game that is missing is survivability and all these statements about watching local and D-scan are so ridiculous because the people writing them know you could do the best job in the world and still not be survive.

Lots of people have already mentioned the game is about numbers but i also think it's about being in control and not just about clicking on a module and watching it cycle. There is no cost to jams, webs disruptors, scrambs, TP, like there is to neuts and noses and that is why Ewar needs looking at.

Eventually i'd like to play a game where it is possible to defend yourself against a surprise blob through clever piloting. At the moment we are sat repeating the same process for every encounter making the game dull and boring.
Doc J
Space Wolves ind.
Solyaris Chtonium
#43 - 2015-11-17 18:24:12 UTC
Gregor Parud wrote:
Jenn aSide wrote:
Gregor Parud wrote:
It's not about being against the EULA or bad (but was a good try to change the subject a bit :P), it's about distancing yourself, in words anyway, from what the group you choose to be with is all about.


I didn't distance myself from anything. I made a statement of fact ("I am not an Alliance") against a nonsense allegation (something to do with blobs that has nothing to do with EWAR).

So, what are you on about, or are you just trolling right now, because you aren't making any sense. What is TEST doing wrong that I should distance myself from it?


Nothing, as stated I'm not talking about this or any specific situation. I'm merely commenting on the statement that you distance yourself from what the alliance you choose to be with does. Not saying Doc's remark made any sense.


Merely connecting the points of view.
Valacus
Streets of Fire
#44 - 2015-11-17 18:49:39 UTC
Vol Arm'OOO wrote:
Dagnar wrote:
Jamming has been one of the least fun things in this game for a long time. Sure it's great to jam someone with all the power it makes you feel that the person cannot fight for at least 20 seconds, and probably longer with successive jams. However, it is absolutely crap for the jammed person. You don't even get a chance to do some damage or even fight back.


I dont understand this attitude at all. Being helpless because of jamming is no different then being helpless because you cant track that small frig that is circling your ship at a close orbit or being kitted while being damped, etc. . . Eve is all about asymmetrical combat - rock/paper/scissor - and hard counters. ECM is no different.


That's not a valid comparison, because even when tracking disrupted, you can still apply drones, neuts, scrams, webs, and all of your own EWAR. When you are jammed you can't apply anything. You're flying a brick.
Jenn aSide
Soul Machines
The Initiative.
#45 - 2015-11-17 18:50:59 UTC
Gregor Parud wrote:
Jenn aSide wrote:
Gregor Parud wrote:
It's not about being against the EULA or bad (but was a good try to change the subject a bit :P), it's about distancing yourself, in words anyway, from what the group you choose to be with is all about.


I didn't distance myself from anything. I made a statement of fact ("I am not an Alliance") against a nonsense allegation (something to do with blobs that has nothing to do with EWAR).

So, what are you on about, or are you just trolling right now, because you aren't making any sense. What is TEST doing wrong that I should distance myself from it?


Nothing, as stated I'm not talking about this or any specific situation. I'm merely commenting on the statement that you distance yourself from what the alliance you choose to be with does. Not saying Doc's remark made any sense.


I've explained to you why you are incorrect. I did not distance myself from my alliance. You read into my statement something that does not exist, then refuse to understand even after I clarified it for you.

Lets recap. I posted ways to negate the kinds of EWAR the OP is complaining about. Someone then posted something about blobs and suggested that my membership in an alliance that does this is somehow the reason for my opinion. This was not true, my opinion is my own, not that of the group I'm in, and it has nothing to do with benefiting from being in an alliance that 'blobs.

I don't think in such collectivist terms. I am an individual, and an individualist, every comment I make is from that point of view. I did not 'distance' my self from TEST, and would not do so unless TEST was doing something really wrong. "I'm not an alliance" is plain English, it means exactly what it said.

Where you got that i didn't like what my alliance was doing or some such is impossible for me to understand.

I hope that clears it up, but if it doesn't I'm sorry. Your take on the exchange was incorrect Gregor.
Moac Tor
Cyber Core
Immediate Destruction
#46 - 2015-11-17 18:51:37 UTC
Gillia Winddancer wrote:
Ewar is perfectly fine minus the ugly duckling ECM.

Agreed. Particularly ECM drones, it is so cheap when you get jammed out by a flight of ECM drones (and despite the low jam strength they are strangely reliable in jamming anything BC and below).

If you are interested in a better method for implementing ECM whilst keeping it fairly similar to how it currently fuctions then I have a proposal linked in my signature which would fix the issue.
Paranoid Loyd
#47 - 2015-11-17 18:56:41 UTC
Gregor, not sure if you are just trolling Jen or what but you are looking pretty dumb which is not your MO. I don't see any distancing himself from the alliance. I simply see him stating he does not speak for the alliance, he speaks for himself.

"There is only one authority in this game, and that my friend is violence. The supreme authority upon which all other authority is derived." ISD Max Trix

Fix the Prospect!

Jenn aSide
Soul Machines
The Initiative.
#48 - 2015-11-17 18:56:57 UTC
Doc J wrote:
Gregor Parud wrote:
Jenn aSide wrote:
Gregor Parud wrote:
It's not about being against the EULA or bad (but was a good try to change the subject a bit :P), it's about distancing yourself, in words anyway, from what the group you choose to be with is all about.


I didn't distance myself from anything. I made a statement of fact ("I am not an Alliance") against a nonsense allegation (something to do with blobs that has nothing to do with EWAR).

So, what are you on about, or are you just trolling right now, because you aren't making any sense. What is TEST doing wrong that I should distance myself from it?


Nothing, as stated I'm not talking about this or any specific situation. I'm merely commenting on the statement that you distance yourself from what the alliance you choose to be with does. Not saying Doc's remark made any sense.


Merely connecting the points of view.


What you were doing was trying to invalidate my comment by pointing to something that has nothing to do with anything.

EWAR (in this case points and webs) are working as intended, and there are planty of ways to negate the advantages they offer. Rather than use those advantages, some people would rather complain about them, and imo that's the wrong way to look at it.

As we know from years of posting on this forum, some peoples idea of balanced vs unbalanced is "did it kill me? yes = unbalanced, no = balanced". Points and scrams are nessacary evils, space combat isn't liek Star Trek . After playing EVE for so many years I can't watch a Star Trek battle, I always end up thinking "damn, why don't they just warp off, no one has a point on them" lol.

As an Aside, isn't it always strange how the FIRST thing to go in every Star Trek fight is the damn warp engines? Put some armor on the damn things already Kirk/Picard/Sisko whoever.
Gregor Parud
Imperial Academy
#49 - 2015-11-17 19:10:26 UTC  |  Edited by: Gregor Parud
Paranoid Loyd wrote:
Gregor, not sure if you are just trolling Jen or what but you are looking pretty dumb which is not your MO. I don't see any distancing himself from the alliance. I simply see him stating he does not speak for the alliance, he speaks for himself.


I don't troll, I might (in jest) poke a few holes but that is not the same thing. The statement I reacted to (again, regardless of the validity of Doc's remark) was a clear and obvious "just because I'm with a group doesn't mean I agree to what they do nor should you perceive me as being one of them" which is, in and of itself, a silly statement for various reasons.

What makes it funny is the reason for being in that alliance, the rather casual distancing from it and, afterwards, the denial of it all. But that's perhaps not for everyone to notice :)

Anyway, lets drop the silliness and get back on topic.
Paranoid Loyd
#50 - 2015-11-17 19:19:24 UTC  |  Edited by: Paranoid Loyd
Nah it wasn't clear or obvious, all I see is you overreacted with your comment, it was not valid and now you are just trying to save face, but as you said it's all silly.

"There is only one authority in this game, and that my friend is violence. The supreme authority upon which all other authority is derived." ISD Max Trix

Fix the Prospect!

Jenn aSide
Soul Machines
The Initiative.
#51 - 2015-11-17 19:21:14 UTC
Gregor Parud wrote:
Paranoid Loyd wrote:
Gregor, not sure if you are just trolling Jen or what but you are looking pretty dumb which is not your MO. I don't see any distancing himself from the alliance. I simply see him stating he does not speak for the alliance, he speaks for himself.


I don't troll, I might (in jest) poke a few holes but that is not the same thing. The statement I reacted to (again, regardless of the validity of Doc's remark) was a clear and obvious "just because I'm with a group doesn't mean I agree to what they do nor should you perceive me as being one of them" which is, in and of itself, a silly statement for various reasons.

What makes it funny is the reason for being in that alliance, the rather casual distancing from it and, afterwards, the denial of it all. But that's perhaps not for everyone to notice :)

Anyway, lets drop the silliness and get back on topic.


You have a very limited way of looking at things, and no ability to admit that you were wrong.

Quote:
"just because I'm with a group doesn't mean I agree to what they do nor should you perceive me as being one of them"


This is not what I said, I don't understand why you don't understand. Let me ask you this, is English your 1st language, maybe that's the problem?
Gregor Parud
Imperial Academy
#52 - 2015-11-17 19:38:37 UTC
Paranoid Loyd wrote:
Nah it wasn't clear or obvious.


It is, but as said perhaps not everyone will see that.
Jenn aSide
Soul Machines
The Initiative.
#53 - 2015-11-17 19:41:21 UTC
Gregor Parud wrote:
Paranoid Loyd wrote:
Nah it wasn't clear or obvious.


It is, but as said perhaps not everyone will see that.


You have issues friend.
Valacus
Streets of Fire
#54 - 2015-11-17 19:45:08 UTC
I like how there's actual conversation on the topic at hand going on in the background of two salties screaming at one another while ignoring everyone else in the thread.
Divine Entervention
Doomheim
#55 - 2015-11-17 19:47:54 UTC
My favorite part is how ewar is fine, if anything it's underpowered, yet there are dudes crying about it.

get good scrubs.

learn 2 adapt
Murauke
Space Wolves ind.
Solyaris Chtonium
#56 - 2015-11-17 22:15:13 UTC
ll Kuray ll wrote:


EWAR should be small, medium, large. Neuts and Nos are but none of the other EWAR is.

I like the idea of making EWAR modules restricted to the specific ship class. Small EWAR modules can not be used on larger ship sizes, of course there are the specific role bonused ships that would be exempt from this. It just means more thought goes into fleet setups instead of making every man and his dog wear a web, disruptor, jam, nos etc.


This..
Mephiztopheleze
Laphroaig Inc.
#57 - 2015-11-17 23:17:24 UTC
Daerrol wrote:

Ok so a Griffon kitted out with Jams (1 of each racial) and 2 Signal Amps II, all level 5
Radar Jam Strength: 18.84 (total)


j00 gieb 18.84 jam strength Griffin?

Your maths a little out mate. I'm not sure you can get that much jam strength in a Falcon with full info links. Maybe, I'll have to check, but it's flat out impossible for a Griffin.

I've got Signal Dispersion V and I cap out at around 10 points cold in a Griffin and 11.2 cold/12.9 points heated in a Kitsune (although my Kitty uses a damage control). Around 15 points of Jam Strength is the cap for a Falcon IIRC (I can't fly one yet).

The tradeoff is a paper thin tank. And I mean PAPER THIN.

I get forced off-field by a flight of light drones (2 volleys will do me). A Confessor can kill me with two shots, an Orthrus with a single volley. My Kitty's 'tank' is RANGE and whatever bookmarks I can make in the heat of combat to give me bounce points and positioning options.

Occasional Resident Newbie Correspondent for TMC: http://themittani.com/search/site/mephiztopheleze

This is my Forum Main. My Combat Alt is sambo Inkura

Jill Xelitras
Xeltec services
#58 - 2015-11-18 00:05:41 UTC
Valacus wrote:
Vol Arm'OOO wrote:
Dagnar wrote:
Jamming has been one of the least fun things in this game for a long time. Sure it's great to jam someone with all the power it makes you feel that the person cannot fight for at least 20 seconds, and probably longer with successive jams. However, it is absolutely crap for the jammed person. You don't even get a chance to do some damage or even fight back.


I dont understand this attitude at all. Being helpless because of jamming is no different then being helpless because you cant track that small frig that is circling your ship at a close orbit or being kitted while being damped, etc. . . Eve is all about asymmetrical combat - rock/paper/scissor - and hard counters. ECM is no different.


That's not a valid comparison, because even when tracking disrupted, you can still apply drones, neuts, scrams, webs, and all of your own EWAR. When you are jammed you can't apply anything. You're flying a brick.


I disagree.

- You can still warp out unless you're scrammed (most ECM ships are flown at long ranges because they are squishy targets.You'll rarely see tackle ECM ships.)
- being sensor damped to a point where you're unable to lock targets that are beyond your range is not that much dissimilar to being jammed (depending on what ship you're flying)
- Some weapons are unaffected by jams: F.o.F. missiles, deployed and agressing drones, smartbombs, ECCM.
- ECM has a chance to fail, giving you a window of opportunity which other ewar modules don't.


Don't anger the forum gods.

ISD Buldath:

> I Saw, I came, I Frowned, I locked, I posted, and I left.

Mephiztopheleze
Laphroaig Inc.
#59 - 2015-11-18 00:21:28 UTC
Jill Xelitras wrote:
- You can still warp out unless you're scrammed (most ECM ships are flown at long ranges because they are squishy targets.You'll rarely see tackle ECM ships.)


Just FYI: The upcoming Navy Griffin is designed as an ECM Brawler, most likely with tackle. However, they will still be very squishy and one failed jam will see them splatted.

Occasional Resident Newbie Correspondent for TMC: http://themittani.com/search/site/mephiztopheleze

This is my Forum Main. My Combat Alt is sambo Inkura

Valacus
Streets of Fire
#60 - 2015-11-18 00:43:52 UTC
Jill Xelitras wrote:
Valacus wrote:
Vol Arm'OOO wrote:
Dagnar wrote:
Jamming has been one of the least fun things in this game for a long time. Sure it's great to jam someone with all the power it makes you feel that the person cannot fight for at least 20 seconds, and probably longer with successive jams. However, it is absolutely crap for the jammed person. You don't even get a chance to do some damage or even fight back.


I dont understand this attitude at all. Being helpless because of jamming is no different then being helpless because you cant track that small frig that is circling your ship at a close orbit or being kitted while being damped, etc. . . Eve is all about asymmetrical combat - rock/paper/scissor - and hard counters. ECM is no different.


That's not a valid comparison, because even when tracking disrupted, you can still apply drones, neuts, scrams, webs, and all of your own EWAR. When you are jammed you can't apply anything. You're flying a brick.


I disagree.

- You can still warp out unless you're scrammed (most ECM ships are flown at long ranges because they are squishy targets.You'll rarely see tackle ECM ships.)
- being sensor damped to a point where you're unable to lock targets that are beyond your range is not that much dissimilar to being jammed (depending on what ship you're flying)
- Some weapons are unaffected by jams: F.o.F. missiles, deployed and agressing drones, smartbombs, ECCM.
- ECM has a chance to fail, giving you a window of opportunity which other ewar modules don't.




"You can still warp out" is not an argument. You can still warp out if you aren't jammed. That means nothing.

Being sensor damped only applies if you are outranged, but that's a specific scenario. At close range, no amount of sensor damps are going to keep you from locking. Again, you can also apply all of your other modules. You can still lock things close, including fleet mates who might need repping. Jamming leaves no such opening.

FoF missiles are unaffected by jamming, but they also don't allow you to choose your target. They also only work if you're flying a missile boat. Well, not all ships use missiles. You're rolling the dice when you use them. Same with aggressive drones. They go for the first thing that aggroes you, which may not be the ship jamming you.

Yes, ECM has a chance to fail, but that doesn't balance it. It is still, hands down, the most dangerous EWAR in the game. It is on a completely different level than all other EWAR. It turns a ship it lands on ineffective regardless of range, tracking, or sensor resolution. One jam cycle can determine the entire course of a fight.