These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
Previous page12
 

CCP rises $ 30 million of new investment for VR projects

First post
Author
Nick Bete
Highsec Haulers Inc.
#21 - 2015-11-13 16:22:50 UTC
Jenn is one of the worst bittervet trolls, status quo fanbois on these forums. Best to just block his ignorant ramblings as I've done than to waste your time trying to engage in a rational conversation.
Jenn aSide
Worthless Carebears
The Initiative.
#22 - 2015-11-13 16:30:20 UTC
Nick Bete wrote:
bittervet trolls, status quo fanbois


So actually liking the video game entertainment software I'm paying for is bad? Man, am I out of touch with this current angsty generation.
Market McSelling Alt
Doomheim
#23 - 2015-11-13 16:30:55 UTC
Nick Bete wrote:
Jenn is one of the worst bittervet trolls, status quo fanbois on these forums. Best to just block his ignorant ramblings as I've done than to waste your time trying to engage in a rational conversation.



Jenn is pretty simple really. The entire premise of his arguments here is that Eve is perfectly fine and the best game ever as long as we are hurr hurring Code, Ganking, High-sec nerfs and tears.

The second something happens that gives anyone joy in this game and doesn't involve the direct extraction of tears, Jenn thinks the entire game needs to be changed to suit his needs and desires.

The Irony is, that while Jenn has called for sweeping changes to this game, and expressed great displeasure at all things High-Sec, he claims to love the game and tells people who want changes to leave.

It is actually quite comical because of the round-robin style of logic and the constant ad-hominem retorts.

CCP Quant: Of all those who logon in Eve, 1.5% do Incursions, 13.8% PVP and 19.2% run Missions while 22.4% mine.

40.7% Join a fleet. The idea that Eve is a PVP game is false, the social fabric is in Missions and Mining.

Lucas Kell
Solitude Trading
S.N.O.T.
#24 - 2015-11-13 16:36:49 UTC
Jenn aSide wrote:
You wouldn't know honesty if it bit you in the exhaust port of your Drake {insert name of some Elite:Dangerous spaceship here}.
Calm down son.


Jenn aSide wrote:
CCP gets honest feedback, from people who actually like and understand their game and can recognize when they make mistakes. "Honest Feedback" is not possible from people who start from a point of disliking core aspects of EVE and who wish to see it be something completely different from the get go.
Honest feedback comes in a lot of forms. I love how because I don't like what you like though, I automatically disliked "core aspects of EVE". See the thing is, we just have different opinions on what the core of EVE is. I don't like that there's ridiculously easy gameplay that gets excused because the person benefitting has to shoot a handful of noobs to do it, thus making it PvP and therefore exempt from balance discussions.

Jenn aSide wrote:
You can call it psychoanalyzing if you want, but deep down you know there is something wrong with someone that is this interested in the fortunes of a game they don't totally like.
No, I don't. deep down I know that I play games for entertainment and different games entertain me in different amounts at different times and therefore get different amounts of my attention. There was a time when EVE dominated my attention and that time has passed as they've neglected gameplay elements to cater to an ever more toxic community.

Jenn aSide wrote:
By your own words, You think another existing product (Elite) is more interesting and more fun...

... yet here you are.
Again demonstrating your inability to see anything between two extremes. I like another game more, therefore I should never play EVE at all, that's your opinion. Right now I like Fallout 4 more than any other game so that get's the vast majority of my attention. When I've destroyed that I'll undoubtedly go back to Uncharted, Elite and little EVE on the side. See, unlike you I have more than one interest. Your interest is only in EVE and moreover only in your playstyle of EVE, and that's why you're biased. Quite why you feel the need to launch into personal attacks with almost every post I'm not sure.

Jenn aSide wrote:
You and Market, I honestly have never once seen a post from you guys that seemed in the least bit joyful about something having to do with EVE.
That doesn't surprise me, since you seem to pay more attention to the other types of post, so just like the moonwalking bear, they go unnoticed. That doesn't mean they aren't there though, just means you aren't paying enough attention.

The Indecisive Noob - EVE fan blog.

Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list.

Jenn aSide
Worthless Carebears
The Initiative.
#25 - 2015-11-13 16:39:59 UTC
Market McSelling Alt wrote:
tells people who want changes to leave.


I've never told anyone to leave. I question their sanity at staying with something they don't like (and crapping up the forums with all their suggested 'changes' that are, at best, misguided attempts to attack people they don't like rather than jsut standing up to them in the game), but how they spend their time is up to them. And pointing out that combat pve income (an income I've explotied for years) is out of whack (and not just in high sec, FW is worse) isn't asking for change, it's pointing out a flaw, CCP is the group that changes things, I'm not CCP.

Tell me this (asking honestly) if you (like Lucas) have so many problems with so many things having to do with EVE, why do you stay (again, this is not asking you to leave, it wa syou who said you were waiting for your sub to expire so you could be done with the game)? Is my theory correct, do you actually enjoy disappointment?

And before you tell me it's not my business again, I'll remind you, it was you who posted about you're leaving, I didn't make you do that, so you opened the door.
Jenn aSide
Worthless Carebears
The Initiative.
#26 - 2015-11-13 16:51:48 UTC
Lucas Kell wrote:
Calm down son.


I am not your son, I am undoubtedly older than you, so you calm done, child.


Quote:
I don't like that there's ridiculously easy gameplay that gets excused because the person benefitting has to shoot a handful of noobs to do it, thus making it PvP and therefore exempt from balance discussions.


Nothing is exempt, but this is your "white night" personality type over-reacting to the idea that someone is being abused. They aren't, they chose to play EVE and are old enough to make that choice.

The thing to do is not feel sorry for the noob, it's to teach the noob to survive and eventually strike back. You and people like you (in game and in real life) always think you are helping by feeling sorry for people, you aren't. Especially in a video game.

Quote:

No, I don't. deep down I know that I play games for entertainment and different games entertain me in different amounts at different times and therefore get different amounts of my attention. There was a time when EVE dominated my attention and that time has passed as they've neglected gameplay elements to cater to an ever more toxic community.


This is probably the big thing here. CCP has made mistakes, but EVE is still good. It was YOU who changed, you got older, probably your tastes changed, yet you blamed it on EVE. A lot of people do that. It's no different than in real life when people (as they age) increasingly think the world is going to crap, when in actuality nothing much really changed...except for the fact that they got older.

Quote:
Again demonstrating your inability to see anything between two extremes. I like another game more, therefore I should never play EVE at all, that's your opinion. Right now I like Fallout 4 more than any other game so that get's the vast majority of my attention. When I've destroyed that I'll undoubtedly go back to Uncharted, Elite and little EVE on the side. See, unlike you I have more than one interest. Your interest is only in EVE and moreover only in your playstyle of EVE, and that's why you're biased. Quite why you feel the need to launch into personal attacks with almost every post I'm not sure.


Child, i haven't attacked you. That you feel attacked demonstrates that somewhere in that brain you know I'm doing nothing but telling you the truth.

I'm interested in more than EVE, that's not the issue. the real issue if your inability to appreciate the idea that a problem might not be some external thing (the state of EVE), but rather an internal thing (an incompatible worldview, prejudice against people you consider 'toxic' etc).

EVE is not dying. it is not a sinking ship. And no, it's not supposed to change because you don't fit with it, YOU are supposed to change to fit it OR choose to do something you actually enjoy. Most of the rest of the MMO world is WoW clone crap, can we have at least one good game without the Kells and Alts of the world lobbying for it's destruction?


Lucas Kell
Solitude Trading
S.N.O.T.
#27 - 2015-11-13 17:24:03 UTC
If I were any calmer I'd be in a coma. Seriously though, you should chill out before you give yourself a heart attack or something.

Jenn aSide wrote:
Nothing is exempt, but this is your "white night" personality type over-reacting to the idea that someone is being abused. They aren't, they chose to play EVE and are old enough to make that choice.

The thing to do is not feel sorry for the noob, it's to teach the noob to survive and eventually strike back. You and people like you (in game and in real life) always think you are helping by feeling sorry for people, you aren't. Especially in a video game.
Of course it is. Anything you don't think should be changed is exempt to you, which is why when anyone tries to discuss it you come running in insulting them. I don't have a "white knight" personality, I just think the game should be fun and rewarding for all players, which it isn't, and that's a core part of the problem that destroys new player retention. New players join, get roflstomped with ease by veterans, then we're supposed to be surprised that they don't stick around?

Jenn aSide wrote:
This is probably the big thing here. CCP has made mistakes, but EVE is still good.
... in your opinion. In mine, it's "OK".

Jenn aSide wrote:
It was YOU who changed, you got older, probably your tastes changed, yet you blamed it on EVE.
I'm sure part of it is that, if anything I'm less of a PvE crazy carebear than I was though. But now I see how insanely easy it is to gank randoms and think "where's the challenge here?". It certainly doesn't mean that it's only me that has changed.

Jenn aSide wrote:
Child, i haven't attacked you. That you feel attacked demonstrates that somewhere in that brain you know I'm doing nothing but telling you the truth.
You attack everyone that disagrees with you. It's one of the certainties of life, that if I see posts with your name responding to something you disagree with, it will be riddled with insults and attacks on their character.

Jenn aSide wrote:
I'm interested in more than EVE, that's not the issue. the real issue if your inability to appreciate the idea that a problem might not be some external thing (the state of EVE), but rather an internal thing (an incompatible worldview, prejudice against people you consider 'toxic' etc).

EVE is not dying. it is not a sinking ship. And no, it's not supposed to change because you don't fit with it, YOU are supposed to change to fit it OR choose to do something you actually enjoy. Most of the rest of the MMO world is WoW clone crap, can we have at least one good game without the Kells and Alts of the world lobbying for it's destruction?
You're not though, you've made it clear to me before that your game of choice is EVE, and that's why you feel your opinion is more valid. You can't see past your bias to appreciate why other people like or dislike EVE or it's competitors.

It kinda looks like a sinking ship. Decent developers being laid off, smaller developments being made more frequent to mask the fact that large developments are taking significantly longer, drastically reducing playerbase, microtransactions to make up for lost sub revenue. Even this thread itself is around signs that CCP are pushing more into VR, and EVE isn't part of that.

And mate, I've been here since 2005 and spent a significant amount of my life playing EVE and attending EVE events. It's a bit rich you telling me what I'm allowed to choose to play because I don't particularly like where EVE is heading and disagree with you that it's all sunshine and rainbows.

The Indecisive Noob - EVE fan blog.

Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list.

Ima Wreckyou
The Conference Elite
The Conference
#28 - 2015-11-13 17:39:52 UTC
In Eve, blocking Lucas Kell is something you do right after you configured your overview
Jenn aSide
Worthless Carebears
The Initiative.
#29 - 2015-11-13 17:41:51 UTC
Quote:
I don't have a "white knight" personality, I just think the game should be fun and rewarding for all players, which it isn't, and that's a core part of the problem that destroys new player retention. New players join, get roflstomped with ease by veterans, then we're supposed to be surprised that they don't stick around?


Who said anyting about being surprised. What you descibe is EVE working as intended. If a person is so weak minded that they can't get past what you descibe, quitting is actually the mature option. You would create a world where weakness is celebrated. If you were a movie director, not only would Han hav ento shot first, he wouldn't even have enetered the Cantina because he was too busy that day building huts for Habitat for Tatooiners or somehting.



Quote:
... in your opinion. In mine, it's "OK".


So you wates your time with something that is just OK. Your time to waste.

Look at the rest of your reply and your previous replies. "its too easy to gank", "Toxic community", "noobs being pushed out" ect. This is what I mean by incompatible world view. You focus on external things, on what other people are doing, on some weird idea that somehow things are unfair for someone. That's your problem. I see the people you call 'toxic' as at best Content, and at worst a mild distraction. I see noobs as people who need to prove themselves (to themselves) or take the smart route and play something they actually like.

Your percpetions color your opinion, and frankly I think that what you think its way more irritating and just plain wrong than any number of Goons, CODE, Gankers, Scammers and isboxers.

I never said EVE was all sunshine, I've been critical of CCP when they deserved it. But you, Lucas Kell, come off in your posts as a neurotic hater just looking for something else to hate when you could be filling your life with things you actually enjoy. Why one would waist the only thing any of us actually have (time on this earth) doing what you do is unfathomable to me, but to each his own I guess.
Lucas Kell
Solitude Trading
S.N.O.T.
#30 - 2015-11-13 17:57:46 UTC
Ima Wreckyou wrote:
In Eve, blocking Lucas Kell is something you do right after you configured your overview
See! Even less of a challenge. Default overview is the hardcore way to play.

The Indecisive Noob - EVE fan blog.

Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list.

Paranoid Loyd
#31 - 2015-11-13 18:00:49 UTC
Lucas Kell wrote:
Post on topic or **** off.
Blink

"There is only one authority in this game, and that my friend is violence. The supreme authority upon which all other authority is derived." ISD Max Trix

Fix the Prospect!

Lucas Kell
Solitude Trading
S.N.O.T.
#32 - 2015-11-13 18:01:01 UTC
Jenn aSide wrote:
Who said anyting about being surprised. What you descibe is EVE working as intended. If a person is so weak minded that they can't get past what you descibe, quitting is actually the mature option.
Roll it's not about people being weak minded, it's about delivering a quality experience to players. You might want EVE to consist of you and your 5 mats who play exactly like you, but CCP want it to be a business with enough players to generate a decent amount of income. Sure enough, it's a niche game, so it should never be a WoW clone, but they do need to have enough entertainment so that even if you're losing it's fun. Again, this seems to be coming back around to your inability to see anything between two extremes.

Jenn aSide wrote:
You would create a world where weakness is celebrated.
Incorrect, but nice try. If anything, that's what you push for by supporting the continuation of easy gameplay for veterans. Try challenging yourself for once.

Jenn aSide wrote:
So you wates your time with something that is just OK. Your time to waste.
Indeed it is, thanks for finally realising that.

Jenn aSide wrote:
Look at the rest of your reply and your previous replies. "its too easy to gank", "Toxic community", "noobs being pushed out" ect. This is what I mean by incompatible world view. You focus on external things, on what other people are doing, on some weird idea that somehow things are unfair for someone. That's your problem. I see the people you call 'toxic' as at best Content, and at worst a mild distraction. I see noobs as people who need to prove themselves (to themselves) or take the smart route and play something they actually like.
It's no more my problem than it is yours, it's just differing viewpoints. I see people actively keeping their gameplay easy so they can upset rookies to "harvest tears", and newbies who could very well like much of EVE if they could get past the fact that those veterans purposely push them out. Neither point of view is categorically right, they are just two opposing opinions from different types of players, both of which are valid. You keep trying to act like anyone who doesn't have your opinion must have some personality flaw to believe that, but your wrong. If anything the flaw is yours as you can't accept other people having a different opinion to yourself without desperately trying to invalidate them personally.

Jenn aSide wrote:
I never said EVE was all sunshine, I've been critical of CCP when they deserved it. But you, Lucas Kell, come off in your posts as a neurotic hater just looking for something else to hate when you could be filling your life with things you actually enjoy. Why one would waist the only thing any of us actually have (time on this earth) doing what you do is unfathomable to me, but to each his own I guess.
Again, that's your opinion based on the posts you've chosen to read and remember. I've supported plenty that CCP have done, just more frequently lately I've disagreed with them.

The thing is, I do fill my life with things I enjoy. CCP have lost 16 of my subscriptions and most of my playtime. I play maybe a couple of hours a week now down from "most of the time". I've been playing EVE far too long to drop it out completely and I still hold out hope that CCP won't destroy it. Not much hope mind you, but the hope is there.

The Indecisive Noob - EVE fan blog.

Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list.

Lucas Kell
Solitude Trading
S.N.O.T.
#33 - 2015-11-13 18:01:48 UTC
Paranoid Loyd wrote:
Lucas Kell wrote:
Post on topic or **** off.
Blink
Touché.

The Indecisive Noob - EVE fan blog.

Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list.

Jenn aSide
Worthless Carebears
The Initiative.
#34 - 2015-11-13 18:35:12 UTC  |  Edited by: Jenn aSide
I wont' reply to most of your post, because, frankly again, trying to convince someone of the wrongness of their way of being is a fools errand. I stand by the opinion that you are your own worst problem Lucas, but as I'm just someone sharing a game with you rathert than someone who would be responsible for your well being, I won't press the issue lol.

But this part bears responding to:

Lucas Kell wrote:

The thing is, I do fill my life with things I enjoy. CCP have lost 16 of my subscriptions and most of my playtime. I play maybe a couple of hours a week now down from "most of the time". I've been playing EVE far too long to drop it out completely and I still hold out hope that CCP won't destroy it. Not much hope mind you, but the hope is there.


Sunk Cost fallacy right there.

I used to be like you. I have been a Battletech fan since I was twelve (crap, that's 30 years now) so of course I played all the Mechwarrior games. I played Mech4 for like 5 years, even made it into a beta testing group for the Black Knight expansion.

I hated Mech4. Moreso than I dislike MWO now. It went against the spirit of Battletech in every imaginable way, mainly because of FASA interactive/microsoft's desire to "break out of it's niche and appeal to a more mainstream audience" (hmmm, sounds familiar, wonder if any CCP DEVs used to work for FASAi lol). They publicly said "Mech4 is an 'action game' based on Battletech but it's not battletech".

I'd been a BT fan for too long to not play the only BT product out there (BT3025 died still born despite being an actual Battletech game, I'm still raw about that these 14 years later). I let myself be miserable and dissapointed (and constantly raging on the forums for "change"), because without mech4 there was no BT universe game for me to be in. I was a Mechjock damn it!

Then one day in 2005 I grew the F up and stopped playing a game I didn't like made by developers I didn't respect (FASAi). Hell, life got better, and I dabbled around many other games and eventually a buddy i'd played mech4 with introduced me to the best game I ever played, EVE Online, a game that fit me like a hand in a glove...and one I will lay down easily when it stops being fun to me because in 2005 I grew the F up...

So yea, I've been you before in a way. It sucked lol.
Vic Jefferson
Stimulus
Rote Kapelle
#35 - 2015-11-13 19:15:51 UTC
Lucas Kell wrote:
... in your opinion. In mine, it's "OK".


See, the thing with EvE is you finally get the SP, ISK, skills, or social group to do an activity, and it is really fun and new for a while. Then you master this activity. Some never bore of their chosen bit in the game, most do.

Some stew and rot and lament, etc, and chose not to find new and exciting activities, groups, and people to do stuff with. Some do. Generally most people will tire of the same thing, day in, day out, so typically the people who explore new play styles and activities are going to find EvE more exciting in the long term. If you cannot find something fun to do, it is generally your own fault.

Any corp, player, or alliance that is allied with the Imperium that subsequently claims there is nothing do to or that the game is boring is responsible for said boredom. You grew it, you chew it.

Vote Vic Jefferson for CSM X.....XI.....XII?

DaReaper
Net 7
Cannon.Fodder
#36 - 2015-11-13 20:49:33 UTC
Seven Koskanaiken wrote:
Thanks. I'll add it to the pile of CCP products I'll never use because it's not on PC.



except Valkaryie IS on pc....

OMG Comet Mining idea!!! Comet Mining!

Eve For life.

DaReaper
Net 7
Cannon.Fodder
#37 - 2015-11-13 21:02:41 UTC
Now that the train of this thread is derailed...

Depending on what the 30m will go towards this is not nessicarily a bad thing.

while people complain that 'they are neglecting eve' the exact opposite is true.

As a 12 year vet (good lord) i've seen eve neglect. and sadly that was form day 1. for some reason CCP was in thsi break neck speed to advance eve, that ehy really did not care if stuff was finished, working, or need i say 'good' before they moved on tot he next thing.

The summer of rage has sense changed that stance, though Very Very slowly. And here we are, in what is commonly known as a rebuild/repair phase. CCP has shifted focus to the New Eden Universe. Which doens;t just include eve.

For the people whining that 'this will be bad' my responce is, focusing on just eve online is bad. If ccp can;t get more products to grwo, which would in tern HELP eve (as long as they reamin focused on different aspectas of ther estuff done by dedicated teams) then ccp and wiht it eve, dies.

Dust is proftable, which means no matter how bad people think the game play is, it bring in more money now then it cost to maintain.

Gunjack, for thous eof you who have not played it, is seriously a wicked fun little game. From the looks of it, it won;t need much support onces its out the door.

Valk has a roadmap, we just dunno what that is yet.

and as far as the arguments about no connection is bad, no, no connection is good. connection done badly, alas Dust, is bad.

CCP MUST grow, its the only way eve can grow. And who says these games won't be linke din the future? also who knwo swhat the money is going to, hell they could add vr support to eve, or even legion/dust for all we know.

Point is, most people who cry about ccp trying to grow are idiots, and that is due to you not knowing anything about the companies financials or plans. But who cares, if you enjoy eve play it. if the ship is going down, then i'll play this game till my head is under water with it. shrugs. time will tell if this is a good thing or not, but one thing is clear, ccp is in decent shape if people are giving them money. Cause you don;t give money to a dying company unless you know you can recoup.

OMG Comet Mining idea!!! Comet Mining!

Eve For life.

Anslo
Scope Works
#38 - 2015-11-13 21:10:08 UTC
Neat. Hope it produces good results CCP.

[center]-_For the Proveldtariat_/-[/center]

ISD Dorrim Barstorlode
ISD Community Communications Liaisons
ISD Alliance
#39 - 2015-11-13 22:11:34 UTC
Quote:

Forum rules

2. Be respectful toward others at all times.

The purpose of the EVE Online forums is to provide a platform for exchange of ideas, and a venue for the discussion of EVE Online. Occasionally there will be conflicts that arise when people voice opinions. Forum users are expected to be courteous when disagreeing with others.

23. Post constructively.

Negative feedback can be very useful to further improve EVE Online provided that it is presented in a civil and factual manner. All users are encouraged to honestly express their feelings regarding EVE Online and how it can be improved. Posts that are non-constructive, insulting or in breach of the rules will be deleted regardless of how valid the ideas behind them may be. Users are also reminded that posting with a lack of content also constitutes non-constructive posting.



Due to off topic posting, and the fact that removing most of it would remove most of the thread, I'm just gonna close this one out. Thanks guys.

Closed.

ISD Dorrim Barstorlode

Senior Lead

Community Communication Liaisons (CCLs)

Interstellar Services Department

Previous page12