These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
123Next page
 

You want to know what else would improve Eve?

First post
Author
Selinate
#1 - 2012-01-06 16:35:06 UTC
For many years, we have been relying on third party programs to form fits for our ship and get basic info from the prospective fit with our character info added to it. These third party developers have done a fairly outstanding job.

However, why should there have to be third party developers for something already so integral for a vast number of players to the game play of Eve?

I propose that CCP should make something with the functionality of EFT in the Eve client. I know, we already have EFT so we shouldn't need it in client, right? Well, this will make rebalances of game play mechanics quicker to update, hence giving us a more accurate of our fit's overall performance.

I would also like something fun like snowball guns on my ship that I can use in high sec for lulz.
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#2 - 2012-01-06 16:40:14 UTC
Selinate wrote:
However, why should there have to be third party developers for something already so integral for a vast number of players to the game play of Eve?
Same reason as for all third-party developers: because CCP won't make anything that's even remotely as functional and because EFT / Pyfa already exists — robbing those guys of their work is just mean.
Professor Alphane
Les Corsaires Diable
#3 - 2012-01-06 16:40:40 UTC
+2

1. Agree totally, why should we have to rely on 3rd party support for ship fitting, it's an intragel part of the game. 3rd parties may not always be able to keep up with development (there was a really good alternative to EFT when I used to play but it wasn't updated). Also in CCP's quest to improve new player experience this would be perfect, why should someone unaware of MMO's know to look for 3rd party tools to have even the most basic functionality for the rather complex system of shipfitting.

2. 'Paintball' rigs would be fun, wargames in highsec with no concord :)

[center]YOU MUST THINK FIRST....[/center] [center]"I sit with the broken angels clutching at straws and nursing our scars.." - Marillion [/center] [center]The wise man watches the rise and fall of fools from afar[/center]

ISD Alassien
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#4 - 2012-01-06 16:41:04 UTC
I think this would be a great idea is it would all be intregated within EVE - although we shouldn't take away credit from the Third Party devs that have put into over the years Big smile, but I would love to see this ingame.

ISD Alassien Lieutenant Community Communication Liaisons (CCLs) Interstellar Services Department

Rek Seven
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#5 - 2012-01-06 16:43:20 UTC
Selinate wrote:

However, why should there have to be third party developers for something already so integral for a vast number of players to the game play of Eve?


Yeah I've always thought it would be good if we didn't have to break immersion by using google and other third party apps to play eve.
Professor Alphane
Les Corsaires Diable
#6 - 2012-01-06 16:44:46 UTC
Tippia wrote:
Selinate wrote:
However, why should there have to be third party developers for something already so integral for a vast number of players to the game play of Eve?
Same reason as for all third-party developers: because CCP won't make anything that's even remotely as functional and because EFT / Pyfa already exists — robbing those guys of their work is just mean.



You know maybe CCP could come up with something even better given there resources.

Not sure where your coming from with 'robbing guys of there work', these a hobby programmers, should CCP see sense I'm sure there's lots of other tools/apps/addons they could spend there time creating. In fact maybe they will manage to create something new and wonderful like they did the first time round.

[center]YOU MUST THINK FIRST....[/center] [center]"I sit with the broken angels clutching at straws and nursing our scars.." - Marillion [/center] [center]The wise man watches the rise and fall of fools from afar[/center]

David Grogan
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#7 - 2012-01-06 16:46:35 UTC
why make software at a cost to CCP when the software is already there, tried n tested, and is free to use?

it would make no financial sense for CCP to divert a team of programmers away from getting dust514 finished and making Eve awesome again just to make an app that already exists.

Everytime you buy something that says "made in china" you are helping the rising unemployment in your own country unless you are from china, Buy locally produced goods and help create more jobs.

Lady Spank
Get Out Nasty Face
#8 - 2012-01-06 16:48:43 UTC
By that logic they should also provide macro ratters and miners because they have become 'integral' to certain players activities in game.

(ಠ_ృ) ~ It Takes a Million Years to Become Diamonds So Lets Just Burn Like Coal Until the Sky's Black ~ (ಠ_ృ)

Cyzlaki
BRAWLS DEEP
HYPE-TRAIN
#9 - 2012-01-06 16:50:30 UTC
David Grogan wrote:
it would make no financial sense for CCP to divert a team of programmers away from getting dust514 finished and making Eve awesome again just to make an app that already exists.

They did it with the Agent Finder, why not EFT?
John Caesse
Just Post Inc.
#10 - 2012-01-06 16:53:14 UTC
Yes, CCP should use finite resources to build things that already exist. That sounds like a great way to improve the game (especially if by "improve" you mean "spend needless money and bring the company one step closer to insolvency")
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#11 - 2012-01-06 16:54:31 UTC
Cyzlaki wrote:
David Grogan wrote:
it would make no financial sense for CCP to divert a team of programmers away from getting dust514 finished and making Eve awesome again just to make an app that already exists.

They did it with the Agent Finder, why not EFT?

Because the agent finder is just a database query.
Doc Fury
Furious Enterprises
#12 - 2012-01-06 16:59:30 UTC
Thank Deus this is not another thread whining about WIS!

There's a million angry citizens looking down their tubes..at me.

Marduk Nibiru
Chaos Delivery Systems
#13 - 2012-01-06 17:03:41 UTC
I don't agree. Software is my field and as an architect, developer, etc...I know that the cheapest way to get the job done is to let someone else do it. This is why instead of suffering deeply from the "Not invented here" syndrome, I make use of as many dependable 3rd party libraries that I can find. If they're free all the better.

This allows me to get more done and faster. I can concentrate on adding features, securing my code, TESTING IT, and otherwise improving the program rather than reinventing a bunch of wheels.

If CCP were to do as you propose then somewhere in Iceland there would be a conversation something like so:

"The users want a fitting tool embedded in the program."

"Isn't there already a fitting tool?"

"Yes, but they want something like EFT."

"Why don't they use EFT?"

"I'm not really sure, it works quite well...better than our code in many respects...maybe they don't like to tab out of the game?"

"Well, OK...lets do it."

"Well, we already have a pretty packed schedule..."

"Put the Faction War and hisec wardec fixes back on the back burner...we'll do them in a future release."

"Roger."

The third party programs enhance the game without forcing CCP to neglect the more important stuff. If you really want it to be IN the game, turn it into a website that works with the in-game browser.
Professor Alphane
Les Corsaires Diable
#14 - 2012-01-06 17:09:46 UTC
I don't think all you guys can put your noob first day in EVE heads on and see how important fit testing functionality is to EVE.


Just another example of CCP's lacksidasical attitude to development. IMO

They want the noob experience to be more streamlined, they should at least be good enough to provide basic funtionality in there game without having to really on 3rd party developments that may well end up depreciated if said developers situatoin/ focus should change.

[center]YOU MUST THINK FIRST....[/center] [center]"I sit with the broken angels clutching at straws and nursing our scars.." - Marillion [/center] [center]The wise man watches the rise and fall of fools from afar[/center]

Famble
Three's a Crowd
#15 - 2012-01-06 17:13:15 UTC  |  Edited by: Famble
Can anything really be "fairly outstanding"? I mean, it's either outstanding or it's not.

...

I'll see myself out.

If anyone ever looks at you and says,_ "Hold my beer, watch this,"_  you're probably going to want to pay attention.

Sieges
#16 - 2012-01-06 17:14:31 UTC
Marduk Nibiru wrote:
The third party programs enhance the game without forcing CCP to neglect the more important stuff. If you really want it to be IN the game, turn it into a website that works with the in-game browser.

+1

This would be awesome. Especially if it stored our fits server-side.
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#17 - 2012-01-06 17:17:56 UTC
Professor Alphane wrote:
They want the noob experience to be more streamlined, they should at least be good enough to provide basic funtionality in there game without having to really on 3rd party developments that may well end up depreciated if said developers situatoin/ focus should change.
…and should that ever happen, there might be a case for CCP picking up the slack rather than expend development resources on duplicating (or triplicating) existing software.

The complexities of ship fitting (to the point where EFT is needed) lies somewhat beyond the n00b stage, and either way, the trick to fitting a ship has nothing to do with a fitting tool such as EFT, but rather with a number of strategical choices and trade-offs. They already need to go to the forums or the wiki or their corp to learn those. That might be something that could be worth bringing more to the fore-front, though.
MNagy
Yo-Mama
#18 - 2012-01-06 17:20:49 UTC
Since the apps are created already - I would rather CCP concentrate their time into fixing broken things or adding new things.

CCP gives you access to your API key so you can go out and develop your own apps to help fitting/learning/manage eve.

I 'agree' with you as to why it isnt in eve, but sometimes there just isnt time for things like that.

So for that reason - I am content with teh API key and alternate google functions to do the work while CCP concentrates on the big picture.
Florestan Bronstein
Ministry of War
Amarr Empire
#19 - 2012-01-06 17:21:44 UTC  |  Edited by: Florestan Bronstein
If CCP were clever they'd look to license Eos (the pyfa engine) for use in the EVE client and limit themselves to building an in-game frontend for it.

In reality they'll probably flesh out the engine you see in the fitting screen every day (re-calculates stats when you fit modules or hover over a module) until it is fancy enough to power a fully-featured fitting tool.
Professor Alphane
Les Corsaires Diable
#20 - 2012-01-06 17:22:55 UTC  |  Edited by: Professor Alphane
Why not do both together, Perhaps a website as someone suggested that has EFT fucionality and some 'suggested' fits for various frigs/dessies. Aurora could link you there and you could pick up the basics.

/edit couple of posts in the time I was writting, I was specifically replying to what Tippia said.

[center]YOU MUST THINK FIRST....[/center] [center]"I sit with the broken angels clutching at straws and nursing our scars.." - Marillion [/center] [center]The wise man watches the rise and fall of fools from afar[/center]

123Next page