These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Player Features and Ideas Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
Previous page12
 

Expiry date on PLEX 6 month after first offered for sale in game.

Author
Nyalnara
Marauder Initiative
#21 - 2015-10-22 16:34:00 UTC
Well, the main problem with all that being: all PLEX would now be separate items, which means there would now be no PLEX market, and only contract. Which means only PLEX being sold will be the max time ones, as those will be the only ones you'll be able to temporarily stock with relative efficiency, in case you need to plex multiple accounts, but not all of those at the same time. Market would also fluctuate a lot much more. The only guys which will be fine with that are the traders which are currently the guys stockpiling. Which means they'll be able to get even more ISKs in a more volatile market...

Actually, i'm fine with that , i don't care if market is bleeding to death or not.

French half-noob.

Non, je ne suis pas gentil.

Iain Cariaba
#22 - 2015-10-23 03:06:19 UTC
Frostys Virpio wrote:
Iain Cariaba wrote:
Hasikan Miallok wrote:
Perceived Problem:

Excess hoarding of PLEX and market manipulation

Recommended Solution:

PLEX can be stored indefinitely if never offered for sale.
Once offered for sale in game a 6 month expiry timer starts to count down.

Advantages

6 months gives scope for PLEX speculation and trading whilst preventing long term stockpiling of PLEX acquired from the market

So if I buy a PLEX and have some RL situations come up where I'm unable to play the game for 6+ months, which has happened to me before, then I lose out on the money I spent for the PLEX because you feel entitled to play the game for free?

How about no.


Can't you transfer your PLEX into game time as soon as you buy it? It's not like it would be an "investement" item if it has an expiration date...

Most often I'm buying PLEX when I get a windfall of cash and saving it until I don't have the cash to pay the subs on all my accounts, or when I do something really stupid and need an injection of ISK. This suggestion would eliminate my ability to play the game entirely at times.

At no point are you entitled to play the game for free. If the price of PLEX is too high for you to pay it, then either pay your subs with a card, or figure out how to make more ISK.
erg cz
Federal Jegerouns
#23 - 2015-10-23 09:10:24 UTC
Iain Cariaba wrote:

Most often I'm buying PLEX when I get a windfall of cash...

This suggestion would eliminate my ability to play the game entirely at times.


So you "ability to play" depends on rare situations, when you "get a windfall of cash"? And you suggest here to "figure out how to make more ISK"? No comment.
Lan Wang
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#24 - 2015-10-23 10:41:52 UTC  |  Edited by: Lan Wang
erg cz wrote:
Iain Cariaba wrote:

Most often I'm buying PLEX when I get a windfall of cash...

This suggestion would eliminate my ability to play the game entirely at times.


So you "ability to play" depends on rare situations, when you "get a windfall of cash"? And you suggest here to "figure out how to make more ISK"? No comment.


the question here is, why should someone elses investment be destroyed to benefit you? plex is gold not a loaf of bread

Domination Nephilim - Angel Cartel

Calm down miner. As you pointed out, people think they can get away with stuff they would not in rl... Like for example illegal mining... - Ima Wreckyou*

Malcanis
Vanishing Point.
The Initiative.
#25 - 2015-10-23 11:05:28 UTC
Lan Wang wrote:
we should also make ice melt, minerals deteriorate, loyalty points decline as time goes on too, hell lets make npc tax increase the longer you stay in an npc corp, or is that too harsh? Pirate


No those are all interesting ideas. Arguably, EVE needs wealth taxes.

"Just remember later that I warned against any change to jump ranges or fatigue. You earned whats coming."

Grath Telkin, 11.10.2016

Boom Laison
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#26 - 2015-10-23 11:34:32 UTC
Lan Wang wrote:
we should also make ice melt, minerals deteriorate, loyalty points decline as time goes on too, hell lets make npc tax increase the longer you stay in an npc corp, or is that too harsh? Pirate


Well, you mean ice and minerals in hangars? I understand your sarcasm but guesss what? it is not 100 % stupid idea after all... The difference with PLEX is that ice or mineral prices does not affect amount of players (so = content in our sandbox). And same is with loyality store items.

But NPC corp taxes increase with time spent in it will surely make sandbox more interesting. Just make it so, that it is not based on join date but on total time being in this corp. Otherwise it will be enough to make your own little corp for a minute and than go back to NPC safe.
Serendipity Lost
Repo Industries
#27 - 2015-10-23 11:48:20 UTC
Iain Cariaba wrote:
Hasikan Miallok wrote:
Perceived Problem:

Excess hoarding of PLEX and market manipulation

Recommended Solution:

PLEX can be stored indefinitely if never offered for sale.
Once offered for sale in game a 6 month expiry timer starts to count down.

Advantages

6 months gives scope for PLEX speculation and trading whilst preventing long term stockpiling of PLEX acquired from the market

So if I buy a PLEX and have some RL situations come up where I'm unable to play the game for 6+ months, which has happened to me before, then I lose out on the money I spent for the PLEX because you feel entitled to play the game for free?

How about no.



The game shouldn't be based on some player having some speculated RL issue where they can't log in for 6 months. Does it happen? Possible. Would it be unfortunate? Yes. Is it something the game should be coded around? Foook No.

And to be honest. If you were that guy, I would hope that you could petition your case and get it resolved to your satisfaction.

This whole "What about the guy that gets trapped in a cave/swamp/hospital for XX time?" argument needs to just go away. Not because I'm a hardasssociopath, but because for the good of the many the game shouldn't be coded around niche arguments.

For you personally - just accept that because (what ever you do for six + months) is a thing, then stockpiling plex isn't a valid game option for you. Invest in something else. Sorry dude but the vast majority of the worlds population doesn't disappear for 6+ months.
Lan Wang
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#28 - 2015-10-23 11:57:16 UTC
Serendipity Lost wrote:
Iain Cariaba wrote:
Hasikan Miallok wrote:
Perceived Problem:

Excess hoarding of PLEX and market manipulation

Recommended Solution:

PLEX can be stored indefinitely if never offered for sale.
Once offered for sale in game a 6 month expiry timer starts to count down.

Advantages

6 months gives scope for PLEX speculation and trading whilst preventing long term stockpiling of PLEX acquired from the market

So if I buy a PLEX and have some RL situations come up where I'm unable to play the game for 6+ months, which has happened to me before, then I lose out on the money I spent for the PLEX because you feel entitled to play the game for free?

How about no.



The game shouldn't be based on some player having some speculated RL issue where they can't log in for 6 months. Does it happen? Possible. Would it be unfortunate? Yes. Is it something the game should be coded around? Foook No.

And to be honest. If you were that guy, I would hope that you could petition your case and get it resolved to your satisfaction.

This whole "What about the guy that gets trapped in a cave/swamp/hospital for XX time?" argument needs to just go away. Not because I'm a hardasssociopath, but because for the good of the many the game shouldn't be coded around niche arguments.

For you personally - just accept that because (what ever you do for six + months) is a thing, then stockpiling plex isn't a valid game option for you. Invest in something else. Sorry dude but the vast majority of the worlds population doesn't disappear for 6+ months.


its a completely valid game option for him if he can disappear for 6+ months because the plex value fluctuates massively over that period of time and his investment has proved to be a good one. the game also should not be based on people who want things for cheap so they can play for free.

Domination Nephilim - Angel Cartel

Calm down miner. As you pointed out, people think they can get away with stuff they would not in rl... Like for example illegal mining... - Ima Wreckyou*

Serendipity Lost
Repo Industries
#29 - 2015-10-23 11:59:39 UTC
Iain Cariaba wrote:
Frostys Virpio wrote:
Iain Cariaba wrote:
Hasikan Miallok wrote:
Perceived Problem:

Excess hoarding of PLEX and market manipulation

Recommended Solution:

PLEX can be stored indefinitely if never offered for sale.
Once offered for sale in game a 6 month expiry timer starts to count down.

Advantages

6 months gives scope for PLEX speculation and trading whilst preventing long term stockpiling of PLEX acquired from the market

So if I buy a PLEX and have some RL situations come up where I'm unable to play the game for 6+ months, which has happened to me before, then I lose out on the money I spent for the PLEX because you feel entitled to play the game for free?

How about no.


Can't you transfer your PLEX into game time as soon as you buy it? It's not like it would be an "investement" item if it has an expiration date...

Most often I'm buying PLEX when I get a windfall of cash and saving it until I don't have the cash to pay the subs on all my accounts, or when I do something really stupid and need an injection of ISK. This suggestion would eliminate my ability to play the game entirely at times.

At no point are you entitled to play the game for free. If the price of PLEX is too high for you to pay it, then either pay your subs with a card, or figure out how to make more ISK.



Luckily I really all but a rocket scientist in real life. I will solve your stated problem. When you have a windfall and are able to buy plex - do so. Instead of holding on to them, just put them toward game time on your account. That game time is now forever safeguarded for your personal use.

For the part where you need an injection of isk: At 5months and 20days - sell your current plex and buy a new one that is fresh and new. You make a profit AND you have a fresh new plex in the bank that is good 6 months.

There is no downside to this guys idea - except that you can't hoard and manipulate plex prices. Honestly, if there is an expiration date and a visible countdown on the plex life span I can see where pricing would become interesting for all. You can hold out for a lower priced plex a guy is trying to unload before it pops and speculators could compete for 'fresh' plex that were just created.

Wait, there is a downside - groups or individuals that already have vast amounts of space bucks won't be able to hoard and manipulate plex as easily as they do now.

Bobb Bobbington
Rattini Tribe
Minmatar Fleet Alliance
#30 - 2015-10-23 12:45:14 UTC
I have a better question, why do people think the plex market is getting manipulated? Think about it, something like 1,000 plex changes hands in Jita every day. That's more than one trillion isk. I suppose if the largest groups banded together they could stir the pot for a few days, but eventually the sheer torrent of supply and demand would equalize it and make it unprofitable. Plex is created by players, and only consumed by players. You can't cut off the supply, or refuse to use it. It's mostly a free market. The price is set mostly by supply and demand, and if you want to change the price, you have to change one of those. Changing the supply would involve lowering the cost to get plex, killing CCP's revenue. Changing the demand would be lowering the amount of plex consumed, also hurting CCP's income, or simply when plex gets to a point high enough where supply and demand stabilize.
The people that stockpile large stores of plex are, as I understand it, speculating that the price will go up, i.e. that demand is more than supply. Except for the recent dip, this idea has been mostly true. When the demand starts to lessen from the increased cost, the price will stop going up.

You shouldn't just change a free market because you believe that a price is too high. That's the price set by the free market, where supply=demand. If you purposefully change it, then its no longer a free market.

This is a signature.

It has a 25m signature.

No it's not a cosmic signature.

Probably.

Btw my corp's recruiting.

Lan Wang
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#31 - 2015-10-23 12:48:16 UTC  |  Edited by: Lan Wang
Bobb Bobbington wrote:
I have a better question, why do people think the plex market is getting manipulated? Think about it, something like 1,000 plex changes hands in Jita every day. That's more than one trillion isk. I suppose if the largest groups banded together they could stir the pot for a few days, but eventually the sheer torrent of supply and demand would equalize it and make it unprofitable. Plex is created by players, and only consumed by players. You can't cut off the supply, or refuse to use it. It's mostly a free market. The price is set mostly by supply and demand, and if you want to change the price, you have to change one of those. Changing the supply would involve lowering the cost to get plex, killing CCP's revenue. Changing the demand would be lowering the amount of plex consumed, also hurting CCP's income, or simply when plex gets to a point high enough where supply and demand stabilize.
The people that stockpile large stores of plex are, as I understand it, speculating that the price will go up, i.e. that demand is more than supply. Except for the recent dip, this idea has been mostly true. When the demand starts to lessen from the increased cost, the price will stop going up.

You shouldn't just change a free market because you believe that a price is too high. That's the price set by the free market, where supply=demand. If you purposefully change it, then its no longer a free market.


exactly this.

The price is high because people are paying for it, if people didnt pay for it the price would drop till people did.

Also how do you put the value of an expiring plex that someone may want to convert to aurum, or make a character transfer? or is the value the same for a plex with 6month and one with 2 days?

"oh look sorry i cant do a character transfer because there is no full plexes on the market"

Domination Nephilim - Angel Cartel

Calm down miner. As you pointed out, people think they can get away with stuff they would not in rl... Like for example illegal mining... - Ima Wreckyou*

Serendipity Lost
Repo Industries
#32 - 2015-10-23 13:05:25 UTC
Lan Wang wrote:
Bobb Bobbington wrote:
I have a better question, why do people think the plex market is getting manipulated? Think about it, something like 1,000 plex changes hands in Jita every day. That's more than one trillion isk. I suppose if the largest groups banded together they could stir the pot for a few days, but eventually the sheer torrent of supply and demand would equalize it and make it unprofitable. Plex is created by players, and only consumed by players. You can't cut off the supply, or refuse to use it. It's mostly a free market. The price is set mostly by supply and demand, and if you want to change the price, you have to change one of those. Changing the supply would involve lowering the cost to get plex, killing CCP's revenue. Changing the demand would be lowering the amount of plex consumed, also hurting CCP's income, or simply when plex gets to a point high enough where supply and demand stabilize.
The people that stockpile large stores of plex are, as I understand it, speculating that the price will go up, i.e. that demand is more than supply. Except for the recent dip, this idea has been mostly true. When the demand starts to lessen from the increased cost, the price will stop going up.

You shouldn't just change a free market because you believe that a price is too high. That's the price set by the free market, where supply=demand. If you purposefully change it, then its no longer a free market.


exactly this.

The price is high because people are paying for it, if people didnt pay for it the price would drop till people did.

Also how do you put the value of an expiring plex that someone may want to convert to aurum, or make a character transfer? or is the value the same for a plex with 6month and one with 2 days?

"oh look sorry i cant do a character transfer because there is no full plexes on the market"




Just get rid of the character bazaar and the full plex issue doesn't exist. Get rid of the Aurum crap and that issue is also solved. (PRO HINT: character bazaar and aurum store both have nothing to do with game play - not necessar)
Lan Wang
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#33 - 2015-10-23 13:11:20 UTC
character bazaar trading is a thing so you can argue it is gameplay

Domination Nephilim - Angel Cartel

Calm down miner. As you pointed out, people think they can get away with stuff they would not in rl... Like for example illegal mining... - Ima Wreckyou*

Serendipity Lost
Repo Industries
#34 - 2015-10-23 14:28:45 UTC
Lan Wang wrote:
character bazaar trading is a thing so you can argue it is gameplay



No I can't. The buying and selling of eve characters is a RL intrusion into the new eden alternate reality. It's a RL tranasaction using game currency. Character ownership is a RL thing, not a game thing. If my character could use it's vast quantities of isk to purchase control of your character in game and all you could do is pay the subscription and watch what my character does with your character, then it would be game play.

https://xkcd.com/849/

Lan Wang
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#35 - 2015-10-23 14:47:49 UTC
Serendipity Lost wrote:
Lan Wang wrote:
character bazaar trading is a thing so you can argue it is gameplay



No I can't. The buying and selling of eve characters is a RL intrusion into the new eden alternate reality. It's a RL tranasaction using game currency. Character ownership is a RL thing, not a game thing. If my character could use it's vast quantities of isk to purchase control of your character in game and all you could do is pay the subscription and watch what my character does with your character, then it would be game play.

https://xkcd.com/849/



character bazaar is part of the game, people make income from it so its just the same as me using rl money to purchase plex to sell on the market, which is also a rl transaction, so can we just remove plex too?

all your doing is reducing the use for plex to satisfy the free to play attitude which is also losing ccp income and also affect the gameplay of many other people who actually provide ccp with rl income instead of freeloading

Domination Nephilim - Angel Cartel

Calm down miner. As you pointed out, people think they can get away with stuff they would not in rl... Like for example illegal mining... - Ima Wreckyou*

Serendipity Lost
Repo Industries
#36 - 2015-10-23 15:39:40 UTC
Lan Wang wrote:
Serendipity Lost wrote:
Lan Wang wrote:
character bazaar trading is a thing so you can argue it is gameplay



No I can't. The buying and selling of eve characters is a RL intrusion into the new eden alternate reality. It's a RL tranasaction using game currency. Character ownership is a RL thing, not a game thing. If my character could use it's vast quantities of isk to purchase control of your character in game and all you could do is pay the subscription and watch what my character does with your character, then it would be game play.

https://xkcd.com/849/



character bazaar is part of the game, people make income from it so its just the same as me using rl money to purchase plex to sell on the market, which is also a rl transaction, so can we just remove plex too?

all your doing is reducing the use for plex to satisfy the free to play attitude which is also losing ccp income and also affect the gameplay of many other people who actually provide ccp with rl income instead of freeloading



CCP flat out dictating PLEX price would also solve it. (15 USD = 1 PLEX = 1 bil isk as an example). A guy that is RL cash heavey and in game isk light could purchase the PLEX from npc (CCP via secure website... blah blah blah). PLEX is created and can be purchased in game for isk. External secure website creates the PLEX in game from real currency. That PLEX is now on sale in game for isk. PLEX can not be sold by players (buying plex brings up the option to extend game time OR dual train) and goes right into your characters bucket at purchase time.


I'm not against plex - I think it provides a service both to the folks that want to give CCP spare cash for some isk AND for folks that want to buy game time with their isk. As long as the game time is purchased w/ real money to create it, then it's a wash.

The issue I have is that folks with large piles of isk profitting from the above parties. Just make is a zero gain transaction. I see no reason that CCP has to give players a profit mechanism for these transactions. Game time (which is what a plex represents) is a real world thing. Player characters being able to profit from it is kind of wierd anyway.
erg cz
Federal Jegerouns
#37 - 2015-10-26 12:17:18 UTC
Serendipity Lost wrote:

I'm not against plex - .


The OP is also not against PLEX. It is against those few PLEX speculators, who effectively remove content from the sandbox.
Bobb Bobbington
Rattini Tribe
Minmatar Fleet Alliance
#38 - 2015-10-26 12:33:18 UTC
erg cz wrote:
Serendipity Lost wrote:

I'm not against plex - .


The OP is also not against PLEX. It is against those few PLEX speculators, who effectively remove content from the sandbox.


How do plex speculators remove content? As I stated earlier, they're betting that the price will go up, they're not manipulating it upwards. The large demand and relatively low supply is what's driving it upwards, when people start getting more bang for their buck more will start buying it with real life cash, or when it starts to become uneconomical to consume them then the demand will start to drop off.

This is a signature.

It has a 25m signature.

No it's not a cosmic signature.

Probably.

Btw my corp's recruiting.

Daichi Yamato
Jabbersnarks and Wonderglass
#39 - 2015-10-26 13:26:18 UTC
erg cz wrote:
Serendipity Lost wrote:

I'm not against plex - .


The OP is also not against PLEX. It is against those few PLEX speculators, who effectively remove content from the sandbox.


And add more content to those people who sell plex for isk.

EVE FAQ "7.2 CAN I AVOID PVP COMPLETELY? No; there are no systems or locations in New Eden where PvP may be completely avoided"

Daichi Yamato's version of structure based decs

Zan Shiro
Doomheim
#40 - 2015-10-26 13:56:25 UTC  |  Edited by: Zan Shiro
erg cz wrote:
Serendipity Lost wrote:

I'm not against plex - .


The OP is also not against PLEX. It is against those few PLEX speculators, who effectively remove content from the sandbox.



What content is removed? Blobs still blob, bears still bear, pirates still go yarrrr, wormholers gonna wormhole, etc. Or did I miss a patch note where access to say incursions will now require a plex?

Only plex limited event I know of is AT and thats for the buy in. Somehow I don't see many emo raging because they can't make the buy in for AT.


PLex is a privilege not a right. I find the content of the game to be enjoyable regardless if I plex or not. As I play the game as if it were, well, a game. Not a job.
Previous page12