EVE General Discussion

Cloaking whilst Fighting an Invisiable Enemy. Question, the run about. Well Given the run about do you attack. Wait or play games - or do you make it safe. Do they eventrually click on what they want to try and achive. or are wowing them selfs still in the same spot as they where since day one. How do you go on the counter offencesive. Either they sit there cloaked as promised or are they promising a spy job. are they trying to negotiate with you, whilst they are still sitting in the same position " thank god for local " -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Question how to fight an enemy for cloaking - Sit on either sides of the gate. " Gate Camping " wait for them to come out Bubble it out so when your gate camp. you win by locking the system down. No retreat. Explination for brand new cloaks - Spose to cause pain whilst you lose isk, what would you do. Now if your one of thoes certian people with a brain in your head whats your forumala that you plain to win or lose against this LAUGH. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Lets say your on Coms and as for a little closing arguement would you cloak your voice because you do no want to admit that you have used such a poor arguement for tactics of battle. or would you use your real voice. Would you go on coms at all.

How ever did find a little tiny articial about our formal players as listed above

A former Christchurch petrol station attendant has been awarded more than $10,000 in unpaid wages and compensation after being unjustifiably dismissed last year.

The Employment Relations Authority at Christchurch heard Nathan Gunning was employed at Blighs Road Service Station from August 1 until he was given notice by the station's owner on August 23 last year.

Station owner David Caddick said Mr Gunning was unable to bring an unjustified dismissal claim because there was a 90-day trial period provision in the contract he signed.

He said Mr Gunning "decided of his own accord to abandon his employment immediately" once he was dismissed and not to work out his notice period.

The authority heard that when Mr Gunning received his employment agreement a number of details were not filled in, including the hourly rate and the position title.



While Mr Gunning was getting changed into his uniform on his first day of work, service station manager Colin Brown filled in the blanks in his contract by hand, including Mr Gunning's remuneration of $14 an hour.

A 90-day trial period clause was included in a final version of Mr Gunning's contract, however authority member Christine Hickey found it was not valid as he was technically already an employee of the business before the clause was added.

Mr Gunning's representative Mark Henderson told the authority that his client's dealings with Mr Caddick amounted to him being "bullied, intimidated, spoken to in an aggressive manner and humiliated".

Mr Gunning highlighted an incident where one evening Mr Caddick came into the service station and asked him if he knew where the forecourt lights were.

When he told him that he didn't, Mr Gunning alleged Mr Caddick told him he should have used his initiative and asked.

Mr Gunning alleged Mr Caddick then asked him how he would feel if it was his "f****** business" and he looked and saw no lights on.

Mr Gunning said the exchange left him embarrassed and humiliated.

Mr Caddick acknowledged he had asked Mr Gunning how he would feel if it was his business and he employed people who were not doing their job properly, but disagreed that the exchange was humiliating and embarrassing for Mr Gunning. Mr Caddick said Mr Gunning was unable to take criticism.

Ms Hickey came to "the unavoidable conclusion" that Mr Gunning was unjustifiably dismissed, awarding him lost remuneration of $5460, unpaid wages of $144, unpaid holiday pay of $545 and unpaid employer Kiwisaver contributions.

The business was also ordered to pay Mr Gunning $6000 in compensation for humiliation, loss of dignity and injury to his feelings.

The authority also ordered the business to pay a $1000 penalty for breaching the Wages Protection Act.

Mr Gunning and Mr Caddick could not immediately be reached for comment.

Comments for Happy Parties involved

Ahh the guys who arranged the " Gank " lawl

you wouldn't have second hand covert op part cloaking devices for sale would you?

I'm more confused than when CCP forgot to include the exe. file.

Huh. Makes me wonder about his Raven fit.

maybe >.< I forgot to cloak

It's a head scratcher. No doubt about it.

Mr Epeen