These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

NPE and NPC Corp Restructure:

First post
Author
Salvos Rhoska
#41 - 2015-10-13 17:40:22 UTC  |  Edited by: Salvos Rhoska
Freya Sertan wrote:
]...are you insane?


Stopped reading right there.

I am prepared, at great length, to answer questions, queries and concerns on my proposal.
Im glad to discuss, explore and negotiate its particulars.
All I ask, and of which is reciprocated, is a modicum of normal decorum of civilized exchange.

But I am not going to tolerate ad hominem, past the point, nonsense .
I knew it would happen, but Im going to pull a very hard line on this.

Next time you do this, I will resort to contacting moderation to protect the integrity of this thread and posters in it.
Not just for myself, but anyone else in it who is subjected to this kind of board illegal behavior.

Paranoid Loyd wrote:
Salvos Rhoska wrote:
Is it an alien concept to you, thatbif you expect people to answer your questions, its normal and rrasonable to expect you to also answer theur questions to you, in return?
Sure, except I didn't ask you any questions. I pointed out an obvious flaw in your troll.


You didnt point out any obvious flaw, as you have not explained why i would be so.
It may be obvious in your mind, but you have not shown why/how it should be obvious to anyone else.

My questions are in the format and stage of rebuttal, so that you would back up what you have claimed, since you omitted that part and still have not provided it. In argumentative models, you already lost when you failed to do so in the first place. Your arguments stand as "empty", because you have not substantiated them. Your "points" are insubstantiatal and not supported by any argument to which to respond, against a subsequent response.The claims you make are merely superficial until you provide them with backing, which is why I asked for them, so that I can intelligently and laterally address them.

TLDR: You made claims, but did not explain them. Until you do so, its based only on your subjective opinion. It carried no weight of validity, nor do I have any reason to argue it, as its just "opinion" without substantiation.
Markus Reese
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#42 - 2015-10-13 17:53:30 UTC  |  Edited by: Markus Reese
Salvos Rhoska wrote:
Markus Reese wrote:
The first flaw is the ideology people are only in NPC corp to hide from war decs

NPC corps are run by NPCs.
Player corps are run by players.
Why then, do NPC corps have wardec immunity, whereas player corps do not?


From an overall perspective, the members pay for said service through taxes and being unable to establish structures. Lore perspective goes to the root of concord and overseeing protection of non capsuleer interests, and so on.

So it is a war dec shield. But nothing is gained for myself in giving it up. All I would get is these notifications saying I cannot do my highsec business for a week. I spend a majority of my time running exploration in low and null so it would just be reduced to a minor annoyance for me. Is all because a war declaration is global. If war decs were not global based, your suggestions would not be so bad. As it stands, war decs are only a grief tool.

So if there we go. A war dec should be to encourage competition between high sec people. It does not. It is only effective as a grief tool. Players without the SP or experience to survive or enjoy despite a war dec are instead relegated to a week of not playing. NPC corp is the only alternative outside of being forced to join an established corp, or not play.

Eve is a sandbox, should new players taking the reigns and trying to forge their own from the start not be a better directive than forcing new players to have to hide under the skirts of others?

Why do the mechanics not encourage new player vs new player war decs for small scale fights over small objectives like mission hubs or mining spots? Make it so people can pvp on their level without making it arena based.

To quote Lfod Shi

The ratting itself is PvE. Getting away with it is PvP.

Bellatrix Invicta
Doomheim
#43 - 2015-10-13 17:54:30 UTC
Salvos Rhoska wrote:
Freya Sertan wrote:
]...are you insane?


Stopped reading right there.

I am prepared, at great length, to answer questions, queries and concerns on my proposal.
Im glad to discuss, explore and negotiate its particulars.
All I ask, and of which is reciprocated, is a modicum of normal decorum of civilized exchange.

But I am not going to tolerate ad hominem, past the point, nonsense .
I knew it would happen, but Im going to pull a very hard line on this.

Next time you do this, I will resort to contacting moderation to protect the integrity of this thread and posters in it.
Not just for myself, but anyone else in it who is subjected to this kind of board illegal behavior.

Paranoid Loyd wrote:
Salvos Rhoska wrote:
Is it an alien concept to you, thatbif you expect people to answer your questions, its normal and rrasonable to expect you to also answer theur questions to you, in return?
Sure, except I didn't ask you any questions. I pointed out an obvious flaw in your troll.


You didnt point out any obvious flaw, as you have not explained why i would be so.

My questions are in the format and stage of rebuttal, so that you would back up what you have claimed, since you omitted that part and still have not provided it. In argimentative parlance, you already lost when you failed to do so in the first place. Your "points" are insubstantiated and not supported by any argument to which to respond. The claims you make are merely superficial until you provide them with backing, which is why I asked for them, so that I can intelligently and laterally address them.


Dude, quit skipping your meds.

If you think you've won, think again.

The CODE always wins.

Freya Sertan
Doomheim
#44 - 2015-10-13 17:55:16 UTC
Salvos Rhoska wrote:
Freya Sertan wrote:
]...are you insane?


Stopped reading right there.

I am prepared, at great length, to answer questions, queries and concerns on my proposal.
Im glad to discuss, explore and negotiate its particulars.
All I ask, and of which is reciprocated, is a modicum of normal decorum of civilized exchange.

But I am not going to tolerate ad hominem, past the point, nonsense .
I knew it would happen, but Im going to pull a very hard line on this.

Next time you do this, I will resort to contacting moderation to protect the integrity of this thread and posters in it.
Not just for myself, but anyone else in it who is subjected to this kind of board illegal behavior.



Hahaha, go right ahead and stop me, fella. Next time, defend yourself instead of running away and threatening "moderation". Onos.

New Eden isn't nice. It isn't friendly. It isn't very hospitiable. Good thing there are people here to shoot in the face.

Want to make New Eden a nice place? Try this out.

Paranoid Loyd
#45 - 2015-10-13 17:57:36 UTC  |  Edited by: Paranoid Loyd
Salvos Rhoska wrote:
You didnt point out any obvious flaw
Yes, I did. Read through your troll thread again.

"There is only one authority in this game, and that my friend is violence. The supreme authority upon which all other authority is derived." ISD Max Trix

Fix the Prospect!

Paul Pohl
blue media poetry
#46 - 2015-10-13 17:57:41 UTC
Salvos Rhoska wrote:


In my proposal, new players have 30 days of wardec immunity. 
Thats enough for them to have a reasonably safe and incubated start.
After that, welcome to EVE, proper.



yes - and like all of your other arguments this is a strawman

NPC's are not safe or incubated from anything - those within them as just as liable to gate-ganking, etc
Anslo
Scope Works
#47 - 2015-10-13 18:07:34 UTC  |  Edited by: Anslo
>NPC corps unconstructive
>NPC corps dont provide anything
>NPC corps dont have a culture
>Nothing every comes out of NPC Corps

lmao ok

also post with your main

[center]-_For the Proveldtariat_/-[/center]

sero Hita
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#48 - 2015-10-13 19:19:14 UTC  |  Edited by: sero Hita
Salvos Rhoska wrote:

NPC corps have only one justification for their existance, and that is wardec immunity.
I dont find that a valid justification. I find it is more harmful to the dynamic player sandbox, as an artificial shield based on an arbitrary PvE mechanic. Its not only new players that may cling to this, its also a huge proportion of alts of experienced players. Trying to use new players as a human shield, in defence of this wardec immunity, is not really honest nor valid. New players in NPC corps are outnumbered many times over by the real beneficiaries of this artificial, undynamic and restrictive pvp immunity, of experienced players who really shouldnt have this crutch in the first place.


You make me so tired, starting this old discussion up again for the eight billion time (see I can also make up numbers). This discussion is assuming most NPC corp members are in highsec(which you don't know tbh., neither do I). It is always discussed with exagerations from both sides with not supported statements:

THOUSANDS!!! THOUSANDS will leave(according to one side they will leave to player corps, and to the other side they will leave game)!! Hear my words... we are legion....Straight and if I don't get my way EVE is DOOOOOMED, DOOOOOMED I say.


As you said yourself, alot of these are alts and probably not a lot of mains(I don't know this with certainty though). Cyno alts, scouting alts, boosting alts, trading alts, PI alts and hauling alts. I personally have one PVP char in a player corp and the 4 remaining in npc corps. They are not untouchable, have lost a BR once in jita, due to my **** up where i forgot to warp to my instadock one day. Thank you and gf., mr Tornado pilot

Salvos Rhoska wrote:
NPC corps have only one justification for their existance, and that is wardec immunity.



The reason they are in a NPC corp: my corp will only allow me to have one char in there. I have asked many times. I have also seen in many corp adds that this is the case... no alts. I also don't have the time to be in more corps, which tbh. very few corps would also allow.. Spying and so on... so there you have another reason. Sure i could have all my alts in my own 4 man alt corp, but I fail to see what you would gain extra from this, that you couldn't fix with a gank catalyst today.

If you make their npc corps wardeccable it wouldn't change anything at all. They would still stay in there. I live in Low sec, so you don't need a wardec to attack any of my alts anyway. So even if your changes were made, I would still stay in a npc corp with my alts, as I would recon a lot of others would. because where should they go with their crappy hauling alt? The only thing that would perhaps change is that I wouldn't get my PVP ships from the major tradehubs but from lowsec tradehubs when I go shopping once a month, as they would be perma camped by corps who have all npc corps wardecced.

TLDR: your fix will not make the giant difference you think it will IMO (THOUSANDS and THOUSANDS of new players in player made corps :D lol), as it is not only scared mains hiding in npc corps, but also alot of utility alts that no corp would take in. Sure you can make it insignificantly harder for these people who has alts, fine for me. But what do you gain from this that you could not handle with suicicde ganking, gameplay wise?

Btw. the new players already have the Help channel the first month. which has the same function of your help corp.

"I'm all for pvp, don't get me wrong. I've ganked in Empire, blobed in low sec. Got T-shirts from every which-where.. But to be forced into a pvp confrontation that I didn't want is wrong ccp." RealFlisker

Bumblefck
Kerensky Initiatives
#49 - 2015-10-13 19:57:37 UTC
Another person has a unique insight into NPC corps and the new player experience, and absolutely has to run to forums to get it down and preserve their idea, which will in all certainty save New Eden and make CCP mega $$$!!!1!11

Perfection is a dish best served like wasabi .

Bumble's Space Log

Salvos Rhoska
#50 - 2015-10-13 20:07:31 UTC  |  Edited by: Salvos Rhoska
Bumblefck wrote:
Another person has a unique insight into NPC corps and the new player experience, and absolutely has to run to forums to get it down and preserve their idea, which will in all certainty save New Eden and make CCP mega $$$!!!1!11


Nah. No point, as I see readily from responses, such as your own, that dont read correctly nor comprehend the actual changes I have proposed.

Its not even a matter of disagreeing, which is fine. Its not even a matter of finding a flaw in my proposal, rationally, intelligently. Id be fine with that.

Its simply a matter of NOT READING ACCURATELY, and instead superimposing their own fictional, false interpretations based on a false reading of the proposal in the first place. Instead of asking for clarification, they default to their own imagination. Instead of understanding, they seek its opposite.

Its pointless. Quality in communication, and in reciprocation, has degraded so far, as to make it entirely impossible and worthless.
The only quality and argument they reciprocate to, is one that is their own, and inlign with their own subjective inter3sts.

There is no way to communicate with someone who refuses to listen.

I fold. **** it.
BeBopAReBop RhubarbPie
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#51 - 2015-10-13 20:13:39 UTC
OP, I am never going to forgive you. I was force to agree with another one of anslo's posts and its all your fault. As for 30/60/90 day restrictions, different players play different amounts. A 30 day time limit is not sufficient for someone who only gets to play for two hours a week, but 60 days is way too long for someone who plays 2-3 hours a day. Furthermore, forcing players to take part in the wardec system will not help anything other than to drive NPC corp players from the game.

Anslo wrote:
>NPC corps unconstructive
>NPC corps dont provide anything
>NPC corps dont have a culture
>Nothing every comes out of NPC Corps

lmao ok

also post with your main

Founder of Violet Squadron, a small gang NPSI community! Mail me for more information.

BeBopAReBop RhubarbPie's Space Mediation Service!

Salvos Rhoska
#52 - 2015-10-13 20:17:57 UTC
Die in your own fires, fkers.

You shall reap what you have sown, and which you deserve.

You are, yourselves, the cancer that plagues this game and the world without it.

Im out.
Goodbye.
Bumblefck
Kerensky Initiatives
#53 - 2015-10-13 20:20:40 UTC  |  Edited by: Bumblefck
Salvos Rhoska wrote:
Bumblefck wrote:
Another person has a unique insight into NPC corps and the new player experience, and absolutely has to run to forums to get it down and preserve their idea, which will in all certainty save New Eden and make CCP mega $$$!!!1!11


Nah. No point, as I see readily from responses, such as your own, that dont read correctly nor comprehend the actual changes I have proposed.

Its not even a matter of disagreeing, which is fine. Its not even a matter of finding a flaw in my proposal, rationally, intelligently. Id be fine with that.

Its simply a matter of NOT READING ACCURATELY, and instead superimposing their own fictional, false interpretations based on a false reading of the proposal in the first place. Instead of asking for clarification, they default to their own imagination. Instead of understanding, they seek its opposite.

Its pointless. Quality in communication, and in reciprocation, has degraded so far, as to make it entirely impossible and worthless.
The only quality and argument they reciprocate to, is one that is their own, and inlign with their own subjective inter3sts.

There is no way to communicate with someone who refuses to listen.

I fold. **** it.


Yay, I'm the straw that snapped the camel's back!


OT: Things are fine as they are, no changes necessary, thank you come again.


I actually just noticed that, although you try to hide it on the forums, you are just another NPC corp-skulking non-entity that has not left the bosom of the noob-friendly teat. Really - get out more.


e: here you are, I believe you threw your toys out of your pram. Play safe, my forum troll

Perfection is a dish best served like wasabi .

Bumble's Space Log

Vic Jefferson
Stimulus
Rote Kapelle
#54 - 2015-10-13 20:21:59 UTC
Worthless.

The biggest problem with new player corps is that it (almost) invariably results in the blind leading the blind. You don't want to have new players in a corp only with new players, ideally, you want to put them in a corp full of veteran players such that they can ask lots of good questions, and get lots of good answers.

Wardecs aren't the problem. Not having veteran players to teach them how to deal with it, or even show them how to have fun participating...that is the problem.

Vote Vic Jefferson for CSM X.....XI.....XII?

Paranoid Loyd
#55 - 2015-10-13 20:24:41 UTC
Salvos Rhoska wrote:
Die in your own fires, fkers.

You shall reap what you have sown, and which you deserve.

You are, yourselves, the cancer that plagues this game and the world without it.

Im out.
Goodbye.

Lol

o/

"There is only one authority in this game, and that my friend is violence. The supreme authority upon which all other authority is derived." ISD Max Trix

Fix the Prospect!

Bumblefck
Kerensky Initiatives
#56 - 2015-10-13 20:29:20 UTC
Salvos Rhoska wrote:
Die in your own fires, fkers.

You shall reap what you have sown, and which you deserve.

You are, yourselves, the cancer that plagues this game and the world without it.

Im out.
Goodbye.



Give me your carebear stuff in compensation for subjecting my eyes and brain to your nonsense electrons, my child

Perfection is a dish best served like wasabi .

Bumble's Space Log

Salvos Rhoska
#57 - 2015-10-13 20:39:20 UTC  |  Edited by: Salvos Rhoska
Bumblefck wrote:
Salvos Rhoska wrote:
Die in your own fires, fkers.

You shall reap what you have sown, and which you deserve.

You are, yourselves, the cancer that plagues this game and the world without it.

Im out.
Goodbye.



Give me your carebear stuff in compensation for subjecting my eyes and brain to your nonsense electrons, my child


No, Im biomassing.

Im done with this community and its cancer.

I made a rational reasoned proposal, and this is what I feared to expect.
Ad hominem, past the topic bullshit.

Based disagreement, articulated counter arguments;
These I would have dealt with happily.

Instead I was faced with what I had hoped, against hope, was not true, but is.
This community has become cancer, in the classic and full definition.

Im out. Rot and die. Meanwhile, I have other things to do.

PS: Lucas Kell. You win our wager. I folded first.
Paranoid Loyd
#58 - 2015-10-13 20:48:10 UTC  |  Edited by: Paranoid Loyd
This thread is nothing but trolling and your performance now is just comical.

If you had a serious proposal you would have put it in the proper place.

You're not going anywhere and claiming you are puts you on the same level as IZ. Yeah I said it.

"There is only one authority in this game, and that my friend is violence. The supreme authority upon which all other authority is derived." ISD Max Trix

Fix the Prospect!

Bumblefck
Kerensky Initiatives
#59 - 2015-10-13 20:48:27 UTC
Salvos Rhoska wrote:
Meanwhile, I have other things to do.





You know, for someone acting so high and mighty, your attitude absolutely stinks. Wishing death upon others - weather literally or figuratively - is unacceptable in any circumstance, and even more so in a game, FFS. To be honest, I think we'll all be better off without your venom.

Quote:
Rot and die.


Quote:
Die in your own fires, fkers.



Quote:
You are, yourselves, the cancer that plagues this game and the world without it.







Contract your stuff to me or not, but in any event the greatest gift you will give will be the future absence of your death-wishing and insults.



Fare thee well, and disembark at the earliest opportunity.

Perfection is a dish best served like wasabi .

Bumble's Space Log

Anslo
Scope Works
#60 - 2015-10-13 21:07:17 UTC
I guess he couldn't cope. Bye bye Salvleaq.

[center]-_For the Proveldtariat_/-[/center]