These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Vanguard Skill Point Changes

First post First post
Author
Zihao
Doomheim
#261 - 2015-09-27 03:37:04 UTC
Tippia wrote:
No skills are being changed in Vanguard.


Moving up the initial value is a change and, as I explained, I believe that's more proximate to the precedent of removal qua "they cannot be trained hence on new characters," at least more so than "they remain but have a new purpose." Hence my suggestion the latter argument is weaker.

Tippia wrote:

This sets this patch apart from all the historical cases where skill change happened and, depending on how and why things changed, SP were reimbursed on some occasions and not on others. It's not even the same class of event.


I agree, what I've suggested is that, of the historical events I am presently aware of and we have discussed, the situation seems to better fit the situation of a pseudo-removal than a purpose shift. I believe we agree the latter is not the case. Your strongest argument, I believe is that there is no change practically, but I have explained above why I disagree.

Tippia wrote:

I said that if things were changing the way you claimed, this thread wouldn't exist because there would be no additional SP for new characters. None would be required to fulfil the intent of the change.

I fully agree that if there were no effective change, as you claim, that this thread would not exist. ;)
Ima GoodGirl
Aria Shi's Wasted ISK
#262 - 2015-09-27 03:43:04 UTC
There is an easy solution for anyone feeling they are hard done by in this:

- biomass your character and start a new one

You'll get the new skill arrangement and have nothing to complain about (I wish).

This thread is a new level of entitlement. Biomass or HTFU. Even without gaining this one week of skillpoints, you'll still be in front of anyone gaining them (<2 weeks old) or starting fresh. You'll still be a vet by comparison.
Zihao
Doomheim
#263 - 2015-09-27 03:44:37 UTC  |  Edited by: Zihao
Corvois wrote:

To which the corollary is that those who are put out by this change are only so because they feel like they are missing out on more free stuff.


Which seems about as valid as the lackadaisical moral hazard argument when it's not entirely clear what the precedent is in this situation. I decline to accept either as morally superior.

Corvois wrote:

Except this change is not about free stuff. It is about giving new players more options sooner. From CCP's perspective SP is just a way to keep track of the options a player has within certain mechanics in the game.


Absolutely true, except it is free stuff for new players because that's two fewer weeks subscription they're paying before they access these new skills.

Ima GoodGirl wrote:

This thread is a new level of entitlement. Biomass or HTFU.


Thanks for keeping the thread bumped. Hopefully we can bring the debate to a close before you lose any more sleep over it.
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#264 - 2015-09-27 03:47:32 UTC  |  Edited by: Tippia
Avvy wrote:
I don't see what that has to do with it.
What what has to do with it?

Quote:
They give sp for extended downtime, so they have the means to make it fair for everyone, yet they choose not to.
They are making it fair: they are ensuring that bad timing does not screw you out of getting the new NPE baseline. If the NPE does not apply to you, then this change is not relevant to you and you can't be screwed over regardless.

They could do it unfairly and just say that, “Oh, you made a character after we released the patch notes? Tough luck.” Instead, they went beyond fair and added a buffer so that even exceptionally slow trainers would reach the new baseline. Everyone else has already reached the baseline and is therefore not party to any kind of fairness argument.

Zihao wrote:
Moving up the initial value is a change and, as I explained, I believe that's more proximate to the precedent of removal qua "they cannot be trained hence on new characters," at least more so than "they remain but have a new purpose." Hence my suggestion the latter argument is weaker.
A change in the new character skill set is not a skill change. No skills are changed in Vanguard. They are all exactly the same as they were before the patch. They do not have a new purpose. There are no change in the mechanics. No-one is losing any ability.

Since no skills are being changed; since no ability is lost; since no skills are removed, there is nothing that would warrant an SP reimbursement.

Quote:
I agree, what I've suggested is that, of the historical events I am presently aware of and we have discussed, the situation seems to better fit the situation of a pseudo-removal than a purpose shift
…except that nothing is being removed. Pseudo or otherwise. Every skill and every level remains exactly the same; every ability unlocked remains exactly the same; every SP trained is retained and does not change in value or functionality.

So there is nothing that would warrant an SP reimbursement.

Quote:
I fully agree that if there were no effective change, as you claim, that this thread would not exist
Then you don't agree.
Zihao
Doomheim
#265 - 2015-09-27 03:51:57 UTC
I believe you've disregarded pseudo too quickly and I believe under a more extreme case we would agree that changes of zero bar are in-fact changes.

Hypothetically: If vanguard made all subcapital ship skills default trained to level V, would we be arguing that nothing had changed since no new skills were added or taken away and their functions remained constant? (Genuinely curious)
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#266 - 2015-09-27 04:03:52 UTC
Zihao wrote:
I believe you've disregarded pseudo too quickly and I believe under a more extreme case we would agree that changes of zero bar are in-fact changes.
It is a change, just not to a skill.
In particular, it's not a change that in any way equates to a skill removal or a loss of ability or a removal of a game mechanic. Thus: there is nothing that warrants a reimbursement.

Quote:
Hypothetically
Practically, on Tuesday, some characters will gain skill levels you have. Some may even gain skill levels you don't have. Neither is equivalent to you losing the skills and abilities you have, and all related game mechanics keep operating the same as they did the day before. Therefore, there is nothing that warrants a reimbursement, same as on every other day when this has happened, is happening, and will keep happening.

If you're curious about your hypothetical, PM one of the devs.
Corvois
Sentinel Development Studio
#267 - 2015-09-27 04:09:37 UTC
Zihao wrote:
Corvois wrote:

To which the corollary is that those who are put out by this change are only so because they feel like they are missing out on more free stuff.


Which seems about as valid as the lackadaisical moral hazard argument when it's not entirely clear what the precedent is in this situation. I decline to accept either as morally superior.

Corvois wrote:

Except this change is not about free stuff. It is about giving new players more options sooner. From CCP's perspective SP is just a way to keep track of the options a player has within certain mechanics in the game.


Absolutely true, except it is free stuff for new players because that's two fewer weeks subscription they're paying before they access these new skills.

Ima GoodGirl wrote:

This thread is a new level of entitlement. Biomass or HTFU.


Thanks for keeping the thread bumped. Hopefully we can bring the debate to a close before you lose any more sleep over it.


Which makes this a business decision made by CCP that I expect they believe will improve the NPE. This decision is not about any other class of player, and it's impact on them is non existent. After this change they can still do the things that they were able to before. The only difference is some kind of perceived and tenuous opportunity cost. It also bears repeating that CCP has been very consistent in how they deal with SP.

The facts can be summerised as:
- CCP makes a change for one class of player in line with their business goals
- The change partially reverses an element of the Apocrypha expansion.
- Other classes of players completely unaffected either positively or negatively are unhappy with this

I am unclear about where this becomes a problem.

You train something, you get it. If the skill changes in some way, you will still have it. If a change affects what you can do in the game, then they will seek to ensure that the thing you did in the past you can still continue to do.

Changing the NPE is not a reason to hand out SP. The value of SP to a new player and to an established player is different. An established player has also received other benefits from the time they have already spent playing, such as the in game rewards linked to their activity. Ergo, an argument that they have somehow 'wasted money' is specious and self serving.

And it has been mentioned, this has been done before, and at one time in the opposite direction. I was even able to find a reference (http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/02/new-eve-online-characters-will-initially-train-skills-twice-as-f/).
Zihao
Doomheim
#268 - 2015-09-27 04:15:27 UTC
Tippia wrote:
In particular, it's not a change that in any way equates to a skill removal or a loss of ability or a removal of a game mechanic. Thus: there is nothing that warrants a reimbursement.


I disagree. It is entirely plausible that characters more than two weeks old not have a skill which becomes a default, which is a loss by reference to the new standard. I don't argue that this is sure to warrant disbursed sp, but I believe it is more like the situations in which sp was disbursed than those in which it wasn't.

Tippia wrote:

Practically, on Tuesday, some characters will gain skill levels you have. Some may even gain skill levels you don't have. Neither is equivalent to you losing the skills and abilities you have, and all related game mechanics keep operating the same as they did the day before. Therefore, there is nothing that warrants a reimbursement, same as on every other day when this has happened, is happening, and will keep happening.

If you're curious about your hypothetical, PM one of the devs.


I would think "practically," was a poor choice of words. If we observe the scenario in which older character suddenly does not have a skill which new character defaults with, he has "practically," lost something, to the extent that there is a new standard which even brand-new characters meet which he does not. I would have gone with "literally."

I will take your lack of opinion on that hypothetical as a kindly nod to my point.
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#269 - 2015-09-27 04:30:36 UTC  |  Edited by: Tippia
Zihao wrote:
I disagree. It is entirely plausible that characters more than two weeks old not have a skill which becomes a default, which is a loss by reference to the new standard.
…and yet, they lose nothing. They still have all the skills and abilities they trained for and unless they ****** up something fierce, they have at least twice the baseline SP. Therefore, they are not negatively affected by the NPE switch-over, especially not in a way that warrants an SP reimbursement.

On the utterly minute chance that they do have less than the baseline, they still come out ahead: they can just biomass and start a new character and get more than they had before. It is impossible to lose.

Quote:
I would think "practically," was a poor choice of words. If we observe the scenario in which older character suddenly does not have a skill which new character defaults with, he has "practically," lost something
No, he hasn't. In practice, everything is the same as before the patch — he has the same skills and abilities he had before and they all work the same as always. Everything his skills let him do in practice before, he can do in practice afterwards as well (Entosis Links and Festival Launchers aside). If he didn't have the skill, he didn't have the skill, so he didn't lose it or the abilities it unlocked.

If he absolutely, desperately wants to see it as an opportunity lost, he lost it a long time ago when he chose not to train that skill — it has nothing to do with what happens on Tuesday. His choice, by the way, does not warrant a reimbursement. Something happening to someone else does not entitle him to anything, least of all SP — only changes that actually happen to him, directly are cause for him getting reimbursed.

Quote:
I will take your lack of opinion on that hypothetical as a kindly nod to my point.
Don't. It'll cause you nothing but grief. Take it for exactly what I said or don't take it at all.
Aerasia
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
#270 - 2015-09-27 05:37:35 UTC
Zihao wrote:
I would think "practically," was a poor choice of words. If we observe the scenario in which older character suddenly does not have a skill which new character defaults with, he has "practically," lost something, to the extent that there is a new standard which even brand-new characters meet which he does not. I would have gone with "literally."

No, they haven't. The older character isn't losing skills which are now standard, they simply chose different ones to train.

The changes to starter skills is just to get rid of any "I'd love to do that, but I need to go find the skill book, afford the skill book, wait 15-30 min for the skill to train, and then get back to the career agent to finish the mission" moments. A 5 year, 5 month, or even 5 week character isn't restricted by those. They may have things they can't do, but at the 3M SP mark those things are left off your character sheet because you decided you didn't need them, not because you haven't had a chance to train them.

So very, very new characters are being given an SP grant because they haven't had the opportunity to negate all those NPE "hurry up and wait" moments. But if you've had enough time to work through those, then there's nothing left to give you.

Don't get me wrong, I'd love it if CCP just gave everybody half a billion SP and ended the entire stupid, time wasting farce. But I can see when a change isn't about the SP, and I'm not going to demand reimbursement for something that doesn't hurt anybody.
Zihao
Doomheim
#271 - 2015-09-27 05:55:09 UTC  |  Edited by: Zihao
Tippia wrote:
No, he hasn't. In practice, everything is the same as before the patch

"In practice" doesn't preclude relative comparison.

Tippia wrote:

If he absolutely, desperately wants to see it as an opportunity lost, he lost it a long time ago when he chose not to train that skill — it has nothing to do with what happens on Tuesday.

I disagree. Most skills aren't trained or used in the first few months. Rolling them into the base represents a change in the marginal cost associated with a skill and that's about as valid as their apriori opportunity given the eventuality was unknown.

Tippia wrote:
Take it for exactly what I said or don't take it at all.


You seemed rather explicitly opposed to discussing it, so that strongly implies you agree with my conclusion, else you would have done what you've proved quite willing to do here and respond at length. :)

Aerasia wrote:

Don't get me wrong, I'd love it if CCP just gave everybody half a billion SP and ended the entire stupid, time wasting farce. But I can see when a change isn't about the SP, and I'm not going to demand reimbursement for something that doesn't hurt anybody.


Since it's gone a few pages without my repeating it: I'm not actually shilling for reimbursement and I don't feel bothered in the lest by this. I just got in on the debate because I felt it was being lazily argued against, I felt a plausible defense could be mounted, and Tippia has been a gracious sparring partner.
Ralph King-Griffin
New Eden Tech Support
#272 - 2015-09-27 07:30:31 UTC
Zihao wrote:
Ralph King-Griffin wrote:
Zihao wrote:
I find this change more akin to removing a skill that changing it's purpose. None of these skills have been modified, but rather have been effectively removed for one or all ranks. Time expended on these skills is therefor extraneous. Thus the case for similarity between learning skills and the associated refund.

Oh stop being so petty,
you are coming off like a petulant child getting jealous and throwing a wobbeler at someone else's birthday.
stop being so petty ffs.


To be perfectly honest McGriffin, I couldn't care less about the skillpoints. I just like the debate and I think I have the better argument. It's certainly better that your lazy ad hominem.

No you don't have the better argument, you're jumping up and down in a shrill voice.

I at no point in this thread have done anything more than mock those of ye doing so and post a couple of ferret related content links

Tippia has been doing the arguing and has been more than adequate in chewing both of ye and the other kids before ye out.
It's been entering watching ye try this without looking like children though genuinely it has so by all means carry on.
Elsa Hayes
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#273 - 2015-09-27 10:47:44 UTC  |  Edited by: Elsa Hayes
Dear op,

entitlement much?
You agreed to a deal to certain conditions when you made your char and you received exactly what you paid for, which was ~50k SP at that time, now there is a new deal (400k SP).
If you bought something 5 months ago you are not entitled to some kind of refund if the item suddenly goes on a sale with a discount.

If you buy a new gaming rig and it goes on a sale in about 5 months time for 25% less no one in the entire world will pay you the difference because the same product is now offered cheaper.

tl:dr
You received exactly what you paid for
Salvos Rhoska
#274 - 2015-09-27 12:25:31 UTC  |  Edited by: Salvos Rhoska
There is no harm in applying the 350k boost universally.

Only benefit, for everyone, equally.

Especially as a universal application will pique interest of players currently away from the game, of all account ages, who have simply forgotten to return while doing other things. Not because they didnt like EVE, but simply because their attention was simply elsewhere during their sabbatical.

This a good opportunity to hit several birds with one stone.

Its not an entitlement issue, its one of pragmatic expedience.
Faenir Antollare
For Ever And Ever
#275 - 2015-09-27 12:31:45 UTC  |  Edited by: Faenir Antollare
Salvos Rhoska wrote:
There is no harm in applying the 350k boost universally.

Only benefit, for everyone, equally.




Nor is there any harm in helping out the NPE with this gesture, if it really bothers you so much and you so dearly need them extra few sp just roll a brand new alt.



Edit.. Your are gaining quite the reputation for editing post's after the fact Salvos Straight it is both very rude and extremely ignorant of you.

RiP BooBoo 26/7/1971 - 23/7/2014 My Lady My Love My Life My Wife

Faenir Antollare
For Ever And Ever
#276 - 2015-09-27 12:33:32 UTC  |  Edited by: Faenir Antollare
double post.

RiP BooBoo 26/7/1971 - 23/7/2014 My Lady My Love My Life My Wife

Faenir Antollare
For Ever And Ever
#277 - 2015-09-27 12:35:00 UTC
triple post fail edit Sad

RiP BooBoo 26/7/1971 - 23/7/2014 My Lady My Love My Life My Wife

Salvos Rhoska
#278 - 2015-09-27 12:35:28 UTC  |  Edited by: Salvos Rhoska
Faenir Antollare wrote:
Salvos Rhoska wrote:
There is no harm in applying the 350k boost universally.

Only benefit, for everyone, equally.


Nor is there any harm in helping out the NPE with this gesture, if it really bothers you so much and you so dearly need them extra few sp just roll a brand new alt.


Nobody is disputing helping NPE with this.
NPE getting 350k sp boost does not bother me at all.

Adding 350k to all characters, past, present and after the change, future, does not rescind, redact nor diminish the 350k boost to NPE.

The question you should be asking, is why does making the 350k change universal bother YOU so much?

It harms no one. Benefits everyone.
Furthermore, the intended increased player retention and streamlining for NPE, is supported by a feasible return of lost players as they remember EVE is still here, with the small inxentive/hype the boost provides them too. Especially in a period of the game where PCU has dropped, and there isnt much hype on the immediate radar to otherwise return the attention of EVE players who are otherwise, for whatever reason, currently on sabbatical.
Faenir Antollare
For Ever And Ever
#279 - 2015-09-27 12:37:53 UTC  |  Edited by: Faenir Antollare
Salvos Rhoska wrote:
Faenir Antollare wrote:
Salvos Rhoska wrote:
There is no harm in applying the 350k boost universally.

Only benefit, for everyone, equally.


Nor is there any harm in helping out the NPE with this gesture, if it really bothers you so much and you so dearly need them extra few sp just roll a brand new alt.


Nobody is disputing helping NPE with this.
NPE getting 350k sp boost does not bother me at all.

Adding 350k to all characters, past, present and after the change, future, does not rescind, redact nor diminish the 350k boost to NPE.

The question you should be asking, is why does making the 350k change universal bother YOU so much?



It does not bother me in the slightest, in fact I am more than happy with the NPE being enriched.
It is to your whining only that I have responded and nothing else



Edit.. I see you have yet again gone back and edited a post after a response, are you really that feeble minded that you need to move goalpost's so as to justify your skriking ? Grow up man ffs GROW UP!!!

RiP BooBoo 26/7/1971 - 23/7/2014 My Lady My Love My Life My Wife

Salvos Rhoska
#280 - 2015-09-27 12:41:38 UTC  |  Edited by: Salvos Rhoska
Faenir Antollare wrote:
Salvos Rhoska wrote:
Faenir Antollare wrote:
Salvos Rhoska wrote:
There is no harm in applying the 350k boost universally.

Only benefit, for everyone, equally.


Nor is there any harm in helping out the NPE with this gesture, if it really bothers you so much and you so dearly need them extra few sp just roll a brand new alt.


Nobody is disputing helping NPE with this.
NPE getting 350k sp boost does not bother me at all.

Adding 350k to all characters, past, present and after the change, future, does not rescind, redact nor diminish the 350k boost to NPE.

The question you should be asking, is why does making the 350k change universal bother YOU so much?



It does not bother me in the slightest, in fact I am more than happy with the NPE being enriched.
It is to your whining only that I have responded and nothing else


What whining?
Nobody is against adding 350k to new characters.

You are the one whining against a universal 350k boost, when it is clear that it harms no one, benefits everyone, and potentially increases the return rate of lost players.

Faenir Antollare wrote:

Edit.. I see you have yet again gone back and edited a post after a response, are you really that feeble minded that you need to move goalpost's so as to justify your skriking ? Grow up man ffs GROW UP!!!


So you went back to edit in some insults, disrespect and trolling, all of which are now reported.

My edit did not move any goal posts nor change what was there.
I merely added more explanation and elaboration on the existing points, for your own benefit so you would understand.
To which you responded with insults/disrespect/trolling.