These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Wormholes

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
Previous page12
 

When did CCP #NERF C5/C6 K-Space connections? #Killing W-Space
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Borsek
KarmaFleet
Goonswarm Federation
#21 - 2015-09-23 02:41:49 UTC
People didn't adapt to frig holes because they ******* suck. We said they'd suck and they do. Only use you ever get out of one is being able to enter an entrenched hostile system with an inty, rest is all balls.

Inb4 oh but I hunt in a bomber and use frig holes. Sure, buddy, but any ******* hole would serve you well for that one. Pun semi-intended.
Tim Nering
R3d Fire
#22 - 2015-09-23 02:50:19 UTC  |  Edited by: Tim Nering
nah bro... enyos + inquis lets do dis. #dankfrags

Stop Caring Start Fragging! Join R3D Fire Today!
TurboX3
Pulling The Plug
PURPLE HELMETED WARRIORS
#23 - 2015-09-23 12:48:55 UTC
Blame the CSM for being carebears & not defending our wormhole connections...
Jonn Duune
OpSec.
Wrong Hole.
#24 - 2015-09-23 19:26:48 UTC
Tim Nering wrote:
Im not a huge advocate of the changes in wspace but i really hope that the first instinct of corps is to adapt to them... and we all know its not.

most wormhole corps dont have frig doctrines for frig holes, never came up with any plan for the changes in wspace activity or null activity.

There is always a way. A lot of corps are still stuck in old ways that are just not relevant ways to play anymore. It is like trying to fly a blaster talos... ya it kinda works but not really... that fit is just not really working the way it used to.

tldr yeah it sucks.. but adapt or die.



We're investigating the best way of setting up some kind of frig hole doctrine, one of our better (and more hilarious suggestions) is RR devoters.

My name is Jonn Duune, and I wholeheartedly support the message posted above.
Previous page12