These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Player Features and Ideas Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
Previous page123Next page
 

[ Feature ] Eve Online - free to play - PLEX for skilling

Author
Donnachadh
United Allegiance of Undesirables
#21 - 2015-09-21 13:21:31 UTC
Amarr Virgin wrote:
Mag's wrote:
No.


then enjoy your empty systems

how do you guys see the "end of eve" ?

there has to be a "plan B" for the game


Ah the proverbial "the end of EvE is nigh" and it will die if CCP does not change it to what I want.
So original, like we have not seen this god only knows how many times.

Those other free to play games survive by getting some of their players to "pay" a subscription fee and in return those players get boosts, bonuses and in some access to items the the free to play people cannot get. In EvE we call that "pay to win" and we want no part of it. If you are tired of paying your subscriptions then plex them, if you do not want to work that hard in the game then quit.
Tabyll Altol
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#22 - 2015-09-21 14:22:18 UTC
Amarr Virgin wrote:
Make Eve Online a free to play game:

if you are "unsubscribed"
- you can use only one account per IP adress / MAC adress
- training of skills is paused
- in case of higher numbers of players trying to log in to servers, "unsubscribed" accounts get kicked
- make unsubscribed players unable to enter systems with more then 200 people in them (trade hubs, fleet fights...)

if you are subscribed - business as per usual




Bad idea, very bad idea.

-1
Cidanel Afuran
Grant Village
#23 - 2015-09-21 15:40:14 UTC
Zan Shiro wrote:
So at eve vegas, eve fest, etc the only person to play eve is the first to login after DT? Server will deny a whole hotel full of eve nerds after that?


house where 2 residents (2 different actual people) play locked out too.


One student gets to play per college campus. This will work out well.
Asuka Solo
I N E X T R E M I S
Tactical Narcotics Team
#24 - 2015-09-21 16:08:07 UTC
Facial Grapist wrote:
Rivr Luzade wrote:
With this suggestion, you do not support the community. With this suggestion, you do not support the game. You do neither.


content generation is not helping the community? lol mate

the servers would spike so hard from all the vets coming back to play

how about a kickstarter to buy out Eve Online from CCP Games?



1) Please explain to the rest of us how you jumped from "your suggestion is not helping the community" to "content generation is bad?".... Cuz from where I'm sitting, you'll have to prove that unsubbed accounts generate eve content first.... Maybe you have some magical source that would dispel our disbelief while balancing the books at the same time?

2) Vets are leaving Eve because of the direction of the game / nerfs to their play styles / changes in ship roles / sov systems. Giving them nerfed albeit free access to a game they no longer enjoy is not going to cause a spike in online connections. Again, source to substantiate your claim?

3) Star Citizen much?

Eve is about Capital ships, WiS, Boobs, PI and Isk!

afkalt
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#25 - 2015-09-21 16:19:26 UTC  |  Edited by: afkalt
Mag's wrote:
No.


Have my input in addition of Mags fine response:

No
Nej
لا
jo
geen
ոչ
heç bir
ez
না
ne
не
Dili
neniu
ei
hindi
aucun
non
όχι
არარის
કોઈ
Pa gen
Ba
לא
नहीं
tsis
mba
tidak
Uimh
Nei
いいえ
Ana
קיין
ಇಲ್ಲ
គ្មាន


아니
ne
ບໍ່ມີ

kwete
Nru
नाही
Talsha Talamar
Nebula Rasa Holdings
Nebula Rasa
#26 - 2015-09-21 16:35:48 UTC
A free 2 play eve beyond the PLEX mechanism would be the death of the game as a whole.

Allowing players to use unsubscribed characters in the game would wreak havoc not only on the markets but in all areas of the game.

Well meant but horrible idea.
Suetia Swan
Teutate raiders
The Initiative.
#27 - 2015-09-21 16:38:20 UTC
No !
ShahFluffers
Ice Fire Warriors
#28 - 2015-09-21 16:39:02 UTC
Also throwing in with a big, fat "hellll nawwwww!"
Bagrat Skalski
Koinuun Kotei
#29 - 2015-09-21 17:20:50 UTC  |  Edited by: Bagrat Skalski
Seriously EVE free to play would be broken any way you will make it.
Lyra Gerie
Garoun Investment Bank
Gallente Federation
#30 - 2015-09-21 18:15:58 UTC
there are a few issues that would have to be worked out.

1 control of alts, limiting via IP could be an answer but might affect users at colleges or other locations.
2 improving the use of plex, if players can play for free they can reach their skill goals and just stop paying, this means less $ for CCP unless CCP can convince players to use plex for more things. This incentivizes the use of Plex to make up for lost income from long time subscribers who are no longer skilling their characters.
3 population control, CCP would need to hire a lot more support staff to handle the larger volume of players. This is important to keep players happy. Further hardware would have to be able to handle a potentially massive influx of players

This would take a pretty large amount of planning as well as time to actually implement, not only that but CCP would have to discuss this at LEAST with the CSM if not the entire playerbase of eve before implementing to avoid another summer of rage.

It's a touchy subject and given the work needed for the change I doubt it's something on CCPs mind, at least until their current short term plan is finalized and players have their own player built stargates.
Zan Shiro
Doomheim
#31 - 2015-09-21 22:58:31 UTC
Bagrat Skalski wrote:
Seriously EVE free to play would be broken any way you will make it.



What could possibly be broken about me waking up an alt, or 2, to run with the main for free. Main is pretty much done, I train to train at this point. have a mostly setup alt already on ice. Just pay for the 3rd account also on ice who is half done.


Link alt (ogb of course, do it the lazy way as its a multibox client I don't even have to manage), falcon alt, combat shooty main....3 for the price of 1. This one of good side effects of plex price rise. Some have trimmed down the alt farms really. The somewhat messed up combo above got too expensive to plex to run.

Now we can argue this is the death of eve. I say no....less alts to run the cheesy combo above probably a good thing. Sort of like how we laughed at the isboxers when they said well yeah....now I will just decommission most of my alts. Oh no....don't do that. We liked a several person bomber wing run by just 1 person. Whatever shall we do without that? Enjoy eve more seems to be the result really.
Anneka Rice
Sniggerdly
Pandemic Legion
#32 - 2015-09-21 23:14:25 UTC
Lets all just get max SP and everything is free too while we are at it....
Doudou Lachatte
Hedion University
Amarr Empire
#33 - 2015-09-21 23:34:15 UTC
Eve free2play: 1 character for freebies.

Eve free2play: Perma-death chars free ;)
Shallanna Yassavi
qwertz corp
#34 - 2015-09-22 01:51:34 UTC
If for no other reason, this will fail because you can't lock people out of the game if they want in bad enough. They'll lie on their billing information, use proxies, and all kinds of other fun things. CCP and the ISDs have almost certainly got enough trouble with this kind of thing from people who pay to play the game.

A signature :o

Max Deveron
Deveron Shipyards and Technology
Citizen's Star Republic
#35 - 2015-09-22 03:52:40 UTC  |  Edited by: Max Deveron
Amarr Virgin wrote:
Make Eve Online a free to play game:

if you are "unsubscribed"
- you can use only one account per IP adress / MAC adress
- training of skills is paused
- in case of higher numbers of players trying to log in to servers, "unsubscribed" accounts get kicked
- make unsubscribed players unable to enter systems with more then 200 people in them (trade hubs, fleet fights...)

if you are subscribed - business as per usual




This might help some of my family members to play more often.....but whoops....4 of us in the same house....guess i would be the only one that played at all then..........

-1
Iain Cariaba
#36 - 2015-09-22 04:27:23 UTC
Omnathious Deninard wrote:
Amarr Virgin wrote:
Celthric Kanerian wrote:
Amarr Virgin wrote:

- you can use only one account per IP adress / MAC adress


As a 4 year old player with only this account, I take great offense...



as a 4 year old you should have somewhere in the 90+ mil skill points if you skilled all the time

so imagine if you didnt have to pay the game anymore and still are able to play it

even more so, you could use the RL money to buy plexes and sell them on the market - which would be closer to the chinese version where the plex is 3-4 bil

As a 4 year old character with 91m sp, I would quit if eve went F2P.
I have played F2P games in the past, they suck.

As an 8 year bittervet with a quarter billion sp spread across four accounts (RL has interfered with my ability to play at times over the years), I would also quit if EvE went F2P.
Laendra
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#37 - 2015-09-22 04:56:16 UTC
F2P...not the MMO, but if they created a scaled down single player version with 100% NPC content and maybe a multiplayer LAN version (start with something like 4 player slots, and could purchase additional slots) that could be run on a stand-alone server with 100% NPC content + some PVP content...

those would be the only things I would support. Would generate some r/l ISK for CCP and one would think that the existing code base could scale appropriately for that...i.e. would require a TON less resources to create the single/limited LAN version(s).

I'd buy it if the NPC content was immersive and fun.
Max Deveron
Deveron Shipyards and Technology
Citizen's Star Republic
#38 - 2015-09-22 05:15:16 UTC
Laendra wrote:
F2P...not the MMO, but if they created a scaled down single player version with 100% NPC content and maybe a multiplayer LAN version (start with something like 4 player slots, and could purchase additional slots) that could be run on a stand-alone server with 100% NPC content + some PVP content...

those would be the only things I would support. Would generate some r/l ISK for CCP and one would think that the existing code base could scale appropriately for that...i.e. would require a TON less resources to create the single/limited LAN version(s).

I'd buy it if the NPC content was immersive and fun.


not even scaled down.....hell i would happily pay up to $60-$80 for an EvE stand alone 4x game that had every aspect of this mmo in it. Imagine a cross between Sins of Solar Empire and GalCiv3.....only it would be EvE....then add the ability to play with others hotseat or LAN.....i would bet that would put some money into CCP's pockets.....and maybe blow all those indiedevelopers on Steam into dust.
Celthric Kanerian
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#39 - 2015-09-22 22:52:52 UTC
Amarr Virgin wrote:
Celthric Kanerian wrote:
Amarr Virgin wrote:

- you can use only one account per IP adress / MAC adress


As a 4 year old player with only this account, I take great offense...



as a 4 year old you should have somewhere in the 90+ mil skill points if you skilled all the time


Because of occasional breaks (RL problems) I only have 46 million Skill points.
Zimmer Jones
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#40 - 2015-09-23 00:33:40 UTC
woot woot! all my massive #'s of mining alts are trained up as far as i need them, why skill more if i don't have to? free free free isk for me, and all i need to do is plex... 0 accounts? IP limitations mean nothing to me, or any other nerd/geek worth his salt. Oh, i could plex one account, have something to shoot others with, but otherwise I'd do my best to make the market for low level mins worthless, cause i can sell so much lower than anyone else...

oh wait, everyone else can do that too. All market items would lose a crapload of their value as people don't need to grind isk to get plex with, although the isk value of plex would drop as well. For a wonder, if people don't have to pay to play THEY WONT pay, and avoiding paying CCP would be the new emergent gameplay.

Then there would be the expected influx of freetards, bringing back a flavor of the past no one wants: The eternal September.
google it. Eve is one of the few games that reward hard work, craftiness, long term planning, opportunism, law breaking/enforcement and tenacity.

F2p games reward none of the above, f2p games want to charge you $ in lieu of having to do any of those activities which generate content for others simply by being there doing those activities. F2p games and gamers are the most fickle examples of games and gamers, we need none of their sort or their sport.

Use the force without consent and the court wont acquit you even if you are a card carryin', robe wearin' Jedi.

Previous page123Next page