These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Intergalactic Summit

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

PIE and the 24th Imperial Crusade Threaten The Disciples of Ston

Author
Tiberious Thessalonia
True Slave Foundations
#61 - 2012-01-04 15:23:03 UTC
Rodj Blake wrote:
Tiberious Thessalonia wrote:
Rodj, are you saying that PIE Inc. now has the authority to uphold Amarrian Law on non-Amarrian organizations now? I would like to see where in your charter you claim that ability, and the official documentation from the MIO which allows you to do so.


We have the same authority as every other capsuleer organisation.



Then declare war and reap the whirlwind.
Tiberious Thessalonia
True Slave Foundations
#62 - 2012-01-04 15:24:06 UTC
Not, of course, that you will undock. Unless undocking to fight pacifists is more PIE's style than an actual war fought against people more than willing to attack back? :)
Rodj Blake
PIE Inc.
Khimi Harar
#63 - 2012-01-04 15:25:23 UTC  |  Edited by: Rodj Blake
Manwe Todako wrote:


As for Mr. Blake's request: He will need to elaborate as to what he means by "amarrian law." The great tragedy of all this is the continual refusal of all the governments and Concord to provide a legal, binding mechanism for capsuleer pilots to rescue former slaves and free them so they are re-designated as citizens that cannot be sold or re-enslaved. Right now this is not an option. Instead, the Disciples of Ston make an ongoing commitment to every former slave we rescue to do all we can to protect, transport, and assist them wherever they wish to go. We only relinguish this when they request to come under the care or help of someone else as in the case of Tobias, the patients, and the group that went to the Electus Matari It is sad, that even after they are rescued, all the governments still consider them slaves.


Let me put it this way - were all of the the slaves released by their legal owners?

Had any of the slaves at any time been subject to forcible release?

Had any of the slaves escaped contrary to the wishes of their owners?

Dolce et decorum est pro Imperium mori

Rodj Blake
PIE Inc.
Khimi Harar
#64 - 2012-01-04 15:27:24 UTC
Tiberious Thessalonia wrote:
Not, of course, that you will undock. Unless undocking to fight pacifists is more PIE's style than an actual war fought against people more than willing to attack back? :)


Pilots from PIE take part in conflicts daily as a part of their militia duties, as you well know.

Dolce et decorum est pro Imperium mori

Arkady Sadik
Gradient
Electus Matari
#65 - 2012-01-04 15:29:53 UTC
I wonder how PIE Inc. manages to shoot down over a hundred ships every month without ever undocking.

It does not pay off to underestimate your enemy. Nor does chestbeating or smack. Let's all take an example in the Disciples here, who have been able to stay civil and respecting thorough the whole affair, even though they were not treated with respect themselves.
Tiberious Thessalonia
True Slave Foundations
#66 - 2012-01-04 15:35:29 UTC
Arkady Sadik wrote:
I wonder how PIE Inc. manages to shoot down over a hundred ships every month without ever undocking.

It does not pay off to underestimate your enemy. Nor does chestbeating or smack. Let's all take an example in the Disciples here, who have been able to stay civil and respecting thorough the whole affair, even though they were not treated with respect themselves.



I am referring to the 5 week war they have 'waged' against us. It has included some particularly humourous elements.

But you are right. I'm just sick and tired of PIE trying to play bully, and trying to show the Disciples that the Grumpkin is not as big and frightening as it is trying to come off as.

PIE will either put its money where its mouth is, and try to enforce its will on an unarmed and pacifist group of monks not operating under Amarrian Law, and draw whatever wrath is coming its way from that, or it will do the smart thing, realize that the Stonites are relatively harmless and that they should never have allowed Ms. Goldcore the authority to claim to be acting on behalf of the 24th IC, or even their own organization.
Silas Vitalia
Doomheim
#67 - 2012-01-04 15:38:47 UTC
Tiberious Thessalonia wrote:
...would like to request a tour of your matriculation centers...


Amarrians are not in the habit of making 'requests' to the lesser races.

And as I understand it the DoS indeed still agreed to a tour, correct?



Sabik now, Sabik forever

Tiberious Thessalonia
True Slave Foundations
#68 - 2012-01-04 15:41:23 UTC
They have, and now its up to PIE as to whether they wish to accept the terms offered for the tour; That is that there will be a single representative from PIE, along with a representative from Electus Matari, and Teraa Matar, and the tour of the matriculation centers will be conducted in such a way that their locations remain a secret.

Honestly, I think even that is too much, but that's just my opinion.
ValentinaDLM
SoE Roughriders
Electus Matari
#69 - 2012-01-04 15:49:42 UTC
Rodj Blake wrote:

Are you able to provide the appropriate documentation to confirm that these former slaves have indeed been released in a manner consistent with Amarrian law?


Even I have a great many slaves acquired from cans or from agent work, I load them up into my Legion every couple of months and take them to Stain, to live better lives. Is this consistent with Amarrian law? I mean, they never stop me, customs agents don't seem to care much where slaves were acquired or where they are going.

More important than that though, is that as a Capsuleer I am above the law. Even Concord can't force me to do things when I am out of their reach.
Mensha Khael Crow
House Murder
#70 - 2012-01-04 15:50:09 UTC
Rodj Blake wrote:
Manwe Todako wrote:


As for Mr. Blake's request: He will need to elaborate as to what he means by "amarrian law." The great tragedy of all this is the continual refusal of all the governments and Concord to provide a legal, binding mechanism for capsuleer pilots to rescue former slaves and free them so they are re-designated as citizens that cannot be sold or re-enslaved. Right now this is not an option. Instead, the Disciples of Ston make an ongoing commitment to every former slave we rescue to do all we can to protect, transport, and assist them wherever they wish to go. We only relinguish this when they request to come under the care or help of someone else as in the case of Tobias, the patients, and the group that went to the Electus Matari It is sad, that even after they are rescued, all the governments still consider them slaves.


Let me put it this way - were all of the the slaves released by their legal owners?

Had any of the slaves at any time been subject to forcible release?

Had any of the slaves escaped contrary to the wishes of their owners?



I do apologise for intervening in a matter that would and should have been between your two corporations. And could have likely been allready handled.

While PIE's concern for the slaves and indeed imperial law should be receiving credit from all, I believe the concern is slightly misplaced. Captain Todako mentioned deteinment center.

So I have one question that comes to mind. Are Disciples Of Ston keeping free Amarrians detained?
And as a follow up, on what grounds?

Captain Crow.
Our righteousness is evident in the failures of the heathen, God keep us from falling prey to their weaknesses.
Arkady Sadik
Gradient
Electus Matari
#71 - 2012-01-04 15:53:16 UTC
Mensha Khael Crow wrote:
And as a follow up, on what grounds?
Unrelated to the Disciples, but let me guess - "an invisible man told me it's ok" wouldn't count? :-)
Manwe Todako
Disciples of Ston
#72 - 2012-01-04 15:54:29 UTC
Rodj Blake wrote:


Let me put it this way - were all of the the slaves released by their legal owners?

Had any of the slaves at any time been subject to forcible release?

Had any of the slaves escaped contrary to the wishes of their owners?


Answers:
Question One: All the slaves we have rescued were illegally sold by their holders to lawless slavers or lawless pilots who sought to illegally transport them out of Amarrian space and sell them into slavery to other buyers. Thus; it is the holders you should be investigating whoever they may be.
Question Two: What is forcible release? I'm not sure what you are talking about. The case of Tobias might apply but you'll have to explain that one.
Question Three: None of the former slaves we have thus far rescued has escaped from their holders. But, the Disciples of Ston will offer sanctuary to any slave who has escaped and appeals for sanctuary so long as they are not guilty of crimes worthy of incarceration or death. If such is the case, they are welcome to be interred in our detention facility if they prefer that to whatever other punishment they might incur elsewhere. The Disciples of Ston oppose the death penalty and will protect even captured slavers from being returned to authorities to be put to death. No slaver we have rescued has requested to return to Amarr for "justice."

SANKOFA

Mensha Khael Crow
House Murder
#73 - 2012-01-04 16:13:04 UTC
Arkady Sadik wrote:
Mensha Khael Crow wrote:
And as a follow up, on what grounds?
Unrelated to the Disciples, but let me guess - "an invisible man told me it's ok" wouldn't count? :-)


It would actually. Just as - "We decided they are morally inferior and must be detained for the good of themselves and others" - Would indeed count. I asked for their reasons, if they are doing so. I am not saying I will agree with the expressed reasons or actions.

Now terrorist Sadik, would you kindly stop digging for the pacifist organization? I doubt this] is the help they need.

Onto the meat:
"The Disciples of Ston oppose the death penalty and will protect even captured slavers from being returned to authorities to be put to death. No slaver we have rescued has requested to return to Amarr for "justice." " -Captain Todako.

You are claiming that of all all Amarr freemen being detained - Apparantly due to their profession. - None has asked that they be handed to the Amarrian authority? Have you only captured slavers who would be punished for violating Amarrian law if you did so?

Captain Crow
Our righteousness is evident in the failures of the heathen, God keep us from falling prey to their weaknesses.
Kalaratiri
Full Broadside
Deepwater Hooligans
#74 - 2012-01-04 16:20:29 UTC
Rodj Blake wrote:
Tiberious Thessalonia wrote:
Not, of course, that you will undock. Unless undocking to fight pacifists is more PIE's style than an actual war fought against people more than willing to attack back? :)


Pilots from PIE take part in conflicts daily as a part of their militia duties, as you well know.


I'd just like to point out that I've seen more members of PIE in this thread than I ever have in space. Considering I've been at war with them in some form for more than a year now, that is rather telling.

She's mad but she's magic, there's no lie in her fire.

This is possibly one of the worst threads in the history of these forums.  - CCP Falcon

I don't remember when last time you said something that wasn't either dumb or absurd. - Diana Kim

Manwe Todako
Disciples of Ston
#75 - 2012-01-04 16:27:49 UTC
Mensha Khael Crow wrote:


You are claiming that of all all Amarr freemen being detained - Apparantly due to their profession. - None has asked that they be handed to the Amarrian authority? Have you only captured slavers who would be punished for violating Amarrian law if you did so?

Captain Crow


Answers:
Yes, none have asked to be returned to Amarrian authorities.
Yes, we have only captured slavers who were in violation of Amarrian law and they are convinced that they would be punished if returned.

SANKOFA

Mensha Khael Crow
House Murder
#76 - 2012-01-04 16:36:19 UTC
Manwe Todako wrote:
Mensha Khael Crow wrote:


You are claiming that of all all Amarr freemen being detained - Apparantly due to their profession. - None has asked that they be handed to the Amarrian authority? Have you only captured slavers who would be punished for violating Amarrian law if you did so?

Captain Crow


Answers:
Yes, none have asked to be returned to Amarrian authorities.
Yes, we have only captured slavers who were in violation of Amarrian law and they are convinced that they would be punished if returned.


Would you object to these being confirmed somehow? Perhaps an interview to confirm they are aware of the option and prefer not to apply to it?
Our righteousness is evident in the failures of the heathen, God keep us from falling prey to their weaknesses.
Arkady Sadik
Gradient
Electus Matari
#77 - 2012-01-04 16:39:54 UTC
Mensha Khael Crow wrote:
Would you object to these being confirmed somehow? Perhaps an interview to confirm they are aware of the option and prefer not to apply to it?
Hm.

Mr. Crow is showing how to handle diplomatic inquiries in a respectful and sensible manner there.

Apologies for my snarky remark earlier. While I disagree with some of your basic beliefs, I should show respect to those who show respect themselves.
Caellach Marellus
Stormcrows
#78 - 2012-01-04 16:40:05 UTC
Rodj Blake wrote:
Tiberious Thessalonia wrote:
Rodj, are you saying that PIE Inc. now has the authority to uphold Amarrian Law on non-Amarrian organizations now? I would like to see where in your charter you claim that ability, and the official documentation from the MIO which allows you to do so.


We have the same authority as every other capsuleer organisation.


So none then? You forget that we aren't subject to most Imperial, Republic, Federal or State law. So long as we don't break CONCORD law in their space, or commit hostile (read, active physical combat based aggression) against an Empire, or finally to be caught with our pants down and contraband in our cargo hold, then quite frankly the laws mean little to nothing.

The problem here Admiral isn't your subordinate's request, it's the way she said and did it. She bullrushed her way into this with intimidation and threats, and the Disciples called her bluff. Ironically if she hadn't threatened around non compliance and had handled the matter with some politeness, chances are this thread wouldn't exist, and communication would be ongoing about arranging a tour.


Thgil screwed up here, I must say I'm surprised you're backing her to the hilt publicly rather than stating you'd handle this matter privately with the dignity I tend to expect from you.

When your gut instincts tell you something is wrong, trust them. When your heart tells you something is right, ignore it, check with your brain first. Accept nothing, challenge everything.

Silas Vitalia
Doomheim
#79 - 2012-01-04 16:56:04 UTC
Caellach Marellus wrote:
the Disciples called her bluff. .


..and yet they still complied with the demands to be granted a tour?

If PIE is indeed given a tour then it would appear to me that the direct, "bullying" approach was in fact successful in the end?

Sabik now, Sabik forever

Caellach Marellus
Stormcrows
#80 - 2012-01-04 17:04:05 UTC
Silas Vitalia wrote:
Caellach Marellus wrote:
the Disciples called her bluff. .


..and yet they still complied with the demands to be granted a tour?


Albeit with certain imposed restrictions, and a media field day for various Anti PIE and Empire outlets.


Quote:
If PIE is indeed given a tour then it would appear to me that the direct, "bullying" approach was in fact successful in the end?


It depends how you measure success, getting a result that is less than ideal or getting the best result possible. I'm pretty sure had first contact been significantly better handled by Captain Goldcore, all her requests would have been fulfilled and the Disciples wouldn't have stipulations in place for any offered tour.


This goes on what you put above, perhaps you should consider treating other races as your equals, and try asking for things rather than charging in after them. You'll find you get what you want more often with a bit of civility, and spending less time having your teeth kicked in.

No one cares how big your ego is if it fails to get ideal results.

When your gut instincts tell you something is wrong, trust them. When your heart tells you something is right, ignore it, check with your brain first. Accept nothing, challenge everything.