These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Assembly Hall

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

[Proposal] Make a Polarized Drone Module...

Author
Bumblefck
Kerensky Initiatives
#1 - 2015-09-07 18:53:32 UTC
...because 'why not?', and discrimination against drones is not cool XXX

Perfection is a dish best served like wasabi .

Bumble's Space Log

Rawketsled
Generic Corp Name
#2 - 2015-09-07 22:43:24 UTC
Bumblefck wrote:
...because 'why not?', and discrimination against drones is not cool XXX

This can only end with more capital lossmails.

I fully endorse this.
Bumblefck
Kerensky Initiatives
#3 - 2015-09-08 00:25:32 UTC
Click 'like' to support ;-)

Perfection is a dish best served like wasabi .

Bumble's Space Log

Bumblefck
Kerensky Initiatives
#4 - 2015-09-08 21:32:23 UTC
On balance, I might have to suggest that it would be restricted to sub-cap hulls, because, as you rightly point out, the number of capital lossmails will increase hilariously. This would be in the interests of balance.


Having said that, though, I would encourage CCP to allow them on carriers, so that the tears flow more freely.

Perfection is a dish best served like wasabi .

Bumble's Space Log

Bienator II
madmen of the skies
#5 - 2015-09-09 04:19:48 UTC
all polarized weapons are the close range variant of the weapon class. Drones would be long range. I don't think CCP wants that.

how to fix eve: 1) remove ECM 2) rename dampeners to ECM 3) add new anti-drone ewar for caldari 4) give offgrid boosters ongrid combat value

Bumblefck
Kerensky Initiatives
#6 - 2015-09-09 10:40:06 UTC
Have them affect Gardes only, in that case vOv

Perfection is a dish best served like wasabi .

Bumble's Space Log

Bumblefck
Kerensky Initiatives
#7 - 2015-09-11 11:56:35 UTC
Actually, thinking about it more, you might be able to make a case for this fictional Polarised Drone Module applicable only for non-sentry drones. If the polarised modules are only for the short range variants, light/medium/heavy drones are arguably the short-range drone variant, as they still must spend time MWDing to their target, much as you would if you ship was fitted with blasters or ACs.

Perfection is a dish best served like wasabi .

Bumble's Space Log

Ralph King-Griffin
New Eden Tech Support
#8 - 2015-09-11 22:20:42 UTC  |  Edited by: Ralph King-Griffin
Bumblefck wrote:
Actually, thinking about it more, you might be able to make a case for this fictional Polarised Drone Module applicable only for non-sentry drones. If the polarised modules are only for the short range variants, light/medium/heavy drones are arguably the short-range drone variant, as they still must spend time MWDing to their target, much as you would if you ship was fitted with blasters or ACs.

Have you seen the new bc thread atop this sub? f&I (I assumed that's where we we, it's usually where the silly ends upBlink)
Bumblefck
Kerensky Initiatives
#9 - 2015-09-12 13:53:33 UTC
Ralph King-Griffin wrote:
Bumblefck wrote:
Actually, thinking about it more, you might be able to make a case for this fictional Polarised Drone Module applicable only for non-sentry drones. If the polarised modules are only for the short range variants, light/medium/heavy drones are arguably the short-range drone variant, as they still must spend time MWDing to their target, much as you would if you ship was fitted with blasters or ACs.

Have you seen the new bc thread atop this sub? f&I (I assumed that's where we we, it's usually where the silly ends upBlink)



Ha, ha...easy to confuse! Thanks for the tip Big smile

Perfection is a dish best served like wasabi .

Bumble's Space Log

xttz
GSF Logistics and Posting Reserves
Goonswarm Federation
#10 - 2015-09-16 07:50:20 UTC
Bienator II wrote:
all polarized weapons are the close range variant of the weapon class. Drones would be long range. I don't think CCP wants that.


The Polarized module could simply enforce a cap on drone control range in the same way it limits resists.