These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Player Features and Ideas Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

CSM Little Things - Jayne's List

First post
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
afkalt
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#41 - 2015-09-02 09:18:41 UTC
Cearain wrote:

Yes and to overheat individual mods it would be very nice if the button was a bit bigger.


OT:

Shift click the mod, it toggles OH.
Kenneth Feld
Habitual Euthanasia
Pandemic Legion
#42 - 2015-09-02 11:11:05 UTC
Now that jump ranges for everything but JF have been suitably nerfed into the ground;

A: REMOVE ALL restrictions on stuff in cargo bays while in a SMA

B: If A isn't possible, make LO a charge, make drugs something so they can go in a SMA



In addition to this, makes it so drugs can be contracted, cause holy crap, nothing more annoying than not being able to contract a ship or container cause it contains drugs...
Otto Bismarck
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#43 - 2015-09-02 12:41:27 UTC
Can we get overload to persist through gate jump / WH / Bridge ETC?

Automatic Mail Forwarding (Ingame), So for example. I may want to have all of Otto's EVEmails to automatically forward to Alt1 similar to regular email forwarding.

Twitter: @ottobismarckEVE

EVE Down Under - a community for players in the AUTZ

In-game channel: evedownunder

Twitter: @evedownunder

https://www.facebook.com/evedownunder
Otto Bismarck
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#44 - 2015-09-02 12:42:15 UTC
Kenneth Feld wrote:


A: REMOVE ALL restrictions on stuff in cargo bays while in a SMA




...and this!

Twitter: @ottobismarckEVE

EVE Down Under - a community for players in the AUTZ

In-game channel: evedownunder

Twitter: @evedownunder

https://www.facebook.com/evedownunder
Jayne Fillon
#45 - 2015-09-02 18:05:09 UTC
Otto Bismarck wrote:
Kenneth Feld wrote:


A: REMOVE ALL restrictions on stuff in cargo bays while in a SMA




...and this!
Yeah this is a great one.

Can't shoot blues if you don't have any. Long Live NPSI.
Tipa Riot
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#46 - 2015-09-02 18:27:31 UTC
Little thing ... make it so that I can sort asset search results by jump range.

Don't like your watchlist proposal, EvE is not a game of consense to intel.

What's your intention behind #7 (Cyno between fleets)? The first idea I had was to fit a cyno, join your fleet and jump in my friends to kill your fleet... Twisted

I'm my own NPC alt.
Aves Asio
#47 - 2015-09-02 19:35:25 UTC
Can we have the RGB slider back please?
Frostys Virpio
State War Academy
Caldari State
#48 - 2015-09-02 19:39:37 UTC
Tipa Riot wrote:


Don't like your watchlist proposal, EvE is not a game of consense to intel.


Intel based on adding names from a spreadsheet is kind of stupid if you ask me...
Tyranis Marcus
Bloody Heathens
#49 - 2015-09-03 02:19:59 UTC
Good suggestions!

Also, put clone bays and repair services in more stations. It really doesn't make sense, from a lore standpoint, to have a station with absolutely no ability to do even small repairs on ships. Also, adding these two vital services will make more stations into attractive office locations, and allow pilots to spread out even more. Personally, I sometimes spend considerable time looking at mission agents or ice belt locations or whatever else I'm doing at the moment because I don't want to use a location that doesn't have the station services I need. If it comes down to it, I'd rather go to an already crowded system than not have repair services in station, and my corp will never put an office in a station without cloning services, which cuts off some otherwise attractive systems.

Jayne Fillon wrote:
  • "member corps" page of the alliance tab should have more info [/list]

    • Good call. Something I've always thought should be there is a member count. (I'm thinking of the member corps tab of the alliance show info window, here, actually. My corp isn't in an alliance, so I'm not even sure what's on the alliance tab in the corp window these days.

    Do not run. We are your friends.
    FT Diomedes
    The Graduates
    #50 - 2015-09-03 02:34:40 UTC
    Tipa Riot wrote:


    What's your intention behind #7 (Cyno between fleets)? The first idea I had was to fit a cyno, join your fleet and jump in my friends to kill your fleet... Twisted


    What Jayne means is this:
    Cyno Alt is in Fleet 1. She lights a cyno so I can jump in with my fleet. Now Fleet 2 needs a cyno in the same system. Cyno Alt still has her cyno up for a few more minutes. She leaves Fleet 1 and joins Fleet 2. Even though she is in Fleet 2, they cannot jump to her. Jayne wants Cyno Alt to be able to rebroadcast her cyno once she joins Fleet 2 and have them jump to her.

    CCP should add more NPC 0.0 space to open it up and liven things up: the Stepping Stones project.

    Areen Sassel
    Dirac Angestun Gesept
    #51 - 2015-09-03 03:00:49 UTC
    Reaver Glitterstim wrote:
    2.) similar to why we shouldn't remove margin trading because of the margin trading scam: it's a mechanic used for other purposes.


    Mind you, I'm all for CSM trying to get margin trading fixed (eg, if you can see a buy offer, it is possible to sell to it). I know not everyone agrees, but I find it a bit jarring the way everything else in the market interface is true but the space libertarians didn't fix that one.

    Tipa Riot wrote:
    Don't like your watchlist proposal, EvE is not a game of consense to intel.


    What if consensual watchlisting worked as at present, but non-consensual watchlisting was a paid-for (locator agent?) function - not more difficult to use UI-wise, but just with a non-zero cost?

    (This is, however, a nerf to highsec aggro, which I think should not be done without an accompanying buff.)
    Tyranis Marcus
    Bloody Heathens
    #52 - 2015-09-03 04:30:12 UTC
    Joe Risalo wrote:


    4) TCUs prioritize the furthest wreck/container, as opposed to the nearest, thus allowing for the use of multiple TCUs for those willing to give hold to carry 2.




    I assume you mean MTU's? That would be really nice to have as an option. It would also allow you to tractor the close wrecks while your MTU grabs the distant ones, so you're not competing with it at the beginning of looting then waiting idly on it to finish at the end.

    Do not run. We are your friends.
    Jayne Fillon
    #53 - 2015-09-03 07:49:37 UTC
    FT Diomedes wrote:
    Tipa Riot wrote:


    What's your intention behind #7 (Cyno between fleets)? The first idea I had was to fit a cyno, join your fleet and jump in my friends to kill your fleet... Twisted


    What Jayne means is this:
    Cyno Alt is in Fleet 1. She lights a cyno so I can jump in with my fleet. Now Fleet 2 needs a cyno in the same system. Cyno Alt still has her cyno up for a few more minutes. She leaves Fleet 1 and joins Fleet 2. Even though she is in Fleet 2, they cannot jump to her. Jayne wants Cyno Alt to be able to rebroadcast her cyno once she joins Fleet 2 and have them jump to her.
    exactly

    Can't shoot blues if you don't have any. Long Live NPSI.
    Galphii
    Caldari Provisions
    Caldari State
    #54 - 2015-09-03 09:10:05 UTC  |  Edited by: Galphii
    Currently, when you are landing on grid from warp, you can't target anything, many modules can't be activated etc, yet your ship is technically on grid as it can be damaged by smartbombs and other aoe effects.

    I'd like to see the 'you can't activate/target because you are in a warp' limit removed, so while you're slowing down to a halt on-grid, you can already target things if they're in range, and activate ship modules. There may be technical reasons for this to be in place though, and if so, disregard this idea.

    The ramifications of this little change could have knock-on effects I haven't thought of, yet I think it's something worth considering. When big, slow ships are dropping out of warp, they can start their targeting process earlier, and even engage before they've dropped out of warp entirely. Big ships need some love to make them worth flying and yeah, smaller ships could scram stuff a little quicker too, though their drop from warp is relatively minor.

    "Wow, that internet argument completely changed my fundamental belief system," said no one, ever.
    Numitor Eto
    State War Academy
    Caldari State
    #55 - 2015-09-03 18:35:08 UTC
    Hello and thank you for your feedback. I put more time into the proposal of UI changes that can save effort than the gameplay proposals.

    Reaver Glitterstim wrote:

    No reason to make contrived gameplay functions to deny people opportunities because they have a specific fit. If the fitted module is overperforming in an area, then change that area. For instance, a better change would be:
    1.) make FW hubs have rats that kite at long range
    2.) put in rats that sporadically use ECM jammers, making you have to re-target every now and then
    3.) more rats with light sensor dampening, just enough to screw up stabbed ships
    Those changes allow stabbed ships to continue farming, but adjust the ISK payouts against them.


    My proposal was only one option and most likely not the best one. But I'm all for changing something about the FW plexing system. Offensive plexing should harder or at least more engaging by spawning stronger or more rats. With the current spawn rate it is only a little more engaging that defensive plexing. To allow low sp characters to still do plexing for a living or for a common FW goal simply spawning more rats in different varieties (kiting and brawling ones) is probably better than simply increasing their stats.

    In defensive plexing, you should also have to fend off attacking rats. Currently, there is basically no risk in defensive plexing and it involves no engagement whatsoever. Right now, the agressor has to commit more into keeping people from defensive plexing than the plexer and offensive plexing himself. Banning stabs is probably a little short-sighted but could at least make this mechanic more dangerous for farmers and active FW players. To make people commit to their activity, CCP could also introduce a Entosis-like mechanic, which would have a similar effect.

    Looking at a gameplay mechanic targeted towards PVP in LowSec, I think Faction Warfare is lacking Warfare. Another option to adress this problem is to increase the LP payouts for player kills while lowering the payouts for plex mining.

    Reaver Glitterstim wrote:

    1.) denying opponents kill value is part of the dynamic nature of warfare in EVE


    The implants themselves are already lost, so you do hurt the person getting his pod caught. But why make it have no consequences except for lost isk? In a situation like this, nobody knows which implants the person lost and that he did lose implants. Thinking about denying kill value, I think of not losing your ship or not having expensive implants plugged in in the first place rather than unplugging implants. The loss exists, it is just invisible.

    Reaver Glitterstim wrote:
    Sometimes a pilot is stuck away from stations and wants to change implants. No reason to make that harder for them.


    As a compromise to adress this issue: What about limiting the restriction to not allow unplugging implants when being targeted?
    Riela Tanal
    Science and Trade Institute
    Caldari State
    #56 - 2015-09-03 19:43:22 UTC  |  Edited by: Riela Tanal
    1. Fitted ships will preload any thing that uses ammo such as guns, cap boosters, ancillary repair modules
    2. The ability to do a mass fit of ships, click on a fit and click fit ship, then quantity you want, and then a quantity taking modules from your existing hangar or corporate hangar.
    3. Mass Ship Rename - The ability to rename multiple ships instead of having to right click on every single one and change it manually.
    4. Mobile Depots that can be usable by fleet or corp members in some limited fashion
    5. More sizes for Dscan Inhibitors that can block ranges from 50km to 250km
    6. The ability to save a fit that has modules in the cargo instead of just ammo, this is important for Capital pilots and some doctrines that want you to keep spare modules for refitting on the fly while roaming.
    7. Special Cargo holds currently do not allow you to save their fits, the ammo hold for one of the Minmatar ships for example.
    8. The tag system for the overview, make it more persistent such as tagging specific pilots with a special icon so whenever they show up on grid.

    That is all I can come up with at the moment
    Cee Blue
    Deep Core Mining Inc.
    Caldari State
    #57 - 2015-09-06 01:08:58 UTC
    1. A character "follow" list that allows you to jump to cynos even when not in fleet. I can think of two ways to do this with one being its limited to characters on accounts linked to you or two its a list that requires both parties to agree to it, but is not limited to one persons accounts. (I just think it'd be nice to have....)

    2. Very short bubble "RF" timers so you cant instantly pop them. (5-10 minutes)
    Tyranis Marcus
    Bloody Heathens
    #58 - 2015-09-06 04:18:15 UTC
    Save weapon groups with ship fittings.

    Do not run. We are your friends.
    FishySquirrel
    Royal Amarr Institute
    Amarr Empire
    #59 - 2015-09-09 00:02:12 UTC
    1. Logistics inherits every single flag under the sun from the people they repair, why don't they get on KM the people they rep get on?
    Ransu Asanari
    Perkone
    Caldari State
    #60 - 2015-09-12 23:18:02 UTC
    Small FE for Contracts:

    Before we complete a contract, the last page shows us a summary of all of the items in the contract, but it's in plain text and not capturable. Can we have item summary be available to be copied so we can drop it into EVEPraisal?

    I find myself having to make a contract twice - once to my self so I can open it and get the item summary so I can get a price, and once to the actual recipient with that price.