These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE Technology Lab

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Error in typeIDs.yaml
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Desmont McCallock
#1 - 2015-09-02 09:28:00 UTC  |  Edited by: Desmont McCallock
While I was in the process of improving the SDEExternalsToSql tool, I stumbled upon an error in the typeIDs.yaml file.
Specifically the traits bonuses for 'Paladin Tash-Murkon Edition' (typeID: 34223) for skill bonus 'Amarr Battleship' (typeID: 3339) are duplicate with the exception of the bonus value.
More specific the first bonusText (ID: 1) should be the 'bonus to ship capacitor capacity' but it's the same with the second (ID: 2) which is 'bonus to Large Energy Turret optimal range'.

I hope this gets fixed (at least on the next SDE release).

If anyone is interested on the fixed file: typeIDs-Galatea1.0-Fixed.yaml
Desmont McCallock
#2 - 2015-09-30 16:52:33 UTC  |  Edited by: Desmont McCallock
This is still an issue with Vanguard. Noone does care about it there at CCP?
Captain Thunk
Explode. Now. Please.
Alliance. Now. Please.
#3 - 2015-09-30 17:04:53 UTC
Surely 'Paladin Tash-Murkon Edition' is defunct since the new skin system, it's just a Paladin now and the skin doesn't modify the typeID into a different item like it used to.
Desmont McCallock
#4 - 2015-09-30 18:32:48 UTC
Captain Thunk wrote:
Surely 'Paladin Tash-Murkon Edition' is defunct since the new skin system, it's just a Paladin now and the skin doesn't modify the typeID into a different item like it used to.
Thanks for your input which is much appreciated but my concern is mostly about data integrity and consistency.
Captain Thunk
Explode. Now. Please.
Alliance. Now. Please.
#5 - 2015-10-01 20:48:58 UTC
Desmont McCallock wrote:
Captain Thunk wrote:
Surely 'Paladin Tash-Murkon Edition' is defunct since the new skin system, it's just a Paladin now and the skin doesn't modify the typeID into a different item like it used to.
Thanks for your input which is much appreciated but my concern is mostly about data integrity and consistency.


Yeah its defunct data then, so basically you were right when you said "Noone does care about it there at CCP?"

There's 0 benefit to cleaning up and correcting stuff that is not used and 100% irrelevent, literally everything else is higher priority