These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Warfare & Tactics

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Caldari Navy MIA?
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Crosi Wesdo
War and Order
#101 - 2015-08-22 00:53:16 UTC
Legatus1982 wrote:
Crosi Wesdo wrote:
I dont even know where to start. Unsurprisingly your main example is the one occasion where you said you held cloak for 20 seconds which you assume is enough to assess what was happening with the NPCs. Once killed for example it can take 60-90 seconds for NPCs to respawn.

And i did camp lituria with corina and we were dual rep fit to tank rats. I imagine he no longer hangs on gate and uses alts to watch for targets instead.

So yeah, not sure where the lies are. The ignorance is quite strong in your post though.


Direct quotes are not ignorance big guy. You're hiding a lot of **** and I don't care to be bothered with it any more.


I asked you to link lies, but half of what you linked were quotes of things you said. Curious.

And if im hiding something, how would you know?
ALUCARD 1208
Digital Ghosts
Nourv Gate Security Commission
#102 - 2015-08-22 11:09:03 UTC
geesh is this guy a cearain alt hes starting to sound whingy ans salty just like him

BEBOPS ODE TO PERUNGA
Legatus1982
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#103 - 2015-08-22 17:29:55 UTC  |  Edited by: Legatus1982
Crosi Wesdo wrote:
Legatus1982 wrote:
Crosi Wesdo wrote:
I dont even know where to start. Unsurprisingly your main example is the one occasion where you said you held cloak for 20 seconds which you assume is enough to assess what was happening with the NPCs. Once killed for example it can take 60-90 seconds for NPCs to respawn.

And i did camp lituria with corina and we were dual rep fit to tank rats. I imagine he no longer hangs on gate and uses alts to watch for targets instead.

So yeah, not sure where the lies are. The ignorance is quite strong in your post though.


Direct quotes are not ignorance big guy. You're hiding a lot of **** and I don't care to be bothered with it any more.


I asked you to link lies, but half of what you linked were quotes of things you said. Curious.

And if im hiding something, how would you know?


I linked context showing clear evidence of you lying about something, there's no need for you to act like you're too stupid to understand that.

"whingy salty blah blah blah", it's almost as if you are all out of relevant things to say and have fallen back to personal attacks, the only defense you have left.

Well, you can always have more bebop spam in here about how "salty" and "whingy" everyone besides bebop is, that will definitely change the actual facts right? It has obviously accomplished so much already. Lol. You just don't have enough gallente in here spamming about how everyone else is whingy and salty. Just get more bebop posts! CTA! Raise the alarms! Gallente looks wrong on the internet spaceship forums! Everyone get in there and show calmil what you got!

Rofl, pathetic. You started off looking like you might have a relevant point, but all you've done is argue over the meaning of words and write a bunch of stories about eve online 10 years ago. None of which addresses the actual issue at all. Then you flip flopped around on certain obvious lies to save face, and called bebop in here to spam "salty, whingy", as if anyone is stupid enough not to see what you're doing.

At this point with all these guys coming in here to help the butthurt brigade, it actually looks more like bebop is desperately flopping around like a panicked fish. Why don't you just say something relevant to the issue and maybe look like you know what you're talking about instead of all the stupid deflecting? Because I know you're not actually this stupid, and all this is is your fragile egos getting in the way of you and your friends actually making a relevant point.
Estella Osoka
Cranky Bitches Who PMS
#104 - 2015-08-22 17:40:50 UTC
Let's see....

1. Legatus thinks avoiding faction navies is an exploit.
2. Others have already said it is not.
3. Legatus doesn't want to file a petition to prove it is.

If it is not an exploit, and you think it is bad game design; then any topic on fixing the game mechanic should be in Features & Ideas Discussion forum.

So basically, anything further is just trolling.
Legatus1982
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#105 - 2015-08-22 17:45:15 UTC  |  Edited by: Legatus1982
Legatus1982 wrote:

Rofl, pathetic. You started off looking like you might have a relevant point, but all you've done is argue over the meaning of words and write a bunch of stories about eve online 10 years ago. None of which addresses the actual issue at all.

...

Why don't you just say something relevant to the issue and maybe look like you know what you're talking about instead of all the stupid deflecting?




Estella Osoka wrote:
Let's see....

1. Legatus thinks avoiding faction navies is an exploit.
2. Others have already said it is not.
3. Legatus doesn't want to file a petition to prove it is.

If it is not an exploit, and you think it is bad game design; then any topic on fixing the game mechanic should be in Features & Ideas Discussion forum.

So basically, anything further is just trolling.


I mean, I could write a whole new post, but if you're just going to spam irrelevant garbage from 5 pages ago, I guess we can waste more time.
Nat Silverguard
Aideron Robotics
Aideron Robotics.
#106 - 2015-08-22 18:17:52 UTC
Legatus1982 wrote:
Legatus1982 wrote:

Rofl, pathetic. You started off looking like you might have a relevant point, but all you've done is argue over the meaning of words and write a bunch of stories about eve online 10 years ago. None of which addresses the actual issue at all.

...

Why don't you just say something relevant to the issue and maybe look like you know what you're talking about instead of all the stupid deflecting?




Estella Osoka wrote:
Let's see....

1. Legatus thinks avoiding faction navies is an exploit.
2. Others have already said it is not.
3. Legatus doesn't want to file a petition to prove it is.

If it is not an exploit, and you think it is bad game design; then any topic on fixing the game mechanic should be in Features & Ideas Discussion forum.

So basically, anything further is just trolling.


I mean, I could write a whole new post, but if you're just going to spam irrelevant garbage from 5 pages ago, I guess we can waste more time.


what is your point actually?

people have taught you the mechanics, instead of accepting and learn from it, you felt upset, why? Ugh

Just Add Water
Crosi Wesdo
War and Order
#107 - 2015-08-22 19:00:36 UTC  |  Edited by: Crosi Wesdo
Legatus1982 wrote:
I linked context showing clear evidence of you lying about something, there's no need for you to act like you're too stupid to understand that.

"whingy salty blah blah blah", it's almost as if you are all out of relevant things to say and have fallen back to personal attacks, the only defense you have left.

Well, you can always have more bebop spam in here about how "salty" and "whingy" everyone besides bebop is, that will definitely change the actual facts right? It has obviously accomplished so much already. Lol. You just don't have enough gallente in here spamming about how everyone else is whingy and salty. Just get more bebop posts! CTA! Raise the alarms! Gallente looks wrong on the internet spaceship forums! Everyone get in there and show calmil what you got!

Rofl, pathetic. You started off looking like you might have a relevant point, but all you've done is argue over the meaning of words and write a bunch of stories about eve online 10 years ago. None of which addresses the actual issue at all. Then you flip flopped around on certain obvious lies to save face, and called bebop in here to spam "salty, whingy", as if anyone is stupid enough not to see what you're doing.

At this point with all these guys coming in here to help the butthurt brigade, it actually looks more like bebop is desperately flopping around like a panicked fish. Why don't you just say something relevant to the issue and maybe look like you know what you're talking about instead of all the stupid deflecting? Because I know you're not actually this stupid, and all this is is your fragile egos getting in the way of you and your friends actually making a relevant point.


This is the first time ive been accused of bat-phoning out-of-game in a forum thread. I cant imagine what it must be like wandering around the empty paranoid halls of your mind.

I started off looking like i had a relevant point did i? Then why have you been sperging at 11 out of 10 since my very first post where i said that the described ways people are dealing with NPC aggro are absolutely not an exploit as you said they were lol.

Alas, it started off like you might have just been ill informed and greatly naive and perhaps worth educating in simple EVE terminology, but it is clear now that you are just interested in misquoting, disregarding peoples meaning even though they explained it to you, accusing people of lying just because you dont like the truth, accusing people of cheating even though CCP specifically says they are not and generally trolling at a rudimentary level.

Well, i dont think you are a Cerain alt. While you both employ similar strategies of twisting what people say into an opposite meaning to support their argument lol.

Cerain knows a lot more about the game than you do but still thinks everything is broken and is unable to accept that is just his opinion. You seemingly know nothing about the game and think its broken and are unable to accept that you are using fundamentally wrong language when you accuse everyone of cheating when they do something you dont like.
Legatus1982
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#108 - 2015-08-23 18:39:28 UTC  |  Edited by: Legatus1982
More exploit definition deflecting instead of addressing the actual issue, imagine my surprise. Try to imagine, if you can... the amount of surprise I felt when you instantly reverted back to the definition of exploit. We never knew you were going to go back to that pointless diversion from the OP 5 pages ago.

And the sad part is that you're still wrong anyways. Just because we are in the eve forums doesn't mean every use of the word exploit has to be in the context of CCP-declared bannable "exploiting". It's not that way now, it never was that way, and it's never going to be that way, so lay off it already, you're wrong, period, move on and learn from your mistakes. Stop with the stupid incorrect deflections and make a relevant point. FFS.
Esturary
Busted Blonde
#109 - 2015-08-23 19:43:10 UTC
Topic's getting old. It is what it is.

Lead, follow or get out of the way.
Crosi Wesdo
War and Order
#110 - 2015-08-24 01:39:44 UTC  |  Edited by: Crosi Wesdo
Legatus1982 wrote:
More exploit definition deflecting instead of addressing the actual issue, imagine my surprise. Try to imagine, if you can... the amount of surprise I felt when you instantly reverted back to the definition of exploit. We never knew you were going to go back to that pointless diversion from the OP 5 pages ago.

And the sad part is that you're still wrong anyways. Just because we are in the eve forums doesn't mean every use of the word exploit has to be in the context of CCP-declared bannable "exploiting". It's not that way now, it never was that way, and it's never going to be that way, so lay off it already, you're wrong, period, move on and learn from your mistakes. Stop with the stupid incorrect deflections and make a relevant point. FFS.


Just because CCP say it isnt an exploit doesnt mean it isnt an exploit?

Ok mate...

i think we are done here lol. Good attempt at trolling, nothing to write home about.
Legatus1982
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#111 - 2015-08-24 02:06:18 UTC
Crosi Wesdo wrote:
Legatus1982 wrote:
More exploit definition deflecting instead of addressing the actual issue, imagine my surprise. Try to imagine, if you can... the amount of surprise I felt when you instantly reverted back to the definition of exploit. We never knew you were going to go back to that pointless diversion from the OP 5 pages ago.

And the sad part is that you're still wrong anyways. Just because we are in the eve forums doesn't mean every use of the word exploit has to be in the context of CCP-declared bannable "exploiting". It's not that way now, it never was that way, and it's never going to be that way, so lay off it already, you're wrong, period, move on and learn from your mistakes. Stop with the stupid incorrect deflections and make a relevant point. FFS.


Just because CCP say it isnt an exploit doesnt mean it isnt an exploit?

Ok mate...

i think we are done here lol. Good attempt at trolling, nothing to write home about.


Roll read the text pls
H Zub
Captain Morgan Society
#112 - 2015-08-24 09:08:31 UTC
Just to spread some light here...

0.5 navy can be tanked easily in any ship size. The time it takes for the navy to start attacking you seems random, but it also depends on if your own agro timers. The end result is sometimes it will take up to 30 sec for the navy to start attacking.

All the above is not exact numbers. However theres no need to use any kind of exploit to survive.

How'd ya feel like scraping the barnicles off me rudder matey
Crosi Wesdo
War and Order
#113 - 2015-08-24 09:37:28 UTC
Legatus1982 wrote:
Crosi Wesdo wrote:
Legatus1982 wrote:
More exploit definition deflecting instead of addressing the actual issue, imagine my surprise. Try to imagine, if you can... the amount of surprise I felt when you instantly reverted back to the definition of exploit. We never knew you were going to go back to that pointless diversion from the OP 5 pages ago.

And the sad part is that you're still wrong anyways. Just because we are in the eve forums doesn't mean every use of the word exploit has to be in the context of CCP-declared bannable "exploiting". It's not that way now, it never was that way, and it's never going to be that way, so lay off it already, you're wrong, period, move on and learn from your mistakes. Stop with the stupid incorrect deflections and make a relevant point. FFS.


Just because CCP say it isnt an exploit doesnt mean it isnt an exploit?

Ok mate...

i think we are done here lol. Good attempt at trolling, nothing to write home about.


Roll read the text pls


You basically said, to paraphrase;

"theres no need to use language that perfectly describes a situation, in fact its often better to use language that is out of context and is a perfect antithesis to what would be said if we all agreed to stick to the correct context. This way we can use nasty words that make us feel better about our inadequacies"

So i think my point still stands lol.
Legatus1982
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#114 - 2015-08-24 10:46:21 UTC
You had to paraphrase with a paragraph the same size as the one I originally wrote? How interesting. Roll

You're a joke frankly and you aren't worth the time anymore. Best of luck to you dude.
Crosi Wesdo
War and Order
#115 - 2015-08-24 10:59:29 UTC
Thats about the 10th time ive not been worth your time lol.

And a paraphrase does not have to be more concise than the original statement, but is often used to more clearly state its meaning. Which i pretty much nailed.
Dread Operative
Lowlife.
Snuffed Out
#116 - 2015-08-25 20:18:30 UTC
CalMil is currently building up assets to support blues in northern Placid, don't worry we are still here.
George Gouillot
MASS
Pandemic Horde
#117 - 2015-08-26 07:25:05 UTC
Dread Operative wrote:
CalMil is currently building up assets to support blues in northern Placid, don't worry we are still here.


Got a whole militia of pets?
Well played!
Dread Operative
Lowlife.
Snuffed Out
#118 - 2015-08-26 14:12:34 UTC
George Gouillot wrote:
Dread Operative wrote:
CalMil is currently building up assets to support blues in northern Placid, don't worry we are still here.


Got a whole militia of pets?
Well played!


****, posted with wrong toon. Oh well.
Spar Multendor
why did i join this corp
Not Purple Shoot It.
#119 - 2015-09-06 19:43:42 UTC  |  Edited by: Spar Multendor
Wow! All this because three guys can think outside the box. Luv you Legolas
croakroach
24th Imperial Crusade
Amarr Empire
#120 - 2015-09-06 19:51:39 UTC
We are doing the Militia a valuable service by disrupting enemy logistics and ensuring all the farmer stay in lowsec where they belong.

The navy mechanics have not changed since FW started. We are not the first to fully understand the mechanics and use them to our advantage; we will not be the last. Calling "clever use of game mechanics" an exploit because you don't understand the mechanics is just childish and petty. We are not invincible; come pop a few of us if we are causing you this much hassle.