EVE General Discussion

Player can intervene against incursion fleet. That is what you are missing. As long as you miss that point, all what you say is complete BS and worthless to read.

CONCORD.

They don't miss.


You are running HS most profitable activity, in HS most bling ships, with no player intervention, under CONCORD protection, in a mechanic that otherwise disables the system.

I understand your profits are important, but try to remember there is a larger game at stake here.
Its against all of EVE ethics, what you are doing.

Disable CONCORD in HS Incursions.

Or are you saying you dont have the balls to compete?

Whats terrible about it.

Nobody stays in an Incursion system.
The modifiers make all activity pointless, except for bling CONCORD immune Incursion fleets.

As to transit, well, too bad.
Funny you would resort to blaming a poor itinerant transitor who can see in on the map, as an excuse for your far larger fleets and bling ships to farm with complete immunity and safety.



Makes perfect sense to me.

And there is another 50 page thread driving exactly towards this same point btw.

Read the thread.

Not only did I start it, I also have responded to everything in it.

If thats not enough for you, check here:
CCP - End Highsec Incursions
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=421040&find=unread

You are going to lose this.

Also yes, there is another thead on the subject, your point?

It's everyone privilege to use the system with it's current security features, you are the one trying to deny that for your personal interests, not me. Eve the act of fleeing you refer to is hampered by creating new engagement rules with concord removal.

And again, those ship do not operate by any special rules, you are free to engage them as you see fit with the same restrictions as any other ship in highsec. Being a loot pinata has never been cause for a rule change. That's a non-argument unless you suddenly want any system with a bowhead, overloaded freighter or blinged mission ship to lose concord protection.

Lastly, I'm not here to help you get your jollies. And I'm not going to support bad mechanics to help you do what you can already do yourself. I never claimed to be "tough" because being tough at internet pixel space ships isn't exactly an aspiration of mine.

Indeed.

Instead farming HS profits in HS security in superbling ships, is.

Barring CCP coming to their senses, I cant wait till CODE or some other HS farming control entity finally finds a way to start muscling in on you.

Its not like you are hard to find.

I'm going to assume you're not trolling or an idiot. Because right now those really are the only two options for such a stupid statement

Without concord the only thing that would stop people from ganking newbies all day long would be the lack of newbies joining the game. CCP saw the stupidity of the camps back in the early days of testing. That's why concord was introduced. Eve was absolutely no fun without the concept of highsec and concord.


Yes and I remember not long ago when people were blaming plex prices and prices in general on boxers while demanding the banning of isboxer and such. So here we are 9 months post repeater ban and plex prices along with other prices continued climbing regardless. The reality is Nullsec and WH alliances laugh at the piddly isk that incursion runners make.

If you want to run incursions all you need is a t1 battleship with t2 tank skills. Meta 4 guns work and most communities accept them. Only a handful of communities are actually maximizing their incursion fleets (I can think of 2). The vast majority of incursion communities don't even live up to the stereotype that some are trying to push here.

Like I said earlier my entire VG fleet including booster costs under 6b to replace.


I would earn slightly less per hour while a whole lot more AFK if I took up some offers to join certain groups in null. If I went to WHs I could earn over double an hour what I'm earning now. Why don't I? Many reasons including some real life related ones.


I can think of several including the fact that concord cannot work the way you're asking without major work on the programming side of things. You want CCP to invest massive amount of work on something because you're too lazy to do the work yourself. You're the ultimate cancer in eve.

You could easily introduce PVP to incursions if you wanted but that takes effort. Instead you demand that CCP take developer hours and put into a complicated and ultimately stupid plan to disable concord selectively.

Stopped reading right there.

If you want people to actually read your effort in posting, it might be a good idea not to insult them right at the start.

Or you are an idiot, or a troll.

See how I did that? Worked.

So you HS afK mine, and run HS Incursions at no risk.

Im beginning to see the picture here.

Love how you completely skipped moving Incursions out of HS.

Hows that for intellectual dishonesty.



You must have not read my previous post.
Pretty clear indicator of a troll, if you ask me.

Speaking of which, good attempt to run this thread into a lock.
Maybe even successful, but the other 50 page thread still stands.