These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Player Features and Ideas Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

CCP You need to add More Role Bonuses for Command Ships Please!!

First post
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Segraina Skyblazer
Doomheim
#1 - 2015-08-21 02:02:37 UTC
Before I started training for CS last year I wasn't aware of PYFA or EFT and so I just went on here say as far as my training went. Now a year later and having max out skills for the Astarte, I've been EFT warrioring like mad to find an appropriate fit for the Astarte to run Level 4's in and later C3 WHs. But to my immense frustration, I can't find a fit that is anywhere close to cap stable with 2 med reppers unless I fit 6 darn cap mods whereas only 3 is needed for the Deimos. The Deimos has the same 4 mids and 6 lows slot layout as the Astarte, gets higher speeds, lower sig and almost twice the cap recharge. I find this to be a huge oversight on CCPs part in not properly balancing CSs after the HACs got their delicious buff. So I propose to CCP to please continue balancing the higher class of ships. SInce my last proposal for CSs didn't meet with favorable response, I've proposed another simpler one aimed at the root of CSs lacklusterness compared to the HACs.

Since Command Ships have crappy cap recharge I propose to make them cap booster dependent and increase their cargo holds in the ranges of 650m3 to 750m3.

New Additional Role Bonuses for Command Ships

Role Bonus:
• Can use 3 Warfare Link modules simultaneously
* 70% reduction in Micro Jump Drive reactivation delay
* 100% bonus to Cap Boost Injected amount
Zan Shiro
Doomheim
#2 - 2015-08-21 02:14:13 UTC  |  Edited by: Zan Shiro
Your other thread right beneath this one right before I posted not good enough?



CS and HAC's are different animals for starters.

Several links already covered in your other thread as well. Run links or run for combat and don't mix the 2 for better results was the guidance.


CS' are a great force multiplier....expect tradeoffs with that.
Segraina Skyblazer
Doomheim
#3 - 2015-08-21 02:49:09 UTC
Zan Shiro wrote:
Your other thread right beneath this one right before I posted not good enough?



CS and HAC's are different animals for starters.

Several links already covered in your other thread as well. Run links or run for combat and don't mix the 2 for better results was the guidance.


CS' are a great force multiplier....expect tradeoffs with that.


Well the previous post lacked oversight since I'm not familiar enough with missiles to post a proper balance for them compared to the turret based Command Ships.

I don't use CSs to run links, I do that with a T3C. Until CCP get rid of OGB, running links on CSs isn't all that beneficial compared to a T3C.
ISD Buldath
#4 - 2015-08-21 05:27:18 UTC
Quote:
17. Redundant and re-posted threads will be locked.

As a courtesy to other forum users, please search to see if there is a thread already open on the topic you wish to discuss. If so, please place your comments there instead. Multiple threads on the same subject clutter up the forums needlessly, causing good feedback and ideas to be lost. Please keep discussions regarding a topic to a single thread.




Use the one you posted earlier, instead of adding another post. You can edit the post too change your ideas.

It can be found here

Locked.

~ISD Buldath

Instructor King of the Forums! Knight of the General Discussion

Support, Training and Resources Division

Interstellar Services Department

I do not respond to EVE-Mails regarding forum moderation.