These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Ships & Modules

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
123Next page
 

T2 armor plates - what's the point, CCP?

Author
Sizeof Void
Ninja Suicide Squadron
#1 - 2012-01-02 14:22:08 UTC
Rolled Tungsten Plates (meta 4) have lower CPU and PG reqs, less mass, lower skill reqs - and are more available and cheaper (thanks to the increased drop rate from NPC wrecks) - than the equivalent T2 plates. So, why even bother having T2 plates in the game?

Oh, I guess you do get an additional 3 armor HP with the T2 plates... wow... gee whiz.... (yeah, a bit of sarcasm here)

How about that long overdue buff to T2 plates?
Bruce Kemp
Suddenly taken over
#2 - 2012-01-02 14:40:47 UTC
+1 for a buff to tec2 plates.
Shukuzen Kiraa
F4G Wild Weasel
#3 - 2012-01-02 14:44:34 UTC
Bruce Kemp wrote:
+1 for a buff to tec2 plates.


This^
Firestorm Delta
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#4 - 2012-01-02 14:54:31 UTC
Sizeof Void wrote:
Rolled Tungsten Plates (meta 4) have lower CPU and PG reqs, less mass, lower skill reqs - and are more available and cheaper (thanks to the increased drop rate from NPC wrecks) - than the equivalent T2 plates. So, why even bother having T2 plates in the game?

Oh, I guess you do get an additional 3 armor HP with the T2 plates... wow... gee whiz.... (yeah, a bit of sarcasm here)

How about that long overdue buff to T2 plates?


Tps are the same... the Meta lvl 4 PWNGE painter is better then the t2 in just about every way.
Death Toll007
Perkone
Caldari State
#5 - 2012-01-02 15:08:23 UTC
While we are at it... ECM is in the same boat... ECM is just not that effective...

Need to restore falcon and buff t2 mods to make up for it. Twisted

-DT
Lunkwill Khashour
Ministry of War
Amarr Empire
#6 - 2012-01-02 15:38:38 UTC
Make meta plates more rare is also a solution but it'ld be nice if all T2 would be plain better (except for fitting and/or cap use)

While you're at it, introduce 3200mm and 6400mm plates.
Vixorz
Cabronazos
#7 - 2012-01-02 15:55:05 UTC
Quote:
How about that long overdue buff to T2 plates?

+1

Chuck Norris would approve this if he were part of CCP. Roll
Goose99
#8 - 2012-01-02 16:06:13 UTC
Buff faction guns too.
Malcanis
Vanishing Point.
The Initiative.
#9 - 2012-01-02 16:50:23 UTC
Clearly the answer here is a hull upgrades specialisation skill that gives some specific bonus when using T2 plates.

"Just remember later that I warned against any change to jump ranges or fatigue. You earned whats coming."

Grath Telkin, 11.10.2016

Zhilia Mann
Tide Way Out Productions
#10 - 2012-01-02 18:13:55 UTC
Malcanis wrote:
Clearly the answer here is a hull upgrades specialisation skill that gives some specific bonus when using T2 plates.


Now this I can approve of. Reduced mass addition? Of course it would have to be minimum 7.5% per level to beat RRT at 5, but whatever.
Buzzmong
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#11 - 2012-01-02 18:45:54 UTC
Zhilia Mann wrote:
Malcanis wrote:
Clearly the answer here is a hull upgrades specialisation skill that gives some specific bonus when using T2 plates.


Now this I can approve of. Reduced mass addition? Of course it would have to be minimum 7.5% per level to beat RRT at 5, but whatever.


Now that's actually a rather good idea.
Templar Dane
Amarrian Vengeance
Ragequit Cancel Sub
#12 - 2012-01-02 18:51:02 UTC
Firestorm Delta wrote:


Tps are the same... the Meta lvl 4 PWNGE painter is better then the t2 in just about every way.


Last I checked, they are easier to fit and that's all.

rolled tungsten plates are easier to fit and have less added mass. Same armor.

So, tech 2 are WORSE in every way.
Lunkwill Khashour
Ministry of War
Amarr Empire
#13 - 2012-01-02 19:08:10 UTC
Malcanis wrote:
Clearly the answer here is a hull upgrades specialisation skill that gives some specific bonus when using T2 plates.


Great idea!

Tash'k Omar
Indefinite Mass
#14 - 2012-01-02 20:36:16 UTC  |  Edited by: Tash'k Omar
Death Toll007 wrote:
While we are at it... ECM is in the same boat... ECM is just not that effective...

Need to restore falcon and buff t2 mods to make up for it. Twisted

-DT


Not the same. Meta 4s cost significantly more.

For armor plates, there is literally 0 reason to use T2 over meta 4.

EDIT: Hit the wrong quote or something lol. I thought I was quoting TPs.

ECM is similar, TPs are fine as is imo. T2 ECM modules need a buff (and I know 90% of people here will despise me for saying that).
SpaceSquirrels
#15 - 2012-01-03 00:41:08 UTC
Hmm I like the idea of a skill, or a bonus on a ship that reduces armor plate penalties... prot maybe?
Trinkets friend
Sudden Buggery
Sending Thots And Players
#16 - 2012-01-03 00:58:58 UTC
Reality check guys. There's uck fall chance of making T2 armour plates have more armour than their metalevel equivalents because it would just make armour buffer fits that much more ridiculous than they already can be (eg, 750K EHP Proteus or Legion is already dumb enough).

I would say the only hope you've got is a reduced mass or velocity penalty from T2 plates. Which would make buffer armour ships more maneuverable and stop all the mongfaces whining constantly about "bawww winmatar are too OP" and crap like that. Basically, if your T2 plate lets you go a smidge faster than fitting T1, people will go wild over them for ships like the Deimos, Harby, etc. Plus, bonus of bonuses, this wouldn't unbalance the game as much as making ships even more tougher.

It is clear CCP is concerned with making their module stats at least make sense (eg; the rebalancing of faction and T2 probe launhers, gang links, etc). So it is an anomaly that a lot of T2 modules actually suck compared to the meta-4 variants. There's no sensible reason for this aside from CCP not having the time or carefactor to fix these anomalies.
Sizeof Void
Ninja Suicide Squadron
#17 - 2012-01-03 01:38:20 UTC
Trinkets friend wrote:

So it is an anomaly that a lot of T2 modules actually suck compared to the meta-4 variants. There's no sensible reason for this aside from CCP not having the time or carefactor to fix these anomalies.

Actually, in the case of Rolled Tungsten plates vs. T2 plates, the situation was somewhat "sensible" until CCP randomly decided to massively increase the drop rate of the meta-4 items from NPC wrecks. Prior to this change, Rolled Tungsten plates were a low supply / high demand item, and the prices were correspondingly much higher than the T2 plates.

But, even at higher prices, Rolled Tungsten plates are still more popular than T2 plates, due to their across-the-board superiority. So, rather than rollback the meta-4 drop rates, I think everyone would prefer to see some sort of a buff to T2 plates.

Right, folks?
Misanthra
Alternative Enterprises
#18 - 2012-01-03 03:10:25 UTC
Tash'k Omar wrote:
[quote=Death Toll007]ECM is similar, TPs are fine as is imo. T2 ECM modules need a buff (and I know 90% of people here will despise me for saying that).



thye'd have to be open minded to see why. Main thing about named gear to make t2 gear even better to increase sales a good idea is it would make people pay more for thier jam rides.

For me, good named ecm mods drop often from rats. Throw in some rt plate drops, named prop mod and if you mix your pve and pvp just right and the loot table gods like you, half if not more of a jam ship fit is "free" mod wise. Which is real funky with the ecm mods, a scorp can be like 6 of them easy. talking full rainbow and 2 mutli's as a catch all. "Free" mods in that you didn't pay for em, less cap need and easier fitting...win win win for the person who takes the few extra seconds to hit every rat wreck.

Better t2 to make them worth buying and when you kill a jammer, you'd actually have them lose money in the jam mods. As is now, hell if I stil pvp'd and I died I got full sets of named rainbow from loot drops I can't be bothered to sell at hubs since I don't wan't to rebuy them when rl schedule lets me get bo back to pvp. Not mssing the isk from sales I ain't making now...sure as hell won't be missing if/when when blown up lol.
Julia Connor
P R O M E T H E U S
From Anoikis
#19 - 2012-01-03 03:15:03 UTC
Buff shield extenders to 4k hp while you are at it.
Hrett
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#20 - 2012-01-03 03:31:15 UTC
Sizeof Void wrote:
Rolled Tungsten Plates (meta 4) have lower CPU and PG reqs, less mass, lower skill reqs - and are more available and cheaper (thanks to the increased drop rate from NPC wrecks) - than the equivalent T2 plates. So, why even bother having T2 plates in the game?

Oh, I guess you do get an additional 3 armor HP with the T2 plates... wow... gee whiz.... (yeah, a bit of sarcasm here)

How about that long overdue buff to T2 plates?


Lets throw in all meta levels of plates. The RTPs are so good there is literally no reason to fit any other meta or T2. The lower Tiers that give less armor should have some other redeeming quality. Right now, they dont. The whole lineup needs looking at.

spaceship, Spaceship, SPACESHIP!

123Next page