These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Crime & Punishment

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Oh the irony!

First post
Author
Schmantoo
State War Academy
Caldari State
#241 - 2015-08-19 07:33:32 UTC
Code, the RP nerds? They are still a thing?
Leto Thule
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#242 - 2015-08-19 13:29:19 UTC
Remiel Pollard wrote:
Leto Thule wrote:
Remiel Pollard wrote:
Leto Thule wrote:
/soapbox


Killboards demonstrate more than anything activity and experience, which, IMO, is more valuable intel than ability anyway.


Ok, so, how do you glean a persons experience from a killboard? Most of us have been all over new eden, and if you plan on using my killboard to determine my experience youll have quite a long read.

And if your tracking a mission runner or miner/hauler/whatever, using a killboard isnt going to help you track activity.

Im not disputing you, just pointing our that killboards all used too often as a one stop shop to rate players, and its not always gonna work that way.


No, I don't use it as a one-stop source of intel already, I merely stated that more than anything else, killboards demonstrate, or indicate, activity and experience, which in my opinion, is more valuable intel than ability, because ability can be circumvented with strategy. I chose my words very carefully, and in no way did I stipulate that a killboard is the be-all end-all source of information on a player/corp/alliance. It is, however, a good place to start. Much like how one starts their research for a university paper on Wikipedia, but ends with a page-long list of other sources when the paper is handed in.


Yes you did. Apologies, long day and I misread.

Thunderdome ringmaster, Community Leader and Lord Inquisitor to the Court of Crime and Punishment

ISD Buldath
#243 - 2015-08-19 14:49:24 UTC
Quote:
7. Discussion of real life religion and politics is prohibited.

Discussion of real life religion and politics is strictly prohibited on the EVE Online forums. Discussions of this nature often creates animosity between forum users due to real life political or military conflicts. CCP promotes the growth of a gaming community where equality is at the forefront. Nationalist, religious or political affiliations are not part of EVE Online, and should not be part of discussion on the EVE Online forums.


I have removed some offending posts.

~ISD Buldath

Instructor King of the Forums! Knight of the General Discussion

Support, Training and Resources Division

Interstellar Services Department

I do not respond to EVE-Mails regarding forum moderation.

ISD Buldath
#244 - 2015-08-19 15:06:48 UTC
Quote:
4. Personal attacks are prohibited.

Commonly known as flaming, personal attacks are posts that are designed to personally berate or insult another forum user. Posts of this nature are not conductive to the community spirit that CCP promotes. As such, this kind of behavior will not be tolerated.

5. Trolling is prohibited.

Trolling is a defined as a post that is deliberately designed for the purpose of angering and insulting other players in an attempt to incite retaliation or an emotional response. Posts of this nature are disruptive, often abusive, and do not contribute to the sense of community that CCP promote.

27. Off-topic posting is prohibited.

Off-topic posting is permitted within reason, as sometimes a single comment may color or lighten the tone of discussion. However, excessive posting of off-topic remarks in an attempt to derail a thread may result in the thread being locked, or a forum warning being issued to the off-topic poster.


Offending posts have been scrubbed.

~ISD Buldath

Instructor King of the Forums! Knight of the General Discussion

Support, Training and Resources Division

Interstellar Services Department

I do not respond to EVE-Mails regarding forum moderation.

Mobadder Thworst
Doomheim
#245 - 2015-08-19 16:53:02 UTC
Leto Thule wrote:
Remiel Pollard wrote:
Leto Thule wrote:
/soapbox


Killboards demonstrate more than anything activity and experience, which, IMO, is more valuable intel than ability anyway.


Ok, so, how do you glean a persons experience from a killboard? Most of us have been all over new eden, and if you plan on using my killboard to determine my experience youll have quite a long read.

And if your tracking a mission runner or miner/hauler/whatever, using a killboard isnt going to help you track activity.

Im not disputing you, just pointing our that killboards all used too often as a one stop shop to rate players, and its not always gonna work that way.


I don't pretend to be able to weigh everything about a guy's skill from a KB.

The only time I will look at a KB is if I'm picking a risky fight and I want to know whether I need to ship up.

I can tell you that I've found, on average, top ranked players on BC typically have a very firm command of mechanics. When I'm picking fights, I often pick from a position of weakness. I've got quite a few kills where I'm killing 2 or more tiers up(cruiser with frig, etc...).

When I do that, I'm counting on the other Guy to make mistakes... I can't win if he plays smart. Top ranked guys who have kb's that demonstrate lots of small team or solo kills don't make those mistakes.

I think kill/loss ratios say very little. You can make some guesses about how much risk a person accepts and playstyle. However, I think battleclinic specifically (through the point system) is a great representation of playstyle and likelihood of my success in a risky baiting scenario.
Austneal
Nero Fazione
#246 - 2015-08-19 18:39:00 UTC  |  Edited by: Austneal
Remiel Pollard wrote:

Austneal was new and had yet to prove his capabilities to people who he'd never flown with, and was also largely inactive

Fair point in the first part. However, I was not at all inactive. As stated in previous posts, I was online almost every day and had participated in fleets

Remiel Pollard wrote:

Austneal was not invited, he applied, and was, by default, on probation

Austneal chose to do something that was particularly high-risk with no real benefit to the alliance at large

Austneal joined a war corp, NOT a ganking corp - this is an important one to remember, because there are different requirements for each

All fair enough points

Remiel Pollard wrote:

And finally, there isn't a corp or alliance that wouldn't have reacted the same way

I've been in quite a few corps and alliances, and I've only ever seen one other that reacted like this.

Remiel Pollard wrote:

The losses don't matter. The incompetence does. That's the bottom line, and there's nothing in that bottom line that even suggests that losing something 'juicy' had anything to do with it. You're inserting that fiction all on your own.

Also, the corp was kicked before anyone was told what had happened. The only thing the leadership had to go on for kicking the corp was the ship loss itself.

That coupled with the fact that the corp was kicked without even attempting to get more information suggests that it may be a little less than "fiction"
Carrie-Anne Moss
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#247 - 2015-08-19 18:45:55 UTC
Austneal wrote:
Remiel Pollard wrote:

Austneal was new and had yet to prove his capabilities to people who he'd never flown with, and was also largely inactive


Fair point in the first part. However, I was not at all inactive. As stated in previous posts, I was online almost every day and had participated in fleets

Remiel Pollard wrote:

Austneal was not invited, he applied, and was, by default, on probation

Austneal chose to do something that was particularly high-risk with no real benefit to the alliance at large

Austneal joined a war corp, NOT a ganking corp - this is an important one to remember, because there are different requirements for each


All fair enough points

Remiel Pollard wrote:

And finally, there isn't a corp or alliance that wouldn't have reacted the same way


I've been in quite a few corps and alliances, and I've only ever seen one other that reacted like this.

Remiel Pollard wrote:

The losses don't matter. The incompetence does. That's the bottom line, and there's nothing in that bottom line that even suggests that losing something 'juicy' had anything to do with it. You're inserting that fiction all on your own.


Also, the corp was kicked before anyone was told what had happened. The only thing the leadership had to go on for kicking the corp was the ship loss itself.

That coupled with the fact that the corp was kicked without even attempting to get more information suggests that it may be a little less than "fiction"

NPC Corp posters shouldnt be allowed to post outside of New Citizens Forum.
People that die with MINING LASER UPGRADES in their cargohold shouldnt be allowed to post in C&P unless they are crying about real pvpers/bad guys

Oh wait you are.

Scrub just stop posting. No one here likes you. You are bad at this video game.
Bronson Hughes
The Knights of the Blessed Mother of Acceleration
#248 - 2015-08-19 18:54:58 UTC
Carrie-Anne Moss wrote:
Scrub just stop posting. No one here likes you. You are bad at this video game.

I predict a feeding frenzy in 3...2...1....

Relatively Notorious By Association

My Many Misadventures

I predicted FAUXs

Mortlake
Republic Military School
#249 - 2015-08-19 19:34:47 UTC
Carrie-Anne Moss wrote:

NPC Corp posters shouldnt be allowed to post outside of New Citizens Forum.
People that die with MINING LASER UPGRADES in their cargohold shouldnt be allowed to post in C&P unless they are crying about real pvpers/bad guys

Oh wait you are.

Scrub just stop posting. No one here likes you. You are bad at this video game.


I think it may be time for your meds.

Sometimes you hit the bar and sometimes the bar hits you...

Zimmy Zeta
Perkone
Caldari State
#250 - 2015-08-19 19:41:36 UTC



http://i.imgur.com/su6Fzl6.gif

I'd like to apologize for the poor quality of the post above and sincerely hope you didn't waste your time reading it. Yes, I do feel bad about it.

admiral root
Red Galaxy
#251 - 2015-08-19 19:54:07 UTC
Austneal wrote:
That coupled with the fact that the corp was kicked without even attempting to get more information suggests that it may be a little less than "fiction"


Meh. Sue us in the court of C&P if you like.

No, your rights end in optimal+2*falloff

Austneal
Nero Fazione
#252 - 2015-08-19 20:33:30 UTC
admiral root wrote:

Meh. Sue us in the court of C&P if you like.

/thread
Remiel Pollard
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#253 - 2015-08-20 06:21:59 UTC
Austneal wrote:
Remiel Pollard wrote:

Austneal was new and had yet to prove his capabilities to people who he'd never flown with, and was also largely inactive

Fair point in the first part. However, I was not at all inactive. As stated in previous posts, I was online almost every day and had participated in fleets

Remiel Pollard wrote:

Austneal was not invited, he applied, and was, by default, on probation

Austneal chose to do something that was particularly high-risk with no real benefit to the alliance at large

Austneal joined a war corp, NOT a ganking corp - this is an important one to remember, because there are different requirements for each

All fair enough points

Remiel Pollard wrote:

And finally, there isn't a corp or alliance that wouldn't have reacted the same way

I've been in quite a few corps and alliances, and I've only ever seen one other that reacted like this.

Remiel Pollard wrote:

The losses don't matter. The incompetence does. That's the bottom line, and there's nothing in that bottom line that even suggests that losing something 'juicy' had anything to do with it. You're inserting that fiction all on your own.

Also, the corp was kicked before anyone was told what had happened. The only thing the leadership had to go on for kicking the corp was the ship loss itself.

That coupled with the fact that the corp was kicked without even attempting to get more information suggests that it may be a little less than "fiction"


I gave it straight mate. I wasn't looking for an explanation or excuses or even a reply, I just told it how it is. Regarding your activity, every CEO can see how long it's been since a corp member has logged in. Kavoro and Kaely both commented on your inactivity. As for the corps you've been in and how they would react in similar circumstances, it's hardly a conclusive population sample and I have no reason to believe you, especially after having been in Absolute Defiance myself and seeing how uptight they can be.

“Some capsuleers claim that ECM is 'dishonorable' and 'unfair'. Jam those ones first, and kill them last.” - Jirai 'Fatal' Laitanen, Pithum Nullifier Training Manual c. YC104

Remiel Pollard
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#254 - 2015-08-20 06:23:05 UTC
Carrie-Anne Moss wrote:

No one here likes you.


You owe me a new irony detector.

“Some capsuleers claim that ECM is 'dishonorable' and 'unfair'. Jam those ones first, and kill them last.” - Jirai 'Fatal' Laitanen, Pithum Nullifier Training Manual c. YC104

Mag's
Azn Empire
#255 - 2015-08-20 09:15:44 UTC  |  Edited by: Mag's
Carrie-Anne Moss wrote:
Scrub just stop posting. No one here likes you.
Well all I can say is, it's a good job I had finished my coffee before reading this. Or else I'd have sprayed it all over my keyboard.

This really is signature worthy stuff. Oh the irony! Lol

Destination SkillQueue:- It's like assuming the Lions will ignore you in the Savannah, if you're small, fat and look helpless.

Nicolai Serkanner
Incredible.
Brave Collective
#256 - 2015-08-20 10:25:29 UTC
Rhamnousia Nosferatu wrote:
Nicolai Serkanner wrote:

So much sense in one post, it's scary.


Because they like to sound sensible every once in a while, to win the general "risky eve is ok" crowd (into which I fall too, btw) while trying to antagonize that same crowd against folks who oppose them in any way.

However, see how that Pedro dude twists my words to switch topic from code to general ganking population? That is why I've blocked the guy on forums and won't discuss stuff with him. He's not after good discussion, he's after spinning words into narratives suiting him. I can't be bothered with that, I don't like when folks claim that I said things I never did and then expect me to waste posts on proving them wrong when they refuse to be proven so (as this thread has nicely demonstrated).

That is one of the reasons I (and many others) are against code as an organisation - not because they are good at ganking, but because of their attitude towards the folks they gank and those who try to oppose them. I have been in this game for several years now in various environments, and never have I encountered such a negative, toxic group, not once. On the other hand, the events that kicked this thread into existence show that Coder's are more or less as we all are - fallible humans. Sadly, they lack the courage to admit that (at least to the wider eve community). So, you see - no one needs to try demonising CODE, they are doing more then a decent job themselves.

Again, if they were what they claim to be, this thread would have never happened in the first place. Remember that one next time you agree with Code guys on something.


Cry some more.
Nicolai Serkanner
Incredible.
Brave Collective
#257 - 2015-08-20 10:49:33 UTC
Herzog Wolfhammer wrote:


That kind of humor or the genre of it you cite - laughing at people having accidents for example - is considered to be one of the facets of the fall of western civilization. As has been apparent now for nearly 10 years and parallel to the increasingly lower quality of the people we meet online in MMOs.



Hahahahahaha .... you are the accident!
Nicolai Serkanner
Incredible.
Brave Collective
#258 - 2015-08-20 10:54:45 UTC
Valkin Mordirc wrote:
Killboards mean nothing. I don't know why people use it to measure their E-peens. There's the Nullsec F1-monkeys with 10k kills but die in a horrible ball of fire when it comes down to a 1v1.


Yep ... that's me Lol ... and I am loving it!
Bronson Hughes
The Knights of the Blessed Mother of Acceleration
#259 - 2015-08-20 12:12:20 UTC
Valkin Mordirc wrote:
Killboards mean nothing. I don't know why people use it to measure their E-peens. There's the Nullsec F1-monkeys with 10k kills but die in a horrible ball of fire when it comes down to a 1v1. Then there's people with sub 1k kills and somehow manage to solo the entire CFC.

Or guys like me who had most of their early kill/loss history wiped from zkillboard when they went CREST-only who look like relative rookies yet still manage to totally dominate a series of 1v1 Thunderdome matches.

Yeah, I went there.

Relatively Notorious By Association

My Many Misadventures

I predicted FAUXs

Zeus Maximo
Mentally Assured Destruction
#260 - 2015-08-20 13:09:28 UTC
Leto Thule wrote:
Kill boards are meaningless.

Edit:

Allow me to elaborate.

Killboards only provide a VERY small glimpse into the total "ability" of an EVE player. This isnt a game like COD where you simply go 15-0 and win the round. There are SO MANY avenues in EVE that allow for victory or defeat, and most of them are defined by the player. As was already pointed out, nullsec killboards (such as mine) are very short scoped in terms of pilot ability. Thats because in huge fleet fights, your job is to follow the instructions of the FC.

But it doesnt stop there. How about some examples? Lets look at my killboard. https://zkillboard.com/character/90841161/

Meh. Its green. It says im 90% effective. But most of my recent kills are fleet fights. Does that mean im good? Does it mean I can follow instructions? Or does it simply mean I am not a complete moron? If you were to rate my skill based on the first few pages, what would you think? Some would say I am epic. Others will say F1 monkey. But its not about that. Its about how much fun you, yourself, have while paying CCP your duckets. Origin. has easily been the best corp I have been with. F1 monkey may I be, its a blast, and simply staggering to see some of the FC's and how they KNOW the game. How they do DPS calculations in their head, on the fly. How they prioritize targets. Ranges. Ammo. ****, I never even USED any other shot than CNAM or T2 before BL.

Do i know how to fly and exploit mechanics? http://eve.battleclinic.com/killboard/killmail.php?eid=34049420 -- (Meaningless to most of you, but a personal victory against a damn good pilot)

Or maybe just get plain lucky and guess someones warp in: http://eve.battleclinic.com/killboard/killmail.php?eid=42996854

The point is that there are different forms of PVP. You cant compare PVP in 0.0 to PVP in Highsec because its NOT THE SAME THING. Killboards dont rate that. In a wormhole, you have to FIND your targets, and are limited by mass, an ever changing map, and the only real place where your assets are NEVER secure. Try as I may, I dont see that on killboards.

I have said it in other threads: kills dont make the player. Mining is PVP. Market play is PVP. People who build ships dont have that stat show up... neither do exploration sites completed or thefts conducted. Intel gathered. Wormholes scanned and chains scouted. Yes, thats meaningless to quite a large base of us, but for some people, one of the above may be where they shine. What is more useful... another killmail whore in your fleet... or the guy who knows how to scout? How to DSCAN correctly so his combat probes hit on the first shot, and the target doesnt have time to GTFO. Or maybe the guy who has a JF. You know, bringing you your pixels? Where are his stats?

In closing, they are all equally important, and they all make contributions you cannot ignore, and in some cases, cannot play without.

/soapbox


^^ This

"It is not possible either to trick or escape the mind of Zeus."

U-MAD Membership Recruitment

PoH Corporation Recruitment