These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Crime & Punishment

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Oh the irony!

First post
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Bronson Hughes
The Knights of the Blessed Mother of Acceleration
#181 - 2015-08-17 18:25:07 UTC  |  Edited by: Bronson Hughes
Sarah Flynt wrote:
As far as I can tell, nobody has ever been banned for his opinion alone. If we ban people, it's always because there are other things involved.

I was banned from an anti-ganking channel, while I was flying as a white knight, for offering some advice to a freighter pilot on how not to get suicide ganked again. I found the whole place rather non-inviting and didn't bother try to fight the ban.

This incident may or may not have helped shape my overall views on hisec suicide ganking, which I now generally support even if I don't partake in it.

EDIT: To clarify, I am not saying that you banned me or that it was from the specific channel you mentioned (because, quite honestly, I don't remember the name of it). But, yes, people do (or, at least one person did) get banned from anti-ganking channels for just their opinions.

Relatively Notorious By Association

My Many Misadventures

I predicted FAUXs
Austneal
Nero Fazione
#182 - 2015-08-17 18:40:00 UTC
Renegade Heart wrote:
admiral root wrote:
Read the entire thread before posting and don't just cherry pick the bits you like? There was more to it than the orca loss.


I liked those bits the best! But as for the spin on the other stuff I did not find it that credible if I am honest, especially since the other reasons were not really discussed in any great amount of detail.

So he didn't do well in the wars? He had a few kills before the Orca loss in that same hub. Checking his killboard out before those indicates he was inactive for some months before joining CODE. Maybe he was a bit rusty?

Also the guy was barely in the corp long enough to make a real impression apart from the Orca loss. Is this really surprising stuff though? If this is a big deal too then good luck recruiting new players to PvP in the future is all I can say, if there are such great expectations upon new recruits to perform well, and quickly.

But maybe there was some other major reason I missed?

I was actually inactive for awhile. It was after reading the forums and seeing CODE posts, that I thought "Hey, they look fun" and resubbed. I joined a small corp that was mostly inactive, then left to join CODE.

I had also went on 2 fleets in the time I was there as bump support. I'm bringing this up because I was told by the CEO that my being kicked was already under consideration from "never being in fleets" and "never leaving Dodixie." While it's true I did base myself out of Dodixie, (mostly because that's where most of my ships are) I was rarely actually in system while logged in. Very rarely were there war targets there.

I'm only making this post as clarification. I've only really skimmed over the last few pages, as I don't really play Eve for the drama / politics. I feel like someone just saying "We may have over-reacted, and yes we care about an Orca loss. This is why we kicked you." would be a more reasonable approach than trying to do... whatever it is they're trying to do.

That's what I would do anyway... but then again, I'm not the leader of a high-profile alliance.
Carrie-Anne Moss
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#183 - 2015-08-17 18:50:14 UTC
Austneal wrote:
Renegade Heart wrote:
admiral root wrote:
Read the entire thread before posting and don't just cherry pick the bits you like? There was more to it than the orca loss.


I liked those bits the best! But as for the spin on the other stuff I did not find it that credible if I am honest, especially since the other reasons were not really discussed in any great amount of detail.

So he didn't do well in the wars? He had a few kills before the Orca loss in that same hub. Checking his killboard out before those indicates he was inactive for some months before joining CODE. Maybe he was a bit rusty?

Also the guy was barely in the corp long enough to make a real impression apart from the Orca loss. Is this really surprising stuff though? If this is a big deal too then good luck recruiting new players to PvP in the future is all I can say, if there are such great expectations upon new recruits to perform well, and quickly.

But maybe there was some other major reason I missed?

I was actually inactive for awhile. It was after reading the forums and seeing CODE posts, that I thought "Hey, they look fun" and resubbed. I joined a small corp that was mostly inactive, then left to join CODE.

I had also went on 2 fleets in the time I was there as bump support. I'm bringing this up because I was told by the CEO that my being kicked was already under consideration from "never being in fleets" and "never leaving Dodixie." While it's true I did base myself out of Dodixie, (mostly because that's where most of my ships are) I was rarely actually in system while logged in. Very rarely were there war targets there.

I'm only making this post as clarification. I've only really skimmed over the last few pages, as I don't really play Eve for the drama / politics. I feel like someone just saying "We may have over-reacted, and yes we care about an Orca loss. This is why we kicked you." would be a more reasonable approach than trying to do... whatever it is they're trying to do.

That's what I would do anyway... but then again, I'm not the leader of a high-profile alliance.

Dude the issue is that you were in a ship with CARGO RIGS AND A FREAKING MINING LINK OPTIMIZER in your cargohold.

Wtf is hard to understand about that miner?
Please go back to mining so i can gank you bear miner
Austneal
Nero Fazione
#184 - 2015-08-17 18:56:34 UTC
Carrie-Anne Moss wrote:
Austneal wrote:
Renegade Heart wrote:
admiral root wrote:
Read the entire thread before posting and don't just cherry pick the bits you like? There was more to it than the orca loss.


I liked those bits the best! But as for the spin on the other stuff I did not find it that credible if I am honest, especially since the other reasons were not really discussed in any great amount of detail.

So he didn't do well in the wars? He had a few kills before the Orca loss in that same hub. Checking his killboard out before those indicates he was inactive for some months before joining CODE. Maybe he was a bit rusty?

Also the guy was barely in the corp long enough to make a real impression apart from the Orca loss. Is this really surprising stuff though? If this is a big deal too then good luck recruiting new players to PvP in the future is all I can say, if there are such great expectations upon new recruits to perform well, and quickly.

But maybe there was some other major reason I missed?

I was actually inactive for awhile. It was after reading the forums and seeing CODE posts, that I thought "Hey, they look fun" and resubbed. I joined a small corp that was mostly inactive, then left to join CODE.

I had also went on 2 fleets in the time I was there as bump support. I'm bringing this up because I was told by the CEO that my being kicked was already under consideration from "never being in fleets" and "never leaving Dodixie." While it's true I did base myself out of Dodixie, (mostly because that's where most of my ships are) I was rarely actually in system while logged in. Very rarely were there war targets there.

I'm only making this post as clarification. I've only really skimmed over the last few pages, as I don't really play Eve for the drama / politics. I feel like someone just saying "We may have over-reacted, and yes we care about an Orca loss. This is why we kicked you." would be a more reasonable approach than trying to do... whatever it is they're trying to do.

That's what I would do anyway... but then again, I'm not the leader of a high-profile alliance.

Dude the issue is that you were in a ship with CARGO RIGS AND A FREAKING MINING LINK OPTIMIZER in your cargohold.

Wtf is hard to understand about that miner?
Please go back to mining so i can gank you bear miner

https://www.reddit.com/r/Eve/comments/3h25fa/code_lost_orca_to_high_sec_griefers/cu3w1so
Sarah Flynt
Red Cross Mercenaries
Silent Infinity
#185 - 2015-08-17 19:30:47 UTC
admiral root wrote:
Sarah Flynt wrote:
You were certainly not banned because of that. On which toon was that and when? There is no entry for "admiral root" in the blocklist of the channel, there never was. Your former alliance SMA was banned from the channel - as were many other CFC alliances - for mass-invading and mass-trolling it in the early days of the channel. When your corp dropped out of SMA, your corp was banned as you had many gankers in your ranks. You specifically have never been personally banned.


More lies. Most people in SMA would be far more likely to join your channel to support you seeing as they're a bunch of carebears.
I've seen first hand how that "support" looks like.

admiral root wrote:
Only two members of Red Galaxy were ever there (me being one of them), netiher of us did anything to warrant a ban. So you banned an entire corp because the two guys from it who visited your channel did nothing but give solid advice and the rest of the corp never visited your channel at all.

Going through the member history of your corp, I immediately recognize 7 names (gankers and scouts) - that's not even including you. And those are only the names that I remember off the top of my head. Given how small your corp is, that's a substantial amount.

Sick of High-Sec gankers? Join the public channel Anti-ganking and the dedicated intel channel Gank-Intel !
Sarah Flynt
Red Cross Mercenaries
Silent Infinity
#186 - 2015-08-17 19:34:27 UTC
admiral root wrote:
It's also worth noting that your original ban list was nuked when the New Order staged a coup and temporarily took control of the anti-ganking channel, so I'm not surprised that there's currently no entry for this toon.

The original ban list has been completely restored - to the letter. It was pulled from SiSi and the missing names between the last server sync and the channel takeover have been reconstructed from channel logs.

Sick of High-Sec gankers? Join the public channel Anti-ganking and the dedicated intel channel Gank-Intel !
Sarah Flynt
Red Cross Mercenaries
Silent Infinity
#187 - 2015-08-17 19:38:14 UTC
Bronson Hughes wrote:
EDIT: To clarify, I am not saying that you banned me or that it was from the specific channel you mentioned (because, quite honestly, I don't remember the name of it). But, yes, people do (or, at least one person did) get banned from anti-ganking channels for just their opinions.

Neither you, nor your corp is banned from 'Anti-ganking' or 'Gank-Intel'. I can't speak for other channels as I don't have administrative rights there.

Sick of High-Sec gankers? Join the public channel Anti-ganking and the dedicated intel channel Gank-Intel !
Bronson Hughes
The Knights of the Blessed Mother of Acceleration
#188 - 2015-08-17 19:58:06 UTC
Sarah Flynt wrote:
Bronson Hughes wrote:
EDIT: To clarify, I am not saying that you banned me or that it was from the specific channel you mentioned (because, quite honestly, I don't remember the name of it). But, yes, people do (or, at least one person did) get banned from anti-ganking channels for just their opinions.

Neither you, nor your corp is banned from 'Anti-ganking' or 'Gank-Intel'. I can't speak for other channels as I don't have administrative rights there.

Good to know. (Not that I'd be joining anytime soon, but still.)

Relatively Notorious By Association

My Many Misadventures

I predicted FAUXs
Kaarous Aldurald
Black Hydra Consortium.
#189 - 2015-08-17 20:05:25 UTC
Bronson Hughes wrote:
Sarah Flynt wrote:
Bronson Hughes wrote:
EDIT: To clarify, I am not saying that you banned me or that it was from the specific channel you mentioned (because, quite honestly, I don't remember the name of it). But, yes, people do (or, at least one person did) get banned from anti-ganking channels for just their opinions.

Neither you, nor your corp is banned from 'Anti-ganking' or 'Gank-Intel'. I can't speak for other channels as I don't have administrative rights there.

Good to know. (Not that I'd be joining anytime soon, but still.)


I doubt I was banned before I officially joined CODE, but I would not go in there ever again regardless. I got more irl threats from those maladjusted freaks in an hour than in a week of actually ganking. They are some sick fucks.

"Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."

One of ours, ten of theirs.

Best Meltdown Ever.
Herzog Wolfhammer
Sigma Special Tactics Group
#190 - 2015-08-17 20:11:10 UTC
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:
Bronson Hughes wrote:
Sarah Flynt wrote:
Bronson Hughes wrote:
EDIT: To clarify, I am not saying that you banned me or that it was from the specific channel you mentioned (because, quite honestly, I don't remember the name of it). But, yes, people do (or, at least one person did) get banned from anti-ganking channels for just their opinions.

Neither you, nor your corp is banned from 'Anti-ganking' or 'Gank-Intel'. I can't speak for other channels as I don't have administrative rights there.

Good to know. (Not that I'd be joining anytime soon, but still.)


I doubt I was banned before I officially joined CODE, but I would not go in there ever again regardless. I got more irl threats from those maladjusted freaks in an hour than in a week of actually ganking. They are some sick fucks.




Prove it.

Bring back DEEEEP Space!
Kaarous Aldurald
Black Hydra Consortium.
#191 - 2015-08-17 22:39:50 UTC  |  Edited by: Kaarous Aldurald
Herzog Wolfhammer wrote:

Prove it.



Nevermind the hilarious irony of you, who is more than willing to believe the story in the OP without evidence or proof, just because it's against someone you hate...

But prove what? That anti ganking are a bunch of toxic hate-mongers? That's easy to find out for yourself. Roll up an alt, gank a few retrievers so it shows up on the alt's killboard, then go into their channel and talk about how ganking can be avoided easily with only a few steps. List these steps. Talk about gankers are players too, not some demons wearing human skin.

But by talking about ganking in anything other than a "it should not exist" light, you will either have sexual and/or racist insults slung your way, be told to kill yourself in real life, have a family member threatened, banned from the channel, or more than likely some combination of the above.

"Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."

One of ours, ten of theirs.

Best Meltdown Ever.
Kaely Tanniss
Black Lotus Society.
Something Really Pretentious
#192 - 2015-08-18 00:56:52 UTC
Rhamnousia Nosferatu wrote:
Kaely Tanniss wrote:
*stuff*


Ok, just don't mind me asking some questions:

- If you guys are so cool, all about fun, with good community and internal relations etc, how come a whole corp gets kicked out of the alliance instead of directorship simply sorting out the incident the day after and kicking the guy out (which, coming from you who claim to laugh at kb stats would still be a fairly funny thing to do, but kind of more logical).

- Guy was inside corp for just 7 days, but that's already enough to start 'thinking' about kicking him out since he's not contributing? Damn, you are true leet pvpers.

- I din't take down 10+ bil ships, but I got a 7 bil one of yours (among others). Does that count?

- is it only important that a 'bad' killmail is not traceable to code for a random outsider, since I don't remember you kicking out some other folks who had worse and lazier losses than this one (namely - oprah winfrey getting podded in kamio while being afk in a ship named after the char), or your illustrious executor, losing his provi and the pod (again, afk)? Let's not forget about Daxter either, logging off in front of my svipul with combat probes out, losing his 2 bil pod

- Why did Globby bother with that failed DC story on reddit?

All in all, an Orca lost should be irrelevant for a bunch of fun-loving, isk-showering, no s***s given guys who are only trying to do good thing and fight the afk disease while preaching their code.
However, all of the above provides enough material for anyone with some common sense to doubt your whole narrative and everything you ever post related to it since it certainly does appear that a) loyal rage-kicked that corp, and b) you guys don't believe in stuff you rub into others faces all the time.


You are not meant to understand our ways. We don't question the decisions of the leadership..which is probably why Code. is sucessful and AG isn't. Roll

If I had a nickel for every time someone said women don't play eve, I'd have a bag of nickels to whack the next person who said it..
Freya Sertan
Doomheim
#193 - 2015-08-18 01:47:02 UTC
I was banned from AG for having a permit.

Take from that what you will.

New Eden isn't nice. It isn't friendly. It isn't very hospitiable. Good thing there are people here to shoot in the face.

Want to make New Eden a nice place? Try this out.
Mobadder Thworst
Doomheim
#194 - 2015-08-18 02:29:35 UTC
Freya Sertan wrote:
I was banned from AG for having a permit.

Take from that what you will.


I don't know what AG is, but I got banned from Texas Roadhouse and a nearby CVS.

It sucks, but they had their reasons. I forgive them.

You should forgive too.
John E Normus
New Order Logistics
CODE.
#195 - 2015-08-18 04:38:11 UTC
*** Official CODE Alliance update ***

I logged in tonight and held an emergency CODEdot Red Alert Crisis Management Summit Meeting™ on TS. Tensions were very high as we assembled and the big question was... miners or freighters for Monday evening?

That was a close one!

Thanks to everyone who took part in this discussion, your opinions are important to James 315, the New Order of Highsec, and CODEdot alliance.

A special shout out to my friends in the AG, love you long time

Sincerely,
Me










Between Ignorance and Wisdom
Herzog Wolfhammer
Sigma Special Tactics Group
#196 - 2015-08-18 06:11:51 UTC
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:
Herzog Wolfhammer wrote:

Prove it.



Nevermind the hilarious irony of you, who is more than willing to believe the story in the OP without evidence or proof, just because it's against someone you hate...

But prove what? That anti ganking are a bunch of toxic hate-mongers? That's easy to find out for yourself. Roll up an alt, gank a few retrievers so it shows up on the alt's killboard, then go into their channel and talk about how ganking can be avoided easily with only a few steps. List these steps. Talk about gankers are players too, not some demons wearing human skin.

But by talking about ganking in anything other than a "it should not exist" light, you will either have sexual and/or racist insults slung your way, be told to kill yourself in real life, have a family member threatened, banned from the channel, or more than likely some combination of the above.



Real irony is that you boast about death threats and people doxxing you (you claim attacks on your house so I assume getting an address on someone qualifies as a dox) while being a very toxic person yourself, and failing to see the pattern. I've been playing online games since the 90s and never had that happen.

And in failing to notice that pattern around you, you continue to blame everybody else, which is the punch line to your story.

I monitor the anti-ganking channels and have never seen what you claim. The only time it happens is when someone comes in and starts posting the exact same crazy stuff as everybody else who lasts for a little less than a hour and then gets kicked. While you and yours might think you are superior to use pubbies, we do muster enough awareness to see when someone is spewing talking points. So the level of threats and lunacy you claim puts the burden of proof squarely on you.

There is another pattern of occurrence lent to your life by your toxicity, but you would take it as an offense if I brought it up. So I'll just leave things as they are and hope you become aware enough to see if yourself and see the light.

Bring back DEEEEP Space!
Dracvlad
Taishi Combine
Astral Alliance
#197 - 2015-08-18 06:33:19 UTC
If I was moderating that channel I would ban Kaarous because he is a tedious bore, that's good enough for me.

As for mining permits, for the ex-Pandamic Horde newbie, that is often indication of a CODE supporter, and of course your posts have indicated you as Ganker aligned, so if that hurts your feelings please cry more.


As for Kaely, define success, I moved back to null mainly because I realised that CODE was unable to stop the market, freighters are still getting through in fact every freighter that gets to market is a victory. Sure you lot are making a dent, but it is not stopping it and is a mere drop in the ocean and in any case you sell the loot into the market.

Furthermore you are just left with the hard core players now, those that insure the ships and are evidently richer than you and don't care.

I passed through Uedama yesterday and saw Loyalanon doing his plaintive attention seeking wail "AG fails again!" and yet 10 freighters made it through Uedama even with all those flashing reds as I passed them, I laughed.

Loyalanons alt, the guy who started talking RL to me by the way in a locked thread, was having a slagging match with someone in Kamio local, I suggested he calm down, and then using another alt Wolf Soprano he asked me where CODE had touched me. Isn't that similar to a certain rather bad taste line that certain toxic Eve players use. Of course I am too mature to find that sort of thing even worthy of a reply, for a start I have not lost a single ship on any of my accounts to CODE, so I sniggered at that and went on my merry way.

Winning, I think not...

When the going gets tough the Gankers get their CSM rep to change mechanics in their favour.

Blocked: Teckos Pech, Sonya Corvinus, baltec1, Shae Tadaruwa, Wander Prian, Daichi Yamato, Jonah Gravenstein, Merin Ryskin, Linus Gorp
Carrie-Anne Moss
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#198 - 2015-08-18 06:40:43 UTC
Austneal wrote:
Carrie-Anne Moss wrote:
Austneal wrote:
Renegade Heart wrote:
admiral root wrote:
Read the entire thread before posting and don't just cherry pick the bits you like? There was more to it than the orca loss.


I liked those bits the best! But as for the spin on the other stuff I did not find it that credible if I am honest, especially since the other reasons were not really discussed in any great amount of detail.

So he didn't do well in the wars? He had a few kills before the Orca loss in that same hub. Checking his killboard out before those indicates he was inactive for some months before joining CODE. Maybe he was a bit rusty?

Also the guy was barely in the corp long enough to make a real impression apart from the Orca loss. Is this really surprising stuff though? If this is a big deal too then good luck recruiting new players to PvP in the future is all I can say, if there are such great expectations upon new recruits to perform well, and quickly.

But maybe there was some other major reason I missed?

I was actually inactive for awhile. It was after reading the forums and seeing CODE posts, that I thought "Hey, they look fun" and resubbed. I joined a small corp that was mostly inactive, then left to join CODE.

I had also went on 2 fleets in the time I was there as bump support. I'm bringing this up because I was told by the CEO that my being kicked was already under consideration from "never being in fleets" and "never leaving Dodixie." While it's true I did base myself out of Dodixie, (mostly because that's where most of my ships are) I was rarely actually in system while logged in. Very rarely were there war targets there.

I'm only making this post as clarification. I've only really skimmed over the last few pages, as I don't really play Eve for the drama / politics. I feel like someone just saying "We may have over-reacted, and yes we care about an Orca loss. This is why we kicked you." would be a more reasonable approach than trying to do... whatever it is they're trying to do.

That's what I would do anyway... but then again, I'm not the leader of a high-profile alliance.

Dude the issue is that you were in a ship with CARGO RIGS AND A FREAKING MINING LINK OPTIMIZER in your cargohold.

Wtf is hard to understand about that miner?
Please go back to mining so i can gank you bear miner

https://www.reddit.com/r/Eve/comments/3h25fa/code_lost_orca_to_high_sec_griefers/cu3w1so

You couldnt sell the Mining Laser Optimizer?

You were barely in Code. Then you MADE SEVERAL COMMENTS TO THE CORP YOU DIED TO ABOUT JOINING THEM!

This is all a freaking SETUP BY THE LOSER THAT DIED.
Check his history he used to be in pvp/merc corps


Then joins Code for 1 week.
Suicides Mining fit Orca to merc buddies and THEN COMMENTS ABOUT JOINING THEIR CORP SEVERAL TIMES ON REDDIT AND HERE.


Freaking planned set up suicide to his friends to make Code look bad.


Stupid Beat
Herzog Wolfhammer
Sigma Special Tactics Group
#199 - 2015-08-18 06:44:28 UTC
Dracvlad wrote:
If I was moderating that channel I would ban Kaarous because he is a tedious bore, that's good enough for me.

As for mining permits, for the ex-Pandamic Horde newbie, that is often indication of a CODE supporter, and of course your posts have indicated you as Ganker aligned, so if that hurts your feelings please cry more.


As for Kaely, define success, I moved back to null mainly because I realised that CODE was unable to stop the market, freighters are still getting through in fact every freighter that gets to market is a victory. Sure you lot are making a dent, but it is not stopping it and is a mere drop in the ocean and in any case you sell the loot into the market.

Furthermore you are just left with the hard core players now, those that insure the ships and are evidently richer than you and don't care.

I passed through Uedama yesterday and saw Loyalanon doing his plaintive attention seeking wail "AG fails again!" and yet 10 freighters made it through Uedama even with all those flashing reds as I passed them, I laughed.

Loyalanons alt, the guy who started talking RL to me by the way in a locked thread, was having a slagging match with someone in Kamio local, I suggested he calm down, and then using another alt Wolf Soprano he asked me where CODE had touched me. Isn't that similar to a certain rather bad taste line that certain toxic Eve players use. Of course I am too mature to find that sort of thing even worthy of a reply, for a start I have not lost a single ship on any of my accounts to CODE, so I sniggered at that and went on my merry way.

Winning, I think not...




I was also under the impression that it was some goon-fed highsec commerce interdiction but then the lost loot, that which is not destroyed, simply ends up on the market anyway.

That mockery of "tell us on your ship where CODE touched you" is a very distasteful use of an old method that police investigators used to interview children who were victims of sexual assault or molestation. That the same crowd of whom would share an audio of other players freaking out, as if it were a trophy also takes pleasure in using a meme derived from a very serious and deplorable topic is in fact very telling of the kind of people we are dealing with and that wonderful quality of players that keeps Eve a niche game.

As for CODE. "winning", we try to convo freighter pilots often and when we can, the majority of them do not care. If they cared they would not have been AFKing in the first place. And no matter how many ganks they pull off, the freighters just keep on coming and highsec continues to be everything the gankers hate. I would not call that victory.

Thus most of what CODE. relies on is image. And it's plausible that under that cool elitist snark they portray is really some players who cannot handle minor losses, like an Orca, to some simple tomfoolery and will resort to ham-handed solutions to maintain their fragile image. Every freighter they gank is held up high as an example of their mastery but a loss means an interruption in their delayed twitch stream so nobody else can see it.


Bring back DEEEEP Space!
Herzog Wolfhammer
Sigma Special Tactics Group
#200 - 2015-08-18 06:51:13 UTC
Carrie-Anne Moss wrote:
Herzog Wolfhammer wrote:
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:
Herzog Wolfhammer wrote:

Prove it.



Nevermind the hilarious irony of you, who is more than willing to believe the story in the OP without evidence or proof, just because it's against someone you hate...

But prove what? That anti ganking are a bunch of toxic hate-mongers? That's easy to find out for yourself. Roll up an alt, gank a few retrievers so it shows up on the alt's killboard, then go into their channel and talk about how ganking can be avoided easily with only a few steps. List these steps. Talk about gankers are players too, not some demons wearing human skin.

But by talking about ganking in anything other than a "it should not exist" light, you will either have sexual and/or racist insults slung your way, be told to kill yourself in real life, have a family member threatened, banned from the channel, or more than likely some combination of the above.



Real irony is that you boast about death threats and people doxxing you (you claim attacks on your house so I assume getting an address on someone qualifies as a dox) while being a very toxic person yourself, and failing to see the pattern. I've been playing online games since the 90s and never had that happen.

And in failing to notice that pattern around you, you continue to blame everybody else, which is the punch line to your story.

I monitor the anti-ganking channels and have never seen what you claim. The only time it happens is when someone comes in and starts posting the exact same crazy stuff as everybody else who lasts for a little less than a hour and then gets kicked. While you and yours might think you are superior to use pubbies, we do muster enough awareness to see when someone is spewing talking points. So the level of threats and lunacy you claim puts the burden of proof squarely on you.

There is another pattern of occurrence lent to your life by your toxicity, but you would take it as an offense if I brought it up. So I'll just leave things as they are and hope you become aware enough to see if yourself and see the light.


STFU BEAR.
Go talk in mission and complexes or Science and Industry.
Gtfo bear




I got kicked for insisting that everything should have stabs on it. Oops

Bring back DEEEEP Space!