These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

CCP! Please clarify the future plans for WiS!

First post
Author
Alpheias
Tactical Farmers.
Pandemic Horde
#2021 - 2012-01-02 14:47:03 UTC
DeMichael Crimson wrote:
Alpheias wrote:
oldbutfeelingyoung wrote:


now we have a few butthurt people who want to rage on



Indeed. The WiS crowd continues to throw tantrums left and right, but that was the purpose of this thread wasn't it? To show just how butthurt you are after the abandonment of WiS.


God, you couldn't sound more juvenile if you tried.


Just to set the record straight, WiS wasn't abandoned. Work on it has been temporally postponed.

Whether you like it or not, CCP isn't going to abandon or remove WiS. Eventually more WiS content (Establishments, Character Interaction, etc) will be introduced into the game. However, looking at CCP's track record, it'll probably be in a year or two.


Now you know what it feels like every time I have to stoop to your level.

And I hope they don't. But I hope they put all of it into WoD where it belongs.

Agent of Chaos, Sower of Discord.

Don't talk to me unless you are IQ verified and certified with three references from non-family members. Please have your certificate of authenticity on hand.

Doc Fury
Furious Enterprises
#2022 - 2012-01-02 14:55:47 UTC
Indahmawar Fazmarai wrote:

Will CCP talk to us before this issue escalates into yet another PR disaster?


Not before fanfest, so by all means start orchestrating your "PR disaster" now.

Might I suggest you begin your campaign by unsubbing?

I bet if the whole dozen or so of you that are demanding answers to questions already answered did that, it would send a clear message to CCP that you really mean business.

Otherwise I would direct you to the CSM, and the Features & Ideas Discussion forum.


There's a million angry citizens looking down their tubes..at me.

oldbutfeelingyoung
Perkone
Caldari State
#2023 - 2012-01-02 19:50:08 UTC
Arcathra wrote:
Please bear in mind the following:

During the 2 years that are mentioned repeatedly by the WiS haters they build the Carbon Framework through refining the old code. They wanted to use it as foundation for other projects. The nice side effect was that they now have a much better foundation for EVE. I state that the carbon frame work and the two years they worked on it made many of the improvements that were delivered with Crucible possible in the first place. Or maybe not possible, but much faster and easier to develop.
Remember how they always stated that they can't change the UI. Now they can and they do because of their code refinement. So don't pretend as if the core gameplay don't got any benefit out of it. That simply isn't true.
True is that those two years also had expansions with many additions (but not iterations) for the core gameplay. Infrastructure stuff, Pirate Epic Arcs, revisited Faction Ships, new planet graphics, Planetary Interaction, removal of learning skills, "Little Things" from Team BFF, Incursions... to just name some of the bigger things. Looking at the expansions before that they mostly hadn't that much content in them, too.

The real problem was the lack of iteration and the practice of feature abandonment they did. But they already did that before WiS, or ambulation how they called it back in the day, was a topic. You can try to babble as long as you want, but WiS and WoD were not entirely responsible for that. It more looks like some major mismanagement by CCP. They have grown too big too fast and couldn't handle it properly. Now they have learned (hopefully) that something was amiss, they can restructure and try to get a grip on it again. Crucible showed us that they can and that there is enough potential. And it showed that Carbon was a good idea.

I see the need to iterate and revamp many old features (heck, I do want that maybe as desperate as you WiS haters) and I know that this is more urgent than new content for WiS. I think most WiS supporters understand that pretty well.


I have to admit that a lot of our loved haters here are right that we already got our answer from CCP. WiS is on the backburner. So I think we should formulate some questions that are more precise. That something is on the backburner can mean a lot of things. Maybe we should ask more specific questions... like:

What does it mean exactly that WiS is on the backburner?
Are there still a few developers working on WiS related content or iterations for features that are already delivered (Captains Quarters, Character Customization)?
If yes, on what are they working at the moment?
If no, when can we expect to hear anything new? No exact date needed, just some rough estimation (eg after the summer expansion, after the next winter expansion, propably in two years etc.)?
Are you seriously considering to abandon WiS entirely? Or is it more like putting it back to the drawing board and thinking of how to make it more meaningful?
Have you really overshot the mark regarding hardware requirements of your engine? Is there a way to scale it down and lower them? Do we have to wait for the next generation of graphic cards to get any multiplayer enviroment running smoothly?
Can we expect that Captains Quarters are going to be iterated some time in the future? There are features lacking that were talked about ( eg market tickers).
What about the request by many players to make the bloodlines and races more distinct, eg through racial clothing and additional accessory?
There are also a lot of requests regarding bloodline and gender changes. Is there something you are working on?

I think that this are a lot of the questions we "barbie fetishists" like to know and it is far from unreasonable to ask them and expect an answer of some kind.



+1
you are a better talker then me and any of the people replying here
this sums up a lot what is being discussed here (well not really a discussion,but alright)
and it sums it up in a very good way.
thank you

R.S.I2014

oldbutfeelingyoung
Perkone
Caldari State
#2024 - 2012-01-02 19:54:30 UTC
Doc Fury wrote:
Indahmawar Fazmarai wrote:

Will CCP talk to us before this issue escalates into yet another PR disaster?


Not before fanfest, so by all means start orchestrating your "PR disaster" now.

Might I suggest you begin your campaign by unsubbing?

I bet if the whole dozen or so of you that are demanding answers to questions already answered did that, it would send a clear message to CCP that you really mean business.

Otherwise I would direct you to the CSM, and the Features & Ideas Discussion forum.





if this thread don,t deliver some extra info
why would the CSM and some idea subforum do deliver

The CSM has as always no use in this matter
We want info from CCP ,not from some CCP-internetpuppets

R.S.I2014

Doc Fury
Furious Enterprises
#2025 - 2012-01-02 20:11:19 UTC
oldbutfeelingyoung wrote:
Doc Fury wrote:
Indahmawar Fazmarai wrote:

Will CCP talk to us before this issue escalates into yet another PR disaster?


Not before fanfest, so by all means start orchestrating your "PR disaster" now.

Might I suggest you begin your campaign by unsubbing?

I bet if the whole dozen or so of you that are demanding answers to questions already answered did that, it would send a clear message to CCP that you really mean business.

Otherwise I would direct you to the CSM, and the Features & Ideas Discussion forum.





if this thread don,t deliver some extra info
why would the CSM and some idea subforum do deliver

The CSM has as always no use in this matter
We want info from CCP ,not from some CCP-internetpuppets



Well, CCP isn't going to answer feature discussion questions here in EVE GD, and there is a thread that you are well aware of in the CSM area where you all received an answer about WIS development from a CSM representative.

But, by all means continue beating this corpse and demanding answers to questions already answered. If you are so impatient you can't wait until fanfest for new information, I am sure you can find the unsubscribe button.

There's a million angry citizens looking down their tubes..at me.

Guttripper
State War Academy
Caldari State
#2026 - 2012-01-02 20:14:38 UTC
oldbutfeelingyoung wrote:
We want info from CCP ,not from some CCP-internetpuppets


Perhaps their silence is saying something you do not want to hear...
oldbutfeelingyoung
Perkone
Caldari State
#2027 - 2012-01-02 20:18:41 UTC
Guttripper wrote:
oldbutfeelingyoung wrote:
We want info from CCP ,not from some CCP-internetpuppets


Perhaps their silence is saying something you do not want to hear...


As long as they keep silent,we don,t know that

R.S.I2014

oldbutfeelingyoung
Perkone
Caldari State
#2028 - 2012-01-02 20:20:32 UTC  |  Edited by: oldbutfeelingyoung
Doc Fury wrote:
oldbutfeelingyoung wrote:
Doc Fury wrote:
Indahmawar Fazmarai wrote:

Will CCP talk to us before this issue escalates into yet another PR disaster?


Not before fanfest, so by all means start orchestrating your "PR disaster" now.

Might I suggest you begin your campaign by unsubbing?

I bet if the whole dozen or so of you that are demanding answers to questions already answered did that, it would send a clear message to CCP that you really mean business.

Otherwise I would direct you to the CSM, and the Features & Ideas Discussion forum.





if this thread don,t deliver some extra info
why would the CSM and some idea subforum do deliver

The CSM has as always no use in this matter
We want info from CCP ,not from some CCP-internetpuppets



Well, CCP isn't going to answer feature discussion questions here in EVE GD, and there is a thread that you are well aware of in the CSM area where you all received an answer about WIS development from a CSM representative.

But, by all means continue beating this corpse and demanding answers to questions already answered. If you are so impatient you can't wait until fanfest for new information, I am sure you can find the unsubscribe button.





Yep we saw that response

Quote:
CCP's exact prioritization for the next couple of expansions is still up in the air, but it will focus heavily on FiS work. There may be some more information in the Summit minutes about manpower allocations, but I can't go into more details at present.



imternetpuppet behaviour with some good info?
guess not.

R.S.I2014

oldbutfeelingyoung
Perkone
Caldari State
#2029 - 2012-01-02 20:24:27 UTC
Arcathra wrote:
Please bear in mind the following:

During the 2 years that are mentioned repeatedly by the WiS haters they build the Carbon Framework through refining the old code. They wanted to use it as foundation for other projects. The nice side effect was that they now have a much better foundation for EVE. I state that the carbon frame work and the two years they worked on it made many of the improvements that were delivered with Crucible possible in the first place. Or maybe not possible, but much faster and easier to develop.
Remember how they always stated that they can't change the UI. Now they can and they do because of their code refinement. So don't pretend as if the core gameplay don't got any benefit out of it. That simply isn't true.
True is that those two years also had expansions with many additions (but not iterations) for the core gameplay. Infrastructure stuff, Pirate Epic Arcs, revisited Faction Ships, new planet graphics, Planetary Interaction, removal of learning skills, "Little Things" from Team BFF, Incursions... to just name some of the bigger things. Looking at the expansions before that they mostly hadn't that much content in them, too.

The real problem was the lack of iteration and the practice of feature abandonment they did. But they already did that before WiS, or ambulation how they called it back in the day, was a topic. You can try to babble as long as you want, but WiS and WoD were not entirely responsible for that. It more looks like some major mismanagement by CCP. They have grown too big too fast and couldn't handle it properly. Now they have learned (hopefully) that something was amiss, they can restructure and try to get a grip on it again. Crucible showed us that they can and that there is enough potential. And it showed that Carbon was a good idea.

I see the need to iterate and revamp many old features (heck, I do want that maybe as desperate as you WiS haters) and I know that this is more urgent than new content for WiS. I think most WiS supporters understand that pretty well.


I have to admit that a lot of our loved haters here are right that we already got our answer from CCP. WiS is on the backburner. So I think we should formulate some questions that are more precise. That something is on the backburner can mean a lot of things. Maybe we should ask more specific questions... like:

What does it mean exactly that WiS is on the backburner?
Are there still a few developers working on WiS related content or iterations for features that are already delivered (Captains Quarters, Character Customization)?
If yes, on what are they working at the moment?
If no, when can we expect to hear anything new? No exact date needed, just some rough estimation (eg after the summer expansion, after the next winter expansion, propably in two years etc.)?
Are you seriously considering to abandon WiS entirely? Or is it more like putting it back to the drawing board and thinking of how to make it more meaningful?
Have you really overshot the mark regarding hardware requirements of your engine? Is there a way to scale it down and lower them? Do we have to wait for the next generation of graphic cards to get any multiplayer enviroment running smoothly?
Can we expect that Captains Quarters are going to be iterated some time in the future? There are features lacking that were talked about ( eg market tickers).
What about the request by many players to make the bloodlines and races more distinct, eg through racial clothing and additional accessory?
There are also a lot of requests regarding bloodline and gender changes. Is there something you are working on?

I think that this are a lot of the questions we "barbie fetishists" like to know and it is far from unreasonable to ask them and expect an answer of some kind.



not empty quoting again ,bc i like this one

R.S.I2014

ElQuirko
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#2030 - 2012-01-02 21:05:13 UTC
Dibs on post #2030

Dodixie > Hek

Dr Grey
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
#2031 - 2012-01-02 21:34:02 UTC
Still waiting on that mirror for my SC

And Shoes ....... more quality shoes
oldbutfeelingyoung
Perkone
Caldari State
#2032 - 2012-01-02 23:40:56 UTC
Alpheias wrote:
DeMichael Crimson wrote:
Alpheias wrote:
oldbutfeelingyoung wrote:


now we have a few butthurt people who want to rage on



Indeed. The WiS crowd continues to throw tantrums left and right, but that was the purpose of this thread wasn't it? To show just how butthurt you are after the abandonment of WiS.


God, you couldn't sound more juvenile if you tried.


Just to set the record straight, WiS wasn't abandoned. Work on it has been temporally postponed.

Whether you like it or not, CCP isn't going to abandon or remove WiS. Eventually more WiS content (Establishments, Character Interaction, etc) will be introduced into the game. However, looking at CCP's track record, it'll probably be in a year or two.


Now you know what it feels like every time I have to stoop to your level.

And I hope they don't. But I hope they put all of it into WoD where it belongs.


would give you an ladder to go up that level,but you had to mention WOD,so taking that ladder away.

R.S.I2014

Tiberius Sunstealer
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#2033 - 2012-01-02 23:44:42 UTC  |  Edited by: Tiberius Sunstealer
oldbutfeelingyoung wrote:
would give you an ladder to go up that level,but you had to mention WOD,so taking that ladder away.

English. How does it work?
Ladie Harlot
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#2034 - 2012-01-03 00:15:03 UTC
Guttripper wrote:
oldbutfeelingyoung wrote:
We want info from CCP ,not from some CCP-internetpuppets


Perhaps their silence is saying something you do not want to hear...

They haven't been silent. If CCP had actually been ignoring these people I'd understand their frustration but CCP hasn't ignored them. The space barbie enthusiasts just didn't like the answer they got so they continue to whine.

The artist formerly known as Ladie Scarlet.

oldbutfeelingyoung
Perkone
Caldari State
#2035 - 2012-01-03 00:22:00 UTC
Tiberius Sunstealer wrote:
oldbutfeelingyoung wrote:
would give you an ladder to go up that level,but you had to mention WOD,so taking that ladder away.

English. How does it work?



sorry about that,but i am not English

R.S.I2014

oldbutfeelingyoung
Perkone
Caldari State
#2036 - 2012-01-03 00:24:06 UTC
Ladie Harlot wrote:
Guttripper wrote:
oldbutfeelingyoung wrote:
We want info from CCP ,not from some CCP-internetpuppets


Perhaps their silence is saying something you do not want to hear...

They haven't been silent. If CCP had actually been ignoring these people I'd understand their frustration but CCP hasn't ignored them. The space barbie enthusiasts just didn't like the answer they got so they continue to whine.


read this then,quoting somebody else bc he is better at English then me

Arcathra wrote:
Please bear in mind the following:

During the 2 years that are mentioned repeatedly by the WiS haters they build the Carbon Framework through refining the old code. They wanted to use it as foundation for other projects. The nice side effect was that they now have a much better foundation for EVE. I state that the carbon frame work and the two years they worked on it made many of the improvements that were delivered with Crucible possible in the first place. Or maybe not possible, but much faster and easier to develop.
Remember how they always stated that they can't change the UI. Now they can and they do because of their code refinement. So don't pretend as if the core gameplay don't got any benefit out of it. That simply isn't true.
True is that those two years also had expansions with many additions (but not iterations) for the core gameplay. Infrastructure stuff, Pirate Epic Arcs, revisited Faction Ships, new planet graphics, Planetary Interaction, removal of learning skills, "Little Things" from Team BFF, Incursions... to just name some of the bigger things. Looking at the expansions before that they mostly hadn't that much content in them, too.

The real problem was the lack of iteration and the practice of feature abandonment they did. But they already did that before WiS, or ambulation how they called it back in the day, was a topic. You can try to babble as long as you want, but WiS and WoD were not entirely responsible for that. It more looks like some major mismanagement by CCP. They have grown too big too fast and couldn't handle it properly. Now they have learned (hopefully) that something was amiss, they can restructure and try to get a grip on it again. Crucible showed us that they can and that there is enough potential. And it showed that Carbon was a good idea.

I see the need to iterate and revamp many old features (heck, I do want that maybe as desperate as you WiS haters) and I know that this is more urgent than new content for WiS. I think most WiS supporters understand that pretty well.


I have to admit that a lot of our loved haters here are right that we already got our answer from CCP. WiS is on the backburner. So I think we should formulate some questions that are more precise. That something is on the backburner can mean a lot of things. Maybe we should ask more specific questions... like:

What does it mean exactly that WiS is on the backburner?
Are there still a few developers working on WiS related content or iterations for features that are already delivered (Captains Quarters, Character Customization)?
If yes, on what are they working at the moment?
If no, when can we expect to hear anything new? No exact date needed, just some rough estimation (eg after the summer expansion, after the next winter expansion, propably in two years etc.)?
Are you seriously considering to abandon WiS entirely? Or is it more like putting it back to the drawing board and thinking of how to make it more meaningful?
Have you really overshot the mark regarding hardware requirements of your engine? Is there a way to scale it down and lower them? Do we have to wait for the next generation of graphic cards to get any multiplayer enviroment running smoothly?
Can we expect that Captains Quarters are going to be iterated some time in the future? There are features lacking that were talked about ( eg market tickers).
What about the request by many players to make the bloodlines and races more distinct, eg through racial clothing and additional accessory?
There are also a lot of requests regarding bloodline and gender changes. Is there something you are working on?

I think that this are a lot of the questions we "barbie fetishists" like to know and it is far from unreasonable to ask them and expect an answer of some kind.

R.S.I2014

Morganta
The Greater Goon
#2037 - 2012-01-03 00:25:38 UTC
oldbutfeelingyoung wrote:
Tiberius Sunstealer wrote:
oldbutfeelingyoung wrote:
would give you an ladder to go up that level,but you had to mention WOD,so taking that ladder away.

English. How does it work?



sorry about that,but i am not English


do not be sorry, that other guy is an idiot
Large Collidable Object
morons.
#2038 - 2012-01-03 00:27:49 UTC
Everyone in this thread should apply to my corp - you're either morons for wanting space-barbies or morons for discussing with morons wanting space barbies.

(Just posting bacause the thread is on top anyway so no harm done)
You know... [morons.](http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4gjOx65yD5A)
oldbutfeelingyoung
Perkone
Caldari State
#2039 - 2012-01-03 00:32:42 UTC  |  Edited by: oldbutfeelingyoung
Large Collidable Object wrote:
Everyone in this thread should apply to my corp - you're either morons for wanting space-barbies or morons for discussing with morons wanting space barbies.

(Just posting bacause the thread is on top anyway so no harm done)



a corp named Morons ,i could actually fit in.
but you Avatar looks like my mother in law (don,t worry my wife looks a lot better)
so i pass


so back to topic Hello CCP Are you there?

R.S.I2014

Tiberius Sunstealer
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#2040 - 2012-01-03 00:33:15 UTC
Morganta wrote:
do not be sorry, that other guy is an idiot

I resemble that remark.