Player Features and Ideas Discussion

Was talking with someone who keps dropping my arguments on new changes and how they are actualy beneficial in some way to smaller groups and put mindless "warp me to position where i press f1" out of play.

Anyhow, i suggested, since fights are smaller now and usualy revolve around beacons, that either a modul can be implemented which would collapse the subspace (disable warp) in 150km (75km from center) sphere giving everyone a fight they actualy came to do, not warping off from point to point.

Now, i know many of you won't understand this since it will actualy require pilots skill, good team composition and a bit of tactic to pull off but but i believe this to be a good addition to existing way how fights are now done in nullsec.

Module would not be able to be anchored anywhere but on those beacons in nullsec which you need to fight over to win the system.

It should be a small amount of ehp, maybe 3-5k total so gangs with a snipe ship can snipe it if it becommes unfavorable for them.

There should be delay before anching a new one in that position.

Now everyone who are afraid to lose their ships in an actual fight, tell me how exactly this is a bad idea. It promotes fights, it requires involvement to which you agreed when you undocked and it actualy requires flying and shooting stuff

like evident in here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zDVEHE10nHc&index=25&list=PLF614A7A6461E61E1

Also, please don't turn this into a discussion about how sovie foz is bad, its not, please discuss and expand on my idea

If you allow the pod to warp out of this field it would not be like interdictors and heavy interdictors.
It's an idea, not a finished product. For all intents and purposes you can still take dictors and hdictors out for fights elsewhere, this would be beacon specific to force a fight that was allready scheduled to run since you undocked with your fleet.

Like mentioned above, the low ehp would allow one of your snipe ships to bring it down in a few volleys, if you wish to disengage after that you can. Please consider, the part where you want to reposition tacticaly, it goes both ways.
What if your winning and other fleet needs to back down and save their assets?

Anchor a mobile micro jump unit and jump to them?

Everything is allready in the game to be used.. not sure why people think this is a terrible idea...

wait i thought you have to get a fleet out there to fight/defend the points no?

A ceptor can be sniped no?

Da frak do you even play this game Danika?: )

My idea is for fleets, not solo ceptors using entosis which they can't deactivate and are easy targets to pick off for a sniper, even if it takes 10 rounds to kill it.

Idea is only terrible for you, either provide good solid and constructive arguments which can't be easily countered or don't bother to post.

Hahahahahaha.. good one!

I do believe that Danika knows all good and well what she is talking about.

Moving on, your idea sounds like a bubble and a bubble does interrupt a warp prematurely, it just doesn't help with entosi-ceptors.

Yeah, as in "Your rack of 1400mm artillery pathetically missed the interceptor. Do you want to try and fail again?". Why? Because he is still going at 6km/sec. Or i hope you have loooots of remote tracking.

Little hint to next time you post something, don't talk down to us... We're not idiots.

Secondly, this sounds exactly like Interdictor bubbles.

bump for constructive feedback.

If my idea is like dictor/standard bubbles like people are suggesting then its along the reasoning for jump bridges, why would one need em when we have gates. :)

Alot of Eve is complicated, for me industry is very complex and i will probably never do it...
Still bumping o7