These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Test Server Feedback

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

All kind of anomalies

First post
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Fl4chz4ng3
Garoun Investment Bank
Gallente Federation
#1 - 2015-08-11 13:29:36 UTC
Good morning everyone,

I was wondering last night why we do not have all kind of anomalies in each system on the test server?

I know it's the same mechanics as TQ but It,s very time consuming to look for anom...
Kierss Mann
Pator Tech School
Minmatar Republic
#2 - 2015-08-11 13:38:25 UTC
I know.
I also think that anoms should escalate ever time you complete is so you can test out fittings on DED sites etc
Fl4chz4ng3
Garoun Investment Bank
Gallente Federation
#3 - 2015-08-11 13:40:10 UTC
Kierss Mann wrote:
I know.
I also think that anoms should escalate ever time you complete is so you can test out fittings on DED sites etc


Agreed :-)
Barrogh Habalu
Imperial Shipment
Amarr Empire
#4 - 2015-08-12 05:36:06 UTC
But what if you want to test mechanics associated with spawning and escalating, and not anoms themselves? P

Future of T3 cruisers - multi-tool they aspired to be instead of sledgehammer they have become
Kierss Mann
Pator Tech School
Minmatar Republic
#5 - 2015-08-12 07:55:14 UTC
Barrogh Habalu wrote:
But what if you want to test mechanics associated with spawning and escalating, and not anoms themselves? P

They should have a few systems in the region that people can test the mechanics of the escalating
CCP Goliath
C C P
C C P Alliance
#6 - 2015-08-14 13:35:14 UTC
We had a discussion last year about the idea of a "content constellation", where each system would have a particular type of content to test (one with a large variety of wormhole entrances, one with DED sites, one with all kinds of agent (possibly with debug options to let you pick missions), etc.). Didn't get very far with it as there were other things to take priority over it, but definitely something that interests us.

CCP Goliath | QA Director | EVE Illuminati | @CCP_Goliath
Fl4chz4ng3
Garoun Investment Bank
Gallente Federation
#7 - 2015-08-14 14:21:20 UTC
CCP Goliath wrote:
We had a discussion last year about the idea of a "content constellation", where each system would have a particular type of content to test (one with a large variety of wormhole entrances, one with DED sites, one with all kinds of agent (possibly with debug options to let you pick missions), etc.). Didn't get very far with it as there were other things to take priority over it, but definitely something that interests us.


Ok thanks for the update :-)

I'll wait for this nice update.
BUS1NESSMAN
MMMONSTER ENERGY
#8 - 2015-08-20 12:44:28 UTC
Good idea. Why not.
Ghaustyl Kathix
Rising Thunder
#9 - 2015-08-20 19:46:37 UTC
CCP Goliath wrote:
We had a discussion last year about the idea of a "content constellation", where each system would have a particular type of content to test (one with a large variety of wormhole entrances, one with DED sites, one with all kinds of agent (possibly with debug options to let you pick missions), etc.). Didn't get very far with it as there were other things to take priority over it, but definitely something that interests us.

That would be kind of abusable. We already have people pulling down others' towers outside of 6-C, which is against the rules. It'd be easy for people to grief others if these are in specific systems.