These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
Previous page123Next page
 

Slaves or no

First post
Author
Thorn Galen
Bene Gesserit ChapterHouse
The Curatores Veritatis Auxiliary
#21 - 2012-01-02 12:49:48 UTC
RubyPorto wrote:
..... aaaand there we are, right off the rails.


Not empty quoting. +1
Kehro Urgus
Dark Nebula Academy
O X I D E
#22 - 2012-01-02 12:59:25 UTC
CCP Navigator wrote:
Guys and Girls,

if you wish to discuss the backstory of EVE in regards to the Amarr and Minmatar then please do so. If I believe that your posts are racist in nature, or point to real world events, you will be off these forums permanently.

Here is a rule of thumb before you have to ask, 'What is allowed?', consider for a moment if I will like it. If not, don't post it.

Simple.


Sheesh... who died and made you Destination Skillqueue?Lol

Yeeee! 

Valei Khurelem
#23 - 2012-01-02 13:04:57 UTC  |  Edited by: Valei Khurelem
CCP Navigator wrote:
Guys and Girls,

if you wish to discuss the backstory of EVE in regards to the Amarr and Minmatar then please do so. If I believe that your posts are racist in nature, or point to real world events, you will be off these forums permanently.

Here is a rule of thumb before you have to ask, 'What is allowed?', consider for a moment if I will like it. If not, don't post it.

Simple.


I'm sorry, but this is why having a 12+ rating for EVE and having slavery/sex in the lore you have is a stupid idea.

What this says to people is "Yes, we have sex and violence in our games, but no we don't talk about it and we won't allow anyone else to talk about it" this some of the most nonsensical case of political correctness I've ever read and I regularly get news from the BBC, please stop being a bunch of pussies and just give this game an 18+ rating already. Your sales won't fall because children who want to play the game will either lie about their age or get their parents to buy it for them, the only people who care about this thing are people who either don't have children or are parents who are completely incompetent and incapable of raising them.

People need to stop running around and pretending they're for freedom of speech and expression and then immediately going back on what they say the moment anyone decides to bring up real issues.

Oh and stop censoring swear words you stupid assholes, I know of kids as young as 13 who know exactly what it all means so it just proves it does nothing anyway.

"don't get us wrong, we don't want to screw new players, on the contrary. The core problem here is that tech 1 frigates and cruisers should be appealing enough to be viable platforms in both PvE and PvP."   - CCP Ytterbium

Tallianna Avenkarde
Pyre of Gods
#24 - 2012-01-02 13:15:59 UTC
Valei Khurelem wrote:
CCP Navigator wrote:
Guys and Girls,

if you wish to discuss the backstory of EVE in regards to the Amarr and Minmatar then please do so. If I believe that your posts are racist in nature, or point to real world events, you will be off these forums permanently.

Here is a rule of thumb before you have to ask, 'What is allowed?', consider for a moment if I will like it. If not, don't post it.

Simple.


I'm sorry, but this is why having a 12+ rating for EVE and having slavery/sex in the lore you have is a stupid idea.

What this says to people is "Yes, we have sex and violence in our games, but no we don't talk about it and we won't allow anyone else to talk about it" this some of the most nonsensical case of political correctness I've ever read and I regularly get news from the BBC, please stop being a bunch of pussies and just give this game an 18+ rating already. Your sales won't fall because children who want to play the game will either lie about their age or get their parents to buy it for them, the only people who care about this thing are people who either don't have children or are parents who are completely incompetent and incapable of raising them.

People need to stop running around and pretending they're for freedom of speech and expression and then immediately going back on what they say the moment anyone decides to bring up real issues.

Oh and stop censoring swear words you stupid assholes, I know of kids as young as 13 who know exactly what it all means so it just proves it does nothing anyway.



Why do you feel the need to be able to cuss in the forums. They aren't filtered in game so you can fill up the local chat all you want when some lucky pie makes you 500m poorer, but all it does here is make you look like an uneducated buffoon.

And navi never said you couldn't discuss slavery, only that there was no need to turn it into R/L racism, or you will get the banhammer.

And a sudden plunge in the sullen swell. Ten fathoms deep on the road to hell.

Valei Khurelem
#25 - 2012-01-02 14:32:54 UTC  |  Edited by: Valei Khurelem
I've seen so many perfectly good threads out there ruined by bored moderators these days I guess I'm pretty pessimistic about this sort of thing now, the moment they get a complaint I think it's very likely they'll lock it so they can save face, but anyway, swearing is just a matter of context and censorship has systematically proven itself over the years to be completely pointless. As for me seeming like an uneducated buffoon, at least it's better than being an over-educated and arrogant moron.

Oh and to stay on topic when the hell am I going to be able to get minmatar slaves in my Captain Quarters? I can't be a True Amarrian without slaves! :(

"don't get us wrong, we don't want to screw new players, on the contrary. The core problem here is that tech 1 frigates and cruisers should be appealing enough to be viable platforms in both PvE and PvP."   - CCP Ytterbium

FloppieTheBanjoClown
Arcana Imperii Ltd.
#26 - 2012-01-02 15:20:14 UTC
The trick to enslaving someone is convincing them they have something to lose. It would be harder with capsuleers, but perfectly possible. Start by convincing them to move their clone to a facility you control. Then have them killed and be standing outside the clone vat when they wake up. You've established dominance over them, then it's just a matter of retaining that dominance by preventing them from ever moving their clone.

This limits what you can force them to do, but it seems like a rather good way to subjugate a slave in the long term: they can either comply or die a grisly and painful death, only to be revived to find their master standing there waiting for them. You would eventually drive them mad, or at least to the point they're so broken not even pain motivates them...but you could definitely enslave them.

Founding member of the Belligerent Undesirables movement.

Long John Silver
Doomheim
#27 - 2012-01-02 16:33:48 UTC
CCP Navigator wrote:
Guys and Girls,

if you wish to discuss the backstory of EVE in regards to the Amarr and Minmatar then please do so. If I believe that your posts are racist in nature, or point to real world events, you will be off these forums permanently.

Here is a rule of thumb before you have to ask, 'What is allowed?', consider for a moment if I will like it. If not, don't post it.

Simple.


Navigator, I tread very carefully here but one interpretation of your post is that you have approved of the post five before your own? Shocked

I think it might be wise to reconsider, then also wipe this post, and any that subsequently quote it.

Seriously.

**Long John Silver **| Pirate Alt and Forum Troll.

Nyx Na'gorg
Doomheim
#28 - 2012-01-02 16:38:10 UTC
What kind of "Slavery" are we talking about here?

Slavery all *whip cracks* or indentured servitude?




P.S. Ancient slavery was indentured servitude, usually with good healthcare, food and shelter.
Ghoest
#29 - 2012-01-02 16:52:41 UTC
Because there were some serious bad choices in original EVE lore and game design its not appropriate IMO to be a proponent of slavery even from a role play perspective.

Remember that...
1 All black avatars in EVE are part of the slave race.
2 All black avatars in EVE originally were from the in game tribe with the lowest intelligence.

These were really bad original choices by the devs. They probably didnt know better because they lived in the rather closed society of Iceland, but none the less it was bad.

So given this back ground I dont really think any one should be openly role playing in favor of slavery.
Its fine to use this as lore and say its the reason for a historic war - but its not fine to be pro-slavery in this context.

Wherever You Went - Here You Are

Thorn Galen
Bene Gesserit ChapterHouse
The Curatores Veritatis Auxiliary
#30 - 2012-01-02 17:02:22 UTC
Valei Khurelem wrote:
As for me seeming like an uneducated buffoon, at least it's better than being an over-educated and arrogant moron.


You definitely come across as the latter.

Having said that, God loves you.


Eyup Mi'duck
Doomheim
#31 - 2012-01-02 17:14:10 UTC
Ghoest wrote:
Because there were some serious bad choices in original EVE lore and game design its not appropriate IMO to be a proponent of slavery even from a role play perspective.

Remember that...
1 All black avatars in EVE are part of the slave race.
2 All black avatars in EVE originally were from the in game tribe with the lowest intelligence.

These were really bad original choices by the devs. They probably didnt know better because they lived in the rather closed society of Iceland, but none the less it was bad.

So given this back ground I dont really think any one should be openly role playing in favor of slavery.
Its fine to use this as lore and say its the reason for a historic war - but its not fine to be pro-slavery in this context.


Ghoest, I fully understand your sentiment but you are diving into a hugely controversial area. Take your argument to its logical conclusion and you'll also get to 'I don't really think that any one should be openly role playing in favour of shooting people'.

It just aint gonna happen...

You're never going to resolve the argument re: whether RPG and RL moralities should align.

I am me.         I am not you.     I have my own thoughts.     I am very happy with this situation.

Ghoest
#32 - 2012-01-02 17:24:38 UTC  |  Edited by: Ghoest
Eyup Mi'duck wrote:


Ghoest, I fully understand your sentiment but you are diving into a hugely controversial area. Take your argument to its logical conclusion and you'll also get to 'I don't really think that any one should be openly role playing in favour of shooting people'.

It just aint gonna happen...

You're never going to resolve the argument re: whether RPG and RL moralities should align.


No that isnt the logical reduction.

My problem is that CCP tied a negative in game status to a real life group - and in a way parallels and magnifies some ugly history .
If the in game groupings had not been tied to real life races I would be content to let people role play slavers.

Wherever You Went - Here You Are

Rhinanna
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#33 - 2012-01-02 17:44:59 UTC
Actually Ghoest, the ONLY group that has ANY relationship to any specific in game group is the Gals been from a french origin.

Also you don't think instead of discrimination, the lower intelligence of the 'ex-slave' races might have been more due to their lower levels of education as opposed to a natural lack of intelligence. It would only really have been discrimination if you couldn't remap your attributes to the same levels as everyone else.

Lets avoid IRL discrimination without influencing RP please, we DON'T need all this political correctness bullshit we get in real life. We can RP as rapists, murders, thiefs and slavers. It has ZERO relevance to the real world.
If you can't seperate the real world from the game then YOU have a problem, not the RPers.

Oh and if you think ANY of this is sick, wait till you see World of Darkness. All I have to say there is read about the Sabbat, that make ANYTHING the Amarr have done tame in comparison.

-The sword is only as sharp as the one who wields it! Other names: Drenzul (WoT, WoW, Lineage 2, WarH, BloodBowl, BSG, SC2 and lots more) 

Ghoest
#34 - 2012-01-02 18:20:38 UTC
Rhinanna wrote:
Actually Ghoest, the ONLY group that has ANY relationship to any specific in game group is the Gals been from a french origin.

Also you don't think instead of discrimination, the lower intelligence of the 'ex-slave' races might have been more due to their lower levels of education as opposed to a natural lack of intelligence. It would only really have been discrimination if you couldn't remap your attributes to the same levels as everyone else.

Lets avoid IRL discrimination without influencing RP please, we DON'T need all this political correctness bullshit we get in real life. We can RP as rapists, murders, thiefs and slavers. It has ZERO relevance to the real world.
If you can't seperate the real world from the game then YOU have a problem, not the RPers.

Oh and if you think ANY of this is sick, wait till you see World of Darkness. All I have to say there is read about the Sabbat, that make ANYTHING the Amarr have done tame in comparison.



You are aware that some of what you said doesnt even make sense. Whether or not you actually believe what you roleplay has no bearing upon whether or not the roleplay is disrespectful.
I never said that a person RPing a slaver was a bad person IRL. I said that given the ugly mistakes CCP made early on - it would be best to not RP a slavery because it is is disrespectful.

As for the Gallente issue you have a point - but the degree of negative inference of about the French comes even close to the negative inference about blacks that the devs put in the game originally. If someone find a way to feel insulted as French guys I would give them room for that(I have some French ancestry and dont see it personally.)
On the other hand its notable that CCP has went out of their way to obscure the inferences they made about blacks in the game at release.

Wherever You Went - Here You Are

Rhinanna
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#35 - 2012-01-02 19:05:26 UTC  |  Edited by: Rhinanna
Your argument only holds ANY truth if you regard there as been no difference between effective intelligence and potential intelligence. A person with a lesser education with have a lower effective intelligence than someone who has had a better education.
They how how to analyse information better because they have been taught to.

You are reading into it that CCP were saying that the minmatar race is genetically less intelligent than the others, instead of the simple fact that a race emerging from slavery is much much less likely to have the same education facilities. I'm fairly sure that educating their slaves wasn't a high piroity for the amarr.....

Also what relevance does that have to RPing a slaver.... even IF CCP were been racist (which I don't believe) then that doesn't mean that a player RPing a slaver is been either racist or disrespectful, they are just RPing.

Also the fact that there is no relation in the lore between blacks IRL and Minmatar in game completely destroys your argument. For all you know the Minmatar could originally have been a population of white people who simply lived on a planet with a high UV output sun, in which case natural evolution would have made their skin become darker over the generations.

Trying to read as much between the lines as you are doing into this you could make a large number of other faulty accusations about anyone.

-The sword is only as sharp as the one who wields it! Other names: Drenzul (WoT, WoW, Lineage 2, WarH, BloodBowl, BSG, SC2 and lots more) 

Blue Rook
Ghost Cabal
#36 - 2012-01-02 20:31:44 UTC
Rose Hips wrote:
Q: Would a Minmatar "Capsuleer" ever be a slave of an Amarr Capsuleer?


A: Yes. I know of one such Minmatar Capsuleer that was given to an Amarr Capsuleer as a gift by his mother. The Minmatar is quite skilled and hard working, only flying industrial ships and is never employed in combat. It was apparently the aim of the Amarr mother to ensure that her son didn't leave space untidy with rubble and wrecks, and also she indicated you should never arm the slaves.

The means of ownership/dominance of said slave are simple. The Amarr pays for the Minmatar's pilot license and clones, not to mention the Amarr has a permanent tracker affixed. If the Minmatar decided to run, he'd be promptly hunted down, and if he resists further the Amarr slave master would pod him and stop payment on the pilot license.

Slavery comes in many forms, physical shackles being more aptly replaced by economics and sociology.
Blue Rook
Ghost Cabal
#37 - 2012-01-02 21:03:06 UTC
Ghoest wrote:
[quote=Eyup Mi'duck]
My problem is that CCP tied a negative in game status to a real life group - and in a way parallels and magnifies some ugly history .
If the in game groupings had not been tied to real life races I would be content to let people role play slavers.


Well.. the uglyness of history should always be magnified - atleast in so much that ignoring history dooms all to repetition. (feel the platitude burn) That being said, New Eden is riddled with barbaric practices - slavery, being only a fraction of them.

Ofcourse, I do think that restricting "black skin" to a single race is shortsighted. Specifically, at the minimum the Gallente should have access to the applicable skin-tone and features. Rationally speaking, the fact that all the Empires don't have a wider spread of ethnocentric qualities is a bit absurd IMO.

The fact that the Empires themselves do not have a united front on the motivations of a given capsuler is telling, despite the motivations doubtlessly instilled in said pilot by their origin cultures alone. IE: not all Amarr are devot racists, not all Gallente are freedom respecting altruists, not all Caldari are corporate lackies/oppresors, not all Minmatar are abolitionist rebel types, and not all Jovians are... well... weird.

Ethnic blending would have/should have happened enough to rationally justify access for every empire to have a wider diversity of ethnic stylization - though that wouldn't necessarily mean access across all bloodlines in a given empire.
Rhinanna
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#38 - 2012-01-02 21:09:35 UTC
And what would stop that Minmatar capsuleer from flying into Minmatar space?

Amarr aren't going to be able to hunt him there, many Minmatar corps would take him in, remove the tracker and give him a job to pay for his license/clones. Also under concord law, only the capsuler himself would be allowed to decide where his clone location was set to.

You can't enslave a capsuler unless they want to be 'enslaved' and then its not really enslavement.....

-The sword is only as sharp as the one who wields it! Other names: Drenzul (WoT, WoW, Lineage 2, WarH, BloodBowl, BSG, SC2 and lots more) 

Blue Rook
Ghost Cabal
#39 - 2012-01-02 21:32:22 UTC  |  Edited by: Blue Rook
Rhinanna wrote:
And what would stop that Minmatar capsuleer from flying into Minmatar space?

Amarr aren't going to be able to hunt him there, many Minmatar corps would take him in, remove the tracker and give him a job to pay for his license/clones. Also under concord law, only the capsuler himself would be allowed to decide where his clone location was set to.

You can't enslave a capsuler unless they want to be 'enslaved' and then its not really enslavement.....


O certainly, nothing can stop him if he decided to. Actually at one point he ran away to Angel Cartel space, because there was an unusually large collection of freedom fighters that he then took to Minmatar space to fund an upgrade to his ship and bolster the liberation of more of his people. In the end his mater caught him and it was a sad state of affairs.

The meta catch is The Amarr has access to the Slave's Concord License (read: username and password) so there is no escape for the poor fellow.

As meta as it all is, there are absolutely ways for a slave to earn it's freedom with help and motivation. But, it's just as feasible that said capsuleer slave could be prevented/discouraged from grasping the opportunity of freedom.
Blue Rook
Ghost Cabal
#40 - 2012-01-02 21:37:10 UTC
Rhinanna wrote:
And what would stop that Minmatar capsuleer from flying into Minmatar space?

Amarr aren't going to be able to hunt him there, many Minmatar corps would take him in, remove the tracker and give him a job to pay for his license/clones. Also under concord law, only the capsuler himself would be allowed to decide where his clone location was set to.

You can't enslave a capsuler unless they want to be 'enslaved' and then its not really enslavement.....


Partially agreed, fundamentally the primary component of slavery is removing a fellow humans will to fight back for their own freedom IMO. Physical restraint is only a component of slavery.
Previous page123Next page