These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Crime & Punishment

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Official announcement regarding Anti-Ganker "White Knights".

First post
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Dracvlad
Taishi Combine
Astral Alliance
#101 - 2015-08-09 07:34:28 UTC  |  Edited by: Dracvlad
Remiel Pollard wrote:
The percentage of damage done on a target that is going to die anyway, and was always intended to die, is completely irrelevant. You think you've done something amazing by blowing up a ship the pilot intended to lose? You think you bothered them at all?


So what, I had fun doing it and you sound bothered by it because of your vehemence it decrying it, I take it as a double win then. Generally as soon as someone said "CONCORD whoring" in local I knew that we had hit gold as their ego was bruised by those nasty AG's getting a kill on them, its funny every time I see it, its also funny watching you trying to downgrade it when its actually a DPS race before CONCORD shows up.

You don't like the fact that people are having fun while shooting gankers, lighten up, its a game and I valued a good percentage of those kills because I have the most damage on them.


Paula Enkhashour, very impressive in exposing their thinking, which is the extra enjoyment derived from victims getting emotional over losses, the focus on carebears is because they give the best tears. However there are less and less players who cry at least openly, which is kinda fun to see from my perspective.

When the going gets tough the Gankers get their CSM rep to change mechanics in their favour.

Blocked: Teckos Pech, Sonya Corvinus, baltec1, Shae Tadaruwa, Wander Prian, Daichi Yamato, Jonah Gravenstein, Merin Ryskin, Linus Gorp
admiral root
Red Galaxy
#102 - 2015-08-09 08:00:42 UTC
Kaely Tanniss wrote:
-Funny you should say that. I am Code. I am not a ganker. Yet the only time many of our war targets will fight is with overwhelming odds...yet you criticize the same thing when we do it...why is this?


You answered your own question - you're involved with gankers; you're guilty by association. It's a well-documented "fact" that anyone who engages in internet spaceship violence in a game about internet spaceship violence has a day job where they engage in terrorism, genocide, theft, harming children and whacking old ladies over the head. We've also been proved to have a lot of mental health issues, we're sociopaths, psycopaths, etc. Only someone like us would want to associate with us.

For more information you should contact the Teg Center for Hand Holding. Their office is out in nullsec, in AG-LOL.

Also, people are still engaging with a self-proclaimed troll? I blame Jonah. :)

No, your rights end in optimal+2*falloff
Dracvlad
Taishi Combine
Astral Alliance
#103 - 2015-08-09 09:20:56 UTC
admiral root wrote:
Kaely Tanniss wrote:
-Funny you should say that. I am Code. I am not a ganker. Yet the only time many of our war targets will fight is with overwhelming odds...yet you criticize the same thing when we do it...why is this?


You answered your own question - you're involved with gankers; you're guilty by association. It's a well-documented "fact" that anyone who engages in internet spaceship violence in a game about internet spaceship violence has a day job where they engage in terrorism, genocide, theft, harming children and whacking old ladies over the head. We've also been proved to have a lot of mental health issues, we're sociopaths, psycopaths, etc. Only someone like us would want to associate with us.

For more information you should contact the Teg Center for Hand Holding. Their office is out in nullsec, in AG-LOL.

Also, people are still engaging with a self-proclaimed troll? I blame Jonah. :)


Do you seriously believe that, that is seriously stupid, it is also not what was said, from my point of view those who gank tend to like it when people get upset, especially those that they have de-humanised as carebears and made a major enemy in their mind, for my own part when an enemy that has been difficult starts raging after we have blown him up then I can find myself enjoying that, but thats a perfectly normal response in my opinion.

You lot may have defined people who just like to do their own thing in Eve as your enemy, you love their bewilderment, most of them are more annoyed because they were not doing anything against you, but in your eyes they are scum because they do not play the game like you do, get over it, its all cool.

When the going gets tough the Gankers get their CSM rep to change mechanics in their favour.

Blocked: Teckos Pech, Sonya Corvinus, baltec1, Shae Tadaruwa, Wander Prian, Daichi Yamato, Jonah Gravenstein, Merin Ryskin, Linus Gorp
admiral root
Red Galaxy
#104 - 2015-08-09 09:33:00 UTC
Dracvlad wrote:
Do you seriously believe that


Yup, I totally believe all those things about me. Roll

No, your rights end in optimal+2*falloff
Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
#105 - 2015-08-09 09:56:52 UTC
admiral root wrote:
Also, people are still engaging with a self-proclaimed troll? I blame Jonah. :)
I enjoy a fine whine, this one has a delicate bouquet of butthurt with overtures of think of the children and a flavour that is reminiscent of saline solution; who are you to deny me my pleasures? Twisted

In the beginning there was nothing, which exploded.

New Player FAQ

Feyd's Survival Pack
Noragen Neirfallas
Emotional Net Loss
#106 - 2015-08-09 10:15:39 UTC
Jonah Gravenstein wrote:
admiral root wrote:
Also, people are still engaging with a self-proclaimed troll? I blame Jonah. :)
I enjoy a fine whine, this one has a delicate bouquet of butthurt with overtures of think of the children and a flavour that is reminiscent of saline solution; who are you to deny me my pleasures? Twisted

I'm running a think of the children post atm. Although I feel it has a very different think of the children flavor to this one Twisted

Member and Judge of the Court of Crime and Punishment

Noragens basically the Chribba of C&P - Zimmy Zeta

Confirming that we all play in Noragen's eve. - BeBopAReBop

ISD Buldath favorite ISD

'"****station games" - Sun Tzu' - Ralph King Griffin
Remiel Pollard
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#107 - 2015-08-09 10:19:44 UTC
Dracvlad wrote:
...you sound bothered by it ...


You say this like it satisfies you that I'm bothered, but in ignorance of what I literally just asked - what makes you think anyone is upset over losing ships they intended to lose?

If you're objective is to bother people, and then point it out, I worry a little. I do, maybe I even pity you a little. But you don't even rate as a thorn in my side, so please don't conflate 'bother' with 'amusement' here because you will thoroughly miss the point of the ridicule I've been heaping on you if you do that.

“Some capsuleers claim that ECM is 'dishonorable' and 'unfair'. Jam those ones first, and kill them last.” - Jirai 'Fatal' Laitanen, Pithum Nullifier Training Manual c. YC104
Remiel Pollard
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#108 - 2015-08-09 10:23:12 UTC
Dracvlad wrote:
admiral root wrote:
Kaely Tanniss wrote:
-Funny you should say that. I am Code. I am not a ganker. Yet the only time many of our war targets will fight is with overwhelming odds...yet you criticize the same thing when we do it...why is this?


You answered your own question - you're involved with gankers; you're guilty by association. It's a well-documented "fact" that anyone who engages in internet spaceship violence in a game about internet spaceship violence has a day job where they engage in terrorism, genocide, theft, harming children and whacking old ladies over the head. We've also been proved to have a lot of mental health issues, we're sociopaths, psycopaths, etc. Only someone like us would want to associate with us.

For more information you should contact the Teg Center for Hand Holding. Their office is out in nullsec, in AG-LOL.

Also, people are still engaging with a self-proclaimed troll? I blame Jonah. :)


Do you seriously believe that, that is seriously stupid, it is also not what was said, from my point of view those who gank tend to like it when people get upset, especially those that they have de-humanised as carebears and made a major enemy in their mind, for my own part when an enemy that has been difficult starts raging after we have blown him up then I can find myself enjoying that, but thats a perfectly normal response in my opinion.

You lot may have defined people who just like to do their own thing in Eve as your enemy, you love their bewilderment, most of them are more annoyed because they were not doing anything against you, but in your eyes they are scum because they do not play the game like you do, get over it, its all cool.


No one is trying to squeeze tears out of anyone, but it's worth noting the amusing nature of people getting bent out of shape and calling us things like "ni**ers" and "fa**ots" because they lost some internet pixels. We don't ask for tears, but when they're offered, we do humbly oblige the tear-giver as best we can.

“Some capsuleers claim that ECM is 'dishonorable' and 'unfair'. Jam those ones first, and kill them last.” - Jirai 'Fatal' Laitanen, Pithum Nullifier Training Manual c. YC104
Dracvlad
Taishi Combine
Astral Alliance
#109 - 2015-08-09 10:25:48 UTC  |  Edited by: Dracvlad
admiral root wrote:
Dracvlad wrote:
Do you seriously believe that


Yup, I totally believe all those things about me. Roll


Well you stated what was said out of context and then said that was what you thought, I asked if you believe that? So with your reply obviously not.

But the key thing is that you put words into the mouth of the other poster that was totally out of context and not what was said, too many people on these forums say that another person said x and then go to town on what they said they said, I find it rather amusing to see people slagging off their own comments because that is what you just did. Roll

When the going gets tough the Gankers get their CSM rep to change mechanics in their favour.

Blocked: Teckos Pech, Sonya Corvinus, baltec1, Shae Tadaruwa, Wander Prian, Daichi Yamato, Jonah Gravenstein, Merin Ryskin, Linus Gorp
Dracvlad
Taishi Combine
Astral Alliance
#110 - 2015-08-09 10:30:58 UTC
Remiel Pollard wrote:
Dracvlad wrote:
...you sound bothered by it ...


You say this like it satisfies you that I'm bothered, but in ignorance of what I literally just asked - what makes you think anyone is upset over losing ships they intended to lose?

If you're objective is to bother people, and then point it out, I worry a little. I do, maybe I even pity you a little. But you don't even rate as a thorn in my side, so please don't conflate 'bother' with 'amusement' here because you will thoroughly miss the point of the ridicule I've been heaping on you if you do that.


Well you would not be making a big thing out of CONCORD whoring if it did not bother you would you.

And as I keep saying I am having fun blapping them, and getting very high DPS has value to me, your ridiicule matters not to me because I have you marked down as a class A hypocrite and those I find immensely amusing.

When the going gets tough the Gankers get their CSM rep to change mechanics in their favour.

Blocked: Teckos Pech, Sonya Corvinus, baltec1, Shae Tadaruwa, Wander Prian, Daichi Yamato, Jonah Gravenstein, Merin Ryskin, Linus Gorp
Dracvlad
Taishi Combine
Astral Alliance
#111 - 2015-08-09 10:32:42 UTC
Remiel Pollard wrote:
No one is trying to squeeze tears out of anyone, but it's worth noting the amusing nature of people getting bent out of shape and calling us things like "ni**ers" and "fa**ots" because they lost some internet pixels. We don't ask for tears, but when they're offered, we do humbly oblige the tear-giver as best we can.


So far the only people I saw use the N word and F word were Gankers trolling in the AG channel.

When the going gets tough the Gankers get their CSM rep to change mechanics in their favour.

Blocked: Teckos Pech, Sonya Corvinus, baltec1, Shae Tadaruwa, Wander Prian, Daichi Yamato, Jonah Gravenstein, Merin Ryskin, Linus Gorp
Noragen Neirfallas
Emotional Net Loss
#112 - 2015-08-09 10:34:11 UTC
I propose we let this latest Grr code. thread die off

Member and Judge of the Court of Crime and Punishment

Noragens basically the Chribba of C&P - Zimmy Zeta

Confirming that we all play in Noragen's eve. - BeBopAReBop

ISD Buldath favorite ISD

'"****station games" - Sun Tzu' - Ralph King Griffin
Remiel Pollard
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#113 - 2015-08-09 10:36:15 UTC
Dracvlad wrote:
Remiel Pollard wrote:
No one is trying to squeeze tears out of anyone, but it's worth noting the amusing nature of people getting bent out of shape and calling us things like "ni**ers" and "fa**ots" because they lost some internet pixels. We don't ask for tears, but when they're offered, we do humbly oblige the tear-giver as best we can.


So far the only people I saw use the N word and F word were Gankers trolling in the AG channel.


Then you should read minerbumping more often. Or choose to remain in ignorance, your choice.

“Some capsuleers claim that ECM is 'dishonorable' and 'unfair'. Jam those ones first, and kill them last.” - Jirai 'Fatal' Laitanen, Pithum Nullifier Training Manual c. YC104
Dracvlad
Taishi Combine
Astral Alliance
#114 - 2015-08-09 10:38:57 UTC
Remiel Pollard wrote:
Dracvlad wrote:
Remiel Pollard wrote:
No one is trying to squeeze tears out of anyone, but it's worth noting the amusing nature of people getting bent out of shape and calling us things like "ni**ers" and "fa**ots" because they lost some internet pixels. We don't ask for tears, but when they're offered, we do humbly oblige the tear-giver as best we can.


So far the only people I saw use the N word and F word were Gankers trolling in the AG channel.


Then you should read minerbumping more often. Or choose to remain in ignorance, your choice.


People quoting their own words to discredit someone else who would have thought that...

When the going gets tough the Gankers get their CSM rep to change mechanics in their favour.

Blocked: Teckos Pech, Sonya Corvinus, baltec1, Shae Tadaruwa, Wander Prian, Daichi Yamato, Jonah Gravenstein, Merin Ryskin, Linus Gorp
Dracvlad
Taishi Combine
Astral Alliance
#115 - 2015-08-09 10:39:44 UTC
Noragen Neirfallas wrote:
I propose we let this latest Grr code. thread die off


Nah its turned into a Grrr CONCORD Whoring...

When the going gets tough the Gankers get their CSM rep to change mechanics in their favour.

Blocked: Teckos Pech, Sonya Corvinus, baltec1, Shae Tadaruwa, Wander Prian, Daichi Yamato, Jonah Gravenstein, Merin Ryskin, Linus Gorp
Remiel Pollard
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#116 - 2015-08-09 10:44:53 UTC
Dracvlad wrote:
Remiel Pollard wrote:
Dracvlad wrote:
Remiel Pollard wrote:
No one is trying to squeeze tears out of anyone, but it's worth noting the amusing nature of people getting bent out of shape and calling us things like "ni**ers" and "fa**ots" because they lost some internet pixels. We don't ask for tears, but when they're offered, we do humbly oblige the tear-giver as best we can.


So far the only people I saw use the N word and F word were Gankers trolling in the AG channel.


Then you should read minerbumping more often. Or choose to remain in ignorance, your choice.


People quoting their own words to discredit someone else who would have thought that...


I'm sorry, were you halfway through a point here and accidentally hit "post'? Or did you intend to say nothing of merit, value, or incidence? The screenshots of antiganker channels and mails received from them are all over the place. Again, ignore it if you choose, but that just makes you misinformed, and your opinion irrelevant. Meanwhile, if you have similar evidence of CODE members misbehaving, I'm sure people would like to see it.

“Some capsuleers claim that ECM is 'dishonorable' and 'unfair'. Jam those ones first, and kill them last.” - Jirai 'Fatal' Laitanen, Pithum Nullifier Training Manual c. YC104
Dracvlad
Taishi Combine
Astral Alliance
#117 - 2015-08-09 10:50:27 UTC
Remiel Pollard wrote:
Dracvlad wrote:
Remiel Pollard wrote:
Dracvlad wrote:
Remiel Pollard wrote:
No one is trying to squeeze tears out of anyone, but it's worth noting the amusing nature of people getting bent out of shape and calling us things like "ni**ers" and "fa**ots" because they lost some internet pixels. We don't ask for tears, but when they're offered, we do humbly oblige the tear-giver as best we can.


So far the only people I saw use the N word and F word were Gankers trolling in the AG channel.


Then you should read minerbumping more often. Or choose to remain in ignorance, your choice.


People quoting their own words to discredit someone else who would have thought that...


I'm sorry, were you halfway through a point here and accidentally hit "post'? Or did you intend to say nothing of merit, value, or incidence? The screenshots of antiganker channels and mails received from them are all over the place. Again, ignore it if you choose, but that just makes you misinformed, and your opinion irrelevant. Meanwhile, if you have similar evidence of CODE members misbehaving, I'm sure people would like to see it.


I don't control the AG channel, but they have been banned, seen it multiple times. And nope I just don't fall for your propaganda.

When the going gets tough the Gankers get their CSM rep to change mechanics in their favour.

Blocked: Teckos Pech, Sonya Corvinus, baltec1, Shae Tadaruwa, Wander Prian, Daichi Yamato, Jonah Gravenstein, Merin Ryskin, Linus Gorp
Remiel Pollard
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#118 - 2015-08-09 10:52:58 UTC  |  Edited by: Remiel Pollard
Dracvlad wrote:


I don't control the AG channel, but they have been banned, seen it multiple times. And nope I just don't fall for your propaganda.


Uwotm8? Screenshot evidence is propaganda now? I bet you think the moon landings were fake, don't you.

“Some capsuleers claim that ECM is 'dishonorable' and 'unfair'. Jam those ones first, and kill them last.” - Jirai 'Fatal' Laitanen, Pithum Nullifier Training Manual c. YC104
Dracvlad
Taishi Combine
Astral Alliance
#119 - 2015-08-09 10:54:39 UTC
Remiel Pollard wrote:
Dracvlad wrote:


I don't control the AG channel, but they have been banned, seen it multiple times. And nope I just don't fall for your propaganda.


Uwotm8? Screenshot evidence is propaganda now? I bet you think the moon landings were fake, don't you.


Putting words in my mouth there on the lunar landings, same old mis-information rubbish.

Yes it is propaganda, very well crafted propaganda, of course I went on that site, I just see it for what it is!

When the going gets tough the Gankers get their CSM rep to change mechanics in their favour.

Blocked: Teckos Pech, Sonya Corvinus, baltec1, Shae Tadaruwa, Wander Prian, Daichi Yamato, Jonah Gravenstein, Merin Ryskin, Linus Gorp
Remiel Pollard
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#120 - 2015-08-09 10:58:38 UTC
Dracvlad wrote:
Remiel Pollard wrote:
Dracvlad wrote:


I don't control the AG channel, but they have been banned, seen it multiple times. And nope I just don't fall for your propaganda.


Uwotm8? Screenshot evidence is propaganda now? I bet you think the moon landings were fake, don't you.


Putting words in my mouth there on the lunar landings, same old mis-information rubbish.

Yes it is propaganda, very well crafted propaganda, of course I went on that site, I just see it for what it is!


No, I see what you're doing. You're dismissing the evidence because of where it is, but that doesn't change the conclusiveness of the evidence. If Infowars.com posts hard evidence proving a fact, it doesn't matter that inforwars posted it, what matters is the merits of the evidence. Getting it yet? The source is only as relevant as the argument they make, and you don't just dismiss it because of some subjective conclusion you've come to about the source itself. Hitler was an evil man, but he was right about the working class in Germany before WWII.

And I didn't put words in your mouth, I made a bet based on your propensity for dismissing evidence that runs contrary to what you want to believe.

“Some capsuleers claim that ECM is 'dishonorable' and 'unfair'. Jam those ones first, and kill them last.” - Jirai 'Fatal' Laitanen, Pithum Nullifier Training Manual c. YC104