These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Customer Support lifting previous restrictions regarding war decs

First post First post First post
Author
RubyPorto
RubysRhymes
#501 - 2012-01-02 01:08:21 UTC
Izziee wrote:
Poetic Stanziel wrote:
Izziee wrote:
That's exactly what I enjoy about eve, the complete freedom to do what a player wishes to do.
So, why are you whining? You have freedom to try to do what you want, and other people have the freedom to try to kill you ("griefing" as you would incorrectly refer to it.)


I'm not the one who is whining. Not once.

Unless you assume by me saying I find something amusing, whining? Which..is pretty whack if you ask me.

And my analogy of griefing is just fine.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Griefing

If someone sets out to ruin someone elses day for funzies, that's griefing. Am I against it? No, Eve wouldn't be as we know it without it. Do I think it's pathetic? It completely depends. As I stated, in the case of a player who sets out to do this, while themselves, being to cowardly to actually have any risk themselves, then yes, very much so. I think it's extremely pathetic, but if the player griefs while actually putting themselves into risk (be it by PvPing in null or whatever) then no, nothing wrong with that at all. (I include griefing in high sec in that analogy just for the record)

It's called cowards.


Wikipedia wrote:

more specifically, intentionally disrupting the immersion of another player in their gameplay


Eve is a cold, dark, harsh gameplay environment. By breaking your shit for funzies, I increase the immersion you have into the game. So shooting you is antigriefing per your definition.

Fun Fact: CCP does not define (or indeed mention) griefing in the EULA, the TOS, or the Rules of Conduct.

"It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths." -Abrazzar "the risk of having your day ruined by other people is the cornerstone with which EVE was built" -CCP Solomon

Izziee
University of Izziee
#502 - 2012-01-02 01:11:02 UTC  |  Edited by: Izziee
RubyPorto wrote:
Izziee wrote:
Poetic Stanziel wrote:
Izziee wrote:
That's exactly what I enjoy about eve, the complete freedom to do what a player wishes to do.
So, why are you whining? You have freedom to try to do what you want, and other people have the freedom to try to kill you ("griefing" as you would incorrectly refer to it.)


I'm not the one who is whining. Not once.

Unless you assume by me saying I find something amusing, whining? Which..is pretty whack if you ask me.

And my analogy of griefing is just fine.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Griefing

If someone sets out to ruin someone elses day for funzies, that's griefing. Am I against it? No, Eve wouldn't be as we know it without it. Do I think it's pathetic? It completely depends. As I stated, in the case of a player who sets out to do this, while themselves, being to cowardly to actually have any risk themselves, then yes, very much so. I think it's extremely pathetic, but if the player griefs while actually putting themselves into risk (be it by PvPing in null or whatever) then no, nothing wrong with that at all. (I include griefing in high sec in that analogy just for the record)

It's called cowards.


Wikipedia wrote:

more specifically, intentionally disrupting the immersion of another player in their gameplay


Eve is a cold, dark, harsh gameplay environment. By breaking your shit for funzies, I increase the immersion you have into the game. So shooting you is antigriefing per your definition.

Fun Fact: CCP does not define (or indeed mention) griefing in the EULA, the TOS, or the Rules of Conduct.


Point to me any single place I said they did? Can you?

Edit, you can't.

So what have we learned. Today I PvE'd, and I still think it is amusing the the biggest criers are the griefers. So what's changed? Absolutely nothing. On that note, I'm off to bed.

Toodles and happy new year ;)
RubyPorto
RubysRhymes
#503 - 2012-01-02 01:21:12 UTC
Izziee wrote:


Point to me any single place I said they did? Can you?

Edit, you can't.

So what have we learned. Today I PvE'd, and I still think it is amusing the the biggest criers are the griefers. So what's changed? Absolutely nothing. On that note, I'm off to bed.

Toodles and happy new year ;)


Right here:
Izziee wrote:


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Griefing

If someone sets out to ruin someone elses day for funzies, that's griefing.

You pointed at Wikipedia, saying that certain activities you dislike are Griefing. I pointed out that in Eve, per Wikipedia's definition, they're not, and per CCP they're not. So they are unambiguously not Griefing.

I don't play in hisec besides logistical stuff. But the breaking of the Wardec mechanic is bad for Eve. I like Eve. Therefore, I make noise to help CCP realize its mistake.

"It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths." -Abrazzar "the risk of having your day ruined by other people is the cornerstone with which EVE was built" -CCP Solomon

Rellik B00n
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#504 - 2012-01-02 01:51:00 UTC
perception is everything here.

there are a lot of statements attached to eve that are the lore of EvE:

Dont fly what you cant afford to lose
if its too good to be true it is
everything in eve is pvp

so then add to that:

if you join a player corp you declare yourself ready for spaceship pvp. It really needs a game dev or someone to come out and say "actually player corps in some cases are not meant to be counted as ready for pvp." at which point everyone knows where they stand. As of right now the bolded statement is held as the truth.

griefing does not exist in eve except in starter systems in terms of ship pvp. Again, someone would have to come out and say "here is our definition of griefing" (maybe it already exists). Until that point the bolded statement is generally accepted as truth.

what it really needs is someone with the balls to come out and say it because until that point you have a large group of players that feel like they are being lied to/badly supported.

I deeply worry about the NullSM and its influence on high sec war decs. I would go one farther and say that although I was never in the privateers the original "dec everyone" idea was amazing.
[Of a request for change ask: Who Benefits?](https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&find=unread&t=199765)
RubyPorto
RubysRhymes
#505 - 2012-01-02 01:56:00 UTC
Rellik B00n wrote:

griefing does not exist in eve except in starter systems in terms of ship pvp. Again, someone would have to come out and say "here is our definition of griefing" (maybe it already exists). Until that point the bolded statement is generally accepted as truth.


CCP has clearly defined what actions are considered Harassment and thus invite sanction. Baiting Newbies, Bumping Freighters, and Abusive Language. And that's about it. They do not use the term Griefing because that comes with a bunch of extra baggage. There is no griefing in Eve. There is Harassment and Normal Game Play.

"It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths." -Abrazzar "the risk of having your day ruined by other people is the cornerstone with which EVE was built" -CCP Solomon

Endeavour Starfleet
#506 - 2012-01-02 01:57:56 UTC
This topic has gone on long enough. It is nothing but a hatefest now.

If you have ideas about how to fix Wardecs you ought to post it in the F&I forum.

Requesting lock as

A) CCP made their decision and most likely wont be influenced by this topic as opposed to finding a good system to replace the current one.

B) This is not an idea topic.
RubyPorto
RubysRhymes
#507 - 2012-01-02 02:03:13 UTC
Endeavour Starfleet wrote:
This topic has gone on long enough. It is nothing but a hatefest now.

If you have ideas about how to fix Wardecs you ought to post it in the F&I forum.

Requesting lock as

A) CCP made their decision and most likely wont be influenced by this topic as opposed to finding a good system to replace the current one.

B) This is not an idea topic.


tl;dr I'm loosing, where's my Forum DecShield. Help
Roll

"It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths." -Abrazzar "the risk of having your day ruined by other people is the cornerstone with which EVE was built" -CCP Solomon

iudex
State Protectorate
Caldari State
#508 - 2012-01-02 05:16:30 UTC  |  Edited by: iudex
Tippia wrote:
Izziee wrote:
Once again, wrong. I already told you, today I PvE'd, I didn't have any engagement with another player.
…except that in doing so, you competed against other players. So you PvPed. You can tell me as many times as you like that you “PvE'd”, but that doesn't change the fact that you did so in competition with other players, for the simple reason that the game doesn't allow you to not do so.

Just because you got lucky and no-one stole your stuff or mission completion items, and just because you chose not to pick some stuff up doesn't mean you weren't competing — it just means you willingly forfeited the competition. The game does not have instancing; you are never in your own disconnected little bubble; you are always affecting the shared world we all play in. So there is no way to escape the PvP other than doing absolutely nothing.



Look how dumb you are, you don't even know what PVP means in Eve, yet you keep on lecturing and snubbing others on the forums. The "versus" in PlayerVersusPlayer means you do something in opposition or against a player, it has an antagonistic element, it usually refers to a collision of two opponents (e.g. x versus y in boxing or court proceedings). So no, simple player to player interaction like killing NPCs and selling their stuff on the market, is NOT PVP. Stop correcting people when it's you who is wrong.
But i understand why you want to call your carebearism "PVP": this way you can act here on the forums like a big PVP "connoisseur" (which you regularly do), despite of having only 38 lifetime kills since 2007 (according to killoboard).
And when people ask you for your PVP experience you can then say "oh but I was PVPing today in my Raven by killing that Gurista Pirate rats and even won a 30v1 fight, i'm such a PVP pro !!!"
RubyPorto
RubysRhymes
#509 - 2012-01-02 08:07:38 UTC
iudex wrote:
Missing the Economic point


Any time isk enters the economy, the real income of everyone who relies on an isk faucet for income decreases.

Any time minerals enter the economy, the price of minerals decrease, so the incomes of miners decreases.

The point was that there is no Pure PvE in Eve because everyone is connected and in competition. The point is not saying that fighting Red crosses is the same as fighting blinky red squares.

As for KB stats, what the fuck? Everyone knows people have alts and that their main might not be the character they Pew with. And if you're going to drag up KB stats, yours have taken a fine beating these past two years, haven't they Roll

"It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths." -Abrazzar "the risk of having your day ruined by other people is the cornerstone with which EVE was built" -CCP Solomon

iudex
State Protectorate
Caldari State
#510 - 2012-01-02 09:23:22 UTC
RubyPorto wrote:
iudex wrote:
Missing the Economic point


Any time isk enters the economy, the real income of everyone who relies on an isk faucet for income decreases.

Any time minerals enter the economy, the price of minerals decrease, so the incomes of miners decreases.

The point was that there is no Pure PvE in Eve because everyone is connected and in competition. The point is not saying that fighting Red crosses is the same as fighting blinky red squares.

As for KB stats, what the fuck? Everyone knows people have alts and that their main might not be the character they Pew with. And if you're going to drag up KB stats, yours have taken a fine beating these past two years, haven't they Roll


No i didn't miss that, read my post again, the economic interaction between players is included in it. But this kind of interaction can not be called PVP, for the reasons i've given above. As for my KB stats: they are irrelevant since i don't try to teach people on the forums about PVP, like the person in question does, i even don't see myself as PVPer. As for the alts: why is that smartass not posting with his main then, if Tippia is his alt ? Yes sure, this is my alt too, my other two characters are Chribba and Shrike.
Chribba
Otherworld Enterprises
Otherworld Empire
#511 - 2012-01-02 09:50:06 UTC
iudex wrote:
RubyPorto wrote:
iudex wrote:
Missing the Economic point


Any time isk enters the economy, the real income of everyone who relies on an isk faucet for income decreases.

Any time minerals enter the economy, the price of minerals decrease, so the incomes of miners decreases.

The point was that there is no Pure PvE in Eve because everyone is connected and in competition. The point is not saying that fighting Red crosses is the same as fighting blinky red squares.

As for KB stats, what the fuck? Everyone knows people have alts and that their main might not be the character they Pew with. And if you're going to drag up KB stats, yours have taken a fine beating these past two years, haven't they Roll


No i didn't miss that, read my post again, the economic interaction between players is included in it. But this kind of interaction can not be called PVP, for the reasons i've given above. As for my KB stats: they are irrelevant since i don't try to teach people on the forums about PVP, like the person in question does, i even don't see myself as PVPer. As for the alts: why is that smartass not posting with his main then, if Tippia is his alt ? Yes sure, this is my alt too, my other two characters are Chribba and Shrike.

So many character imposters in this thread Big smile

★★★ Secure 3rd party service ★★★

Visit my in-game channel 'Holy Veldspar'

Twitter @ChribbaVeldspar

RubyPorto
RubysRhymes
#512 - 2012-01-02 09:56:45 UTC
iudex wrote:
RubyPorto wrote:
iudex wrote:
Missing the Economic point


Any time isk enters the economy, the real income of everyone who relies on an isk faucet for income decreases.

Any time minerals enter the economy, the price of minerals decrease, so the incomes of miners decreases.

The point was that there is no Pure PvE in Eve because everyone is connected and in competition. The point is not saying that fighting Red crosses is the same as fighting blinky red squares.

As for KB stats, what the fuck? Everyone knows people have alts and that their main might not be the character they Pew with. And if you're going to drag up KB stats, yours have taken a fine beating these past two years, haven't they Roll


No i didn't miss that, read my post again, the economic interaction between players is included in it. But this kind of interaction can not be called PVP, for the reasons i've given above. As for my KB stats: they are irrelevant since i don't try to teach people on the forums about PVP, like the person in question does, i even don't see myself as PVPer. As for the alts: why is that smartass not posting with his main then, if Tippia is his alt ? Yes sure, this is my alt too, my other two characters are Chribba and Shrike.


If you'd read the conversation, Tippia and I are the ones trying to get this WarDec change retracted. So calling Tippia out for carebearism doesn't make much sense.

As for alts. Say I'm an industrialist and make a name on the forums with that toon. Then I make a Pew alt. I post with my main, but my main doesn't do any Pew and thus doesn't get any kills. Doesn't mean I don't (as a person) pew or know how to pew.

"It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths." -Abrazzar "the risk of having your day ruined by other people is the cornerstone with which EVE was built" -CCP Solomon

ShipToaster
#513 - 2012-01-02 10:36:16 UTC
Izziee wrote:
I think those who legitimately want to wage war with a corp because they generally hate them, or been annoyed by them should be allowed tbh


Just to make it clear to all: you have annoyed me and validated my declaration of eternal hatred to eve university and have legitimised my war against them. Good job. Twisted

Did you get kicked for posting here? Or was your leaving just a coincidence?

Rellik B00n wrote:
I would go one farther and say that although I was never in the privateers the original "dec everyone" idea was amazing.


This was really a defining moment in EVE and was the stuff that greatness in EVE was made of.

CCP nerfing it was the beginning of the downward spiral.

RubyPorto wrote:
Endeavour Starfleet wrote:
This topic has gone on long enough. It is nothing but a hatefest now.

If you have ideas about how to fix Wardecs you ought to post it in the F&I forum.

Requesting lock as

A) CCP made their decision and most likely wont be influenced by this topic as opposed to finding a good system to replace the current one.

B) This is not an idea topic.


tl;dr I'm loosing, where's my Forum DecShield. Help
Roll


Nice one!

.

Izziee
University of Izziee
#514 - 2012-01-02 14:17:53 UTC  |  Edited by: Izziee
ShipToaster wrote:
Izziee wrote:
I think those who legitimately want to wage war with a corp because they generally hate them, or been annoyed by them should be allowed tbh


Just to make it clear to all: you have annoyed me and validated my declaration of eternal hatred to eve university and have legitimised my war against them. Good job. Twisted

Did you get kicked for posting here? Or was your leaving just a coincidence?



Wow! are you really THAT ********? I honestly didn't think people could actually be that thick, shocker. Do you honestly think by you running to a corp tell tailing like a little kiddiewink would to their mummy and daddy, a corp that I've been in no more than a couple of days would actually offend or even upset me in the slightest? For your information, I doubt very much you actually got me kicked, It might even have something to do with me telling the ceo (Actually, not sure who he is) that he has double standards and unprofessional. though, realistically it probably had something to do with the fact I abused the CEO for not understanding his own rules and telling him to remove me rather than suspending me while they check out the posts, I can show you the mail if you wish ;). (The short version, rules state that they can't post in the corporation section..which, this is not) and me telling him I WILL continue to post.

So while I picture you there, sat behind your computer screen eating cheetos sniggering to yourself with a bit of drool being sucked back up into your mouth and a cheese stained T-shirt, the only thing you did for me was actually doing me a favor, because no way would I stay in a corp which demands players from posting, since that ain't ever going to happen, add that to the fact I found the majority of them in my short stay ignorant (By no means ALL, there were a couple nice people) and the fact the only "event" I did with them was some low sec roam with about 40 of us that had to run away from a couple of hurricanes through a bunch of jump gates with our tails between our legs rather than engage or the fact that my first day some people were talking in chat how none of the directors are ever online and it's pretty much just noobs teaching noobs (Can't be sure how true that is except for the fact the only officer I saw in my short time there was the guy who invited me, who was actually unsure of a certain rule himself which I asked about, telling me that rigging T2 rigs was encouraged in wartime when it clearly states on the Wsop they aren't..still, for people to say that must at least have SOME merit to it), or even the fact a day after I joined they went to war and basically told us no one could undock unless following a bunch of out of date rules (I can see why they are in place, but as argued on their forum, they're pretty much obsolete)...actually, I could give a huge great list with the only upside was that I met like 3 actually decent people, all which I've not seen since the war anyway. So, while they may or may not be a decent enough corp, it was most certainly not one for me, hence why I told him to remove me.

So aside from making me think you're one of those drooling suck ups you only did me a favor, so perhaps I should be thanking you, backfired a bit for you though so good job ;)

RubyPorto wrote:
Endeavour Starfleet wrote:
This topic has gone on long enough. It is nothing but a hatefest now.

If you have ideas about how to fix Wardecs you ought to post it in the F&I forum.

Requesting lock as

A) CCP made their decision and most likely wont be influenced by this topic as opposed to finding a good system to replace the current one.

B) This is not an idea topic.


tl;dr I'm loosing, where's my Forum DecShield. Help
Roll

Nice one!


Yes, you're definitely a suck up lol. Happy new year :O

Oh an by all means, please do feel free to war dec them, that's "really" going to annoy me lol!!

Edited for failage quoting :(
Poetic Stanziel
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#515 - 2012-01-02 18:34:08 UTC
Izziee wrote:
Do you honestly think by you running to a corp tell tailing like a little kiddiewink would to their mummy and daddy...
I had to stop reading after that sentence. Are you using a random word generator?
Wacktopia
Fleet-Up.com
Keep It Simple Software Group
#516 - 2012-01-02 19:48:57 UTC
RubyPorto wrote:
Mu-Shi Ai wrote:
Wacktopia wrote:
2. The solution should no be to remove them.


They haven't been removed! Seriously. That's the mentality that isn't quite clicking for me here. Corps having the option to use a mechanic to avoid your dec /= wardecs have been removed. Overstating the case you're trying to make never helps.


Wardecs *were* a method of (kind of) forcing PvP on a corporation for a week. Meaning POSes were vulnerable, and operations might be disrupted for that week. Currently Wardecs are a method of forcing PvP on a corporation for 24h. Meaning POSes are not vulnerable and operations will not be disrupted for longer than a day.

Add to that the fact that an alliance hopping corp is immune from wardecs going live for the 24hr period following the vulnerability, and wardecs are now useless for affecting any corporation who is not in an alliance. (This doesn't affect Sov holding alliances because alliance hopping has some slightly negative effects re: Sov mechanics)

So wardecs for anything other than consensual war between hisec corps, beating up on people who are too new to know how to alliance hop, and trying to kill Sov holder JF pilots has disappeared. Wardecs for POS bashing profit are gone, wardecs to disrupt rival industrial elements are gone.

All that's left among nonconsensual hisec wardecs are the wardecs that people have been complaining about, the so called "griefing" wardecs of newbies.


This.

The current war dec mechanics reminds me of the old "turn on pvp" option - i.e Only those that choose to turn on "pvp mode" can or will pvp. There are ENDLESS mmo's out there with rich PVE content and optional PVP. Turning EVE into another of those game is a terrible mistake. EVE is different. It must be different to survive.

Kitchen sink? Seriousy, get your ship together -  Fleet-Up.com

RubyPorto
RubysRhymes
#517 - 2012-01-02 22:29:16 UTC  |  Edited by: RubyPorto
Chribba wrote:
So many character imposters in this thread Big smile


X You're not my real Chribba.



Izziee wrote:
ShipToaster wrote:
Izziee wrote:
I think those who legitimately want to wage war with a corp because they generally hate them, or been annoyed by them should be allowed tbh


Just to make it clear to all: you have annoyed me and validated my declaration of eternal hatred to eve university and have legitimised my war against them. Good job. Twisted

Did you get kicked for posting here? Or was your leaving just a coincidence?



Wow! are you really THAT ********? I honestly didn't think people could actually be that thick, shocker. Do you honestly think by you running to a corp tell tailing like a little kiddiewink would to their mummy and daddy, a corp that I've been in no more than a couple of days would actually offend or even upset me in the slightest? For your information, I doubt very much you actually got me kicked, It might even have something to do with me telling the ceo (Actually, not sure who he is) that he has double standards and unprofessional..... AND STUFF


Yeah, his point was that trying to categorize or legitimize wardecs by motives is ridiculous, since he went ahead and declared that he has a grievance with everyone, so per you, all his outgoing wardecs are legitimate.

Quote:



Yes, you're definitely a suck up lol. Happy new year :O

Oh an by all means, please do feel free to war dec them, that's "really" going to annoy me lol!!

Edited for failage quoting :(


Yeah, asking for the Mods to "Oh God Please make it stop" is a sure sign of being in a good position.

"It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths." -Abrazzar "the risk of having your day ruined by other people is the cornerstone with which EVE was built" -CCP Solomon

ShipToaster
#518 - 2012-01-02 22:46:39 UTC
Another few threads about wardecs posted in features and ideas are worth checking out.

Moving off topic Roll

Izziee wrote:
Epic tale!


Cool story bro.

Poetic Stanziel wrote:
Izziee wrote:
Do you honestly think by you running to a corp tell tailing like a little kiddiewink would to their mummy and daddy...
I had to stop reading after that sentence. Are you using a random word generator?


I can handle arguments, rage, tears and whines with a degree of aplomb but claiming I told on you to carebear uni is a bit low. The only contact I want to have with eve university is if I can have them all f***** to death by space robo donkeys.

(before the report post spam starts it is in game I want eve university members to be f***** to death by space robo donkeys, I dont want them f***** to death by space robo donkeys in real life P)

.

RubyPorto
RubysRhymes
#519 - 2012-01-02 22:56:01 UTC
ShipToaster wrote:
Another few threads about wardecs posted in features and ideas are worth checking out.

Moving off topic Roll

Izziee wrote:
Epic tale!


Cool story bro.

Poetic Stanziel wrote:
Izziee wrote:
Do you honestly think by you running to a corp tell tailing like a little kiddiewink would to their mummy and daddy...
I had to stop reading after that sentence. Are you using a random word generator?


I can handle arguments, rage, tears and whines with a degree of aplomb but claiming I told on you to carebear uni is a bit low. The only contact I want to have with eve university is if I can have them all f***** to death by space robo donkeys.

(before the report post spam starts it is in game I want eve university members to be f***** to death by space robo donkeys, I dont want them f***** to death by space robo donkeys in real life P)


You might enjoy the Penny Arcade video games. They have Fruit Fuckers.

"It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths." -Abrazzar "the risk of having your day ruined by other people is the cornerstone with which EVE was built" -CCP Solomon

Jenshae Chiroptera
#520 - 2012-01-03 13:53:59 UTC
Asuri Kinnes wrote:
Jenshae Chiroptera wrote:
Just re-iterating that I think this change is good. It gives people a defence against griefing and more freedom of choice.

Griefing is illegal... and enforced by CCP

Hi-sec wars aren't greifing.

And you can bet your last isk, war-decs are being looked at.


Depends on how you gauge griefing. In terms of the EULA and harassment it has to be very clear cut and extreme cases as CCP is a business. However, there are a lot of grey areas.

Griefing much like trolling is done when some pathetic little creature uses a mechanic in a game to deliberately sabotage the playing of another gamer with the purpose of obtaining an emotional response. They make no gain within the game and they usually feel a little more significant and in control of their screwed up lives. Sadly, since this all occurs in the game, it does nothing to fix the roots of their problems, so they continually perpetuate this activity in order to get another "fix."

CCP - Building ant hills and magnifying glasses for fat kids

Not even once

EVE is becoming shallow and puerile; it will satisfy neither the veteran nor the "WoW" type crowd in the transition.